logo
Deportation flights draw weekly protests at Sonoma County airport

Deportation flights draw weekly protests at Sonoma County airport

CBS Newsa day ago

For many in the San Francisco Bay Area, political protests have become a regular weekend activity, and that is especially true in recent days.
One demonstration in Sonoma County is being noted, not for its size, but for its persistence.
"Fight the power! Fight the power!..." blared the music from a speaker set up alongside a protest at the Sonoma County airport. Tamara Mucha said she could think of better things to do on a Sunday, but none more important.
"Standing out here in a public place, in the sun, in my free time, when there's more fun things to do than this?" she said. "But, you know, you've got to stand up. You've got to say what you stand for."
Mucha said she has attended hundreds of protests, but this was only her second time on Airport Boulevard in Santa Rosa. A local chapter of the activist group Indivisible has been holding a sidewalk vigil every Sunday for more than two months.
It's because Charles Schulz Airport is one of the hubs for Avelo Airlines, a small air carrier that has accepted a lot of money from the Department of Homeland Security to transport undocumented immigrants out of the country.
"And this company that has taken a $150 million contract to participate in that," said Mucha. "I think business owners and retirees like myself, and even people coming by and honking their horns, you know, we all have a part to play."
The company's CEO, Andrew Levy, acknowledged the deal. In a written statement, he said:
"We realize this is a sensitive and complicated topic. After significant deliberations, we determined this charter flying will provide us with the stability to continue expanding our core scheduled passenger service and keep our more than 1,100 Crewmembers employed for years to come."
But it's not doing much to expand business in Sonoma County. The airport released numbers that show Avelo has seen a 32% drop in ridership year-to-year, while Alaska and American have increased their passenger load.
No one can say for sure if the protests are having an effect on that.
"Well, they're only flying a couple of connecting flights out here anymore," said Mucha. "So, what they say is it's unrelated. But, you know, it's awfully coincidental."
Either way, the weekly airport demonstrations are giving people a chance to express their concerns about the direction of the country. A man named Steve from Petaluma said protests and boycotts may be the only power the people have in the fight.
"I've been to probably, in the last six or eight weeks, 30-odd protests," he said. "We've noted that there's been first timers at a lot of these actions. It's a watershed period in our history and we're watching our democracy slip away with the rule of law and what's coming out of the White House."
Lisa Rice, an organizer with the activist group Indivisible, agreed.
"It's either sit at home, be depressed and scared, or go out and do something and change the world," said Rice. And she said it doesn't have to be a massive event with thousands of people, that even a small gathering can have an impact, "because we're all connected, each little handful is another drop in the bucket."
And she said she is happy to be one of those drops. But at the airport, a man named Jimmy from Willits, who supports the president, said he doesn't even understand why people are protesting at all.
"Why are they protesting here? People are in the country illegally. They're being deported. That's how it should be," he said. "Come legally. They shouldn't be here illegally. Deport 'em. They should buy the tickets anyway. Support that airline."
Avelo said it is basing its international deportation flights out of an airport in Mesa, Arizona. Any immigrants transported from the Sonoma Airport would be connecting to that location.
Currently, the airline operates few passenger flights out of Charles Schulz, but now that they're focusing on the charter flight business, they can probably expect a welcoming committee out on the street for some time to come.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Out with Task Masking, In with Authentic Workplaces
Out with Task Masking, In with Authentic Workplaces

Forbes

time7 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Out with Task Masking, In with Authentic Workplaces

