Hong Kong activists' appeal ends, judgement due in nine months
The case stems from the "47 democrats", dubbed by Hong Kong media for the number of activists arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit subversion in 2021.
Forty-five of the defendants were jailed last year for holding an unofficial primary election in 2020, soon after Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law in response to pro-democracy protests.
Eleven are appealing their conviction and sentences, while one who pleaded guilty is challenging her sentence.
Government prosecutor Andy Lo told the hearing on Thursday that the case involved "an unprecedented conspiracy", while defence lawyers said on Wednesday their clients had been denied a fair trial.
Judge Jeremy Poon said a decision would be made within nine months. After that, it would still be possible to seek an appeal to Hong Kong's highest court.
The 45 received prison terms of between four and 10 years after prosecutors said they sought to paralyse government and force the city's leader to resign by securing a legislative majority to indiscriminately veto budget proposals.
"INTERVENTIONIST" TRIAL
During this week's appeal hearing, defence lawyers argued on Wednesday that the three judges who presided over the original trial had frequently interrupted defendants during cross-examination.
"The trial court was interventionist from very early on," said Robert Pang, a lawyer for unionist Winnie Yu. He said the court repeatedly disallowed questions on grounds of irrelevance.
Lawyer Steven Kwan said his client, activist Owen Chow, did not receive a fair trial as "his evidence was disbelieved very early on" and judges posed 45 per cent of all the questions to him.
But prosecutor Derek Lau said judges had that right, noting it was not a jury trial.
"There is no unfairness that can be observed that is to the prejudice of the defender in these questions," he said.
Lawyer Trevor Beel, representing activist Gwyneth Ho, said on Wednesday that legislators had a duty to use whatever legitimate means to negotiate with the government and that Hong Kong's mini-constitution or Basic Law allows for a budget not to be passed.
Under Article 52 of the Basic Law, the chief executive must step down if the legislature twice rejects the government's budget.
Hong Kong was handed back to China by Britain in 1997 with a promise of freedom and autonomy under the "one country, two systems" framework and an eventual democratic vote for the chief executive and the legislature.
If Ho wanted to achieve dual universal suffrage and an effective legislature, then it "was not radical, and this is not against the principle of one country, two systems," Beel said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
9 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
China denies link to espionage group accused of attacking Singapore critical infrastructure , Singapore News
SINGAPORE - The Chinese embassy in Singapore refuted claims that an espionage group accused of performing cyberattacks on Singapore's critical infrastructure was linked to China. In a Facebook post published over the weekend, the Chinese embassy said such claims were "groundless smears and accusations". "The embassy would like to reiterate that China is firmly against and cracks down all forms of cyberattacks in accordance with law. China does not encourage, support or condone hacking activities," it wrote on Saturday (July 19). Last Friday, a Singapore minister said the espionage group UNC3886 was "going after high value strategic threat targets, vital infrastructure that delivers essential services" but did not give details of the attacks. The minister did not link the group to China but Google-owned cybersecurity firm Mandiant has described UNC3886 as a "China-nexus espionage group" that has attacked defence, technology and telecommunications organisations in the United States and Asia. Beijing routinely denies any allegations of cyberespionage, and says it opposes all forms of cyberattacks and is in fact a victim of such threats. Singapore's critical infrastructure sectors include energy, water, banking, finance, healthcare, transport, government, communication, media, as well as security and emergency services, according to the country's cyber agency. [[nid:720394]]
CNA
9 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: Japan's leader has lost his ‘mandate of heaven'
TOKYO: Shigeru Ishiba was long considered an outside prospect to become Japan's leader – so much so that he once said it would take the involvement of the gods themselves. 'If I were ever to become prime minister, it would probably be when the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) or Japan was in serious deadlock,' he wrote in his book published last year. 'Unless I receive a mandate of heaven, it's unlikely to happen.' After Sunday's (Jul 20) humiliation at the polls, whatever mandate from heaven he once commanded is lost. The LDP suffered a devastating loss in the Upper House elections. Ishiba had already set himself the low bar of retaining a majority in the chamber along with long-time coalition partner Komeito. It failed to achieve even that, even if the final results were better than exit polls had suggested. It's a rebuke from the electorate that has few parallels outside of times of extreme economic distress, such as when the LDP was ejected from power in 2009 in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. The brewing matter now is the ongoing trade talks with the United States. But these results show Ishiba no longer has the authority to negotiate them as Japan's leader. Against all odds, he was elected LDP leader, and therefore prime minister, after a fractious search in 2024 – with a party tainted by scandal looking for a new face that could win elections. He had previously sought the top office on four separate occasions, and had declared this his last attempt. With little support from traditional factions, and hewing to a more liberal wing of the party than normally commanded power, his goal seemed