
How big drop in trade deficit as tariffs hit imports looks inside U.S. supply chain and economy
One closely watched data point is the widening gap between inventory levels and inventory costs. These metrics generally track together, according to the Logistics Managers' Index. In 2024, the average space between these metrics was 12.1 points. But in May 2025, the gap has expanded to 26.8 points, the third-highest in the history of the index, said Zachary Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management and Colorado State University Supply Chain Management Forum director.
When inventories are high and quickly expand, warehouses cost more. Traditionally, when warehouse inventories decrease, warehouse costs slow down as well. But because of the front-loading of products ahead of the tariffs in the January-March period, inventory is flat, with replenishment orders not coming in. But costs are still up because the inventory is being held longer.
"The situation we're in now, inventories are up, and they're sitting there," said Rogers. "Essentially, imports in January, February, and early March looked a lot like what we would normally see in August, September, and early October."
Normally in mid-October, holiday sales kick into gear, which would move inventory out of the warehouse. But given the uncertainty in tariffs and concerns about the financial health of the consumer, retailers have told CNBC they are not placing full orders.
"Warehousing capacity is tight, which means there is no inventory movement, and the associated costs (e.g., warehousing prices and inventory costs) are much higher than what we would normally see at this time of the year," Rogers said. "This means the inventory is getting more expensive to hold."
Ocean freight orders from around the world to the U.S. show the pause button in product orders continues.
As President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping held their first call since a raft of new tariffs on China in an initial attempt to de-escalate the trade war, data on Chinese ocean freight bookings to the U.S. shows a picture similar to the softness in global orders after the surge.
A recent drop in freight vessel sailings from China drove up the cost for imports as there has been less capacity available on ships. Peter Sand, Xeneta chief shipping analyst, said the recent 88% increase in ocean freight spot rates on the China to U.S. trade route indicates demand of some shippers willing to pay to pull forward their freight during the 90-day tariff pause.
"However, this will not last because [vessel] capacity is heading back to the Transpacific and the desperation of shippers to get supply chains moving again will ease once boxes are on the water and inventories begin to build up," said Sand. "Spot rates are expected to peak in June before downward pressure returns."
The conditions in the freight market resulted in an advantage for larger firms over small businesses, according to Rogers. "Smaller firms were boxed out during the big rush of imports in Q1, so they have had to bring inventories over later, resulting in higher costs," he said.
But since the larger companies aren't continuing to stock up, as the surge ends it is impacting smaller supply chain companies directly too. The smaller firms in the Logistics Managers' Index survey sample are representative of the "middle mile" in supply chains, wholesalers and logistics service providers as the points in the supply chain where freight is transported between a supplier's warehouse, distribution center and the final point of delivery, which could be a retail store or a customer's doorstep.
They get hit when large manufacturers and retailers avoid inventory as much as possible — unlike Covid, they are running leaner inventory overall, which further squeezes the "middle mile."
"Essentially, it is the small businesses of America that are bearing the brunt of the tariffs right now," Rogers said. "This could change as inventories move downstream to retailers if costs could be passed down to the consumer," he added.
Recent Federal Reserve survey data shows many firms planning to pass on price increases resulting from tariffs to customers.
But the ability to pass on price increases to customers varies business to business, and based on end customer. Helen Torkos, president and owner of Regent Tek Industries, which manufactures pavement markings, tells CNBC the global trade war has greatly impacted the cost of importing the raw components needed to manufacture the highest grade of thermoplastic road markings, the product that is on state, city, and local roads and highways.
"The majority of our components are now being tariffed," said Torkos. "Our cost has gone up tenfold. We cannot pass on these costs to some of our customers because they cannot afford the increases. We also cannot source these products domestically."
Torkos said the uncertainty of future tariff costs has also led to the cancellation of key projects.
"The recent removal from several bid processes due to the tariffs causing rising material prices further underscores the impact of these tariffs on our operations," Torkos said.
To address the swings in tariffs, and in an effort to offer more certainty on possible freight costs, logistics firms are launching tariff analysis tools. C.H. Robinson and Flexport are among companies to roll out technology that allows businesses and consumers to model tariff impact on price.
Wine for Europe is one example that can impact both the business and consumer. The EU was threatened by President Trump in a social media post of a 50% tariff, only to have that threat walked back by the president, delaying that increase from June 1 to July 9.