Gen Z is adopting the trend of task masking. Here's how managers can effectively respond. What is task masking, exactly? Well, if you're at a loss, you're not alone. It took me about an hour to even skim the surface and figure out how this new movement is impacting the modern workplace. And let me tell you, it's becoming quite popular, especially among Gen Z. In fact, according to a recent article by Fortune, there's an entire TikTok feed that provides tons of advice to employees on how to look busy without even breaking a sweat. So, how did this become the new norm? Some believe that the return-to-office mandate had a significant impact on it. But who's to say exactly? That fact is, if you do any research on task masking, you come back with numerous possibilities behind this growing trend. Some suggest that it's nothing more than a stance of rebellion by angry workers. Others, like Gabrielle Judge, known on TikTok as Anti Work Girlboss, believe that task masking is nothing more than strategic disengagement, where people disengage because it doesn't move the career needle forward. In short, Judge, unlike many critics, views this trend as a positive development because, from her perspective, it exposes inefficiencies within a business. Why Is Gen Z Embracing This Trend? So, who has it right? Is Gen Z trying to prove the inefficiency of in-person workplaces, or are they simply refusing to be bothered with their job? The opinions on this topic are endless, but here are my two thoughts on why I think Gen Z is leaning toward task masking. It's essential to remember that when Gen Z entered the workforce, they were accustomed to conducting everything online. Many of them from this generation had little to no in-person interaction during their last few years of high school. So, for some, the idea of spending 8 hours in an office space was overwhelming and, in their mind, a massive waste of time. Think about it: for years, they were independent learners. They had to figure out how to navigate a global pandemic while working from isolation. Now, for many of us, this would seem like torture. And perhaps that's why older generations, compared to younger ones, are so set on getting back to normal and returning to the office. But we need to ask ourselves two questions: Another significant factor contributing to the increase in task masking is the rise of constant burnout for this generation. According to a Gallup study, 68% of Gen Z and young Millennials reported feeling stressed. Over half of an entire generation in their 20s is already feeling high levels of stress. And why wouldn't they? As the increase in AI integration, the scarcity of entry-level work, and the looming insecurity of tariffs and trade talks take their toll, Gen Z is exhausted and overwhelmed. Task masking may be their way of dealing with everything. Perhaps it's even their way of coping through escapism. How Can Managers Tackle Task Masking? The first step is to determine how this issue actually affects your business or if it has any impact at all. Here's what I mean. Let's say you lead a group of tech-savvy Gen Zers who are loyal to your company, love your product, and would go above and beyond to exceed expectations. These employees are incredible when it comes to innovation and product design, but keeping them confined to their cubicles from 9 to 5 feels like a lost cause. To the untrained eye, this appears to be an issue. After all, how do you know that your workers are being productive during the day? Are they scrolling through TikTok, or are they putting in a full day's work? Well, you have a few options here. Remember, task masking exists because employees feel compelled to hide the fact that they are struggling. So, if your team needs a break, give them the space they need. And create a workplace where Gen Z can feel a sense of belonging. Because, as long as goals are being met, let them bring in a coffee cart, break out some Dungeons and Dragons, and scroll to their heart's content.

