logo
Nearly all of Australia's top CEOs get performance bonuses — regardless of performance

Nearly all of Australia's top CEOs get performance bonuses — regardless of performance

SBS Australia24-06-2025
Almost all of Australia's top chief executives are, according to their boards at least, knocking it out of the park in terms of performance. That is despite sluggish productivity, persistently high carbon emissions, rising inequality and Australia's public spending on research and development being among the lowest in the OECD. According to new data from the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, 91 per cent of Australia's top chief executive officers (CEOs) received some form of performance bonus last year. That elevated their pay well above their base salaries (which were already over $1 million). Only five CEOs out of 142 eligible for a bonus received zero. The fact nearly all of Australia's top CEOs are receiving these performance bonuses shows performance pay is more about rewarding conformity and discipline than risk-taking and entrepreneurship.
Do we really believe 91 per cent of our CEOs made big bets that paid off last year? A more plausible explanation is that we simply reward executives for not stuffing up. Their customer base is growing in line with population growth and their prices are rising faster than their cost of production, which means profits rise without too much effort.
Take the electricity industry for example. It's hard to imagine an industry in which change is more inevitable than the industry responsible for transitioning away from gas and coal-fired power stations to renewable energy. But according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the electricity, gas and water industry spends a mere 0.24 per cent of sales on research and development each year. That is half the economy-wide average. Unfortunately, innovation does not appear to be a prerequisite for CEOs being rewarded with large bonuses. According to Energy Australia, its CEO Mark Collette (base salary over $1 million) recently challenged a room full of other well-paid leaders at Australian Energy Week to continuously ask themselves: "Will this make energy cheaper?"
However instead of focusing on keeping costs down for consumers, companies have sometimes resorted to misleading statements. Energy Australia recently admitted to misleading customers by claiming the coal and gas-fired electricity it was selling was "carbon neutral". Energy Australia was buying widely used carbon offsets to make the claim the fossil-fuel fired electricity it was selling was carbon neutral. In its apology, Energy Australia conceded "offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use". While it is clear Energy Australia's spending on carbon credits did nothing to make the company's energy cheaper, it is not yet clear if the board will award a "performance bonus".
Another example of the lack of relationship between CEO pay and organisational performance is Australia's university sector. The vice chancellors of Australian universities are among the best paid in the world, with over a dozen Australian earning more than the head of Cambridge University.
But there is no correlation between student satisfaction and vice chancellor pay. And while Australian vice chancellor pay has been soaring, Australian universities have been slipping steadily down international rankings for university quality.
While performance-based bonuses and incentives are common among CEOs and vice chancellors, the same is not true for lower-paid staff. Instead, these staff are often asked to "do more, with less" even as their real wages have declined. Universities have seen a notable decline in academic staff per student while the gap between the pay of lecturers and vice chancellors has skyrocketed.
Extremely high salaries for CEOs and vice chancellors have done nothing to boost Australian productivity growth, or our performance in global rankings for our universities, research and development or innovation. Paying out large bonuses for average performance has done little to help either. Inequality in Australia is rising. As long as CEO pay is rising faster than the minimum wages, that gap will continue to widen. The latest data showed CEO salaries are 55 times that of the average worker.
While it is true it is hard to measure the performance of a CEO, it's also hard to measure the care and attention provided by a childcare worker, the compassion of an aged care nurse, the helpfulness of a call centre operator or the enthusiasm of a lecturer. Few CEOs think we need bonuses to motivate the vast majority of Australian workers. But it is heresy to suggest those at the top of a big organisation could simply work diligently without a giant bonus. So, it's not just income that is unequal in Australia. We expect a lot more self-motivation from those at the bottom of the income distribution than those at the very top.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aussies explode over Albo's latest cash grab
Aussies explode over Albo's latest cash grab

