Trump calls New York's mayoral primary Zohran Mamdani "communist lunatic"
US President Donald Trump launched a blistering attack on New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and several progressive Democrats in a pair of Truth Social posts on Thursday, calling Mamdani a '100% Communist Lunatic' and accusing the Democratic Party of pushing the country toward ruin.
'It's finally happened, the Democrats have crossed the line,' Trump wrote. 'Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor.' He continued with personal jabs, calling Mamdani's voice 'grating' and questioning his intelligence, while mocking his support from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her allies, whom Trump referred to as 'AOC+3, Dummies ALL.'
Trump also took aim at Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, sarcastically calling him 'our Great Palestinian Senator' and accusing him of 'groveling' to Mamdani.
In a follow-up post, Trump mocked the Democratic Party's future, proposing a satirical 'dream team' of left-wing politicians. 'The Democrats should nominate Low IQ Candidate, Jasmine Crockett, for President, and AOC+3 should be, respectively, Vice President, and three High Level Members of the Cabinet,' he wrote. 'Added together with our future Communist Mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani, and our Country is really SCREWED!'
Trump's posts came in the wake of a major political upset in New York City, where Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist and current State Assemblyman, defeated former Governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic mayoral primary. The victory, which has not yet been officially certified due to ranked-choice voting, shocked the city's political establishment and marked a historic breakthrough for the progressive left.
Mamdani, who is poised to become the city's first Muslim and Indian American mayor if elected in November, ran a grassroots campaign focused on bold economic reforms and vocal support for the Palestinian cause—positions that set him apart from the party's centrist figures. His campaign was backed by prominent progressives including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
2 hours ago
- Roya News
European summit condemns Gaza crisis, demands full blockade lift
European Summit strongly condemned the catastrophic humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip, highlighting the worsening famine and the large number of civilian casualties resulting from ongoing military operations and the blockade imposed on the territory. In their statement, EU leaders called on 'Israel' to fully lift the blockade and allow unhindered access for humanitarian aid, stressing the need to ensure a safe and regular flow of assistance to civilians in Gaza. The summit also denounced the recent escalation in the occupied Palestinian territories, including settler violence and settlement expansion, as well as the continued 'Israeli' military operations in the West Bank. The leaders emphasized that these violations undermine prospects for peace and stability in the region. Furthermore, the statement announced that the European Summit will discuss a report in July assessing 'Israel's' compliance with the partnership agreement it has with the EU, amid growing concerns over Tel Aviv's obligations to international law and human rights.
Jordan News
4 hours ago
- Jordan News
Washington Launches Investigation into Leak of "Top Secret" Intelligence Report on Iran Strikes - Jordan News
U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced that an investigation has been launched into the leak of a preliminary intelligence report prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) regarding the recent American strikes on Iran. اضافة اعلان Speaking to reporters in The Hague, Netherlands, on Wednesday, Hegseth confirmed that the U.S. airstrikes had destroyed Iran's nuclear capability. He described the media coverage of the leaked intelligence report—which he called 'Top Secret'—as 'politically motivated.' 'We've launched an investigation with the FBI into the leak of this report,' Hegseth said. 'It was an internal document, and networks like CNN and others tried to discredit the highly successful President Donald Trump.' He also referred to President Trump's remarks during a press conference, in which Trump stated that the bombs had hit their intended targets precisely and caused the anticipated damage. 'Iran knows this too,' Hegseth added. 'If you want to assess what happened at the Fordow facility,' he said, 'you'll need a big shovel and to dig deep—because Iran's nuclear program has been destroyed.' He again criticized the media for publishing the leaked report. The initial intelligence assessment, obtained and published by CNN, stated that the U.S. airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend likely did not destroy the core infrastructure of Iran's nuclear program, but rather set it back by only a few months. On June 13, Israel, backed by the United States, launched a 12-day assault on Iran that targeted military and nuclear sites, civilian infrastructure, and involved the assassination of military leaders and nuclear scientists. Iran responded by striking Israeli military and intelligence targets with ballistic missiles and drones. Following Iran's missile retaliation and the heavy losses inflicted on Israel, the U.S. launched its own airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities on June 22. In response, Iran struck the U.S. Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar. On June 24, the U.S. announced a ceasefire between Tel Aviv and Tehran. There remains considerable ambiguity and conflicting narratives regarding the extent and impact of the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities. Tehran has only stated that the sites were "heavily damaged" and insists the Israeli-American offensive failed to achieve its objectives, without offering detailed explanations. Meanwhile, Israel and the U.S. maintain that the Iranian nuclear program has been destroyed or set back for years. (Anadolu Agency)
Jordan News
4 hours ago
- Jordan News
Wall Street Journal: Disputes Over Leaked Intelligence Report on Iran Deepen Uncertainty About Trump's Claimed Achievements
