Bengal teacher tainted case: SC junks review pleas, scraps 2016 recruitment of 25,734 school jobs; untainted allowed till December 31; fresh hiring by then
has dismissed all review petitions against its April 3 order scrapping the 2016 recruitment of 25,734 school staffers, saying the selection process was "vitiated and tainted" beyond redemption.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The Aug 5 order could be accessed on Tuesday.
On Bengal govt's plea, the SC had allowed "untainted candidates" to continue as teachers till Dec 31 and directed the state to complete fresh recruitments to all vacant posts by then. The state has already issued notification and schedules for fresh recruitment in keeping with the SC-mandated timeline.
The Bengal govt, state School Service Commission, a section of both 'tainted' and 'untainted' teachers, group C and group D staffers had filed review petitions against the apex court order but an SC bench of justices Sanjay Kumar and Satish Chandra Sharma dismissed all of them saying, "These review petitions which, in effect, seek a re-hearing of the entire matter on merits, therefore, do not deserve to be entertained as all relevant aspects have already been examined and considered comprehensively.
"
Tried to shield untainted to greatest extent possible: SC
The SC bench said its April 3 order "was passed after hearing extensive and exhaustive arguments and upon considering all aspects, factual and legal". The judges reasoned that SSC's failure to retain original OMR sheets or at least their mirror copies to "cover up lapses and illegalities" made verification more difficult and led to the "inevitable conviction that the entire selection process was compromised".
This is what had led to the selection panel being invalidated, the bench said.
The SC added that it had tried to protect the interests of untainted candidates to the "greatest extent possible". "No doubt, invalidation of such untainted appointments would lead to heartburn and anguish, which the court was fully conscious of, but protecting the purity of the selection process is paramount and necessarily has to be given the highest priority," it said.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
It added, "The adverse remarks made against the authorities concerned, who were wholly and solely responsible for this entire imbroglio, adversely affecting the lives of thousands of candidates, untainted and tainted, were fully warranted and justified."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Assam Stops Issuing Aadhaar To Adults; CM Himanta Cites ‘Saturation', Infiltration Concerns
Assam govt halts Aadhaar cards for adults, except SC, ST, and tea garden communities, citing illegal immigration concerns and 103 percent Aadhaar saturation. The Assam Cabinet on Thursday announced that Aadhaar cards will no longer be issued to adults in the state, except members belonging to the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes, and tea garden communities, who will be granted an additional one-year window. Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma announced the decision following the cabinet meeting in the afternoon. He said that this decision has been taken in light of the state achieving Aadhaar saturation and as a 'safeguard" against illegal immigrants accessing the document. Sarma said that Assam has 103% Aadhaar saturation, but that this is at 96% among the SC, ST and tea garden communities. 'We have taken this decision because, particularly in the last year, we are continuously apprehending Bangladeshis entering the country at the border. Yesterday, too, we pushed back seven of them. But we are not sure if we have been able to catch all of them. So we want to create a protection so that no one can enter Assam illegally and take an Aadhaar and live as Indian citizens. We want to completely close that door," he said. 'If someone is left behind for whatever reason, even after one year, they will have to apply to the relevant DC, and the DC will consult all stakeholders, like the Superintendent of Police, Foreigners Tribunal and will be able to give it in the rarest of rare cases," he said. Last month, after a cabinet meeting, Sarma had announced that the government was considering a policy under which new Aadhaar cards for adults in the state would be issued only through Deputy Commissioners. He said the move was aimed at preventing 'infiltrators" from obtaining the document. Currently, Aadhaar applications are submitted at designated centres, after which verification is carried out at the district level by ADCs or Circle Officers to confirm the applicant's residence in that district. view comments First Published: August 21, 2025, 19:40 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
SSC Recruitment Time Decreased, Exam Notice Duration Reduced From 45 To 21 Days: Govt
Last Updated: The recruitment cycle for various SSC examinations has decreased from 15-18 months to 6-10 months, according to Union Minister of State for Personnel, Jitendra Singh. The Staff Selection Commission (SSC) has implemented various reform measures to shorten the recruitment cycle, such as reducing the duration of exam notices from approximately 45 days to 21 days, the Rajya Sabha was informed on Thursday. As a result of these measures, the recruitment cycle for various SSC examinations has decreased from 15-18 months to 6-10 months, according to Union Minister of State for Personnel, Jitendra Singh, in a written reply, reported PTI. Singh mentioned that the SSC has completely transitioned from pen and paper-based examinations to computer-based ones. It has also reduced the number of tiers/stages of examinations and shortened the duration of exam notices from around 45 days to around 21 days. Other reform measures include the removal of descriptive-type papers in all examinations (except the combined Hindi translators examination), document verification of selected candidates by ministries/departments, discontinuation of interviews, and the introduction of e-dossiers, replacing physical dossiers to expedite pre-appointment verification. In a separate response, Singh noted that the SSC has developed an online centralised e-dossier system for secure, tamper-proof, and transparent handling of candidate dossiers for recruitment examinations. Key features of this system include controlled, role-based access through authorised logins for users in SSC and ministries/departments, and a tracking mechanism at every stage with a unique tracking number to ensure authenticity and data integrity. The e-dossier system has been successfully implemented in several major SSC examinations, including the combined graduate level examination 2024, combined higher secondary level examination 2024, junior engineer examination (JE) 2024, and multi-tasking (non-technical) staff and havaldar (CBIC and CBN) examination 2024, among others, the PTI report added. Implementing the e-dossier system for the pre-appointment process has resulted in faster validation and forwarding of dossiers with digital tracking, improved coordination between SSC and ministries/departments, and reduced use of physical dossiers, thereby speeding up pre-appointment verification and the recommendation of candidates to ministries/departments, Singh said. Regarding the promotion of regional languages in competitive examinations, Singh stated that since 2022, the SSC has conducted three all-India competitive examinations – multi-tasking (non-technical) staff and havaldar (CBIC and CBN) examination, combined higher secondary (10+2) level examination, and constable (GD) examination – in 13 regional languages along with Hindi and English. Regarding other competitive examinations, the civil services (mains) examination conducted by the UPSC allows candidates to write answers in any of the 22 languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution, besides Hindi or English (except in the case of language and literature papers), Singh noted. Other recruitment agencies, such as the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS) and Railway Recruitment Boards (RRBs), also conduct examinations in 13 regional languages along with Hindi and English, the minister added. 