Daily Telegraph

time9 minutes ago

  • Daily Telegraph

Aussies explode over Albo's latest cash grab

Don't miss out on the headlines from Motoring. Followed categories will be added to My News. Earlier this week, we published a story about the Federal Government's intention to introduce a road user charge (RUC) for electric vehicle (EV) owners. A per-kilometre tax to replace the fuel excise revenue lost as more Australians switch to electric vehicles. The proposal encouraged more than 2000 readers to comment. What followed was a passionate public policy debate, part stand-up comedy and a masterclass in Australian scepticism. RELATED: Carmaker's fury over Albo's new road tax Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers has long flagged the development of a new road-user charge across Australia for drivers of electric vehicles to ensure EV drivers are contributing a fair share to road upgrades. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman While the conversation is divided, a large majority of readers believe EV drivers should contribute to road maintenance. But many also say the policy must be fair, transparent and apply equally across all vehicle types. 'Tax the trucks, not the Teslas,' one reader wrote, summing up a sentiment that hundreds of readers agreed with. Another, HelpMeOverHere, accused the government of double standards: 'A mining truck the size of a suburban street guzzles thousands of litres a week and gets all the fuel tax refunded.' The 'free ride' is over Many of our readers argue it's simply time for EV owners to pay their way. They believe that EV owners are currently getting a 'free ride' by avoiding the fuel excise, which raises more than $15 billion annually. 'There is not one solitary argument that supports the notion that EV drivers should be able to use the roads and not contribute to their upkeep. Not one,' nonedeplume said. RELATED: New EV tax makes no sense Heavy vehicles cause heavy road damage. Stephen argued: 'EV manufacturers are upset that the free ride is coming to an end and the EV drivers will have to pay to use the road like everyone else.' But others saw it less as fairness, more as the government's latest 'gotcha' tax. 'It's always the proletariat that has to pay for incompetent government,' Walker Texas Ranger said. 'Just another tax to prevent us from moving up in the world.' Some readers proposed replacing the fuel excise entirely with a universal RUC. 'Why don't we scrap the fuel excise and then just apply a RUC to all road users - that would then be fair to ALL road users regardless of what type of fuel (petrol, diesel, EV, hybrid),' Gaynor said. The trucking elephant in the room A big chunk of outrage was over Australia's heavy freight industry. Many said heavy vehicles are the 'culprits' and should pay more, given their impact on infrastructure. Fair enough. RELATED: What new Albo road tax would mean for you EV owners fear a new road tax will hit them harder than fuel guzzlers. Picture: AFP Infrastructure Australia data shows that one five-axle truck causes the same road wear as 2900 cars. The actual ratio varies depending on factors like axle weight and road construction, but a truck's damage is often cited as being much higher than 2900. Currently, heavy vehicles pay a RUC of 32.4 cents per litre, set to rise 6 per cent annually until 2025-2026. They also pay the federal fuel excise, now around 51-52 cents per litre - but operators can claim back the difference through fuel tax credits, reducing their net cost by about 20 cents per litre. 'Trucks are the issue,' Grande_choice said. 'All those regional roads are getting slammed by trucks but not EVs.' Aussie drivers are split over who should really pay the price. Picture NCA Newswire / Gaye Gerard Rural drivers fear being slugged harder Polestar Australia's managing director Scott Maynard said a one-size-fits-all approach could unfairly hit regional drivers who travel long distances for essential services. According to Australians tend to drive longer distances for essentials and often live further out because property is more affordable. 'People in regional areas generally are poorer and drive more distances to get from A to B,' BobtheBuilder said. 'Hence why the CEO (Scott Maynard) makes the point that they will be discriminated against.' Reader Vicki agreed: 'I'm rural and 75km from my nearest town, doctor, supermarket…city EV owners with public transport will cost them nothing, and rural/regional drivers big money. When the policy debate turned into a comedy set In between the policy arguments came some memorable one-liners that had me chuckling hard. 'If it can't be eaten or plucked, it will be taxed.' 'The word of the day is fungible.' 'I'm just going to wait until a hamster-powered car comes out.' 'How about we bring in a tax on breathing?' Another day, another tax for Albo?. Picture: NewsWire / Nikki Short The green glow-up….or greenwash? Some readers went straight for the environmental jugular. 'It's time the idealists wake up to the fact that electric cars aren't better for the environment…they will never pay off the carbon footprint cost of making the batteries,' Mark wrote. But Adam added, 'battery disposal facilities are already at 90+ per cent recyclability…the 'cut even' point for emissions is approx 37,000km.' Trusting the government…like trusting a cheating ex Underlying much of the conversation was the distrust of the government. Even commenters who back the idea of EVs paying said they didn't trust Canberra to use the money for roads. 'For FY23-24 the fuel excise raised $15b while [the] government only spent $10bn on roads,' Bryn wrote. 'When is it enough?' 'It's just revenue raising,' Jeff said. 'Once they have you hooked, they tax you.' The road ahead So the consensus? Most readers agree that EV drivers should pay and contribute. But it's simple, they want it to be fair. If the government can deliver that, they might just win people over. But if not, they'll be left with a few angry Australians. Originally published as Aussies explode over Albo's latest cash grab

‘Blown away': $49 item making 31yo more than $100,000
‘Blown away': $49 item making 31yo more than $100,000

