AI images of Holocaust violin players circulate online
The post shows an image of a gaunt man playing the violin with emaciated figures standing behind him. "Henek survived the war. He never touched a violin again," the post, which generated more than 12,000 likes and 5,000 shares, claims.
Image
Screenshot of a post on Facebook taken July 31, 2025, with red cross added by AFP
The image was shared across numerous other accounts on Facebook, as well as on X, Instagram, Threads and YouTube. ad in multiple languages including Greek, French and Bulgarian.
arches reveal that "Henek" is just one of many fake characters featured in fabricated narratives about violin players including "Eliska Varga," "Miriam Grünbaum," "Eliezer," "Jakob," "Eli Grunfeld," "Leon," "David Morgenstern" and multiple images of men apparently nam."
Image
Screenshots of multiple posts on Facebook taken July 31, 2025, with red cross added by AFP
The images follow an alarming trend of content creators churning out AI-generated content for money, targeting Westerners' emotional reactions to the Holocaust, in which six million Jewish people were killed (archived here).
The Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum repeatedly condemned the content (archived here) -- also lodging complaints with Facebook owner Meta over the posts. But it said the technology giant did not respond.
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) warned of the dangers of false Holocaust content in a 2024 report, which said AI-generated posts can warp historical narratives and fuel anti-Semitism (archived here).
While music was an integral part of everyday life in almost all the Nazi-run camps, with prisoners being forced to either sing or play instruments (archived here), both the image and the story shared on social media are fabricated.
Visual inconsistencies
ntified several visual inconsistencies in the image of "Henek."
The violinist seems to have square-like knuckles that are disproportionate in size.
One figure in the background only has three fingers.
Image
The image shared on social media, with visual inconsistencies highlighted by AFP
The fourth string of the violin also disappears at the bottom part of the instrument.
Image
The image shared on social media, with visual inconsistencies highlighted and magnified by AFP
His appearance is also inconsistent with the other figures in the "Henek" has a head full of hair while those in the background have their heads shaved.
A shirt clings to the violinist's torso while the majority of the prisoners are shirtless and wearing pants with a belt.
Both modes of dressing, however, differ from the blue and and jacket required in the Nazi-run camps (archived here).
Sybille Steinbacher, professor of contemporary history at the University of Vienna (archived here), said her doubts about the authenticity of the image were reinforced by the shirtless men depicted.
s had to be clothed; there was no such thing as standing for roll call with a naked upper body," she said on July 23 to AFP.
Pawel Sawicki, deputy spokesperson for the Auschwitz Memorial (archived here), said in a July 24 email that prisoners "did not have belts and camp numbers were also sewn onto their trousers."
pointed out that in 1943 prisoners would have had tattoos with their numbers on their arms.
Image
The image shared on social media, with visual inconsistencies highlighted by AFP
AFP also analyzed a video posted on Facebook, which pointed to further visual inconsistencies.
The InVID Verification Plugin magnifier tool reveals frames in the clip where the faces in the background appear The person to the left of the musician also looks as if he has no sternum or stomach, with ribs showing down to his belt.
Image
Screenshot of a keyframe with results from the InVID verification tool taken July 21, 2025, with visual inconsistencies highlighted by AFP
Historical inaccuracies
Researchers other historical inaccuracies pertaining to the story of "Henek."
On July 6, the Auschwitz Memorial account posted a screenshot of a false post on X, saying: "Publishing fake, AI-generated images of Auschwitz is not only a dangerous distortion. Such fabrication disrespects victims and harasses their memory" (archived here).
In a comment below the post, it pointed to inaccurate details in the story, including that it was improbable for a girl to have walked past a male violinist as the "men's orchestra played in the men's camp."
Publishing fake, AI-generated images of Auschwitz is not only a dangerous distortion. Such fabrication disrespects victims and harasses their memory.
If you see such posts, please don't share them. Instead, follow the official @AuschwitzMuseum, where every name, every photo, and… pic.twitter.com/8sMBxvPkOt — Auschwitz Memorial (@AuschwitzMuseum) July 6, 2025
Auschwitz-Birkenau museum historian Jacek Lachendro (archived here) said that some historical accounts mention the men's orchestra in Birkenau playing while newly arrived Jews were being led to the gas chambers or while "prisoners were being led to the place of their execution by hanging or shooting (but not during the execution itself)." However, he emphasized that the musicians did not play in these situations "as a
Elise Petit, whose research focuses on music within the Nazi camp system, agreed, telling AFP on July 21 that musicians mainly "played close to the gate when prisoners were marching in and out of the camp to work," (archived here, here and here).