A salary-cap surprise for 2026-27
A salary-cap surprise for 2026-27

New York Times

time8 minutes ago

  • New York Times

A salary-cap surprise for 2026-27

NBA free agency is moving fast and furious, and teams are making major moves more newsworthy salary-cap item is the report by ESPN's Bobby Marks that next year's cap will only rise by 7 percent, and not the maximal 10 percent. This is important because the same percentage raise impacts the tax and apron lines. Teams had budgeted for another 10 percent rise, but now must change their projections downward for the luxury tax and aprons by roughly $5 million apiece. There is something inherently funny about the NBA announcing the salary cap and luxury tax levels for the next season hours (or minutes) before free agency begins. Sure, this year, it didn't matter because it's been known for a while that the cap would just jump 10 percent from last year. But this actually has mattered in years past. The NBA and the NBPA spend about a week at the end of the fiscal league year hammering out the Basketball Related Income and getting these numbers. Then, they get it to the teams as soon as they possibly can. It's a very harried process. Every cent matters as teams do their financial planning, and it just happens to not be 100 percent clear until the end. Every team in the NBA had budgeted for this exact cap number. The year-to-year raises in the salary cap have a 10 percent celling under the 2023 CBA, while the league's new TV deal ensured that this year's number would have otherwise blown right pass that limit. The NBA has announced that the salary cap for the 2025-26 season will be $154.647 million. The luxury tax threshold is at $187.895 million. The first apron is at $195.945 million. The second apron is at $207.824 million. The non-taxpayer midlevel exception will be worth $14.104 million, the taxpayer MLE is $5.685 million, and the room MLE is $8.781 million. GO FURTHER NBA free-agency 2025 primer: Key free agents, explaining the aprons and more Getty Images G, Nets Age: 23 BORD$: $23,390,386 Much like D'Angelo Russell, Thomas' value is an extremely divisive topic because he is so dependent on generating tough 2-point jump shots and offers little in the non-scoring categories. However, he was more efficient last season (57.5 true shooting percentage), and his sheer shot-creation volume provides a solid floor for an offense. On a rebuilding team, the key variable in Thomas' favor is that he is still only 23, so theoretically, his best years remain ahead. The other, even more crucial variable is that his cap hold is only $12.1 million. As with Russell above, the Nets will do their other business and then sign Thomas' contract once they have absorbed other contracts into the rest of their cap room. (Note that they may agree on a contract earlier, but they can drag their feet on signing it and submitting it to the league.) Given that Thomas is basically free money against the cap and the Nets have little risk of ending up all the way into the tax, Brooklyn is pretty heavily incentivized to re-sign him to a front-loaded deal with 8 percent annual declines that would make him a favorable value in the final two years of the deal. For example, a four-year, $100 million deal would start at $28.41 million in 2025-26 — likely taking the Nets right to the tax line — but just $21.6 million in 2028-29 for Thomas' age-27 season. Thomas is a restricted free agent, but that distinction borders on irrelevant in a market where nobody else has cap space, and Thomas figures to make more than the nontaxpayer MLE. GO FURTHER LeBron? Harden? Kuminga? The Top 25 NBA free agents for the 2025 offseason A late entrant to the market after taking a buyout from Utah, Jordan Clarkson grades out as a good-minimum get, according to my BORD$ formula. He will have the chance to play on a team that is actually trying to win for the first time in three years. His shooting numbers dove south the past two seasons, and he made just 44.8 percent of his 2s in the 2024-25 season. He's also 33 years old and not exactly renowned for his defense. But Clarkson still provides a jolt of shot creation off the bench and can be hard to stop when he's cooking. Contenders in need of backcourt depth could do a lot worse. Getty Images G, Nets Age: 29 BORD$: $23,898,145 Russell's brand has taken a beating since he didn't fit in L.A. and has been exposed defensively in the postseason. But he's a good scorer and shooter whose shortcomings might be perceived differently if he were cast as a high-usage sixth man rather than a starting point guard. Russell was also outlier bad from 3 last year (a career low 31.4 percent), but that isn't the way to bet going forward. The Nets will have full Bird rights on him in addition to their jillions in cap space; while he doesn't exactly fit Brooklyn's timeline, re-signing him to use as a trade piece either in-season or next summer makes sense from a cap perspective and adds some floor for Brooklyn's offense as the Nets rebuild. Notably, if Brooklyn struggles to find other uses for its cap space, it could sign Russell to a bloated one-year deal with a non-guaranteed second year, one that would effectively operate as a trade exception to use in-season or even next summer. Russell's cap hold is $28 million, but the Nets could pay him the max if they wanted; as long as they set aside $28 million of their cap space for his hold, they can finish their other business and then go as high as they want on Russell. Note that keeping Russell and Cam Thomas (below) on their books would take the Nets down to $40 million in room — still likely plenty for what they have planned this offseason. GO FURTHER LeBron? Harden? Kuminga? The Top 25 NBA free agents for the 2025 offseason F, Grizzlies Age: 24 BORD$: $25,631,532 Aldama is a restricted free agent this offseason. Memphis is likely to bring back Aldama because his low cap hold is a key part of the Grizzlies' strategy. Memphis can park his $11 million salary-cap hold on its sheet and have enough space to renegotiate and extend Jaren Jackson Jr.'s contract, then coming back to re-sign Aldama to a new deal. The tricky part is how much they're willing to pay Aldama when he overlaps at an already strong position on the Memphis roster and other needs lay waiting. The counterargument would be that this is why Memphis has to re-sign Aldama. In addition to the Jackson strategy above, his contract would need to be the matching salary for virtually any starting-caliber player whom Memphis would acquire in-season. I don't think there's enough money out there this summer to hit the BORD$ figure above, unless the Nets get wild. However, something around three years and $60 million to $65 million — especially if it's a front-loaded deal with 8 percent annual declines — would give the Grizzlies enough cap ballast to keep all its trade options open down the line. GO FURTHER LeBron? Harden? Kuminga? The Top 25 NBA free agents for the 2025 offseason Cary Edmondson / Imagn Sources from three different rival teams have linked the Lakers to De'Anthony Melton as we near the official start of free agency. The expectation is that there's strong mutual interest. Melton, 27, missed the majority of last season with a partially torn ACL. Getty Images G, Kings Age: 25 BORD$: $24,714,831 Ellis has a non-guaranteed team option for 2025-26. Ellis is a valuable player on a cheapo contract for at least one more season, making just $2.3 million on the final year of his minimum deal. The Kings can extend his contract for up to four years and $85 million and absolutely should be looking at doing this given his 3-and-D profile. Even if Ellis overlaps some with Zach LaVine, an extended contract for him at $18 million to $20 million a pop should still have positive trade value. (Also, LaVine isn't good enough to be driving long-term strategy for a non-contender.) One other option for the