Thousands of Alcoholics Anonymous members in Vancouver for convention
More than 35,000 people are expected to flood downtown Vancouver for the International Alcoholics Anonymous Convention, which is returning after a 10-year hiatus.
The three-day conference is normally held every five years, but the 2020 event was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ballrooms and other spaces at the Vancouver Convention Centre will hold AA meetings, events and other gatherings as a way for attendees to share their journey to sobriety.
Long-time AA member Vera F. arrived this week from Massachusetts. She told CTV News her road to recovery began in 1989 after years of alcohol abuse.
She explained that her drinking led to broken relationships, lost jobs and even jail time after she was arrested in 1986 for driving under the influence – which ended with her flipping her truck on the highway, sending her sliding 300 feet.
Four decades later, her arm remains with significant scarring and injuries.
'This is a direct result of my drinking,' said Vera. 'This is a reminder of what my life looked like before Alcoholics Anonymous.'
She credits the program for saving her life and giving her a renewed sense of purpose.
Over the next three days, Vera and the other members from around the world will attend meetings and share their stories before gathering at BC Place for a final celebration on Saturday.
The three-day event has filled nearly 96,000 hotel room nights, which will contribute to the expected $63 million boost to the local economy, according to new figures from Destination Vancouver.
For those who are seeking help for a drinking problem, more information can be found on the AA website.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
36 minutes ago
- CTV News
Clicks! Likes! Sugar! Gambling! In a world of quick pleasures, an addiction expert says it might be time for a ‘dopamine fast'
A couple are silhouetted against the smoke filled sky as they both look on their smart phones in Britannia Beach, B.C., Friday, October 2, 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward Maybe you'd like to spend time on hobbies or hang out with friends, but nothing feels as exciting and engaging as it used to –– so you just squander another hour on social media. Your problem may have to do with your dopamine levels. In many parts of the world, people are fed media, activities and foods that can cause dopamine to surge and throw the balance off, and that could affect your mental health, according to Dr. Anna Lembke, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University School of Medicine, chief of the Stanford Addiction Medicine Dual Diagnosis Clinic and author of 'Dopamine Nation: Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence.' Lembke spoke with CNN about what dopamine is, what it does and how you can find better balance. This conversation has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity. CNN: What is dopamine exactly? Dr. Anna Lembke: Dopamine is a chemical we make in our brain. Specifically, it's a neurotransmitter. Neurotransmitters allow for fine-tuned regulation of electrical circuits. Basically, our brain is a bunch of electrical circuits, a bunch of wires in the form of neurons that conduct electrical signals that allow for information processing — the job of our brains. Dopamine has many functions, but in the last 75 years or so, it's been identified as a key player in pleasure, reward and motivation. It's not the only neurotransmitter involved in that process, but it has become a kind of common currency for neuroscientists to measure the reinforcing potential of different substances and behaviors. CNN: How does dopamine impact our mental health? Lembke: It plays a central role in the phenomenology of addiction. Addiction is a brain disease where there's dysregulation in a specific reward pathway, a specific circuit in the brain, and dopamine plays a critical role in the brain's reward pathway. When we do something that's reinforcing, that releases dopamine in the reward pathway and tells our brain, 'Oh, that's something you need to do more of. That's important for survival.' The highly reinforcing substances and behaviors that we have engineered and have access to now are overwhelming the system. (They) release so much dopamine all at once in the reward pathway that the brain has to adapt or compensate by downregulating dopamine transmission. The result is that, over time, we can enter into a chronic dopamine-deficit state, where we have essentially changed our hedonic or joy set point. Now we need more of our reward — and more potent forms –– not to feel good, but just to stop feeling bad. And when we're not 'using,' we're experiencing the universal symptoms of withdrawal from any addictive substance or behavior like anxiety, irritability, insomnia, dysphoria and craving. CNN: Does this just affect people who have an addiction to drugs or alcohol? Lembke: We're all now kind of on the spectrum of compulsive overconsumption, moving toward addiction, which is resetting our hedonic threshold –– or joy set point. We need more and more of these reinforcers to feel any pleasure at all, and when we're not using, we're dysphoric, we're irritable, we can't sleep. CNN: What kinds of things risk putting us into dopamine deficit? Lembke: A lot of different things release dopamine in the reward pathway, including things that are good for us, like learning or spending time with friends. It's not that dopamine is the villain here, that dopamine release is bad –– not at all. The problem is that we've now engineered old-fashioned drugs to be more potent than ever before, and we've also created drugs that never existed before, like digital media, like 'drugified' foods. We've even taken healthy behaviors like exercise and drugified them by (tracking) ourselves and ranking ourselves and adding in social media and social comparisons. We're now seeing more and more and more people addicted to