quixotic. Nonetheless, he saw off the opposition to realise his four decade-long quest to lead Japan. A CRISIS OF SHIGERU ISHIBA'S OWN MAKING This latest crisis was largely of Ishiba's own making. Upon becoming prime minister last year, he called a snap election – one that wasn't legally required, and which he initially said he wouldn't seek. His purported popularity dissipated instantly, and he was forced into a minority government. His period in power since has been a hodgepodge of temporary alliances just to keep government lights on. Last month, Ishiba oversaw the most disastrous campaign ever for his party in the Tokyo assembly election. Surely, this third time must be his last chance. He has been so unpopular with his own party's candidates that many asked he not show up at rallies. As a result, the LDP was virtually anonymous, and the party that has ruled Japan for most of the last seven decades yielded the debate floor to the opposition. The vote in 2024 left the LDP without accomplishments to run on, while smaller groups with YouTube accounts and gripes about foreigners promised the electorate everything. In 2009, as a member of then Prime Minister Taro Aso's Cabinet, Ishiba was among the first to break ranks after an electoral defeat, and call for Aso's removal. Yet now, in the face of a far worse loss, he insists he will stay on, citing the need to handle the ongoing US tariff talks – discussions he has presided over for three months without the slightest sign of progress. Ishiba's smartest political move has been to exploit the threat of US President Donald Trump to extend his own time in power. He cleverly branded the threat of tariffs a 'national crisis', a phrase politicians previously used to describe the likes of the devastating Mar 11, 2011, earthquake. REJECTED BY VOTERS YET AGAIN But Sunday's results leave little doubt. In three major elections in a row, the public has rejected him. Younger voters and conservatives deserted the LDP in droves, drawn instead to the likes of the fringe right party Sanseito. It's a movement that I believe won't last long, but which is attracting right-leaning voters with its populist talk – and nabbing those who would normally lean LDP. If, like in Aso's era, there was an organised opposition party waiting in the wings to take power that would be one thing. But the protest vote from a disillusioned electorate has gone instead to cranks and conspiracy theorists. Ishiba says he must solve the trade issue, but what right does he have to negotiate such long-lasting deals? No one wants to see a return to the 'revolving door' of Japanese politics. But this is an exception. Ishiba must do the right thing and resign. It's unclear if there's anyone in the LDP who can salvage the party's fortunes. But it's not the current prime minister.
Independent Singapore
an hour ago
- Independent Singapore
Ho Ching appears to take aim online at Jamus Lim, but some netizens stand up for him
SINGAPORE: After Workers' Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) Jamus Lim (Sengkang) commented on social media on a speech made earlier this week by Senior Minister (SM) Lee Hsien Loong, the former Prime Minister answered him, and they had a short and respectful exchange on Facebook. Afterwards, SM Lee's wife, Ho Ching, waded into the fray with a Facebook post that appeared to be aimed at the WP MP, an associate professor of economics, who had attended the Economic Society of Singapore's annual dinner where SM Lee had made remarks on a number of issues, including the Certificate of Entitlement (COE) and access to car ownership in Singapore. While Assoc Prof Lim praised SM Lee's 'masterclass in the economist's way of thinking' and called him a 'mighty fine economist,' he also explained how he differed from SM Lee, advocating for policies that lead towards a 'more empathetic and just economy and society'. While Mdm Ho did not name Assoc Prof Lim in her post, she asked why, instead of standing up 'to propound his proposal', he had gone out 'to post some virtue signals on social media'. She surmised that 'he' — the unnamed person — 'was afraid to lose his credibility among the thinking people,' that is, academicians, investors, business leaders, and political leaders. The most telling part of the post that suggested it was aimed at the WP MP came at the end, when she wrote, 'Beware Hep A virus in raw or uncooked cockles!' Assoc Prof Lim had gone viral during the 2020 general election campaign period for having said in a debate that when Singapore Democratic Party's Chee Soon Juan highlighted inequalities in the education system, it ' warms the cockles of my heart.' When the WP's Sengkang team won that year, he thanked residents, saying it 'warms the cockles of our hearts to be able to work for the people of Singapore, and for all Singaporeans,' and holding up a finger heart as he spoke. Afterwards, he joked that he had been banned from using the phrase. While some netizens sided with Mdm Ho, others did not. 'Mdm Ho – you should attack the point, not the speaker,' wrote one. Some stood up for the WP MP. 'I don't think that was what Jamus intended. You knew that there was not enough time for everyone to ask questions due to time constraints. Only a few questions were entertained,' a Facebook user chimed in. 'Maybe Jamus was courteous and didn't want to put people in a difficult position? What if those esteemed folks agreed with Jamus but didn't want to offend your husband? How are they supposed to react in public? Jamus spared them from having to make a difficult decision between staying true to themselves and keeping their rice bowl,' another opined. 'Imagine thinking that post is virtue signalling, when the man literally delivered a policy rebuttal with nuance and restraint. Must've hit a nerve,' a netizen commented. A Facebook user reminded others: 'All said and done and dusted, Jamus and his team gave PAP a knockdown in Sengkang, in the recent GE . That speaks for something.' /TISG Read also: SM Lee vs Jamus Lim on COE and the 'best way to meet people's needs and take care of them'
