logo
‘Weapons' Star Austin Abrams Talks the Wild Ending, ‘Willow' and Why He Pities His Tragicomic Character

‘Weapons' Star Austin Abrams Talks the Wild Ending, ‘Willow' and Why He Pities His Tragicomic Character

Yahoo11-08-2025
[This story contains major spoilers for .]
Weapons is a watershed moment for star Austin Abrams.
More from The Hollywood Reporter
Box Office: 'Weapons' Blazes to $42.5M Opening, 'Freakier Friday' Smiles Wide With $29M Bow
'Weapons' Star Alden Ehrenreich Wants You to Go to More Theater in Los Angeles
Box Office: 'Weapons' Targets Stellar $40M-Plus Opening, 'Freakier Friday' Wows With $30M-Plus
The scene-stealer of Zach Cregger's mystery-horror film is on the verge of going from one of the names atop a call sheet to the name atop a call sheet. The 28-year-old Florida native has already booked the starring role in Cregger's next film, Resident Evil, and he's currently leading Brian Duffield's highly anticipated adaptation of Whalefall for 20th Century.
Weapons chronicles a collection of characters in Maybrook, PA, as they orbit the baffling disappearance of 17 schoolkids at 2:17 AM. Abrams was a part of Cregger's original cast that once featured the likes of Pedro Pascal. But due to the delay caused by 2023's WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes, Pascal's crowded schedule forced him to exit the role of Archer Graff. The rest of the main cast also followed suit, but Abrams became the lone exception who was willing to wait it out and not pursue other work while Cregger reshuffled the deck.
'I just wanted to do Weapons,' Abrams tells The Hollywood Reporter. 'When [Cregger's Barbarian] cut to Justin Long [to begin its second act], I immediately thought, 'Whoever the fuck made this movie, I fucking love this person.' So when I got out of the theater, I was like, 'I need to figure out how to meet this guy and work with this guy.' And it's so rare that it actually happens.'
As for his Resident Evil casting, Abrams can only speculate as to how much his loyal gesture influenced Cregger's decision to have him carry his original story in the video game-based franchise.
'I don't think it hurt anything. If I did something else instead of Weapons, I certainly don't think that would've helped me do something like Resident Evil,' Abrams admits.
(Spoilers ahead.) Josh Brolin ended up portraying the role that Pascal vacated in the now critical and commercial hit. His grieving father character eventually has a climactic confrontation with James, Abrams' homeless addict character, at the house where all the missing schoolchildren have congregated. James and Archer's borderline slapstick fight was already quite bizarre since Abrams' character was possessed by the same type of witch's spell that brought the kids to that particular home in the first place. But what makes it even more bizarre is that Brolin is currently playing Abrams' father in Duffield's aforementioned survival thriller about a scuba diver (Abrams) who's swallowed alive by a sperm whale. (The book includes a father-son flashback narrative.)
'It was just really cool to come into something else and already have this weird connection with [Brolin],' Abrams says. 'It almost feels like you're entering a different dimension, and while you've had an experience with this person, it's not the same person. So it's strange, but it's only helped things.'
Abrams did not get to enjoy Cregger's highly sought-after script with the witchcraft twist intact, but the reading experience was still rewarding, as was his eventual perusal of Cregger's Resident Evil screenplay.
'My freaking agent had spoiled it. I love him, but that was annoying,' Abrams recalls mid-laugh. 'I still loved the script. I just couldn't stop reading it, which is insane and how it's been with all of Zach's scripts [Resident Evil included]. They keep feeling fresh, and they keep going into new territory.'
Below, during a recent spoiler conversation with THR, Abrams also discusses why he pities his Weapons character, as well as the on-set story behind his instantly beloved reference to Willow.
***
Part of me was hoping you'd be doing this interview from the innards of a whale, but I appreciate that you were able to squeeze this in on your one day off from .
(Laughs.) Yeah, I needed a break from inside the whale.