The Auschwitz Memorial concurred with Petit's analysis, writing in a comment on the July 6 post that "Orchestras at Auschwitz did not play 'while men, women, and children were marched to their deaths'. Their main job was to play when columns of prisoners walked out to work and marched back to the camp."
ed the Arolsen Archives -- a containing victims and survivors of the Nazi regime -- for the name "Henek" and individuals mentioned in other posts, using a filter for "Konzenstrationslager Auschwitz" under "Place of Incarceration." But the search results do not match the identity of "Henek" or others depicted in the images and stories shared online.
AI Detectors
AFP analyzed the image developed by cybersecurity company GetReal Lab, which the image was synthetic.
Image
Screenshot taken July 18, 2025 showing the results of synthetic content analysis done using GetReal Lab
AFP through the Hive Moderation AI detection tool, which found that the image is highly likely to contain AI-generated or deepfake content, with a 99.9 percent confidence level.
Image
Screenshot taken July 21, 2025 showing the results of analysis using Hive Moderation
first concentration camps, established in 1933 shortly after Adolf Hitler became chancellor, were primarily used to imprison opponents of Nazi policy. By the end of 1942, six extermination camps were in operation, including Auschwitz-Birkenau, following the Wannsee conference that formalized the Nazis' policy of extermination of Jews in occupied Europe.
Around 1.1 million people were systemically murdered in Auschw it the largest death camp. Approximately one million of those killed at Auschwitz were Jews, with Roma, Russian prisoners of war and Poles among the rest murdered.
AFP fact-checked other claims related to AI here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
29 minutes ago
- Fashion Network
Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model
Vogue US sparked major debate when it ran a Guess ad featuring artificial intelligence–generated visuals in its August 2025 issue. The campaign stirred widespread backlash from readers, image professionals, and content creators, who see it as a warning sign for creative industries. The double-page spread showed a blonde model with light eyes and full lips wearing a sky-blue top and a black-and-white patterned dress. Vogue included a footnote confirming the images came from AI, but readers flooded the magazine's social platforms with criticism. Social media users and TikTok creators expressed frustration with the decision, citing Vogue's legacy of groundbreaking photographers like Irving Penn, Lee Miller, and Erwin Blumenfeld. Critics argued that AI contradicted the magazine's artistic foundation. Although Vogue stated that the ad came from its advertising department, not its editorial team, many readers still saw it as a symbolic turning point. The placement raised bigger questions about the industry's reliance on human creativity. Seraphinne Vallora created the AI visuals Marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora designed the campaign. The company has promoted its synthetic models across Elle, Grazia, Harper's Bazaar, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal. On Instagram, the agency showcases its AI-generated visuals and promotes its ability to replicate real-life models through digital scans. Brands like H&M have already used these AI body doubles, allowing real models to fulfill contracts without attending photo shoots. These avatars save time and reduce production costs. U.S. laws such as the 'right of publicity' protect personal features like a model's face or voice. Companies must obtain consent before using AI likenesses. But disputes still occur. Scarlett Johansson, for instance, accused OpenAI of using her voice without permission—sparking another legal controversy. Although the U.S., the UK, and the EU enforce laws to regulate AI-driven use of personal identity, industry professionals continue to raise concerns about the impact on makeup artists, stylists, photographers, and production crews. Creative professionals push back Many journalists and artists now use AI to streamline repetitive tasks, but this Guess campaign reignited fears that companies will use AI to replace—not support—creative professionals. On Newstalk Tech's TikTok account, correspondent Jess Kelly said, 'This puts people out of work. And creatively, a photoshoot isn't just about the model—it involves photographers, lighting crews, and an entire team working behind the scenes.' Governments and unions act on copyright To protect human-created work, unions and lawmakers are stepping in. The European Union adopted the AI Act in April 2024 to regulate synthetic media. This legislation, rolling out through 2027, requires companies to disclose AI-generated content, publish training datasets, and respect intellectual property—even when using open-source tools. In journalism, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) published formal recommendations in January 2025. 'AI cannot replace human journalists,' the report stated, 'and its production should not be considered journalism unless it undergoes proper human oversight.' INA, the French audiovisual institute, published a report outlining AI's risks and benefits in the newsroom. It praised AI for boosting speed, format diversity, and translation—but warned that it also encourages content standardization, audience detachment, and unchecked data mining. The authors argued that publishers risk prioritizing cost over quality. AI won't affect every media role equally Despite industry anxiety, some roles may adapt instead of disappearing. A 2025 report by consulting firm BearingPoint examined how generative AI could impact broadcast journalism jobs. The study flagged roles like documentalists, subtitlers, motion designers, editors, and translators as highly automatable. But BearingPoint identified other roles—such as reporters, web editors, data journalists, and community managers—that could shift toward supervising AI output, managing quality control, or using AI as a creative partner. In short, the firm believes that many image and information professionals can evolve with the technology rather than get replaced by it. Still, the reaction to Vogue's Guess ad shows that industry players view AI as a serious threat to creative labor. As Condé Nast navigates this backlash, it faces a critical choice: either establish clear rules for advertisers—or risk weakening the very ecosystem that defines its brand legacy.