social media, online pornography, online gambling, video games and all manner of addictive digital media. There's emerging evidence that these digital media activate the same reward pathways as drugs and alcohol and cause the same kinds of dysregulations as we see in other addictions. It's the same thing with sugar. Ultraprocessed foods cause dopamine release, and the reward pathway leads to the same kinds of behaviors as when people get addicted to drugs and alcohol. There's a growing consensus that it's basically the same disease process, just with a different object of desire or reward. CNN: How can we find out if a substance or behavior is problematic? Lembke: When we look at what makes something addictive, there are several factors. One is potency, which refers to how much dopamine is released in the reward pathway and how quickly it's released. But other factors are simple things like access. We know that the easier it is to access a reinforcing substance or behavior, the more likely people are to use it and hence get addicted to it. We now live in this world of very easy, frictionless access to a lot of rewarding substances and behaviors. Digital media in particular is a 24/7 mobile access — anytime, anywhere, to an almost infinite source. The other thing that makes something addictive is the quantity and frequency of exposure. The more dopamine hits the brain gets, the more likely it is to change and adapt in a way that can create a disease of addiction. (Social media algorithms are) actually engineered to overcome tolerance and create novelty, to encourage people to keep searching for the same or similar rewards as what they've already viewed but hopefully a little bit better. The criteria for diagnosing addiction are pretty much the same across different definitions. You're looking for the four C's: out-of-control use, compulsive use, craving and consequences — especially continued use despite consequences — as well as the physiologic criteria that indicate biological dependence. Those would be tolerance, needing more (or more potent forms) over time to get the same effect, and withdrawal when you try to stop using. CNN: What can we do to address dopamine deficit? Lembke: What I recommend is a 30-day abstinence trial, colloquially called a 'dopamine fast,' from the drug of choice. Not from all rewards but just from the problematic substance or behavior to see how difficult it is to stop — and also to see if you feel better after four weeks. Why four weeks? Because that's, on average, the amount of time it takes to reset reward pathways, at least phenomenologically. I always warn people, they're going to feel worse before they feel better. But if they get through the first 10 to 14 days, often they will feel much better. After the abstinence trial, when people want to go back to using, they just need to be very specific about what they're going to use, how much, how often, in what circumstances, how they're going to track it, and what their red flags will be for slipping back into old habits. Then they can reevaluate whether they can really use in moderation. When it comes to food, obviously, people can't abstain, and nor should they try. But they can abstain from sugar. They can abstain from ultraprocessed foods. How do we engage in pleasurable things but stop before we get to dopamine deficit? Lembke: It's not about not having pleasure in life; it is about resetting the balance so that simple pleasures are rewarding again. That is not going to happen if people are constantly indulging in these frictionless, high-potency rewards. I talk a lot about 'self-binding' and making sure we don't constantly surround ourselves with easy access to these high-potency, cheap pleasures so we don't get into that problem in the first place. But it takes intentionality because we live in a world where we're constantly being invited to consume, and we're told that the more we consume, the happier we'll be. So, it does take planning and intentionality to create barriers between ourselves and the many drugs out there. Self-binding can mean physical barriers. If the issue is food, not having ultraprocessed food or sugary food in the house. If it's cannabis, not having pot in the house, not having alcohol. Now, if it's some form of digital media, you can use time as a self-binding strategy: 'I'm only going to use on these days for this amount of time with these people.' Other people are a very important form of self-binding. We tend to do what those around us are doing, so try to hang out with people who are using substances and behaviors in a way that you want to use them. Madeline Holcombe, CNN
CBC
5 hours ago
- CBC
CFIA confirms Prince Edward Island's 1st case of dermo, in oysters from Egmont Bay
Canadian Food Inspection Agency lab tests have confirmed the presence of the highly damaging mollusc disease dermo in oysters from P.E.I.'s Egmont Bay. "This is the first confirmed case of dermo in P.E.I.," the agency said in a news release issued Friday evening. "Dermo does not pose a risk to human health or food safety, but it can cause increased oyster mortality and decreased growth rates." In a separate email, CFIA also said that tests had confirmed the first cases of both dermo and MSX for the province of Quebec, in oyster samples collected in Chaleur Bay. It's been eight months since what was considered the first detection of dermo in Canadian waters, in oysters from Spence Cove, about five kilometres west of the Confederation Bridge in New Brunswick. Dermo disease or Perkinsosis, caused by a parasite called Perkinsus marinus, had previously been detected in Atlantic waters between Mexico and Maine. It affects both cultured and wild American oysters (Crassostrea virginica). Oyster harvesters in P.E.I. fear overfishing, empty rivers next spring amid MSX concerns 25 days ago Duration 2:43 More than 80 of the Island's wild oyster harvesters had to find new places to fish after the MSX parasite forced the shutdown