Kings would be to 'decline-and-sign,' essentially throwing a bone to Ellis by declining his $2.3 million option for this year and turning it into a $14.5 million deal via early Bird rights, with a total package of four years and $65 million and a fourth-year player option. That could create a short-term tax issue for the Kings depending on some other roster choices, but long term, this is a much cleaner way to build the team over the coming seasons and removes some tax concerns in 2027 and 2028. GO FURTHER LeBron? Harden? Kuminga? The Top 25 NBA free agents for the 2025 offseason C, Pacers Age: 29 BORD$: $31,329,931 Myles Turner might be the most contentious free-agent negotiation of the summer. Between his unrestricted status, the lack of competing cap-space teams, the Pacers' accomplishments this season, Indiana's potential tax and apron issues if it pays him big money and the fact his deal cannot be extended before he hits free agency … all the ingredients seem to be there for a prolonged staredown that ends with hurt feelings. Turner's BORD$ value is $31 million; while there is no chance of him getting this much in a market with no viable alternate suitors, it does indicate a figure for the Pacers to at least approach if they want him to sign for multiple years. Is three years for $75 million to $80 million fair? Even at $25 million a pop, Turner's next deal would take the Pacers sailing past the first apron and represent a first-ever foray into the tax for Indiana. That's for 2025-26; extending Bennedict Mathurin could push the Pacers to the second apron in 2026-27. Some tough decisions will need to be made at some point about other spots on the roster, but if you're not willing to pay the luxury tax for the franchise's best team in a quarter century, sell it to someone who will. Finally, note that Turner is eligible for a no-trade clause, although I doubt he has the juice to get one. GO FURTHER LeBron? Harden? Kuminga? The Top 25 NBA free agents for the 2025 offseason Jayne Kamin-Oncea / Imagn With free agency a few hours away, the LA Clippers basically have only two spots on the roster that need to be addressed: ball handling and frontcourt help. Those were the areas that president of basketball operations Lawrence Frank outlined days after the Clippers were eliminated by the Denver Nuggets in the West quarterfinals. The 8-man rotation that finished the Clippers-Nuggets series is intact after the team agreed to terms with All-NBA point guard James Harden and veteran reserve forward Nicolas Batum. Both players declined their player options and secured raises for next season. The Clippers also have their last five draft picks who will be under team control: 2025 picks Yanic Konan Niederhauser and Kobe Sanders (a likely 2-way contract), 2024 second round pick Cam Christie, and 2023 picks Kobe Brown and Jordan Miller (nonguaranteed but fully expected to return). Amir Coffey and Ben Simmons are incumbent free agents, and while both were rotation players entering the postseason, they were both out of the mix by the end of the Denver series. In Coffey's case, he didn't play a single minute in the playoffs. Coffey and Simmons are both expected to get better offers elsewhere than they will from the Clippers, with Simmons in particular looking at teams with exceptions; he's not looking for a minimum deal. Veteran Patty Mills is also a free agent, while center Drew Eubanks has a nonguaranteed contract that could be used in a potential trade. What happens with Eubanks is to be determined, but he might be a long shot to make it to Week 1 if the Clippers add another veteran center. Teams can have a maximum of 21 players under contract in the offseason. The Clippers tendered one of last year's two-way contract players, Trentyn Flowers, so he is a restricted free agent who is expected to return. The other two-way contracts that ended last season, Patrick Baldwin Jr. and Seth Lundy, are still on those contracts. The Clippers also added undrafted rookies John Poulakidas and Jahmyl Telfort, though LA likes to wait to officially sign Exhibit 10 contracts while they do other business. So if the Clippers add two players, likely a backup point guard and a backup center, that will put them at 21 players, including Eubanks and the four 2025 rookies. LA has the nontaxpayer midlevel exception to work with, a little over $14 million. Look for them to use that on Harden and Ivica Zubac insurance. Any other positions would signal that a trade would likely be necessary to balance the roster. Adam Glanzman / Getty Images The Warriors' front office will be stationed in Los Angeles at the start of free agency, as has been their recent custom. They quickly pursued De'Anthony Melton at the start of last summer's free agency and, team sources said, they will be on the recruiting trail for veteran help again in the opening hours on Monday afternoon. Team sources have identified a stretch center as a high priority. Many in the league continue to link Al Horford to the Warriors as a preferred target. If the Warriors use the taxpayer midlevel exception (projected at around $5.7 million) on Horford or another free agent, they'll be hard-capped at the second apron, currently projected at $207.8 million. The Utah Jazz will agree to buy out Jordan Clarkson's contract, a league source confirmed to The Athletic. Clarkson, the 2021 NBA Sixth Man of the Year, averaged 16.2 points and 3.7 assists per game last season. The 33-year-old was slated to make $14.3 million next season. Clarkson and Collin Sexton, who was traded to Charlotte yesterday, were never going to be on the Jazz roster next season. The Jazz were moving off them no matter what. Utah wants to provide more minutes for youngsters Isaiah Collier, Keyonte George, Cody Williams, Brice Sensabaugh and rookie Walter Clayton Jr. Getty Images F, Warriors Age: 22 BORD$: $24,030,341 OK. ... Let's talk about this. Jonathan Kuminga represents the fundamental limitation with statistically evaluating free agents: You can only go by what contribution they made to their current team, but what you're trying to solve for is the player's value to their next team. Most of the time, those two numbers are close enough that the valuation problem isn't particularly challenging. However, for odd players or odd systems, the degree of difficulty multiplies. In Kuminga's case, we might have a particularly notable example of that problem: An odd player and an odd system — magnified, in this case, by the player not fitting the system. Golden State's read-react, pass-and-cut system has made other tunnel-visiony on-ball shot-creators look much worse than they were before or after (see Russell, D'Angelo; Schröder, Dennis), and Kuminga may be another. Alas, we can't be totally sure, because Golden State is the only place he's ever played. Our entire body of work for evaluating Kuminga is in the context of his square-peg game and Golden State's round hole of an offense. To explain this statistically, there is a lot in Kuminga's track record that suggests maybe he just isn't all that good. Most notably, his career shooting marks are 33.2 percent from 3 and 69.6 percent from the line. He's just OK as a defender, seems to have poor instincts for reading the game at both ends and is prone to spectacular bouts of dribble blindness. The Warriors have pushed him to be a beast on the glass, but historically, players rarely change their stripes in this realm, and his rebound rate has stayed right around 10.0 percent his whole career — fine for a combo forward but unremarkable. GO FURTHER LeBron? Harden? Kuminga? The Top 25 NBA free agents for the 2025 offseason The Phoenix Suns have officially announced the Mark Williams trade. The Suns traded Vasa Mičić, the draft rights to Liam McNeeley and a 2029 first-round pick (worst of Cleveland, Minnesota and Utah) for Williams while also receiving their 2029 second-round pick back. Page 2

