Delhi HC pulls up MCD, PWD for lack of action on tree pruning
The court was acting on a plea filed by a resident of Dwarka, who highlighted the authorities' failure to adhere to the Delhi Forest Department's standard operating procedure (SOP) for tree pruning. Notably, the SOP issued by the government on May 2 mandates agencies such as the MCD, PWD, Central Public Works Department (CPWD), Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), and Delhi Cantonment Board to carry out tree pruning.
In his plea, the resident had argued that this negligence was leading to the fall of dead branches and tree parts, resulting in damage to life and property, and obstructing the roads and footpaths.
Referring to the recent death of a 50-year-old man in south Delhi's Kalkaji due to falling of a massive tree during monsoon, a bench comprising chief justice DK Upadhyay and justice Tushar Rao Gedela directed the authorities to conduct a survey in Dwarka within 10 days and identify trees that need pruning. Further, the civic bodies are asked to complete the pruning work within four weeks.
On August 14,a Neem tree got uprooted and fell on a man and his daughter during heavy showers. The two were on a bike. While the daughter got severely injured, the man succumbed to his injuries.
'We have lost a life. What else can be more eye-opening for the MCD? Photographs filed with the PIL clearly depict that immediate attention of the authorities is called for pruning the trees and cutting dead parts. This shows that authorities, especially MCD and PWD who maintain the roads and footpaths have not been discharging their duties under the SOP,' the order stated.
'It is common knowledge that during monsoons, when there are heavy rains, several incidents of falling trees causing damages to life and property are reported. The facts as discussed above warrant the authorities to act promptly and follow the SOP.'
The matter would be next heard on October 29.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Delhi HC quashes proceedings against ex-Canara Bank executive director accused of graft in 2018
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings initiated by CBI against a former executive director of Canara Bank accused of allegedly causing loss to the bank by sanctioning a loan proposal, and reiterated that the absence of specific incriminating evidence in collective institutional decision-making processes can't be 'construed as constituting criminal misconduct.' Ashok Kumar Gupta, who retired as executive director of the bank in 2014, was arraigned as an accused for the first time in a chargesheet filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation in 2018 in relation to a case where a jewellery trading company, Occasion Silver Private Limited (OSPL) allegedly fraudulently obtained Rs 68 crore from the bank as loan in 2013 by misrepresenting its books, along with allegations of oversight by the bank's officials. While Gupta was not named as an accused in the CBI FIR lodged in January 2016, the agency had filed a chargesheet in 2018 against nine people for criminal conspiracy, cheating, as well as for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. CBI said Gupta was implicated as an accused as he was part of the Executive Director-Credit Approval Committee (ED-CAC), which sanctioned the proposal for the loan. Justice Amit Mahajan, discharging Gupta, in an order dated August 14, noted the absence of prima facie or specific evidence against him of gaining pecuniary advantage from the decision of sanctioning the loan. The court also held that continuing the proceedings against him 'would serve no useful purpose and would subject the petitioner to unwarranted harassment'. The order was made public Wednesday. Gupta was represented by Senior Advocate Vikas Pahwa and Advocate Sumer Boparai, The court observed that the 'allegations are vague, unsupported by material evidence, and based on conjectures arising out of collective institutional decision-making', and noted that while the sanction for loan was made collectively by ED-CAC, which was a nine-membered committee, 'not all members of the ED-CAC, nor all Directors of the Board, have been proceeded against.' The court also took into consideration that the decision to sanction the loan to the company was taken after the proposal had passed through several levels of scrutiny within the Bank. Relying on judicial precedents set by the Supreme Court, Justice Mahajan held that Gupta, who was only one among several members collectively sanctioning the proposal, 'cannot be singled out along with a few others and burdened with criminal liability.'
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Man killed in Kalkaji tree fall: We have lost a life, what else can be more eye-opening for MCD, says HC
While directing the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and the Public Works Department (PWD) to conduct a survey to find out the number of trees that require pruning in Dwarka, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday orally remarked that the loss of life of an individual should be eye-opening for the civic body. The court's remark comes against the backdrop of the death of a 52-year-old man after a tree fell on his motorcycle in Southeast Delhi's Kalkaji on August 14. Alleging that the Tree Authority of MCD is not discharging its duties, the PIL requested that the authority be directed to prepare a detailed survey of trees and report of 'all hazardous, obstructive or decaying trees in public areas and ensure their trimming, pruning and removal where required'. Acceding to the petitioner's request, the court directed both MCD and PWD to conduct a survey of trees in Dwarka to ascertain the number of trees in need of pruning. It further ordered that the pruning of trees be completed within four weeks after completion of the survey. Refusing to relent to MCD's request that the time to prune the trees be extended to six weeks, the bench orally remarked, 'We have lost a life, what else can be more eye-opening for MCD?' While noting that 'it is common knowledge that during monsoon… several incidents of falling of trees causing damage to life and property are reported', the bench underlined that the situation 'warrants the authorities to act promptly and follow the SOP (Standard Operating Procedure)' as contained in the Delhi government's May 2 notification. The Department of Forests and Wildlife, in its notice, had issued a SOP for tending and pruning of trees under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi HC raps PWD for inaction on Karol Bagh traffic decongestion plan
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday pulled up the Public Works Department (PWD) for its inaction on a proposal by the Delhi Police to install boom barriers and Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras in Karol Bagh market to ease congestion. The PWD's counsel attributed the delay to a lack of funds. (Shutterstock) A bench of chief justice DK Upadhyay and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, while hearing pleas over parking and traffic problems in the area, noted that the police had first submitted the proposal in August 2024 and sent a reminder in July 2025, yet the PWD had taken no decision. The PWD's counsel attributed the delay to a lack of funds. Unimpressed, the bench observed, 'It has taken months. Departments have been playing football with each other to decide where funds have to come from. It is absurd. We are here to advise the department? As to where they should get funds from to get boom barriers?' The court also recorded, 'We note with dismay that despite the letters of Delhi police written on 24/08/2024 … no adequate steps have been taken by the PWD.' It directed the PWD to file an affidavit indicating steps taken towards compliance with the police's letters dated August 21, 2024, and July 25, 2025. Additionally, the bench ordered the Delhi Police and the Transport Department to 'strictly ensure' enforcement of restrictions on the entry, loading, unloading, and parking of commercial vehicles in Karol Bagh between 10 am and 8 pm, as per a decision taken in a meeting on August 19. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) was also asked to file an affidavit detailing whether anti-encroachment drives had been undertaken in the past three months.
