logo
The FTC says company that pitched financial freedom scammed people out of $1 billion

The FTC says company that pitched financial freedom scammed people out of $1 billion

The Federal Trade Commission and Nevada Attorney General's office filed a federal complaint on Thursday accusing the financial training company IYOVIA of operating a multi-level marketing scheme that scammed consumers, particularly young people, out of more than 1.2 billion dollars since 2018.
The company — which was formerly known by names including IM Mastery Academy and IML, and rebranded last November — billed itself as a platform that could teach people how to make money by trading on the foreign exchange, cryptocurrency, futures, and stock markets.
In social media posts, people involved with the company heavily promoted it as a means to financial freedom — touting luxurious lifestyles and six-figure incomes, the FTC said. "Trading can be your ticket to wealth and success," one salesperson allegedly wrote in an October 2023 Instagram post.
The complaint alleges that while the company claimed that customers could get rich by purchasing its financial training courses — which could cost anywhere from a hundred to few hundred dollars each month, in addition to other "add-ons" services — "subscribers have lost substantial sums of money trading financial instruments, on top of the hundreds if not thousands of dollars they paid IML."
IYOVIA did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company's founder, Christopher Terry, one of the defendants in the suit, described the company on an archived version of his website as "a cutting-edge online educational platform" that introduces customers to financial marketplaces.
The instructors who taught these courses often lacked formal financial training or accreditation — and obtained trainings from Youtube videos or the company itself, The FTC said. Most of the instructors "are salespeople masquerading as top-notch investment professionals," the complaint alleges.
One instructor allegedly doctored his trading results — and the company covered up the allegations because, the complaint says, "If not handled properly, this will be a public reputation nightmare," the company's director of education, product development, and regulatory compliance wrote in a message described in the complaint.
In addition to financial courses, the company also offered subscribers the chance to participate as salespeople, earning commissions by recruiting others into the fold. The FTC says these tactics were a "multi-level marketing scheme" that resulted in the vast majority of salespeople losing or earning very little money.
In 2022, according to income disclosure statements included in the complaint, around 80% of the company's salespeople made less than $500 a year. Ninety percent of people who signed up for the company's trading courses had dropped the services within six months, the complaint said.
'A massive scam'
The company operated "a massive scam that has harmed hundreds of thousands of consumers in the United States and worldwide," the complaint alleged. "Despite direct knowledge that many consumers were losing money trading, and that consumers who purchased the Business Venture were also losing money, IML chose to keep marketing the Trading Training Services and the Business Venture using unsubstantiated, misleading, and dishonest claims."
"The breadth of this scam is remarkable," Christopher Mufarrige, the director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a statement. The agency declined to comment further, citing the active litigation. The Nevada Attorney General's office didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
IYOVIA focused its marketing efforts on young people, particularly young Black and Latino consumers, the complaint said. It added that in 2017, France's financial markets regulator issued a public warning that the company was targeting young people, including high schoolers, and several salespeople were arrested by the Spanish National Police in 2022 for, among other things, trying to recruit adolescents.
"That's the great thing about network [marketing]... They keep making new 18 year olds everyday," Christopher Terry, the company's founder, once wrote to an associate, according to the complaint.
"Young adults can be a very susceptible population to a marketing pitch to dump the 9-to-5 job and really obtain financial freedom," said Bonnie Patten, the Executive Director of the nonprofit organization Truth in Advertising, which has investigated IYOVIA's claims.
"What IYOVIA and the defendants named in this complaint were doing was scamming consumers out of hundreds of millions of dollars on a pitch that they could earn financial freedom, when it was all just a lie," she added.
The complaint said that at least 21 international government agencies have issued warnings about the company, and that Canadian law enforcement has taken legal action.
Terry and his wife, Isis Terry, the company's chief financial officer and co-owner, received at least $20 million from the business, the feds alleged.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google to pay $30 million to settle class-action suit over children's privacy
Google to pay $30 million to settle class-action suit over children's privacy

Engadget

time4 minutes ago

  • Engadget

Google to pay $30 million to settle class-action suit over children's privacy

Google has reached a settlement over a lawsuit that claimed it illegally collected data from child users without parental consent through its YouTube video platform and then sent them targeted ads. The tech giant will shell out $30 million to settle the proposed class-action suit. According to Reuters , the plaintiffs' lawyers said there could be 35 million to 45 million class members. Children aged 13 or younger who watched YouTube between July 1, 2013 and April 1, 2020 could be covered. The proposed settlement was filed last night and now awaits judge approval. This settlement amounts to a slap on the wrist compared to the $170 million fine Google faced in 2019 following a similar suit brought by the Federal Trade Commission for alleged violations of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. Under the terms of that case, YouTube had agreed to stop collecting data on videos aimed at children, and both YouTube and Google were prohibited from future COPPA violations.