The Wall Street Journal reported that ongoing controversy surrounding leaked U.S. intelligence about an airstrike on Iranian nuclear facilities has added to the ambiguity surrounding former President Donald Trump's claims of success, particularly regarding whether Iran had transferred its enriched uranium stockpile before the strike. اضافة اعلان In the report authored by Michael Gordon, Dustin Volz, and Lara Seligman, the paper notes that Trump's assertions about crippling and completely destroying Iran's nuclear program contradict leaked intelligence, which suggests the program was only set back by a few months, not years or permanently. However, the CIA later stated that Iran's nuclear program suffered significant damage. The challenge, it said, lies in assessing the full extent of that damage—something only international inspectors on the ground can determine. On Wednesday, Trump doubled down on his criticism of the intelligence leaks, insisting that the U.S. military had severely crippled Iran's nuclear ambitions and dismissing reports that the program was only delayed for a short period. The newspaper noted that this dispute over the extent of damage will likely trouble intelligence analysts and experts for months, as they work to determine the full impact of the U.S. bombing campaign. Although there is substantial evidence of damage from the U.S. deployment of bunker-busting bombs by B-2 stealth bombers on the Natanz and Fordow nuclear facilities last weekend, the actual status of Iran's program remains unclear without access for international inspectors. Charles Duelfer, a former U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq and ex-CIA assessment director, said, 'Damage assessment from afar is always difficult. That's why people prefer having inspectors on the ground.' At the NATO summit in The Hague, Trump stood by his initial claim that the Iranian program had been 'wiped out,' and dismissed the CIA's preliminary findings as inconclusive. A rare Pentagon press conference, announced by Trump on social media, is expected Thursday to address the matter. CIA Director John Ratcliffe issued a statement backing Trump's remarks but provided no additional details, stating only that there is reliable intelligence indicating major destruction resulting from the recent strikes. According to Ratcliffe, 'New intelligence from a historically reliable source indicates that many of Iran's key nuclear facilities were destroyed, and rebuilding them would take years.' However, neither the White House nor the CIA addressed what happened to Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium—whether it was moved prior to the strike. Vice President J.D. Vance hinted in a Sunday interview with ABC News that Iran may still possess quantities of hidden enriched uranium. He stated, 'In the coming weeks, we will work to ensure this fuel is monitored properly. That will be one of the topics discussed with the Iranians.' Before the Israeli-American operation, Iran was believed to have enough fissile material for approximately 10 nuclear weapons. But Vance argued that without operational enrichment facilities, the uranium would be useless to Iran. The Journal cited a source familiar with the leaked Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report, noting that the document clearly states in its opening paragraph that it was a preliminary assessment based on data available within 24 hours of the strike and not coordinated with other intelligence agencies. A full damage assessment could take days or weeks. A DIA official told the paper that the report was 'preliminary and low-confidence—not a final judgment.' Experts and former officials say one of the key challenges in assessing the strike's impact is determining whether Iran retains nuclear capabilities that could support weapons development. There is also uncertainty about the extent of damage to the Fordow uranium enrichment facility. Another unresolved question is whether Iran moved its enriched uranium stockpile before the attack or recovered it afterward. There is also speculation that Iran may have undisclosed centrifuge stockpiles or nuclear equipment at undisclosed sites. If any part of the program survived, experts warn, Tehran may now be more determined than ever to pursue nuclear weapons. Former senior U.S. official Robert Einhorn, who worked on non-proliferation under the Obama administration, stated: 'The destructive effect of the U.S. and Israeli military attacks may have only strengthened Iran's resolve to acquire nuclear weapons and bolstered hardliners supporting militarization.' Einhorn also raised the unresolved question of whether the U.S. and IAEA can be confident that none of Iran's enriched uranium was transferred to secret locations. According to people familiar with the matter, the DIA's initial classified report concluded that the strikes had only delayed Iran's nuclear ambitions by a few months. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed Wednesday that the FBI is investigating the leak of the intelligence report to the media. The Journal concluded that this disagreement reflects Trump's long-standing tensions with parts of the intelligence community. In the past, he rejected consensus findings—such as those concluding that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help his campaign. This time, the conflict centers around Trump's skepticism toward a preliminary intelligence assessment of a strike he ordered—something analysts say is difficult to evaluate without further information. Typically, intelligence agencies share early-stage, low-confidence assessments across the intelligence community. These are then vetted by analysts, often including signal intelligence or foreign communications intercepted by the NSA. To strengthen conclusions, DIA analysts are now reviewing surveillance data for any Iranian internal discussions about the extent of the damage. Still, intelligence gathering and drawing a comprehensive picture of the U.S. airstrike's impact is a difficult and slow process. Meanwhile, lawmakers in Congress are demanding intelligence briefings on the Israeli-American attacks, even as the White House considers limiting information sharing in response to the DIA leak. (Agencies)