According to the Flexport Tariff Simulator, if a container with bottles of Chianti from Italy was processed by U.S. Customs on June 2, the wine would be under a 10.24% tariff rate. The duties for one 20-foot container filled with 0.75L bottles of Chianti would be $27,024. If the tariff were increased by another 50%, the tariff bill would soar from $27,024 to $132,624. The tariff rate was based on a wholesale value of $264,000 ($20 a bottle w/13,200 bottles in a container.)
Then, there is the stacking of multiple tariff layers already implemented during the trade war. These duties have pushed up costs to import retail goods much higher than the 30% associated with the tentative agreement.
Using an example of a common summer retail purchase, Flexport data shows a 20-foot container storing 60 fully assembled aluminum chaise lounge chairs with a wholesale value of $60,000, departing from China on June 2 and arriving on July 15, would face a 70% tariff — that includes Section 301 tariffs at 25% under the 1974 Trade Act's unfair practices policy; Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum at 25%; and the national emergency powers fentanyl tariffs at 20%. The total amount in tariffs for that single container would be $42,000.
"It's not that simple to calculate," said Ryan Petersen, Flexport CEO. "There's still a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen. For example, it may not be on the tip of everyone's tongue right now, but July 8 is the end of the reciprocal tariffs pause. That could end, and tariffs may not be 10% everywhere. Commerce Secretary [Howard] Lutnick has made comments he is committed to making the tariffs higher."
A women's top imported from India faced a tariff rate on June 2 of 42%. After the reciprocal tariff deadline is lifted, the same top will be taxed at 58%.
Mike Short, president of global forwarding at C.H. Robinson, said for companies to save on tariff costs, they need to have the ability to search their SKUs and identify the product's point of origin so they can tabulate tariff costs.
"Based on that information, they could then quickly compare their total duty spending versus various alternative sources," said Short. "Knowing the spending scenarios can provide businesses with clarity on where to focus their efforts to achieve savings and diversification, down to the individual product level."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Eli Lilly Taps High-Grade Market With Rare 40-Year Paper
(Bloomberg) -- Eli Lilly & Co. is tapping the US investment-grade debt market with a deal that's expected to include a 40-year bond, a rarity in a market characterized by high borrowing costs. The drugmaker is selling debt in as many as seven parts, with 40-year tranche set to yield 0.73 percentage point above Treasuries, according to a person familiar with the matter. Initial price discussions called for a yield in the area of 1.05 percentage points above the benchmark. A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds The deal is also expected to include a 30-year portion, as well as maturities ranging from 3 years to 10 years, the person said, asking not to be identified discussing private information. The offering comes amid a dearth of supply of long-dated corporate bonds: Just 11% of high-grade debt sold this year had a maturity of 30 years or more, down from 15% in 2024, as companies have been reticent to lock in elevated borrowing costs for long periods of time. Eli Lilly is one of nine companies selling US high-grade debt on Monday, with McDonald's Corp., Marriott International Inc. and Charter Communications Inc. among the others. Borrowers are piling in ahead of a seasonal slowdown later this month. They're also taking advantage of more favorable funding conditions: Yields this month are sitting consistently below 5% for the first time this year, yet demand continues to be robust. Most recently, investment-grade order books grew to more than five times the size of fresh supply on Wednesday, while borrowers paid just two basis points in new-issue concessions — both better than average so far this year. Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Mizuho Financial Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley are managing Eli Lilly's sale, with proceeds earmarked for general corporate purposes. The bonds are expected to be rated Aa3 by Moody's Ratings and A+ by S&P Global Ratings. Issuer Profile Debt distribution: LLY US Equity DDIS Capital structure: LLY US Equity CAST Related securities: LLY US Equity RELS Ratings history: LLY US Equity CRPR --With assistance from Michael Gambale and Boris Korby. (Updates with guidance numbers in second paragraph.) Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Living With 12 Strangers to Ease a Housing Crunch Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Workers are ‘job hugging' or clinging to their positions ‘for dear life': report
