Solario's Renaissance Masterpiece 'Madonna and Child' Recovered 50 Years After Theft
News that the Painting had surfaced in Britain went viral earlier this year after the owner, Barbara de Dozsa of Norfolk, attempted to sell the Painting at auction.
Baroness de Dozsa had acquired the painting from her deceased former husband, Baron de Dozsa, who apparently bought the painting in good faith in Austria in 1973 shortly after the theft.
In an effort to claim ownership of the Solario, Mrs. de Dozsa initially cited the UK Limitations Act of 1980 which states that a person who buys stolen goods can be recognised as the legal owner if the purchase was unconnected to the theft after more than six years.
However, Christopher A. Marinello, art lawyer and founder of Art Recovery International (ARI) challenged the claim, calling it "nonsense", and has now recovered the painting after negotiations.
"While the U.K. Limitations Act certainly supported her position, the fact that the Painting was listed on the Interpol and Carabinieri stolen art databases meant that the painting could never be sold, exhibited, or even transported without the risk of being seized", Marinello said.
Acquired by Belluno in 1872, it was among several works stolen from the museum a century later. The painting originally surfaced in 2017 when De Dozsa tried to sell it through a regional auction house. The sale was spotted by someone linked to the Belluno museum but the painting was handed back to De Dozsa in 2020 as delays caused by the Covid lockdown led to the Italian authorities being unable to supply the required documents to restore ownership to the museum.
After months of self-contemplation and some gentle arm-twisting from Marinello Mrs. de Dozsa eventually agreed to release the painting unconditionally to the Civic Museum of Belluno.
Marinello added: "When it comes to returning stolen art and doing the right thing, I can be annoyingly persistent. But ultimately, it was Barbara de Dozsa's decision to make, and she chose wisely. Her kindness has restored my faith in people who unknowingly come into possession of stolen or looted works of art."
The Solario was formally returned at a small ceremony at the Civic Museum of Belluno on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
7 hours ago
- New York Times
Mike Lynch's Estate Ordered to Pay Hewlett Packard $945 Million
The estate of Mike Lynch, the British technology executive who died when his yacht sank off the Italian coast last summer, and his former business partner owe Hewlett Packard Enterprise more than 700 million pounds ($945 million) over the 2011 sale of his company to Hewlett-Packard, a London judge ruled on Tuesday. The decision, which had been delayed several months after the death of Mr. Lynch, was a long-awaited development in the legal fight over Autonomy, the software company he sold to Hewlett-Packard for $11 billion. Hewlett-Packard later accused Mr. Lynch and others of fraudulently inflating the company's value. The amount was far less than the $4 billion sought by Hewlett Packard Enterprise, a successor company to Hewlett-Packard. 'I consider that HP's claim was always substantially exaggerated,' the presiding judge, Robert Hildyard, wrote in the decision. But the judgment is more than the current value of the Lynch estate, which The Times of London recently appraised at about £473 million. The estate is on the hook for a majority of the damages owed to Hewlett Packard Enterprise. The judgment was the latest twist in Mr. Lynch's story. He had been heralded as Britain's answer to Bill Gates after the Autonomy sale, but soon after that deal Hewlett-Packard accused top Autonomy executives, including Mr. Lynch, of lying about the state of the business, and wrote down the value of Autonomy by $8.8 billion. In 2015, Hewlett-Packard accused the British executive and the company's former chief financial officer, Sushovan Hussain, of fraud and sued them in a London court. Both men denied the allegations. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Android Authority
10 hours ago
- Android Authority
Here's why that embattled retro gaming YouTuber might not be so innocent
TL;DR Embattled retro gaming YouTuber Once Were Nerd left out key incriminating details in his initial video. Earlier videos uploaded to the channel link to blog posts sharing ROM and BIOS downloads. He may have also sold consoles, with ROMs, on the secondhand market via Facebook. Creating emulation-focused content online is risky business, since the entire industry is filled with legal gray areas. Italian YouTuber Once Were Nerd found this out the hard way, with authorities seizing dozens of consoles and threatening jail time for sharing copyrighted content. While his initial response video proclaimed innocence, new details have come to light that tell a different story. While the creater never explicitly shared ROMs, he may have played a little too fast and loose for his own good. In a video posted in January, Once Were Nerd creator Francesco Salicini ran through the steps to set up a new emulation handheld (h/t Monto Tech). While he clearly wants to avoid giving details on YouTube, he links to a blog post on his website with the text 'Where to find ROMs' in the description. The link to the blog post has since been removed, but it's still visible in the Wayback machine (translated below). That blog post (which is still live as of writing) links to websites with ROM and BIOS downloads, both of which are protected by copyright. The post does include a disclaimer asking readers to only download ROMs for games they legally own, but this is a very thin legal defense. The video also recommends buying a handheld that ships with a microSD card filled with ROMs, then copying those ROMs to your other gaming handhelds. In addition to this, users on the RetroAchievements forums uncovered that he was auctioning used handhelds on his Facebook page. These included the original microSD cards filled with games, which refutes his initial claims that he did not share or profit from copyrighted material. Still, it's worth pointing out that all of these handhelds are readily available to buy on Amazon. Handing down jail time to a YouTuber for a relatively minor offense while ignoring the retailers and middlemen who are actively profiting off of selling copyrighted materials isn't a great precedent to set for content creators in the future. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
New York Times
16 hours ago
- New York Times
The Death of a Mother and Child in Rome Stumped Police, So They Called a TV Show
Rome's largest park, Villa Doria Pamphili, is something of a haven from the city's bustle and occasional chaos, a place for runners and picnickers and anyone seeking a bit of nature. That vision was shattered last month by the discovery of two bodies: a toddler and a woman, found naked within hours of each other in the brush near an edge of the park. Investigators were stumped. There were no identifying documents, and the woman's body was so decomposed it would have been difficult for anyone to identify her visually. The gruesome case immediately brought sensationalist front-page headlines — 'Rome, horror in the park, woman and child dead' read one in Rome's daily La Repubblica. Il Corriere della Sera, in Milan, called it 'a whodunit in a park in Rome.' The country was hooked; the police under pressure. With few leads, and a media frenzy underway, investigators took an unusual step. A spokeswoman appeared on a popular television show called 'Chi l'ha Visto?' — or 'Who Has Seen Him?' — to ask for the public's help. And viewers of the show, which looks for missing people, did what they had done for 37 seasons: They searched their memories for clues. All the police had to go on was that the woman had four visible tattoos and that a preliminary autopsy had revealed the child was her daughter. People who frequented the park recalled seeing a young woman and child that may have fit that description in the company of a man. What unfolded, over several weekly shows, was a sad tale of a young Russian woman's shattered dream of creating a life for herself abroad. With each revelation, the cachet of 'Chi l'ha Visto?' increased, as did questions about the police's lack of intervention when concerned passers-by had called them about the couple and the child. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