META Focuses on User Safety & Engagement: Ad Revenues to Rise?
META Focuses on User Safety & Engagement: Ad Revenues to Rise?

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

META Focuses on User Safety & Engagement: Ad Revenues to Rise?

Meta Platforms' META focus on enhancing safety for WhatsApp users and new ways to connect Instagram users is expected to help drive advertising revenues. The company's focus on integrating AI into its platforms — Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger and Threads — is driving user engagement to boost ad push is helping Meta Platforms offer content that is interesting and useful, eventually driving engagement. Improvement in content quality, driven by META's recommendation system, has led to a 5% increase in time spent on Facebook and 6% on Instagram in second-quarter 2025. The launch of AI video editing tools across Meta AI and the new Edits app are noteworthy META has introduced features and new anti-scam tools in WhatsApp to combat scammers. In the first half of 2025, WhatsApp proactively detected and banned more than 6.8 million accounts tied to online fraud and scams. Safety features now allow WhatsApp users to review details, leave quietly, or mute notifications when a new contact adds the user to an unknown group. For individual WhatsApp chats, Meta Platforms is testing warnings when users message someone outside their has launched the latest features and tools like repost, interactive map and Friends tab in Reels. The repost option helps Instagram users share reels and posts, which will appear in friends' feeds and a dedicated repost tab on profiles. The interactive map allows friends to share locations and explore posts, reels and stories tagged to places. The Friends tab in Reels makes it easy to see what content friends are second-quarter 2025, advertising revenues (98.8% of Family of Apps revenues) increased 21.5% year over year to $46.56 billion and accounted for 98% of second-quarter revenues. At constant currency, revenues increased 22% year over year. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for third-quarter 2025 advertising is pegged at $48.07 billion, indicating more than 20% growth over the figure reported in the year-ago quarter. META Faces Tough Competition for Advertising Dollars Meta Platforms is facing tough competition from the likes of Alphabet GOOGL and Amazon AMZN for advertising advertising revenues rose 10.4% year over year to $71.34 billion and accounted for 74% of second-quarter 2025 total revenues. YouTube's advertising revenues improved 13.1% year over year to $9.77 billion, while Search and other revenues increased 11.7% year over year to $54.19 billion. Alphabet is leveraging AI to boost search dominance with the launch of Gemini 2.5. Search revenues are driven by improving engagement with features like AI Overview, which now has 2 billion users per month and is available in more than 40 languages across 200 countries. Amazon's advertising business reached a milestone in the second quarter of 2025, capturing 9.4% of the company's total revenues — the highest share ever recorded — and rose 23% year over year to $15.69 billion. Amazon's ability to harness its vast retail media presence, proprietary shopping data and expanding connected TV (CTV) footprint is a key catalyst. The global rollout of Prime Video ads adds a high-value, premium channel that may lift revenues. META's Share Price Performance, Valuation & Estimates Meta Platforms' shares have jumped 31% year to date, outperforming the broader Zacks Computer and Technology sector's return of 13.8% and the Zacks Internet Software industry's appreciation of 21.4%. META Stock's Performance Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Meta Platforms' stock is trading at a premium, with a forward 12-month Price/Sales of 8.98X compared with the broader sector's 6.74X. META has a Value Score of D. META Valuation Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2025 earnings is pegged at $27.98 per share, up 9.8% over the past 30 days, suggesting 17.3% year-over-year growth. Meta Platforms, Inc. Price and Consensus Meta Platforms, Inc. price-consensus-chart | Meta Platforms, Inc. Quote Meta Platforms currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Inc. (AMZN) : Free Stock Analysis Report Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) : Free Stock Analysis Report Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Debate Over Banning Social Media For Kids Under 14
Debate Over Banning Social Media For Kids Under 14

Buzz Feed

time34 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Debate Over Banning Social Media For Kids Under 14