The pandemic era's 'great resignation' has morphed into desperate 'job hugging' — with workers clinging to their positions at levels not seen in nearly a decade, according to the latest data. The so-called quits rate among US workers slipped to 2.0% in June, far below the 3.0% peak of November 2021, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Just 3.14 million people quit in June — down from 3.27 million in May — marking a steady return to pre-pandemic lows. By contrast, 4.5 million people quit their jobs in November 2021. Advertisement Employees are holding onto jobs 'for dear life,' consultants at Korn Ferry wrote in a report last week that was cited on Monday by CNBC. 4 Many workers are clinging to their jobs 'for dear life' as quitting plunges to the lowest level in years. kieferpix – In total, about 47.4 million Americans quit their jobs throughout 2021, setting an annual record. As of June, around 19.3 million Americans have voluntarily quit their jobs year-to-date. Advertisement 'There is this stagnation in the labor market, where the hires, quits and layoff rates are low,' Laura Ullrich, director of economic research in North America at the Indeed Hiring Lab, told CNBC. 'There's just not a lot of movement at all.' 4 The era of job hopping has given way to 'job hugging,' with employees too fearful to leave. Studio Romantic – That has led to the voluntary quits rate crashing to lows unseen since 2016, outside the first days of the COVID pandemic. Advertisement 'There's quite a bit of uncertainty in the world — economic, political, global — and I think uncertainty causes people to naturally' remain in a holding pattern, Matt Bohn, an executive search consultant at Korn Ferry, told the Comcast-owned financial news service. He compared spooked workers to skittish investors sitting on the sidelines, waiting for the right opportunity. The lack of movement comes as higher interest rates make it more costly for businesses to borrow money and expand operations. Job growth has slowed sharply in recent months, with the hiring rate plunging to its lowest level in more than a decade, excluding early pandemic days. Advertisement 4 Rising uncertainty has left many workers paralyzed about their prospects for a new role. fizkes – More CEOs now plan to shrink their workforce over the next 12 months than expand it — the first time that's happened since 2020, according to a recent survey. A Conference Board poll published this month found 34% of executives planning cuts versus just 27% expecting to hire. The dramatic shift from the great resignation to the great stay reflects a labor market that's essentially frozen solid. Workers who couldn't stop quitting two years ago now won't budge. But this death grip on current jobs carries serious risks, experts warned. Job huggers are sacrificing cash because those who switch typically command higher wages than those who stay put, Ullrich noted. 4 Young entrants and recent graduates face an especially tough time breaking into the frozen job market. Andrey Popov – Workers getting too comfortable may stagnate rather than take on additional responsibilities or learn new skills. Advertisement This impacts their marketability and career growth when the labor market eventually improves, Bohn cautioned. Employers might also decide these static workers no longer meet performance standards. It's not inherently bad to stay in a job for a long time, experts stressed, but hugging too tightly can backfire. The freeze-up also makes it harder for new entrants like recent graduates to break in. With fewer workers moving up or out, there's nowhere for them to slot in, Ullrich told CNBC.


New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
FTC sues ticket reseller for using bogus Ticketmaster accounts to evade Taylor Swift's Eras tour ticket limits
Federal Trade Commission sued ticket reseller Key Investment Group for evading purchasing limits to buy up thousands of tickets to live events including Taylor Swift's Eras tour and resell them at a markup, according to a complaint filed in Maryland federal court on Monday. The Baltimore, Md.-based company, which operates ticket resale sites including used thousands of Ticketmaster accounts, including fake or purchased accounts, the FTC said. Ticketmaster faced intense criticism after its botched 2022 sale of tickets to Swift's much-hyped New Eras Tour, when billions of requests from Swift fans, bots and ticket resellers overwhelmed its website and the company canceled a planned ticket sale to the general public. Ticket reseller Key Investment Group, which operates ticket resale sites including used thousands of Ticketmaster accounts, including fake or purchased accounts, the FTC said. AP For one Swift concert, Key Investment Group used 49 different accounts to purchase 273 tickets and evade a 6-ticket purchase limit, the FTC said on Monday. FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson said in a statement that the lawsuit puts ticket sellers on notice that the agency will go after those who circumvent ticketing platforms' limits on ticket sales. The lawsuit is part of a crackdown President Trump announced in March focused on curbing exploitative ticket reselling practices that raise costs for fans. Key Investment Group sued the FTC in July to block its investigation, saying that its ticket purchases did not use automated software, or bots, and did not violate the Better Online Ticket Sales (BOTS) Act. The lawsuit is part of a crackdown President Trump announced in March focused on curbing exploitative ticket reselling practices that raise costs for fans. AP The FTC has made it clear that 'they intend to use the BOTS Act to shut down the entire secondary-ticket market,' the company said in its lawsuit. The agency on Monday accused Key Investment Group and three of its executives of violating the BOTS Act as well as the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive business practices. Ticketmaster and its parent company, Live Nation Entertainment, are facing a lawsuit brought by US antitrust enforcers accusing the company of monopolizing markets across the live concert industry.