'As regards other competitive examinations, the civil services (mains) examination conducted by the UPSC allows candidates to write answers in any of the 22 languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution, besides Hindi or English (except in the case of language and literature papers)," Singh said. Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. Stay updated with the latest education! Get real-time updates on board exam results 2025, entrance exams such as JEE Mains, Advanced, NEET, and more. Find out top schools, colleges, courses and more. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated. tags : ssc view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 21, 2025, 19:26 IST News education-career SSC Recruitment Time Decreased, Exam Notice Duration Reduced From 45 To 21 Days: Govt Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Will courts be powerless to intervene if Governor sits over bills passed by assembly: SC to Centre
New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Centre if courts were "powerless to intervene" if Governor sat over bills for years, rendering the state legislature "defunct". Will courts be powerless to intervene if Governor sits over bills passed by assembly: SC to Centre A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice B R Gavai made the remark in response to Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's submission that courts should refrain from interfering and passing binding directions in such a situation and a political solution can be found to deal with such an impasse. "The assembly, elected by a majority, unanimously passes a Bill, if the Governor does not exercise the proviso under Article 200, it will be virtually making the legislature defunct. The persons who are elected, what is the safeguard for them," the bench also comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar told Mehta. The bench continued, "... can we say that however high the constitutional functionaries may be, if they do not act, the court is powerless to intervene in such a situation? Assent is given or rejected, the reasons we are not going into, why he has given or not given. Suppose an act passed by the competent legislature, if Governor simply sits over it for an indefinite period, what will then?" The bench is hearing a presidential reference on the question whether the court can impose timelines for governors and President to deal with bills passed by state assemblies. Mehta said courts should not lay down a precedent in "such an extreme situation" and rather an endeavour ought to be made in finding a solution from within the system. The Centre has challenged the April 8 verdict for ruling the bills pending with the Tamil Nadu Governor were deemed to have been passed. "This deemed to have been passed bill direction is violative of the constitution," Mehta said, arguing courts couldn't substitute itself to the role of another constitutional functionary. Mehta said no timeline could be fixed for President and Governor to act on the bills passed by the assembly as the Constitution itself didn't provide any timeline for these constitutional functionaries. The bench said it is not sitting in appellate jurisdiction to review the April 8 verdict. CJI Gavai said, "We appreciate your timeline argument. But, consider a situation where the Governor ought to act, but sits over four years. What happens to democratic set up or the 2/3 majority by which the state is elected and represents the will of the people?" Mehta said a solution had to be found politically and concluded his submissions on the presidential reference. Senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, appearing for Madhya Pradesh government, has commenced his arguments. The hearing would resume on August 26. Earlier, the bench asked the Centre if hands of constitutional courts could be tied if constitutional functionaries refused to discharge functions or there was inaction on the part of the Governor on bills passed by state assemblies. The bench made the remarks after Mehta said if some Governors sat over bills passed by the assembly, political solutions had to be explored by states instead of judicial solutions. CJI Gavai asked Mehta, "If constitutional functionaries do not discharge their functions without any reason, can the hands of a constitutional court be tied?" Mehta said for all problems, courts couldn't be the solution and in a democracy, primacy had to be given to dialogue. Justice Kant weighed in, "If there is any inaction on the part of the Governor, which can vary from state to state, and if an aggrieved State approaches the court, can the judicial review of such inaction be completely barred. Tell us what can be the solution?" Calling for some "flexibility", Mehta submitted, "Suppose the Governor is sitting over bills, there are political solutions which can be adopted. It is not everywhere that the chief minister rushes to the court. There are instances where parleys take place, the chief minister meets the Governor, he meets the Prime Minister and President and solutions are found." The law officer said there were several occasions telephonic conversations were made to resolve the impasse. "For decades, this practice has been adopted to resolve disputes, if any. Delegations go and meet the governor, President and sometimes a middle path is found." He underscored invoking statesmanship and political maturity to end the impasse between the state government and Governor, who is Centre's representative. "I am saying, every problem in this country may not have solutions here in the court. There are problems in the country where you find solutions within the system," he added. Earlier, the CJI said judicial activism should not become judicial terrorism. The chief justice's remark came when Mehta said that elected people who have a lot of experience should never be undermined. "We never said anything about the elected people. I have always said that judicial activism should never become judicial terrorism or judicial adventurism," the CJI told Mehta. On April 8, the apex court while dealing with the powers of Governor with respect to bills passed by the Tamil Nadu assembly, for the first time, prescribed the President to decide on the bills reserved for her consideration by the Governor within three months from the date on which such a reference was received. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