Fashion Network
39 minutes ago
- Fashion Network
Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model
Vogue US sparked major debate when it ran a Guess ad featuring artificial intelligence–generated visuals in its August 2025 issue. The campaign stirred widespread backlash from readers, image professionals, and content creators, who see it as a warning sign for creative industries. The double-page spread showed a blonde model with light eyes and full lips wearing a sky-blue top and a black-and-white patterned dress. Vogue included a footnote confirming the images came from AI, but readers flooded the magazine's social platforms with criticism. Social media users and TikTok creators expressed frustration with the decision, citing Vogue's legacy of groundbreaking photographers like Irving Penn, Lee Miller, and Erwin Blumenfeld. Critics argued that AI contradicted the magazine's artistic foundation. Although Vogue stated that the ad came from its advertising department, not its editorial team, many readers still saw it as a symbolic turning point. The placement raised bigger questions about the industry's reliance on human creativity. Seraphinne Vallora created the AI visuals Marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora designed the campaign. The company has promoted its synthetic models across Elle, Grazia, Harper's Bazaar, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal. On Instagram, the agency showcases its AI-generated visuals and promotes its ability to replicate real-life models through digital scans. Brands like H&M have already used these AI body doubles, allowing real models to fulfill contracts without attending photo shoots. These avatars save time and reduce production costs. U.S. laws such as the 'right of publicity' protect personal features like a model's face or voice. Companies must obtain consent before using AI likenesses. But disputes still occur. Scarlett Johansson, for instance, accused OpenAI of using her voice without permission—sparking another legal controversy. Although the U.S., the UK, and the EU enforce laws to regulate AI-driven use of personal identity, industry professionals continue to raise concerns about the impact on makeup artists, stylists, photographers, and production crews. Many journalists and artists now use AI to streamline repetitive tasks, but this Guess campaign reignited fears that companies will use AI to replace—not support—creative professionals. On Newstalk Tech's TikTok account, correspondent Jess Kelly said, 'This puts people out of work. And creatively, a photoshoot isn't just about the model—it involves photographers, lighting crews, and an entire team working behind the scenes.' Governments and unions act on copyright To protect human-created work, unions and lawmakers are stepping in. The European Union adopted the AI Act in April 2024 to regulate synthetic media. This legislation, rolling out through 2027, requires companies to disclose AI-generated content, publish training datasets, and respect intellectual property—even when using open-source tools. In journalism, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) published formal recommendations in January 2025. 'AI cannot replace human journalists,' the report stated, 'and its production should not be considered journalism unless it undergoes proper human oversight.' INA, the French audiovisual institute, published a report outlining AI's risks and benefits in the newsroom. It praised AI for boosting speed, format diversity, and translation—but warned that it also encourages content standardization, audience detachment, and unchecked data mining. The authors argued that publishers risk prioritizing cost over quality. AI won't affect every media role equally Despite industry anxiety, some roles may adapt instead of disappearing. A 2025 report by consulting firm BearingPoint examined how generative AI could impact broadcast journalism jobs. The study flagged roles like documentalists, subtitlers, motion designers, editors, and translators as highly automatable. But BearingPoint identified other roles—such as reporters, web editors, data journalists, and community managers—that could shift toward supervising AI output, managing quality control, or using AI as a creative partner. In short, the firm believes that many image and information professionals can evolve with the technology rather than get replaced by it. Still, the reaction to Vogue's Guess ad shows that industry players view AI as a serious threat to creative labor. As Condé Nast navigates this backlash, it faces a critical choice: either establish clear rules for advertisers—or risk weakening the very ecosystem that defines its brand legacy.
