logo
Esther Rantzen speaks of ‘enormous relief' after MPs backed assisted dying Bill

Esther Rantzen speaks of ‘enormous relief' after MPs backed assisted dying Bill

Yahoo5 hours ago

Dame Esther Rantzen has said she felt 'enormous relief' at MPs approving the assisted dying Bill.
Appearing on ITV1's Loose Women, Dame Esther, who has terminal cancer, said she had not expected to reach her 85th birthday yesterday (Sunday) when she was diagnosed.
'Who knew I'd be 85, heavens,' she said.
On the topic of assisted dying, for which she has been one of the most high-profile campaigners, she said: 'It's not a question of shortening your life, it's a question of shortening your death and we've always thought that was very important for people… to have that choice.'
She said she had not yet been given a six-month deadline for her own cancer and is due to have more chemotherapy this week.
Discussing safeguarding concerns, Dame Esther said: 'The difference is that decisions are being made by the patient and I think some people do find that difficult.
'Some of my closest relatives and best friends are psychiatrists, but I'm not sure psychiatrists are always happy to give control back to the patient, but that's what we're asking for.'
She said of her own illness: 'One of the things about cancer, which I think people don't realise – I didn't realise – it can create fatigue which means you can't do the things you would like to do.'
Referencing not being able to join the panel in the studio, she added: 'Like for example, join Loose Women. I mean, I like being loose!'
Last week, Dame Esther urged members of the House of Lords not to block legislation on the issue.
The Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday, but opponents have vowed to continue their resistance in the unelected chamber.
The legislation could face a difficult passage through the Lords, with critics poised to table amendments to add further restrictions and safeguards to the Bill.
Last week, Dame Esther told BBC Radio 4's Today: 'People who are adamantly opposed to this Bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons, who have voted this through.'
She said the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to end her life at the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland, which she signed up to following her diagnosis.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

J.K. Rowling Reacts To Scripts For The First Two Episodes of HBO's HARRY POTTER Series — GeekTyrant
J.K. Rowling Reacts To Scripts For The First Two Episodes of HBO's HARRY POTTER Series — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time27 minutes ago

  • Geek Tyrant

J.K. Rowling Reacts To Scripts For The First Two Episodes of HBO's HARRY POTTER Series — GeekTyrant

As HBO's Harry Potter reboot moves forward, J.K. Rowling has taken to social media to share her early thoughts on the upcoming show, and unsurprisingly, she's giving it high marks. 'I read the first two episodes of the forthcoming HBO Harry Potter series and they are SO, SO, SO GOOD!' Rowling posted on X. She later clarified that while she's not writing the scripts herself, she has been heavily involved behind the scenes working 'closely with the extremely talented writers.' Rowling's endorsement comes at a time when parts of the fandom are sharply divided. Many longtime fans have distanced themselves from the franchise in response to Rowling's criticized and ongoing anti-transgender rhetoric, which continues to draw backlash. Her comments, even recent ones celebrating a UK court ruling that limits legal recognition for trans women have intensified calls from within the entertainment industry to reevaluate professional partnerships with her. More than 400 UK film and TV professionals signed an open letter pushing for such action, including Harry Potter series cast member Paapa Essiedu, who's set to play Professor Snape in the reboot. Despite the public controversy, HBO is standing by its long-time collaboration with Rowling. HBO Chairman and CEO Casey Bloys addressed the situation directly on The Town with Matthew Belloni podcast: 'The decision to be in business with J.K. Rowling is not new for us. We've been in business for 25 years. We already have a show on HBO from her called C.B. Strike that we do with the BBC.' He continued: 'It's pretty clear that those are her personal, political views. She's entitled to them. Harry Potter is not secretly being infused with anything. If you want to debate her, you can go on Twitter.' Bloys also emphasized Rowling's role in shaping the series, stating: 'She will be involved. She's an executive producer on the show. Her insights are going to be helpful on that.' While acknowledging the complexity of the public conversation surrounding Rowling, Bloys reaffirmed HBO's focus: 'Our priority is what's on the screen. Obviously, the Harry Potter story is incredibly affirmative and positive and about love and self-acceptance. That's our priority — what's on screen.' With production starting this summer and a 2026 premiere in sight, HBO is betting that the story's magic will speak for itself. Whether the fandom's fractured support can be mended remains to be seen.

