Council tax bills could be about to change - and you would pay less each month
Council tax bills will be spread out over 12 months by default under Government proposals that are currently being discussed.
It means you would pay less each month, although your overall council tax bill for the year would remain the same. At present, council tax bills are normally spread over ten months from April to January every year.
This is because when you pay in ten instalments, you don't pay a council tax bill in February and March. You can request your payments be split over 12 months but the proposals, which were first announced in June, want to make this the default.
The average band D household would pay approximately £38 less each month if they paid over 12 months, according to figures from the the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. The average council tax bill for a band D property is currently £2,280.
You will still be able to request to pay your council tax bill over ten months if you want to. The consultation is also proposing slowing down the debt collection process for when someone has missed a council tax payment.
If you miss just one council tax payment, you can be asked to pay the rest of your yearly bill upfront. Councils can then send in bailiffs if you continue to not pay, which results in added legal costs being added to your bill.
The consultation is looking at capping additional costs and ensuring households are given information about what help they could be entitled to, if they are struggling to pay.
It will also become easier to challenge your council tax band, if you believe you may be paying too much. There are also proposals to change the name of the "severe mental impairment" discount to "significant cognitive impairment" discount.
The consultation on these changes to the council tax system is due to end on September 12, with any changes set to be confirmed in autumn.
Minister for Local Government and English Devolution, Jim McMahon OBE said: 'As part of our Plan for Change, we're putting working people first.
'We are listening and taking action to make council tax fairer, more transparent and easier to manage. Under our plans, local government will be there to support, and not to punish, people who fall behind.'
Cut your council tax bill
Check if you're eligible for some sort of council tax discount. For example, your bill is reduced by 25% if you live alone, or if you are classed as severely mentally impaired, or you claim benefits, you may be entitled to 100% off your bill.
If you're in too high of a council tax band, you may be able to challenge this and get thousands of pounds back, plus lower bills going forward. But do your research first, as if you're in too low of a council tax band, your future bills will go up.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
29 minutes ago
- ITV News
Uncertainty over future of Teesside bioethanol plant but company remains 'positive'
A bioethanol plant on Teesside is having urgent discussions with the Government following an announcement that grant funding will not be provided to support the sector. Ensus, based at Wilton site near Redcar is one of the two largest bioethanol producers in the UK - the other being Vivergo Fuels, in Hull. The firms have been in consultation with the Government following a trade deal made with the US allowing American ethanol to be imported tariff free. While Vivergo, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), has now said its facing closure within weeks, Ensus says the future is more "positive" because of the carbon dioxide it makes as a bi-product of bioethanol. The Department for Business and Trade said it had to make the "difficult decision" not to offer support, citing that it would not be "value for the taxpayer", but added that proposals are being worked on to support CO2 supply. Mon 16 June: Chemicals firm on Teesside warns UK-US trade deal could shut them down in a matter of weeks Ensus, which is owned by German company Sudzucker and CropEnergies, is the country's only large scale producer of the gas, providing 30-60% of the CO2 needed in the UK. Grant Pearson, Chairman of Ensus UK, said: "I met with Sarah Jones, the Minister for Business, today to receive the Government's response to our request for financial support and the policy changes required to ensure that the Ensus facilities can continue to operate. "The Minister confirmed that they value both our contribution to the UK economy, the jobs we provide and support in the North East of England and in particular our production of biogenic CO2 which is a product of critical national importance. "They are therefore looking at options to secure an ongoing supply of CO2 from the Ensus facility. "This is positive news, however it is likely to take time to agree upon and finalise and therefore urgent discussions will be taking place to provide a level of assurance to the Sudzucker and CropEnergies Boards that there is a very high level of confidence that an acceptable long term arrangement can be reached." Ensus employs 100 people, and impacts around 3,000 in its supply chain. Until May, all ethanol imported into the UK from the US was subject to a 19% tariff. After the deal was made the eradicate the import fee, Ensus told ITV Tyne Tees that it could not compete in the market without Government support. Vivergo, which employs more than 160 people, said it was now beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant – a process which could see production stop before 13 September. A spokesperson for the Department for Business and Trade said: 'This Government will always take decisions in the national interest. That's why we negotiated a landmark deal with the US which protected hundreds of thousands of jobs in sectors like auto and aerospace.'We have worked closely with the companies since June to understand the financial challenges they have faced over the past decade, and have taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces.'We recognise this is a difficult time for the workers and their families and we will work with trade unions, local partners and the companies to support them through this process. We also continue to work up proposals that ensure the resilience of our CO2 supply in the long-term in consultation with the sector.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The economic roundtable is Jim Chalmers' chance for bold reform. Australians can't afford anything less