You were part of the cast when it was a completely different ensemble. The strike then affected Pedro Pascal's schedule, and Zach had to start over except for you. Did you just get lucky to not have any other conflicts?
No, not necessarily. I just wanted to do Weapons. When I first saw Barbarian in the theaters, I didn't really know what I was walking into. I didn't know about Zach. I didn't know about the movie at all. I just thought it was going to be a regular horror movie, and I wasn't super excited going into it. But my friend wanted to go, and I was like, 'Sure, I'll go.'
So I knew nothing about the movie, and when I saw the first shot, I was like, 'Okay, that's kind of sick.' The camera went through the main character's [Georgina Campbell's Tess] car window. And when it cut to Justin Long [to begin its second act], I immediately thought, 'Whoever the fuck made this movie, I fucking love this person.' I then looked over at my friend and was like, 'Holy shit.' We couldn't even sit next to each other because the theater was so packed.
So when I got out of the theater, I was like, 'I need to figure out how to meet this guy and work with this guy.' And it's so rare that it actually happens. But I just thought he was so gutsy, and it was so refreshing to experience. Weapons then came together, and I only want to work on things that I want to work on.
Zach appreciated that you 'hung tough' with him. He now calls you his 'dude.' Do you think your loyal gesture factored into you landing ?
I have no idea, but I don't think it hurt anything. If I did something else instead of Weapons, I certainly don't think that would've helped me do something like Resident Evil.
Pedro's exit from allowed you to work with Josh Brolin, who is now also playing your father in . Given your violent interactions in , have there been any jokes on about your polar opposite dynamics?
Maybe a few, but not too many. It was just really cool to have worked with him before and then come into something else and already have this weird connection with him. It almost feels like you're entering a different dimension, and while you've had an experience with this person, it's not the same person. So it's strange, but it's only helped things. I really loved him on Weapons and talking with him about things. So I feel a really deep connection with him at this point.
' climax is so dark and disturbing, and yet Josh's character's inability to put James down was hilarious. Did it actually feel comedic on the day?
Well, I remember thinking, 'You want me to get up again and then get up again over there?' So I don't know if I was really sure about it at the time, but I do remember it being funny. It was also super physical, but it was funny on the day.
As you were reading , did you accurately predict that witchcraft was at the root of it?
Well, my freaking agent had spoiled it. I love him, but that was annoying. (Laughs.) I still loved the script. I read it in one go in the middle of the night when I should have been sleeping. I just couldn't stop reading it, which is insane and how it's been with all of Zach's scripts. I just love them. I don't know what it is, really. I mean, it's Zach, but it's the sharpness of the dialogue and the action. They keep feeling fresh, and they keep going into new territory.
So when Josh's character unknowingly painted the cause of everything on Julia Garner's character's car, you immediately knew the game that Zach was playing.
Yeah, I knew something [witchy] was going on, for sure, but I didn't know how the story was going to be told or anything like that. I didn't really know all of those dynamics, so I still unveiled a lot.
I've seen the film interpreted in a wide variety of ways, and I should preface this next question by saying that whatever take you offer today is by no means official.
No, it's official! (Laughs.)
But what is your own reading of the film?
Zach has talked about it in a sense that even he doesn't know what a lot of it means. A lot of it is deep, unconscious, inner-working stuff. What does the [AR-15] rifle that just pops up in Archer's [Brolin] dream mean? I don't really know. I probably had a take a year ago [during filming], but I've been so focused on other things since then that I can't give you a great interpretation right now. But it's all deep unconscious stuff that just floods out of Zach, and he has the skill to make that unconscious stuff work, which might be why his work is so strong and impactful. I know that each different character represents a part of himself, but beyond that, I don't know. I just know that I love the story, even if I don't have a real solid interpretation of it, at least not at this moment. What do you think?
What I consider to be the lasting image of is the young kids chasing after the old witch. So, to me, the movie is about the younger generation turning the tables on the older generation and rejecting their trauma, their dangerous policies and the corrupt systems they uphold.
