Punjab govt's move to acquire land under land pooling policy under HC lens
CHANDIGARH: The Punjab government's land pooling policy, under which the state planned to acquire thousands of acres of land from across the state for developing residential and industrial zones, was challenged before the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
The petitioners in this case submitted to the HC that the move to acquire such a large chunk of land would have widespread negative effects on the agrarian economy of Punjab, which is a major contributor to the nation's food grain supply.
During the hearing of the matter on Tuesday, the HC was informed that the said policy is directly contrary to the spirit and mandate of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LARR Act), which is a central legislation.
It was also submitted that the land pooling policy is being used as a tool to acquire fertile agricultural land across the state of Punjab while circumventing the mandatory procedures laid down under the LARR Act 2013, such as conducting a Social Impact Assessment (Section 4) and Environmental Impact Assessment. The LARR Act 2013 (Section 10) categorically bars the acquisition of fertile agricultural land in the ordinary course and only as a last resort.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
My Brows Look Fuller Looking Now [See Results]
NULASTIN
Learn More
Undo
The case was heard for around half and hour by the division bench headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu.
Responding to the plea, the counsel for the Punjab govt contended that the land pooling policy was notified under the 2025 policy, not under the LARR Act 2013, as argued by the petitioner. On this, the Chief Justice's bench advised the counsel for the petitioner to amend the petition accordingly to challenge the acquisition of land as per the 2025 policy.
The matter was adjourned for August 19 for further hearing.
'Now we will amend the petition challenging the land pooling policy 2025. Although we tried to convince the court that there is not much difference, on the advice of the bench, we will amend our petition accordingly. The matter has now been fixed for August 19 for further hearing,' counsel for the petitioner, Advocate Sahir Singh Virk, told TOI.
The matter reached the HC in the wake of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Naveender P K Singh of Mohali and Samita Kaur of Ludhiana. The petitioners have mainly prayed for quashing the impugned notifications dated July 4 and to restrain the state of Punjab from proceeding with the land pooling policy without adhering to the due process of law under the LARR Act, especially when such fertile agricultural land is at stake.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump gets a change of heart again on Elon Musk, says he had a really-really bad ...
It seems the US President Donald Trump cannot make up his mind on the world's richest man Elon Musk. Tesla CEO and Donald Trump have had something of an on-again-off-again relationship in the past few months -- from being Trump's "first buddy" to sharing barbs and criticism publicly. In the latest twist to the 'Frenemy tale', Trump was asked by reporters that a Gallup poll has called Elon Musk one of the most-unpopular people in the country right now. if he misses having Elon Musk around White House. To this, Trump replied that he thinks Elon Musk is a nice guy and seemingly referring to his public tiff with him, he said that he believes that "he had a bad moment, a really-really bad moment". From attending Thanksgiving dinner at Trump's house, to announcing new party to counter him At the outset of President Donald Trump's second term, Tesla CEO Elon Musk emerged as a prominent figure by the president's side, serving as the de facto head of the White House's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a bold initiative aimed at slashing federal spending. Musk's influence extended far beyond administrative duties, with the New York Times reporting that he attended "almost every meeting and many meals" with Trump, acting as both an advisor and confidant. Musk's presence was notable during high-profile diplomatic engagements, including Trump's calls with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, held at the president-elect's Mar-a-Lago club, where Musk appeared to have taken up residence. "Elon won't go home," Trump quipped to NBC News. "I can't get rid of him." The duo's bond grew personal, with Musk joining Trump for Thanksgiving dinner and hitting the golf course alongside the president's grandchildren, where Kai Trump affectionately dubbed him an "uncle." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo However, cracks in their alliance surfaced by May 2025, when Musk announced he would scale back political involvement to focus on his escalated in June over the controversial "Big, Beautiful Bill." Musk publicly slammed the legislation as "utterly insane," sparking a war of words with Trump as the Republican deadline for passage loomed. When Trump signed the bill into law in early July, Musk took a dramatic step, announcing the formation of a new political party. In response, Trump remarked that his former ally had gone "off the rails," signaling a public unraveling of their once-close relationship. As Musk charts a new political course, the fallout with Trump underscores the volatility of their partnership, leaving observers to question the future influence of the billionaire entrepreneur in Washington. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