Jim Chalmers had a determined look about him this week, ahead of the government's much-hyped economic reform roundtable in Canberra. The atmosphere in the treasurer's office was reminiscent of the days immediately before a federal budget, with frenetic activity and an air of sleep deprivation among the small army of advisers. Preparations for the three-day event have been exhaustive and Chalmers works at a pace few people in the ministerial wing can sustain. Armed with a small page of handwritten notes, Chalmers told this column that the process of consulting with hundreds of individuals and organisations about how to turn around the country's productivity challenges had been more than worthwhile, as 30-odd attenders prepare to take their seats at the cabinet table on Tuesday morning. There's no doubt new approaches are needed. Productivity has barely grown at all since 2016. The stagnation in the Australian economy poses a threat to living standards, since working smarter is the long-run driver of securing higher incomes for households. Ken Henry, the former Treasury boss and summit invitee, puts the challenge another way. He calculates Australian workers have lost about $500,000 in potential pay rises over the past 25 years because of sclerotic productivity growth. 'I see it as three days to help inform three budgets,' Chalmers said, sitting at a conference table in the office previously occupied by Wayne Swan, his former boss and mentor. Family photos and a curated collection of books about politics and history dominate the space. Conscious of messaging and expectations in Canberra and beyond, Chalmers said outcomes from the roundtable would fuel and inform future decisions of the government, helping set a direction for Labor in this term of parliament an others to come. Solutions to emerging problems such as AI and an ageing population are also badly needed. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The event itself has required more than a little productivity already. Treasury received 900 submissions – twice the number of pitches received before Labor's jobs and skills summit early in the government's first term. Chalmers has held boardroom talks with business leaders and lobby groups, while ministers have convened more than 40 preparatory meetings of their own, attended by about 700 people. The Productivity Commission has released a slew of reports to guide the process. Bureaucrats in Chalmers' department have used AI to organise and structure this massive input of ideas, including the predictable mix of kite flying, influence peddling and ambit claims. On Friday, Chalmers sat down with his state and territory counterparts for the last of these events. Talking up consensus, the group agreed to work towards faster approvals for major infrastructure projects, to cut cumbersome and outdated regulation, to boost competition and build more homes more quickly. Some serious ideas are in the mix, illustrated by an awkwardly timed Treasury leak this week, which showed Labor was preparing to move forward with reforms to clear a backlog of 30,000 housing approvals held up by outdated environmental laws, as well as new rules for AI and a pause on changes to the National Construction Code. 'There's been a heap of effort,' Chalmers said. 'Working around the clock for four weeks to make sure that people's voices are heard and that we can shape up a meaningful and useful roundtable.' The meeting has become an organising tool for Labor's second term, including allowing Chalmers and Albanese to test ideas with voters and the media, and rule some ideas out. The prime minister has also stressed the government won't misjudge its mandate or foist new taxes on the electorate. Overdue ideas already firmly in need of resolution are being attached as well: changes to Howard-era national environmental laws will get a kick along and Anthony Albanese telegraphed this week that road user charging rules for electric vehicles would be thrashed out over the roundtable. Here a phased-in and staged approach is expected, treating heavy vehicles differently to ensure EV take-up continues to grow in line with the renewables transition. Labor might even come away with an idea or two for major reform proposals to take to voters at the next election, putting its thumping victory over Peter Dutton to use. But the lead-up to the summit hasn't all been smooth sailing. It emerged on Wednesday that Chalmers and Albanese had held a face-to-face meeting last week after a reported 'frisson' over expectations for the summit. Albanese appeared frustrated at some mission creep for the talks and the pair discussed the need to 'be on the same page' about major tax reform plans and the scale of Labor's ambition. After the story emerged, both were quick to say they meet all the time, while the finance minister, Katy Gallagher, talked up their cooperation at the heart of the government. Despite not wanting to shut down ideas ahead of the summit, Albanese and Chalmers have rejected calls to change the rate and base of the GST, and ruled out negative gearing and capital gains tax concession rule changes. The Australian Council of Trade Unions called for a four-day week for workers, without any loss of pay, a reform that feels both eminently possible in the future but too ambitious for the present. The Greens want Labor to move faster with expensive plans for universal childcare, an ambition Albanese is laying the groundwork for already, while the Coalition is both taking part in the talks and deriding them as akin to a tour of Willy Wonka's chocolate factory. It is unclear who will play the role of Augustus Gloop in this scenario. Labor can't afford not to be bold. It has identified the productivity problem and told voters it is better placed than the Coalition to manage the economy. Chalmers wants to be remembered as a reforming treasurer, and aspires to higher office, but will need to convince his colleagues – and the sometimes more cautious prime minister – of the case for ambition. Chalmers and Albanese made their own job harder by raising the prospect of sweeping tax reform at the start of the process, only to quickly shut down some of the serious proposals in a bid to manage expectations. The best way to undermine claims that the roundtable is a stage-managed talkfest is to make it a success: to take up real economic reform options that drive growth and boost productivity. Strengthening the budget and lifting living standards is as necessary as it is difficult, but buy-in from roundtable participants will be a crucial start, even if Labor has to spend political capital to get the job done.
Evening Standard
2 hours ago
- Evening Standard
Bioethanol plant deems lack of Government support an ‘act of economic self-harm'
He said: 'We did everything we possibly could to avoid closure, but in the end it was the Government that decided the British bioethanol sector was something that could be traded away with little regard for the impact it would have on ordinary hard-working people.