Oh, fuck yeah. I like that.
You mentioned that all of these characters are a reflection of Zach in some way. Can you recognize the James in Zach?
Yeah, he's talked about it being him at his lowest and most desperate.
Do you feel pity for James since he operated under the spell of a witch and the spell of his own addiction?
Yeah, of course. It's fucking terrible, man. Being addicted to drugs is hell. It's a nightmare. When I see someone on the street that is in a psychosis or something like that, that could be me, that could be you, that could genuinely be anyone. It just depends on what situation you grew up in, to a big degree. There's babies that are being raised by meth addicts. I don't know what's going to happen to them, but that's a hard hand to be dealt. So I feel complete empathy for James.
'Oh fuck, .'
(Laughs.)
James' reaction to the DVD is a big hit on the internet.
Is it?
Yeah, is there a story behind that moment?
I think the DVDs were just there, and maybe it was Zach who noticed it. So he was like, 'Oh, can you just say Willow or something like that?' It was maybe that simple, but I don't remember that line being in the script. I think the DVD got placed there, and we just found it funny. And it is fucking funny.
When James was panhandling Julia's character for money to see his brother, we know that the brother part is true since he later called him and asked for money under false pretenses. But the optimist in me wants to believe that James, at that moment, genuinely wanted to go home and get help. Did Zach give you any more backstory for James?
No, not really. At least not that I remember. It just came down to research. But the interesting thing about James asking for money to see his brother, is that true? Is that not true? Because it could be true in that moment. But once he has some money, he then might say, 'I've got to get high so that I can come up with a plan to go see him.' So it's not necessarily a lie, at least not in that moment when he asks Julia's character for money. But I definitely discussed a lot of it with Zach, and he was open to me trying things and throwing things at him. He's so smart, and I just really trust his direction.
IMDb can sometimes be inaccurate prior to the official release, but it had your character name written as Anthony for the longest time. Was that his name on an old script or breakdown?
Yeah, that was his name at first, but between Archer and Alex, there were too many other A-names.
You've had back-to-back foot chases in and now . Did you feel more prepared for this one after going through that crucible on ?
No. (Laughs.) I ended up dropping some weight for Weapons, so the running was a little challenging, sometimes. But I ran for a much shorter period than the Wolfs sequence.
Your director Jon Watts used to be in a film school gang with Jake Schreier, so do you think Jake put you on Jon's radar all those years ago via ?
Yeah, they're really good friends, and I think Jon was in the editing room on Paper Towns, either watching or giving notes or just hanging out. But I know that he had seen me in that and that it kind of started things.
Jon was going to make a sequel until the movie's sudden lack of theatrical release rubbed him the wrong way. Did it ever get as far as you knowing whether you were coming back or not?
Yeah, I think I was. George [Clooney] came up with a bit of a story or the start of a story, and that was the thought for a second.
When I last spoke to Brian Duffield for , he told me how became a source of anxiety after his movie had already gotten moving. They're both alien invasion thrillers on the surface, but completely different under the hood. Well, another movie with a nearly identical premise to Brian's announced itself in May just as you guys were about to start shooting. Has this subject come up at all on set?
I didn't even know about it until weeks ago. So I really don't know much about it, but I've heard it might be a Spanish film or something like that.
I do know that it's an independent. There's no studio behind it.
But I don't know why I didn't know about it until later on. People had already been talking about it, but I don't feel concerned about anything like that.
You're not returning for season three, but your career and so many others have really accelerated from that show. Is that the biggest reason why the show has had such a tough time getting back on the screen? Are there just too many big careers to juggle?
Yeah, probably. There were so many different factors, from everyone's schedules to COVID to Angus [Cloud] passing away. There were a lot of tough situations that made it difficult.
I know you're consumed by the innards of a whale right now, but Zach has already storyboarded . Have you also started wrapping your head around that role yet?
Yeah, we've been wrapping. (Abrams smiles.) Zach is very, very prepared.
