Esther Rantzen speaks of ‘enormous relief' after MPs backed assisted dying Bill
Appearing on ITV1's Loose Women, Dame Esther, who has terminal cancer, said she had not expected to reach her 85th birthday yesterday (Sunday) when she was diagnosed.
'Who knew I'd be 85, heavens,' she said.
On the topic of assisted dying, for which she has been one of the most high-profile campaigners, she said: 'It's not a question of shortening your life, it's a question of shortening your death and we've always thought that was very important for people… to have that choice.'
She said she had not yet been given a six-month deadline for her own cancer and is due to have more chemotherapy this week.
Discussing safeguarding concerns, Dame Esther said: 'The difference is that decisions are being made by the patient and I think some people do find that difficult.
'Some of my closest relatives and best friends are psychiatrists, but I'm not sure psychiatrists are always happy to give control back to the patient, but that's what we're asking for.'
She said of her own illness: 'One of the things about cancer, which I think people don't realise – I didn't realise – it can create fatigue which means you can't do the things you would like to do.'
Referencing not being able to join the panel in the studio, she added: 'Like for example, join Loose Women. I mean, I like being loose!'
Last week, Dame Esther urged members of the House of Lords not to block legislation on the issue.
The Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday, but opponents have vowed to continue their resistance in the unelected chamber.
The legislation could face a difficult passage through the Lords, with critics poised to table amendments to add further restrictions and safeguards to the Bill.
Last week, Dame Esther told BBC Radio 4's Today: 'People who are adamantly opposed to this Bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons, who have voted this through.'
She said the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to end her life at the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland, which she signed up to following her diagnosis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
19 minutes ago
- CNN
UK regulator bans shower gel ad for perpetuating racial stereotypes
UK regulators have banned a TV commercial for Sanex shower gel after ruling that it 'could be interpreted as suggesting that white skin was superior to black skin.' The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) acted after receiving complaints about the ad from two people 'who believed the ad perpetuated negative stereotypes about people with darker skin tones,' it said in a statement Wednesday. The spot, which aired in June, featured a Black model whose skin is covered with red scratch marks and another covered with a cracked material that looks like clay. 'Try to take a shower with the new Sanex skin therapy and its patented amino acid complex. For 24-hour hydration feel,' a voice-over said, accompanying video of a White woman showering. 'Relief could be as simple as a shower,' it added. US consumer products company Colgate-Palmolive, which owns the Sanex brand, said the fact that the ad featured models with different skin tones demonstrated its commitment to diversity, according to the ASA's statement. The regulator said Colgate-Palmolive believed 'the depiction of diverse models in the ad, either experiencing skin discomfort or post-product relief, was utilised in a 'before and after' scenario to show their product was suitable and effective for all, rather than as a comparison based on race or ethnicity.' Clearcast, a company that checks whether TV commercials follow the UK Code of Broadcast Advertising before they can be aired, also said the ad demonstrated the inclusivity of Sanex. While the ASA accepted the argument that the ad showed 'before and after' scenarios to demonstrate the effectiveness of the product, it ruled that its structure was problematic. 'It was the black skin, depicted in association with itchy and dry skin, which was shown to be problematic and uncomfortable, whereas the white skin, depicted as smoother and clean after using the product, was shown successfully changed and resolved,' the statement said. 'That could be interpreted as suggesting that white skin was superior to black skin,' it added, while acknowledging that 'we understood that this message was not the one intended and might appear coincidental or pass unnoticed by some viewers.' The ASA added that it had concluded the ad had breached the broadcast advertising code and was likely to cause serious offense. CNN has contacted Colgate-Palmolive for comment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Much-loved' animal dies at zoo
A "much-loved" animal has died at a zoo near Lowestoft. Jabu the African lion died earlier this week at Africa Alive in Kessingland. A spokesman for the zoo said: "We would like you to join us in celebrating the life of Jabu our much-loved male African lion, who sadly passed away under veterinary care this week. "Following ongoing veterinary care and regular observation due to age-related health changes, Jabu was recently diagnosed with advanced kidney disease. READ MORE: 'Sea of people' enjoy return of carnival parade "After careful consideration, and in line with established welfare protocols, our team made the kindest decision to ensure his comfort and well-being, preventing his condition from deteriorating further." Jabu was born in the zoo in 2009 and quickly became a firm favourite among staff, volunteers and visitors. "He leaves behind a lasting legacy, helping to engage millions of visitors in the challenges facing African lions and the importance of their conservation," the zoo added. "He was often seen playing alongside his sister Kaya and enjoying enrichment provided by his keepers, cardboard boxes being one of his favourites."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How many asylum seekers are in UK hotels and why are they being housed there?
The subject of asylum seekers being housed in hotels has come into sharp focus after a High Court ruling. On Tuesday, Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in the Essex town. Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the latest overall data. – How many asylum seekers are in hotels across the UK? The most recent Home Office data showed there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079. New figures – published among the usual quarterly immigration data release – are expected on Thursday, showing numbers in hotels at the end of June. Figures for hotels published by the Home Office date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023 when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. – How many hotels are in use for asylum seekers? It is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210. – Why are asylum seekers being housed in hotels? Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. The Home Office provides accommodation to asylum seekers who have no other way of supporting themselves on a 'no choice' basis, so they cannot choose where they live. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office can move people to accommodation such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. In May, the National Audit Office said those temporarily living in hotels accounted for 35% of all people in asylum accommodation. – Is this likely to be a permanent arrangement? Labour has pledged to end the 'costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament' – which would be 2029, if not earlier. Campaigners and charities have long argued that hotels are not suitable environments to house asylum seekers. The Refugee Council said they 'cost the taxpayer billions, trap people in limbo and are flashpoints in communities' and urged the Government to 'partner with local councils to provide safe, cost-effective accommodation within communities'. – What is the Government saying since the legal ruling? Ministers are 'looking at a range of different contingency options' following Tuesday's ruling, according to security minister Dan Jarvis In the immediate aftermath of the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle repeated criticism of the previous Conservative government, saying Labour had 'inherited a broken asylum system'. She said the Government would 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns' around asylum hotels. – What options does the Home Office have now? Last month, amid protests outside the Bell Hotel and more migrants crossing the Channel, an extra 400 spaces were being prepared to house male asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield in Essex. The former military site, which has a usual capacity of 800 beds, is expected to house more adult men on a short-term basis. The Labour Government scrapped the large site of the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, earlier this year, while Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent, is also due to end housing asylum seekers and be returned to the Ministry of Defence in September. – Why were there protests outside the Bell Hotel? The hotel in Epping has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl – something he has denied and he is due to stand trial later in August. After the High Court's ruling, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage wrote in the Telegraph calling for Epping protests to inspire further action wherever there are concerns about the 'threat posed by young undocumented males' living in hotels. But on Tuesday more than 100 women's organisations wrote to ministers warning that vital conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' that fuels divisions and harms survivors. The joint statement, including from Rape Crisis England & Wales and Refuge, said: 'We have been alarmed in recent weeks by an increase in unfounded claims made by people in power, and repeated in the media, that hold particular groups as primarily responsible for sexual violence. 'This not only undermines genuine concerns about women's safety, but also reinforces the damaging myth that the greatest risk of gender-based violence comes from strangers.'