of Bedeque Bay last year. As CBC's Nancy Russell reports, the pressure to find more oysters has meant some rivers are being fished out — and that could mean no catches next spring. "Outbreaks of Perkinsosis usually occur with warm summer water temperatures above 20 C," a British government fact sheet on the disease says. "Clinical signs may include pale digestive glands, gaping, shrinking of the mantle away from the outer edge of the shell and stunted growth." The CFIA news release said dermo "does not affect other bivalves in this area, including mussels, scallops or clams." Already dealing with MSX News of the positive test results from Egmont Bay will be another blow to the Island's oyster industry, which has been reeling from last July's discovery of MSX, short for multinucleate sphere unknown. That oyster disease was first detected in samples from P.E.I.'s Bedeque Bay, with more cases confirmed in other areas of the province in the months that followed. Like dermo, it affects only oysters and not the humans eating oysters from waters known to have MSX. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency says the parasite that causes dermo is easily transmitted among oysters, mostly when they are between one and three years of age. "Mortality rates are variable but are typically 50 per cent to 75 per cent," the agency says in a factsheet on its website. CFIA has power to limit movement In a statement to CBC News last month, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency acknowledged that it had been asked to test P.E.I. oyster samples for dermo, but said it had no results to share at that time. The agency did go on to outline what would happen if the samples did test positive. If a product in a PCZ [primary control zone] is deemed to be a potential risk, its movement would be controlled. — Canadian Food Inspection Agency "To prevent the spread of dermo or any other animal diseases, the CFIA may establish a primary control zone (PCZ) in areas where a disease is suspected to occur," the statement said. That kind of move would let the agency control how oysters are handled and shipped within and outside the zone. "For example, if a product in a PCZ is deemed to be a potential risk, its movement would be controlled; this means that a permit from the CFIA would be required to move this product within, through and outside of the PCZ," the statement said. "Any new PCZs would be posted as soon as possible on CFIA's website. When a new PCZ is put in place, the CFIA also notifies its provincial partners, stakeholders, Indigenous communities and industry through pre-existing communications channels."
National Post
5 hours ago
- National Post
Drinking on the rise among Canada's Gen Z: international survey
Drinking among Gen Zers is on the rise in many major markets throughout the world, including Canada, according to IWSR, a British-based firm that analyzes drinking patterns. Article content Previous research about Gen Z alcohol consumption that painted them as abstainers. For example, in 2020, researchers from the University of Michigan reported that abstention was steadily increasing among college-age Americans. In August 2024, a Gallup study found 65 per cent of U.S. adults under 35 considered drinking unhealthy. Article content Article content Article content An IWSR research survey conducted in March has turned that picture of Gen Z on its head. 'The idea that Gen Z drinkers are moderating significantly more than other generations isn't backed up by the data in our latest survey,' says Richard Halstead, IWSR's COO Consumer Insights. Article content The percentage of Canada's Gen Z legal drinking-age (LDA) population who reported drinking rose from 56 per cent in spring 2023 to 69 per cent in spring 2025. Article content Gen Z drinking more 'is based on what we call 'participation rate,'' says Halstead. To be considered a drinker, respondents must have had one or more drinks in the past six months, he wrote to National Post in an email. Article content The recent survey found a third of Canadian Gen Z drinkers reported that the last time they drank it was at a bar, restaurant or club — significantly higher than Canadian drinkers as a whole. Nearly four in five reported consuming spirits, which is higher overall than all drinkers in Canada. Article content How does Gen Z compare to the other generational cohorts? Article content The Canadian data for the other generational cohorts shows a small increase among Millennials: 71 per cent (April 2023) to 75 per cent (March 2025). However, alcohol consumption fell for Gen Xers (77 per cent in 2023 to 76 per cent in 2025) and Boomers (76 per cent in 2023 down to 72 per cent in 2025). Article content IWSR defines these age cohorts as follows: Gen Z (18−27); Millennials (28−43); Gen X (44−59); Boomers (60+). Article content What is contributing to increased Gen Z alcohol consumption? Article content Increasing income played a role in alcohol consumption among Gen Z drinkers, says Halstead. 'As more Gen Z LDA drinkers approach their mid-twenties, their disposable income is increasing, and that generally correlates with increased alcohol purchases.' Article content IWSR research says cost-of-living pressures have meant most consumers focused more on buying essentials and staying home, rather than going out drinking. Article content Otherwise, Halstead says the impact of demographic factors such as gender and household income has 'been fairly consistent in Canada.' Instead, he adds, an increasing number of people are reaching legal drinking age within Gen Z, boosting consumption for that cohort. Article content Gen Z alcohol consumption is also growing in other key markets. In the U.S., consumption among Gen Z consumers rose from 46 per cent to 70 per cent over the same time-period. In the U.K. it jumped from 66 per cent to 76 per cent, in India up from 60 per cent to 70 per cent and in Australia up from 61 per cent to 83 per cent. Article content