***Weapons is now playing in movie theaters.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
The 25 Best U.S. Film Schools in 2025
The 40 Greatest Needle Drops in Film History
The 40 Best Films About the Immigrant Experience
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Matt Howard Reveals How Wife Abby Convinced Him to Have a 3rd Baby
Matt Howard Reveals How Wife Abby Convinced Him to Have a 3rd Baby

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Matt Howard Reveals How Wife Abby Convinced Him to Have a 3rd Baby

The TikTok stars discussed their exciting pregnancy news on the latest episode of their 'Unplanned Podcast' NEED TO KNOW Matt and Abby Howard opened up about their pregnancy news on the newest episode of their Unplanned Podcast released on Aug. 20 The TikTokers recounted how they made the decision to try for a third baby, and Matt remembered how he became excited after seeing his family together during the holidays They also discussed their experiences parenting their sons Griffin, 3, and August, 2, and acknowledged how "the newborn stage can be tough" Matt and Abby Howard are looking back on how they decided to add a third baby to their family. PEOPLE exclusively revealed that the TikTokers are expecting another child together, and the duo discussed the exciting announcement during an episode of their Unplanned Podcast released on Wednesday, Aug. 20. They began by recounting how Abby, 26, convinced her husband that they should grow their family by one more child and give their sons Griffin, 3, and August, 2, another sibling. During the new episode, Abby noted that she felt confident another baby was a good idea, and she wanted Matt, 27, to be "fully on board" and "excited" about the decision. "How did you convince me to do this?" he asked Abby before explaining that his perspective shifted during a particularly festive time at home. "I honestly think it goes back to the holidays. We were with family around Christmas, Thanksgiving, you know, that whole holiday season," said Matt, 27. "I was just looking around and realizing how valuable family is." He added that while "the newborn stage can be tough," he acknowledged that there are plenty of reasons why raising another infant will be worth the challenge. "I was like, wait a minute, we could potentially have like this really big, lively, fun, joyful family," Matt explained in conversation with his wife. After the "conversation started" at Christmas time in 2024, they continued discussing the possibility, and eventually Matt proposed that they go for it. One week later, he recalled, Abby had her IUD removed and they started trying for a baby. They used a cycle-tracking app to figure out when Abby's fertility window would be, and Matt wasn't shy about calling that time "the best week of my entire life." Both podcast hosts laughed as he continued to explain his praise. "I felt like a king," he said. "It was a really great week, and I think it was just like, we both knew what we were doing, and we both were on like a mission, and we were fully aligned in that ... Honestly, we just felt so in love." Later in the episode, the Howards revisited the fact that caring for an infant can be difficult; as their children became toddlers, they did notice a change in their experience. "Two years ago, Abby and I truly were parenting on expert mode," said Matt, comparing the demands of parenting to difficulty settings in a video game. "I was calling my parents all the time just saying, 'Thank you so much for doing this for me, because I had no idea how hard this was." He continued, "Something shifted though, I think when our son started going to the bathroom on his own, our 3-year-old ... I feel like we're parenting on easy mode. Like, we're changing half the diapers we used to we used to change." Still, the influencers are extremely eager to welcome another little one into the world. Speaking to PEOPLE to share the big news, the high school sweethearts said their third pregnancy is "almost more exciting than ever because now we truly know just how good it is." Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

Why I Never Fully Cut Off My Most Toxic Friend
Why I Never Fully Cut Off My Most Toxic Friend

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why I Never Fully Cut Off My Most Toxic Friend