News.com.au

time19 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

‘Blown away': $49 item making 31yo more than $100,000

When Catie O'Neill was in the midst of a turbulent hair journey, she came up with a more than $100,000 business idea to solve it. The 31-year-old Melbourne local is the founder of My Glow 2, a body exfoliator brand that has garnered a cult following and is now a seven-figure business. However, while growing the business, she found herself stuck in a frustrating hair cycle. 'It would go thick and beautiful and then it would start snapping,' she told Ms O'Neill couldn't work out why her hair was so unstable, she believed she was doing all the right things. Eventually she saw a dermatologist, who told her sun damage was messing up her locks and that was the moment she realised there was a gap in the market for hair protection. This is when the 31-year-old came up with her second big business idea, Shirley's Secret, a hair mist that protects against UV damage. 'I spent two years creating a formula that focuses on scalp care and length protection, shielding hair from UV, pollution, and daily stress,' she said. 'It's like a sunscreen for your hair, but designed to be worn every day.' The 31-year-old founder said that, while there are so many products on the market that aim to fix damaged hair, there aren't that many around to prevent it. The business launched in May this year and to great success, with the brand selling over 1000 units in 72 hours. 'We were completely blown away,' she said. The $49 product didn't sellout but that was because she had worked hard to prepare for launch with the right stock levels. 'I didn't want to be a sellout brand,' she said. The fact the brand hasn't sold-out, though, doesn't mean it hasn't been a roaring success. In fact, Ms O'Neill revealed the brand is on 'track to be a six-figure business' within 12 months. The brand founder is stoked because she had to invest over $100,000 to launch the business and has decided to put-off things like becoming a homeowner to bet on her idea. 'You've got to make the decision. Do I take a gamble on myself? Or take the safer option, which is investing into real estate,' she said. For Ms O'Neill, it was a no-brainer because she's 'highly confident' in her own abilities, the brand, and the product, and the response so far has just confirmed it. Coming up with her hair protection idea was a 'light-bulb' moment and all the feedback she was receiving prior to the launch was positive. 'When I speak to people, they're like, 'wow! Why didn't I think of that?'' she said. The young Aussie argued that getting a response like that is as good as formal 'market research' because you immediately know your idea is hitting a nerve. It has also helped that this isn't her first rodeo. She launched her first business when she was 23 and, when she was younger, she found it difficult when people wouldn't take her 'seriously', but now she is far more confident. 'This time around I can navigate more difficult conversations with a lot more confidence and it is like water off a duck's back,' she said. She's also aware of what not to do. In the past she has fallen into the trap of 'chasing the shiny object' but this time she's reinvesting everything back into her one idea.

Inside Seven's big Block poaching gamble for viewers
Inside Seven's big Block poaching gamble for viewers

News.com.au

time39 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Inside Seven's big Block poaching gamble for viewers

Channel 7 is raiding its rival's tool shed, and it's hard not to call it a Blockxodus. In a major reality TV shake-up, former The Block judge Neale Whitaker will front the 2026 season of My Reno Rules, jumping to Seven after more than a decade critiquing Nine's flagship renovation hit. He was replaced by Whitefox chief executive Marty Fox in 2023, with Whitaker guest appearing in the 2023 and 2024 seasons respectively. Joining him on the judging panel is Cohen Handler co-founder Simon Cohen – the same agency where fellow former Block buyers' advocate Nicole Jacobs is now managing director for Victoria. Ms Jacobs famously sold her own Hampton home, along with several of her neighbours' properties, to The Block in 2021. Interiors stylist Julia Green completes the line-up, bringing her bold, magazine-perfect designs and industry clout from years at the helm of her Greenhouse Interiors brand. Earlier this month Seven announced LMCT+ founder Adrian 'Lambo Guy' Portelli is stepping in as principal sponsor and will take the spotlight in the show's live grand final. Portelli made headlines last year splashing more than $27m on eight Block homes and gifting $50,000 to Sunrise host Alex Cullen in a stunt that ended the presenter's Nine career. For My Reno Rules, he will give away two multimillion-dollar homes to viewers in a finale Seven is banking on to rival The Block's Sunday auction night event. Industry sources say the 2026 season will see four teams transforming two rundown Melbourne homes under the watch of host Dr Chris Brown, competing for a major cash prize while viewers have the unprecedented chance to win one of the finished properties. Whitaker's defection is the most high-profile of the moves, while Cohen's professional link to Jacobs ties the series even more closely to Nine's property empire. The changes come as The Block faces its own challenges, with insiders pointing to softening property markets and the underperformance of spin-offs such as Listing Melbourne. While that show tried to channel the glamour of Luxe Listings Sydney where Cohen was a central figure, it never connected with audiences. An industry insider told the Herald Sun there was 'plenty of curiosity' about how the format will perform, but warned Seven faces a mammoth task. 'People are interested, but The Block is a juggernaut, it's been unbeatable for years and My Reno Rules has existed in various forms for over a decade,' the source said. 'This is a big swing, but whether it lands is another story. 'Seven's gamble is clear. Stack the line-up with personalities Block fans already know, add Portelli's high-octane profile, and hope the format finally hits its stride.' Meanwhile, the source revealed Mitre 10 is reportedly in talks to come on board as a major sponsor after being shunned by The Block in favour of Bunnings this year. A deal would give Seven another direct link to its rival's past, and the hardware chain a chance to reclaim prime time renovation turf it once dominated. My Reno Rules will air on Channel 7 in 2026.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store