Last month, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that he plans to ban social media in France for people under the age of 15. "We cannot wait," he said of the ban. In France, it's a pressing issue: Macron's announcement comes in the wake of the murder of a high school teaching assistant who was stabbed to death by a 14-year-old student, which has stirred up a conversation about the radicalization of children online. His plans involve adding age verification to some sites. Online age verification is a big topic in itself at the moment, with the swift implementation of the United Kingdom's Online Safety Act being implemented across the web. These age checks are ostensibly meant to protect minors from pornographic content and other harmful material, and of course apply to websites such as PornHub; however, the law also includes social media sites like X (Twitter), Reddit, Discord, and Bluesky, as well as sites such as Spotify and YouTube. Sites use methods like ID scanning and "AI" facial recognition software to "verify" users' age. In the wake of the implementation of the OSA in the UK, Americans are growing concerned that age verification will soon be implemented in the US, too. Critics worry that "age verification" is a path to censorship, surveillance, and even broader data harvesting than we have now. ...Which brings us to this little tidbit: in Florida this year, a federal judge blocked the enforcement of a state law that banned social media accounts for children under 14. While the judge appreciated concerns about the effect of social media on kids, he stated that the 2024 law was "likely unconstitutional." tuned in to this general conversation, when I saw this post on the popular Ask Reddit page from user Lola_girl_10 asking, "Do you support banning social media for anyone under 14 years old? Why?" I had to know what people had to say. Here are the best comments from the conversation: "I support it in theory, but how do you implement it? Does it require me to use my government ID to use the internet? I want less surveillance, not more…" "Yes. I mean, most platforms require users to be over 13, but kids half that age are addicted to them. But the Online Safety Act isn't the way to do it." "Let's start with the basics. How do you define social media? Is YouTube social media? Is Reddit? Are forums like Stack Exchange or GitHub social media? How about online video games? Niche platforms for marginalized and vulnerable populations?" "No, because we don't live in a world where anyone proposing this type of legislation cares about protecting children. Every single one of these proposals is nothing but a power grab that will be used to further eliminate privacy and control free speech." "Parental controls are available for things like this." "I don't support it because that requires age verification, and that makes it impossible to be anonymous." "In theory, yes. Social media, in my opinion, is like a drug, one to be used responsibly when you have a level of brain development that understands the impact it's having." "Yes, and I think we should also ban online gaming for young children." "Ban phones from schools and classrooms; otherwise, it'll take a cultural shift of parents actually parenting instead of handing their toddler a tablet as soon as they can be entertained by it. Any laws requiring ID or verification should be avoided." "Honestly? I support torching all 'social' media to the ground and salting the earth. They are evil. Facebook and Twitter data centers ought to be nuked." "Not at the expense of my privacy or risking my identity." "I don't support it in the way the UK has just done it. Neither the government nor corporations should be invading the privacy of citizens to make up for the failures of bad parents." "Probably. I listened to a podcast once that made the point that we massively restrict all these things that we know are bad for kids — alcohol, tobacco, etc. — but when it comes to social media, we do nothing, despite research showing a clear link between social media use and child/adolescent suicide." "Yes. But my kids are already banned. If you let your kids loose on the internet, then you're a bad parent." "I have two 13-year-olds and we have explained to them in great detail why they are not allowed to use social media. They. Do. Not. Need. It." "Yes, 100%. But 18 would be better. 'Social'-focused media like Instagram and Facebook are a societal cancer." "Yes, I support banning social media for kids under 14 — and not in a 'boomer killjoy' way, but a protect-your-brain-before-it's-fried kinda way." "No. And I'm not falling into the 'but it's the children!' trap either. The current actions are to establish control, and I feel like it's happening everywhere at the same time, from Australia to the EU and the UK to the US, as if it is a coordinated thing." "Yeah, I support banning social media for anyone under 14 because at that age, kids often aren't emotionally ready to handle the pressure, comparison, and potential dangers online. Giving them more time to develop offline social skills and confidence can help protect their mental health." And finally: "I'm just glad I grew up on the net before all this." So, what do you think about curbing kids' access to social media? Is it a terrible idea, a great idea, or perhaps a good idea that's pretty much unenforceable? I want to hear all your thoughts and opinions in the comments below — or, if you want to write in but you prefer to stay anonymous, you can check out this anonymous form: Who knows — your comment could be included in a future BuzzFeed article. Please note: some comments have been edited for length and/or clarity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store