Sometimes—there is more to the story. Mason pulled up in his lifted truck, engine roaring and bass rattling the door panels. The headlights threw long beams across the street like stage lights summoning me to a set. The truck towered over me, rhythmically shaking the ground under its weight. Mason leaned out the window, flashing a wide grin, 'Well? Are you just going to stare? Get in!' I climbed in, already knowing the plan. We would stop by his place to grab his girlfriend, then head out to the concert. It felt like the start of one of those nights that could go anywhere — and, unfortunately, it did. Within a few minutes of us riding, he started telling me about this new girl he'd been chatting with, who was, 'Sizzling hot.' He went on and on, sharing intimate details of their conversation. I felt slightly uncomfortable hearing about his side piece project, given we were on the way to pick up his girlfriend. He seemed to be overcompensating, and eager to impress me and other people. In the midst of my discomfort, I realized how fast we were going. Houses were flying by as his engine roared. He was pushing his luck on yellow lights, flying through busy intersections. 'I'd prefer not to die tonight, buddy. Can you slow down?' I said, with a sardonic half smile. And part of me wanted to just say, 'Hey, relax man.' I got him to change the subject from his side piece, so that we could discuss other matters. It was awkward enough to hear about and I had other things in common with him, namely our love of metal music. His girlfriend, Jenna, got into the car. She was beautiful and fun. I couldn't fathom why he felt the need to jeopardize what he had. Then Things Went South The concert was a great time. We were headed home that night, feeling sleepy. Mason was in the front, driving with Jenna in the passenger seat. Then, his phone rang. He didn't notice it — and his girlfriend, perhaps suspecting something awry, answered the phone. She said, 'Who is this?' And after a few words exchanged, she hung up the phone, and all hell broke loose: it was the side girl, and Jenna was in the know. She started screaming at him. He yelled back, denying it all, and they went back and forth, while he's driving fast at 11 PM on a dark weaving road. I clutched my seat like I was on a broken and out-of-control rollercoaster. They went back and forth and I did my best not to shrivel up and die. Mason attempted to pull me into the argument saying, 'Don't you remember I was with you at my house that night?' I said, 'Brother, I don't want to get involved in any of this. Just take me home, please.' I managed to get home without the car flipping over. After this complete blowup, I didn't see Mason for a few months. Then, he appeared out of the blue, and we began hanging out again, just going to the gym, playing video games, doing early 20-something guy things. He and his girlfriend had, unsurprisingly, broken up. He'd been a bit of a scumbag and deserved it. After a few months, he vanished again. This was normal. He was one of those friends that just came and went over the years. Popping up out of nowhere without reason, and disappearing without explanation. About three years later, he appeared on my front porch, knocking. He said, 'Can I crash here? I'm having some problems at home. I won't stay long I promise.' I nodded yes, with a bit of confusion. He was nearly unrecognizable. He'd gained 100 lbs and grown a long beard. He stayed for the evening and we caught up, having a few beers and talking about life, forgetting all the drama and second-hand embarrassment he loved to heave onto me. He'd been in and out of jobs over those years, always getting some new gig, or getting fired for myriad reasons that were always someone else's fault. I didn't understand why he couldn't right the ship and just chill out. My other friends often asked why I even stayed friends with Mason, given his track record. Which I understood. Mason wasn't the most sympathetic character. I reasoned that I always enjoyed our company and he hadn't done me wrong up until then. Despite all the swirling nonsense and self-inflicted damage, he was genuinely nice and fun to hang out with. Then, one night, he shared something. He always drank a lot more than I did, never seeming to stop after just one or two beers. He said, 'Hey, I have to tell you something. Don't freak out.' He proceeded to tell me that his parents had been abusive (I have sufficiently moved details around to protect his identity). His mother was an alcoholic and his father had been quite violent, beating him up to the point of needing to go to the hospital with a broken nose. He lied to doctors about what happened, after his father threatened him with a second and third trip to the hospital if he didn't. On another occasion, he said his mother locked him in a closet for eight hours as punishment. One after another, Mason itemized all these horrible things that happened to him, unloading them like they'd been stuffed in his closet all these years. It was quite sad and I wondered how anyone could survive such circumstances. I also didn't know how to deal with him trauma dumping on me, and can't remember saying anything all