GB News presenter claims he was sacked for calling Suella Braverman a racist
GB News presenter claims he was sacked for calling Suella Braverman a racist

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GB News presenter claims he was sacked for calling Suella Braverman a racist

A former GB News presenter has claimed he was sacked for calling Suella Braverman a racist on air. Albie Amankona, who was dropped by the broadcaster last year, is taking the channel to an employment tribunal over a string of claims including racial discrimination and unfair dismissal. Mr Amankona, a Tory commentator who presented debate programme The Saturday Five, left the broadcaster shortly after stating that he believed Ms Braverman was 'a racist and a thoroughly bigoted woman'. GB News issued an apology to the former home secretary, saying the comments 'crossed a line between robust debate and causing unnecessary offence'. The broadcaster added that Ms Braverman was 'understandably upset'. Mr Amankona alleges that he was taken off air as a result of the comments. He is crowdfunding his claim, which also includes allegations of harassment and victimisation, through the Good Law Project, a legal campaign group founded by outspoken barrister Jo Maugham. Mr Amankona said: 'I regret that it has come to this, I have tried very hard to resolve matters privately and in good faith. Like so many fair-minded Britons I believe in free speech, fairness, the rule of law and I know right from wrong. GB News claims to stand for these values. 'My experience tells a different story. They must be held accountable, not only for cancelling me, but for seemingly treating non-white employees differently from white employees, and for abandoning the very values we Britons hold dear.' The Good Law Project said: 'GB News likes to brand itself as a champion of free speech and journalistic independence. But when one of its own presenters dared to call out racism and intolerance, the response was swift and severe: he was dropped instantly. 'It's a familiar pattern – when free speech aligns with their agenda, they celebrate it. But the moment it challenges their narrative, the mask slips.' GB News denies the claims. A spokesman said: 'Mr Amankona's claim is misconceived, without merit and being robustly defended. As the claim is ongoing we do not propose to comment further.' Mr Amankona is a broadcaster and activist who co-founded the Conservatives Against Racism For Equality group. He presented the GB News programme from March 2023 until August 2024, and has made regular appearances on other broadcasters including the BBC, LBC and Sky News. The legal challenge marks the latest twist in a turbulent few years for GB News, which has courted controversy since its launch in 2021 as a challenger to incumbents such as the BBC. Ofcom has found the channel in breach of broadcasting rules a dozen times over impartiality issues including its use of politicians as presenters. But in a major victory earlier this year, GB News successfully challenged Ofcom's decisions in the High Court, leading to several impartiality rulings being dropped. Nevertheless, the start-up is still locking horns with the watchdog, which is now consulting on plans to broaden its ban on politicians acting as news presenters. Angelos Frangopoulos, GB News chief executive, has accused Ofcom of having a 'jailer' mentality towards broadcasters, while co-owner Sir Paul Marshall last month claimed the regulator was unfairly punishing the channel under pressure from Left-wing activists. Ofcom has insisted it enforces its rules 'fairly and proportionately'. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'
Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'

David Lammy has urged a Reform UK MP to 'get some help' because she is 'swallowing conspiracy theories'. Sarah Pochin had asked the Foreign Secretary whether the US felt unable to use the UK-US airbase on Diego Garcia, following the Government's deal with Mauritius over the Chagos Islands. Responding during a statement on the Middle East, Mr Lammy said the MP for Runcorn and Helsby should 'get off social media'. The UK-operated base in the Chagos Islands was not used in the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty has said. He added that the US did not ask to use it, as he answered questions from the Foreign Affairs Committee on Monday. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Pochin said: 'Is he (Mr Lammy) able to explain to the House whether the United States felt unable to use the Diego Garcia base and have to refuel, in a highly dangerous operation three times because of that, because of your deal that you did with the with the Mauritians, that would then tell the Chinese, that would then tell the Iranians?' Mr Lammy replied: 'The honourable lady has got (to) get off social media, has got to get some help… because she is swallowing conspiracy theories that should not be repeated in this House.' The deal over the Chagos Islands follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice which says the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. During the statement on Monday, Mr Lammy was pressed by MPs on the UK's position following the US military action. Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) said: 'Does His Majesty's Government support or oppose US military action against Iran at the weekend?' Mr Lammy replied: 'His Majesty's Government will continue to work with our closest ally, as I was last week in Washington DC.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin (Tunbridge Wells) said: 'What is UK Government policy on whether regime change should be pursued in Iran?' Mr Lammy replied: 'It is not our belief that it's for us to change the regime of any country, that it must be for the people themselves.' SNP MP Brendan O'Hara (Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber) said: 'We've been here for an hour, and still the Foreign Secretary appears incapable of saying whether he supports or condemns America's actions, or whether he regards them as being legal or not. 'And nowhere in this statement does the role of international law even merit a mention. So will the Foreign Secretary take this opportunity now to tell us whether he believes that America's unilateral action was compliant with international law?' Mr Lammy replied: 'I've got to tell (Mr O'Hara), I qualified and was called to the bar in 1995, I haven't practised for the last 25 years. 'It is not for me to comment on the United States' legal validity. I would refer him to article 51 and article two of the UN Charter, and he can seek his own advice.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store