The NBA's salary cap for 2026 is an unmitigated disaster we'll quickly feel
The NBA's salary cap for 2026 is an unmitigated disaster we'll quickly feel

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The NBA's salary cap for 2026 is an unmitigated disaster we'll quickly feel

I hate to divert any attention from all the 2025 NBA free agency fun, but I have some bad news, dearest readers. Remember the NBA's still relatively new second-apron tax rules? You know, the ones that threaten to break apart your favorite teams and force contenders to make shrewd, difficult decisions? Yes, those very same rules! You got it! Advertisement Well, according to the league's projected salary cap increase for the 2026-2027 season (so, starting next summer), the second apron is likely about to wreak even more havoc on NBA squads who are already tight up against the cap. It's just an unfortunate reality. As ESPN's Bobby Marks reported on Monday, the NBA's salary cap will only go up seven percent in 2026-2027. For posterity, players receiving extensions and new contracts are entitled to an eight percent raise on their contracts. All power to players for being in one of the only professions where wages actually rise with inflation, but that's obviously quite problematic for team building, especially for squads who already have a bunch of big-money player contracts on their books. This is also an issue because the assumption around the league was that it would generally go up 10 percent every summer. This meant that many teams, like, say, the Minnesota Timberwolves, were already operating with that level of increase in mind and structuring contracts around the idea they would soon have more breathing room. Instead, they will not, and the second apron is likened to create even more of a cap squeeze: Suffice it to say, with a lower-than-expected salary cap a summer from now, we may now only be scratching the surface of problems the second apron may create for NBA teams. Advertisement Given the extremely stringent penalties inherent in possible trades and the (lack of) available offseason resources, the second apron is something that most franchises around the league do everything in their power to avoid. And if they're already in the second apron or in danger of broaching it, they may consider a shocking trade to break up their roster that otherwise wouldn't have come to mind to get some cap relief. That or they approach internal extensions for players differently — either by lowballing them or not offering an extension in the first place. This is nothing to say of free agency, which figures to be more of a barren wasteland. There are many competent NBA veterans who are certainly worth than minimums. But with teams trying to avoid the second apron, these sorts of veterans may find it increasingly harder to find any higher offers than minimums. And if you think it won't affect this year's open market period, boy, do I have the worst news for you. The mere hint that there will be less flexibility down the road means NBA squads will likely be even more cautious about committing to anything that isn't firmly bolted down. Following this disastrous news about the salary cap, either the NBA takes action to provide some relief for teams (such as a grandfather clause or a lessening of penalties), or this problem is almost certainly about to get worse. This article originally appeared on For The Win: NBA's projected salary cap for 2026 will hurt free agency, make second apron worse

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store