that helpful beyond, 'I'm so sorry that happened to you.' I'd done some therapy myself and learned it was best just to listen in those moments. I thanked him for feeling comfortable sharing. Ten years have now gone by. I think back on Mason's disastrous personal and professional life. I've come to suspect much of his personal chaos may be related to the abuse. Studies have shown this type of abuse can radically warp interpersonal relationships later in life, leading to more manipulation and emotional volatility. But I also know every case is different. No, his bad upbringing doesn't condone or excuse his infidelities and deceptions. But it does provide context and reveal how damaging it can be. After that night, he again vanished, and I only saw him one more time in person before he moved to the other side of the world, searching for something that may or may not exist. It brings to mind the old quote by author Robert Goolrick, 'If you don't receive love from the ones who are meant to love you, you will never stop looking for it.' I often think of Mason's case when I deal with difficult, wholly unreasonable people in everyday life. I look past the deep frustration and animosity I feel, and try to remember there may be details I don't know that drive this behavior. Heck, if anything, it leaves me realizing, 'Wow. This person goes through their everyday life acting like this. It must be so chaotic.' What I've realized is that there are many people in this world who spend much of their life recovering from toxic parenting. I've concluded, a bit darkly, that this world would have fewer problems if people who weren't ready or interested in having kids — didn't. If you ever have a friend who is vulnerable to you in these moments, please take the time to listen. Don't pass judgement, or try to fix the situation, or add context, or dig for excessive details. Just being present in that moment can go a long way. Every so often, I catch myself checking my phone, half-expecting a text out of the blue. Something like, 'Hey, hey! What's up, you free tonight?' And if that ever comes, I'll still say yes. Solve the daily Crossword

Dr. Phil sued by Christian broadcaster for ‘reprehensible conduct' in $500 million deal: ‘Years-long fraudulent scheme'
Dr. Phil sued by Christian broadcaster for ‘reprehensible conduct' in $500 million deal: ‘Years-long fraudulent scheme'

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dr. Phil sued by Christian broadcaster for ‘reprehensible conduct' in $500 million deal: ‘Years-long fraudulent scheme'

The fraught bankruptcy proceedings for Dr. Phil McGraw's 'anti-woke' Merit Street Media have taken another dramatic turn as his broadcasting partner is suing the company and McGraw for fraud and breach of contract. The lawsuit filed by the Trinity Broadcasting comes just a month after Merit Street filed for bankruptcy and sued the Christian television network, accusing TBN of 'sabotage' because it 'reneged on its obligations and abused its position as the controlling shareholder of Merit Street.' Meanwhile, the countersuit by TBN – which was filed in Texas court Tuesday – comes as Dr. Phil and his production company Peteski attempted to halt the Chapter 11 proceedings for the year-old Merit Street, claiming the legal costs of going bankrupt were too expensive. The effort to halt the bankruptcy follows the Professional Bull Riders accusing Dr. Phil of engaging in a 'bad faith' Chapter 11 filing as the bull-riding league tries to collect on the $181 million it claims is owed to them by Merit Street. 'The response to TBN legitimately and lawfully defending itself from Peteski and McGraw's bad-faith attacks is to cry foul because they do not like the true facts that they themselves now regretfully put at issue before this Court, revealing McGraw's true illicit intent and wrongful conduct which he self-described as a 'gangster move' and as '11th-hour poker,'' TBN and its attorneys state in the complaint. 'TBN now asserts its affirmative claims against Peteski and McGraw related to the years-long fraudulent scheme that they developed and executed to fleece TBN, a not-for-profit corporation, to enrich McGraw, his associates and affiliates,' the lawsuit alleges. 'TBN is confident that the truth will set it free, and result in Peteski and McGraw being held accountable for their reprehensible conduct.' Merit Street has accused TBN of failing to live up to the terms of their agreement, specifically citing the inability to secure national television distribution for the Dr. Phil-led channel. 'These failures by TBN were neither unintended nor inadvertent,' Merit Street alleges in its complaint. 