Fashion Network
40 minutes ago
- Fashion Network
Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model
Vogue US sparked major debate when it ran a Guess ad featuring artificial intelligence–generated visuals in its August 2025 issue. The campaign stirred widespread backlash from readers, image professionals, and content creators, who see it as a warning sign for creative industries. The double-page spread showed a blonde model with light eyes and full lips wearing a sky-blue top and a black-and-white patterned dress. Vogue included a footnote confirming the images came from AI, but readers flooded the magazine's social platforms with criticism. Social media users and TikTok creators expressed frustration with the decision, citing Vogue's legacy of groundbreaking photographers like Irving Penn, Lee Miller, and Erwin Blumenfeld. Critics argued that AI contradicted the magazine's artistic foundation. Although Vogue stated that the ad came from its advertising department, not its editorial team, many readers still saw it as a symbolic turning point. The placement raised bigger questions about the industry's reliance on human creativity. Seraphinne Vallora created the AI visuals Marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora designed the campaign. The company has promoted its synthetic models across Elle, Grazia, Harper's Bazaar, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal. On Instagram, the agency showcases its AI-generated visuals and promotes its ability to replicate real-life models through digital scans. Brands like H&M have already used these AI body doubles, allowing real models to fulfill contracts without attending photo shoots. These avatars save time and reduce production costs. U.S. laws such as the 'right of publicity' protect personal features like a model's face or voice. Companies must obtain consent before using AI likenesses. But disputes still occur. Scarlett Johansson, for instance, accused OpenAI of using her voice without permission—sparking another legal controversy. Although the U.S., the UK, and the EU enforce laws to regulate AI-driven use of personal identity, industry professionals continue to raise concerns about the impact on makeup artists, stylists, photographers, and production crews. Creative professionals push back Many journalists and artists now use AI to streamline repetitive tasks, but this Guess campaign reignited fears that companies will use AI to replace—not support—creative professionals. On Newstalk Tech's TikTok account, correspondent Jess Kelly said, 'This puts people out of work. And creatively, a photoshoot isn't just about the model—it involves photographers, lighting crews, and an entire team working behind the scenes.' Governments and unions act on copyright To protect human-created work, unions and lawmakers are stepping in. The European Union adopted the AI Act in April 2024 to regulate synthetic media. This legislation, rolling out through 2027, requires companies to disclose AI-generated content, publish training datasets, and respect intellectual property—even when using open-source tools. In journalism, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) published formal recommendations in January 2025. 'AI cannot replace human journalists,' the report stated, 'and its production should not be considered journalism unless it undergoes proper human oversight.' INA, the French audiovisual institute, published a report outlining AI's risks and benefits in the newsroom. It praised AI for boosting speed, format diversity, and translation—but warned that it also encourages content standardization, audience detachment, and unchecked data mining. The authors argued that publishers risk prioritizing cost over quality. AI won't affect every media role equally Despite industry anxiety, some roles may adapt instead of disappearing. A 2025 report by consulting firm BearingPoint examined how generative AI could impact broadcast journalism jobs. The study flagged roles like documentalists, subtitlers, motion designers, editors, and translators as highly automatable. But BearingPoint identified other roles—such as reporters, web editors, data journalists, and community managers—that could shift toward supervising AI output, managing quality control, or using AI as a creative partner. In short, the firm believes that many image and information professionals can evolve with the technology rather than get replaced by it. Still, the reaction to Vogue's Guess ad shows that industry players view AI as a serious threat to creative labor. As Condé Nast navigates this backlash, it faces a critical choice: either establish clear rules for advertisers—or risk weakening the very ecosystem that defines its brand legacy.