NCERT forms expert panel to review Class 8 map after feedback on Maratha Empire depiction
NCERT forms expert panel to review Class 8 map In response to recent feedback and concerns raised over textbook content—most notably the depiction of parts of Rajasthan under the Maratha Empire in a Class 8 social science textbook—the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has announced the formation of a high-level expert committee. The move, NCERT said in a formal press release, is in line with its well-established practice of undertaking review whenever substantial academic or public input is received. 'These curricular resources, including textbooks, receive regular feedback and suggestions from various stakeholders,' the council said, noting that such feedback is essential for improving content quality. The press release emphasised that the committee will consist of domain experts from reputed institutions and relevant NCERT faculty, and will be convened by the Head of the Curriculum Department. The panel is expected to examine the content in question in light of 'available evidence' and recommend corrective action at the earliest possible time. Background: Class 8 map sparks historical dispute The committee formation comes amid growing debate over a map featured in the new Class 8 social science textbook, which shows parts of western Rajasthan, including Jaisalmer, as being under the Maratha Empire. The most prominent objection came from Chaitanya Raj Singh of Jaisalmer, who argued that 'no authentic historical sources' suggest Maratha control over Jaisalmer and called the portrayal 'factually baseless and historically misleading. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Extragrande 4BHK at 7 Mahalaxmi starts 10.81 Cr* 7 Mahalaxmi, Runwal Group Enquire Now Undo ' In an earlier clarification, Michel Danino, Chairperson of NCERT's curricular group for social science, acknowledged that the map was based on previously published maps in the public domain and developed with expert consultation. He explained that such maps depict not only areas under direct rule, but also those that had tributary or political arrangements with the Marathas, reflecting the complex and fluid nature of historical boundaries. He also conceded that while the Class 7 textbook includes a disclaimer about the approximate nature of historical borders, this caveat was mistakenly omitted from the Class 8 textbook—something he said should have been included to avoid misinterpretation. NEP-aligned curriculum and open review mechanism NCERT's current curriculum overhaul is a part of the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which led to the development of the National Curriculum Framework for Foundational Stage and the National Curriculum Framework for School Education. Aligned with these frameworks, NCERT has produced new teaching-learning materials, including textbooks. Officials stress that the review process ensures academic integrity and transparency. 'Evidence-based decisions are at the core of our process,' the council said, reaffirming its commitment to high-quality, research-driven educational content. NCERT reiterated that the new committee is not limited to a single issue, but is being formed to examine feedback on educational content across a few textbooks. The expert panel will evaluate each case thoroughly and submit a consolidated report for necessary action. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Probal Sen on why oil prices remain steady despite extra 25% tariff on India for buying Russian oil
Probal Sen , V-P, Equity Research, ICICI Securities , says oil prices are steady after new tariffs. Russia exports 4.7 million barrels of oil daily. India's imports from Russia have decreased. Replacing Russian oil is difficult. Sanctions increase logistics costs. OPEC is unwinding supply cuts. Demand is uncertain. India faces supply and cost challenges. OMCs may see reduced GRMs. Worst case: increased costs, not disrupted flows. Oil prices have remained largely unchanged after the additional 25% tariff announcement by Trump last night. What really is the oil market pricing in at this point? What assumptions could be at play here and what levels are you spotting for Brent as of now? Probal Sen: I wish I had clear definitive answers to any of those. Let us put the numbers in perspective. All said and done, Russia still exports at last count, close to about 4.7 million barrels of oil per day. They produce obviously much more, but they have some internal consumption as well, that they are seaborne in exports in that range of around 4.7 million barrels. At one point of time, India was importing close to two million barrels a day of that with most of the balance going to China. Last year, our understanding was that this crude was available to us at basically $4 -5 discounts to benchmark. Now on the face of it, with the new sanctions that the EU has put in place, this price should actually go down. But there is an additional cost that is coming through for logistics. For insurance, for arranging vessels, for freight, everything else gets costlier because of the compliance with sanctions. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo So, effectively speaking, the amount we can import has actually reduced. Some reports indicate on July 25, we imported about 1.5 million barrels, and that is already way down from the 2 million barrel a day number that I mentioned which was there last year. In terms of global impact, replacing 4.7 million barrels of oil per day from the global supplies is not going to be easy. Trump's attempt is basically to make it costlier to trade with Russia and reduce the netbacks that they are getting from these exports. Obviously, the kind of supply uncertainty that comes through if people see those flows getting impacted, then obviously prices can escalate very sharply. The reason perhaps prices have not moved all that much is one, OPEC at the same time is unwinding most of its two million barrel a day supply cuts that they had put in place for a long time and two, there is probably a belief that these barrels will probably get more difficult to export and the flows might become costlier. It's not that these supplies would completely go off the global trade system altogether. Plus the fact that demand obviously is not really growing as much as probably people would like, estimates are varied for CY25. OPEC has a much more optimistic one million barrel a day plus kind of an estimate. Demand is uncertain while supply can be a little bit constrained, but as of now, people are looking in a wait- and-watch mode before taking a call on where prices will move. For India, it is definitely a negative with both supply certainty as well as the cost of those supplies, becoming more adverse than they were earlier. Live Events You Might Also Like: Buy the dip and go for India-centric portfolio; US market more likely to correct sharply than India: Sandeep Tandon What will be the impact on OMCs in both cases? Either we buy from Russia or we do not buy oil from Russia and find another alternative? Probal Sen: If we continue to buy from Russia, our understanding is that while there is still maybe a little bit of a discount with respect to benchmarks, that level of discount has come off quite a bit. So, to do a very simple math, if you are buying 25% of your requirements from Russia and you get a discount of let us say $5 versus benchmark, that is a straight $1.25 per barrel addition to your GRM. If that discount actually comes down to $1, that is just about a 25% advantage, so that is the clear impact that will be there if this crude continues to flow. If you do not get any of this crude and you have to sort of resort to alternate sources of crude at this point of time, obviously again, the same math applies that at this point of time or at your peak, you were taking as much as 40% of your requirements from Russia at a discount of somewhere around $4 to $5 and that was giving you an additional $2 a barrel in terms of GRM. That GRM advantage basically goes away. On top of it, Singapore GRMs have already softened to less than $3 in recent weeks and they are averaging about $2 lower at this point of time if I take July average or August till date versus Q1. In any case, the earnings situation in the near term would look a little bit more vulnerable. What is the worst case scenario for both India and for the listed energy universe? Is it the worst case for OMCs and oil refiners as well? Probal Sen: Honestly, the worst case is that these flows get restricted and there are near-term constraints on arranging crude in the first place from alternate sources. But frankly, it is a very unlikely scenario that is at least in my limited experience, that is not the way global trade works. I would say the worst case is that the costs basically go up by maybe a couple of dollars and therefore GRMs remain under pressure. I would not see anything other than that playing out. Obviously one cannot predict. There are multiple conflicts going on in several parts of the world and the US has been fairly unpredictable in terms of its decisions. But I do not think the flows will get disrupted beyond basically an increase in the cost. With OPEC plus over supply superseding the impact of the Russian supply being out of the global supply equation, will oil prices fall or the other threat that Donald Trump could be coming out with similar sanctions on the other nations that are importing oil from Russia., will it take the oil prices higher if at all that takes place? Probal Sen: Oil prices will basically go higher if on the ground, we see supplies being reduced from Russia's side. Tracking the data in terms of shipping data and flow data shows the supplies going out of the system which means it is not something that will be invisible. We will start to see impact on the ground in terms of refinery runs, availability of crude and so on and so forth. We would probably see a much more bullish reaction. You Might Also Like: Biggest positive trigger for markets would be a sustainable resolution of tariff issue: Abhay Agarwal At this point of time, based on news events, based on pronouncements, based on intent, people are still probably waiting and watching to see how all of this plays out on the ground and whether this has an impact on flows coming out of Russia. I still think you may not see a huge spike in crude prices, but I would not advocate for any softness either. You are probably likely to see a $70-75 range at this point of time and then a definitive move either way depending on how all of this plays out over the next couple of months. You Might Also Like: Oil prices rise on US demand strength, though sanctions uncertainty remains