'They were a conscious, intentional pattern of choices made with full awareness that the consequence of which was to sabotage and seal the fate of a new but already nationally acclaimed network.' However, TBN – which at one point owned 70 percent of Merit Street – counters that it was McGraw who created a 'false sense of urgency' when he approached the broadcaster about cutting ties with CBS and starting up his own network. All the while, TBN alleges, the MAGA-boosting TV psychologist lied about viewership numbers, advertising revenues, back catalogs and production costs in order to quickly secure a highly lucrative $500 million, 10-year deal from the network. 'Among other things, McGraw falsely represented to TBN that CBS would pay him $75 million per year to renew his contract and TBN must (1) immediately sign some form of binding agreement with Peteski and (2) immediately pay him $20 million as a gesture of good faith to show TBN's ability to pay and commitment to the deal,' the complaint states. 'Anything less, McGraw claimed, would be a 'deal killer.' TBN relied on McGraw's false assurances and proceeded with the requested urgency.' Dr. Phil, who had hosted a syndicated television show for roughly 20 years at that point, also told Trinity that he 'wanted to change networks because of what he perceived to be CBS's censorship,' explicitly saying: 'I don't want snot nose lawyers telling me what I can and can't say on TV.' McGraw also allegedly said that he was looking to move his show from California to Texas, where TBN is located, in order to lower production costs by avoiding California regulations and cutting payroll by ridding himself of union-based employees. At the same time, in order to further entice Trinity into a deal, Dr. Phil represented that he owned the entire 21-year media library for his syndicated show and that TBN would have access to it at no additional cost. However, according to the complaint, McGraw hired dozens of employees from his previous show despite the agreement to slash production costs. On top of that, TBN alleges, Peteski – which owned the other 30 percent of Merit – failed to make payments on its interest in the company. While the agreement called for Dr. Phil to produce 160 90-minute episodes of his new primetime show to be aired on Merit Street, TBN claims McGraw never made good on that promise, instead keeping the program in its current hour-long format. A spokesperson for McGraw, meanwhile, stated that the host recorded 214 new episodes of Dr. Phil Primetime, adding that 'to say otherwise is absolutely false.' Elsewhere in the complaint, Trinity claims that McGraw demanded more money – despite TBN already expending tens of millions of dollars establishing his show on the new network – after the broadcaster asked to use the library content to fill out airtime on Merit Street. 'This, among other things, prompted TBN to press McGraw to live up to his representation that he would contribute the Dr Phil Show library to Merit Street,' the lawsuit states. 'Despite his previous representations, McGraw and his attorneys at Manatt informed TBN for the first time that McGraw would not contribute any old episodes of the Dr. Phil Show to Merit Street for Peteski's 30% or otherwise,' the complaint continues. 'Instead, McGraw brazenly demanded that TBN pay him $100 million to obtain a 50% interest in the media library.' As for Merit Street's bankruptcy, which was filed last month, TBN says the Chapter 11 proceedings weren't approved by its board members while accusing McGraw of plotting to use the bankruptcy to start a new media venture and snag the license for his show. Meanwhile, the bankruptcy judge presiding over the case said on Tuesday that the Chapter 11 proceedings will continue for now, adding that the court will decide on September 2 whether to dismiss the filing or convert it to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. 'The judge has initially sided with Trinity Broadcasting Network and Professional Bull Riders, stating that Merit Street is at fault for delaying the case by resisting discovery and it is therefore not going to fund what Trinity and PBR call a 'giant litigation war chest' for the company's professionals,' Sarah Foss, Head of Legal at Debtwire, explained to The Independent. 'The discovery resistance may be tied to reputational concerns from Dr. Phil, and what might be revealed in text messages or emails that come out in the discovery process,' Foss continued, adding: 'Notably, the judge overseeing the bankruptcy denied a request from Merit Street's bankruptcy counsel, Sidley Austin, to withdraw from the case before that hearing, despite being owed $3.7m in unpaid legal fees and a lack of funds to pay the lawyers for their work representing the company at the hearing.' Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store