US first-quarter foreign direct investment falls sharply amid tariff uncertainty
By David Lawder
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Foreign direct investment into the U.S. fell sharply in the first quarter to $52.8 billion from a downwardly revised $79.9 billion in the fourth quarter of 2024, the Commerce Department said on Tuesday, a drop that coincided with high business uncertainty over President Donald Trump's tariff plans.
The fall could prove temporary, as billions of dollars worth of foreign firms' announced U.S. manufacturing projects get underway and Nippon Steel's nearly $15 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel adds to current and future quarters' data.
The lower first-quarter FDI inflows contributed to a widening of the U.S. current account deficit to a record high of $450.2 billion as businesses front-loaded imports ahead of Trump's steep tariffs.
The Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis also said current account data for the fourth quarter was revised to show the gap at $312.0 billion instead of $303.9 billion as previously reported.
The current account data measures the net flow of goods, services and investments into and out of the country. A large and persistent U.S. trade deficit has traditionally been partly offset by investment inflows into U.S. financial assets and foreign direct investment, which includes plant and equipment, corporate mergers and acquisitions.
The first-quarter FDI inflows were the lowest in dollar terms since the $42.4 billion recorded in the fourth quarter of 2022, a period coinciding with high post-pandemic inflation.
Except for that drop, quarterly FDI since the easing of the COVID-19 pandemic had been recorded above $61 billion, with a peak of $135 billion in the third quarter of 2021, according to Commerce Department data.
Economists have warned that extreme uncertainty over Trump's tariffs could paralyze investment decisions by companies and slow economic growth. Trump has argued that his tariffs are prompting an investment rush by companies seeking to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. to avoid tariffs.
Paul Ashworth, chief North American economist at Capital Economics, said it was possible that uncertainty could be impacting some investment decisions but cautioned that quarterly FDI is inherently volatile, driven by specific transactions such as mergers, acquisitions and big projects.
"It's probably noise, rather than signaling something more dramatic or serious about FDI coming into the U.S.," Ashworth said of the first-quarter data.
He said he expected FDI to increase in future quarters as U.S. manufacturing investment projects announced by Japanese and other foreign automakers get started.
South Korea's Hyundai Motor and Hyundai Steel in April announced $21 billion worth of new U.S. manufacturing investments alongside Trump in the White House. Nippon Steel's hard-fought $14.9 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel closed last week and will show up in second-quarter inflows.
"If anything, I'd expect FDI to be going up," Ashworth added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Atlan Holdings Bhd's (KLSE:ATLAN) Earnings Are Weaker Than They Seem
Despite posting some strong earnings, the market for Atlan Holdings Bhd's (KLSE:ATLAN) stock hasn't moved much. Our analysis suggests that shareholders have noticed something concerning in the numbers. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Most companies divide classify their revenue as either 'operating revenue', which comes from normal operations, and other revenue, which could include government grants, for example. Generally speaking, operating revenue is a more reliable guide to the sustainable revenue generating capacity of the business. However, we note that when non-operating revenue increases suddenly, it will sometimes generate an unsustainable boost to profit. It's worth noting that Atlan Holdings Bhd saw a big increase in non-operating revenue over the last year. Indeed, its non-operating revenue rose from RM2.33m last year to RM71.4m this year. The high levels of non-operating revenue are problematic because if (and when) they do not repeat, then overall revenue (and profitability) of the firm will fall. Sometimes, you can get a better idea of the underlying earnings potential of a company by excluding unusual boosts to non-operating revenue. Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Atlan Holdings Bhd. Since Atlan Holdings Bhd saw a big increase in its non-operating revenue over the last twelve months, we'd be very cautious about relying too heavily on the statutory profit number, which would have benefitted from this potentially unsustainable change. As a result, we think it may well be the case that Atlan Holdings Bhd's underlying earnings power is lower than its statutory profit. But the happy news is that, while acknowledging we have to look beyond the statutory numbers, those numbers are still improving, with EPS growing at a very high rate over the last year. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. Be aware that Atlan Holdings Bhd is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis and 1 of those shouldn't be ignored... Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of Atlan Holdings Bhd's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Wall Street Journal
18 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Banca Monte Dei Paschi Gets ECB Approval for Mediobanca Bid
Monte dei Paschi said the European Central Bank approved the direct acquisition of a controlling shareholding in Italian investment bank Mediobanca MB 4.21%increase; green up pointing triangle. The authorization also includes the acquisition of a direct stake in Mediobanca–whose value exceeds 10% of the group's consolidated own funds–and in the relevant indirect shareholdings, it said Wednesday.
Politico
37 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate GOP's tax cuts projected to cost $4.2T — with costly SALT deal pending - Live Updates
Senate Republicans' tax package would cost $4.2 trillion, according to a new estimate that will likely create additional complications for Republicans as they race to get their megabill to President Donald Trump's desk. That's already more than the $4 trillion that House Republicans say they're willing to spend on tax cuts, and it doesn't include the cost of a hoped-for deal to loosen a controversial cap on state and local tax deductions that would likely add hundreds of billions of dollars more. It's unclear whether the House will be willing to swallow the higher price tag. The estimate from the official Joint Committee on Taxation also comes as Senate Republicans are scrambling to salvage a number of provisions meant to offset some of the cost of the legislation after they were rejected by the Senate parliamentarian. Though Republicans have been debating their tax, immigration and defense bill for months, lawmakers in the two chambers have not yet settled on how much they can spend in total on the legislation — an impasse set to soon come to a head. And, confusingly, the estimate is the second official analysis of the legislation in recent days — and is radically different from the first. At the insistence of Republicans, the JCT also estimated the cost of the legislation using an alternative methodology that showed the plan only costing $442 billion. Critics call that 'current policy baseline' analysis a budget gimmick that's designed to hide the true cost of the legislation. Democrats demanded the second estimate using the conventional methodology forecasters use to project the cost of legislation. 'Republicans claim their plan costs only $440 billion, but this new analysis shows it actually costs 10 times that much,' said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore) in a joint statement. 'The Republicans want to rig the process and flout the rules.' The dueling analyses only cover the tax portion of the package. The other parts will be analyzed by JCT's sister agency, the Congressional Budget Office. The new estimate comes as Senate leaders hope to push their draft of the legislation through the chamber this weekend, with an eye toward getting it to Trump's desk by their July 4 recess. On Tuesday, Trump urged lawmakers to stay in session until the bill is passed. 'NO ONE GOES ON VACATION UNTIL IT'S DONE,' he wrote on Truth Social. Amid mounting concern over federal red ink, House Republicans have been adamant that lawmakers spend no more than $4 trillion on tax cuts — their tax cuts clock in at $3.8 trillion — unless they can simultaneously come up with more than $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. Senate Republicans' budget allows $5.3 trillion in tax cuts and is vague about how much in spending they intend to cut. Normally lawmakers would settle on a common approach as part of a budget plan adopted in the spring, but they were unable to find an agreement. The tax portion of the Senate's draft is now being scrubbed for violations of the chamber's arcane procedural rules for budget reconciliation, and it's possible that some of the bill's tax increases — designed to help defray the cost of the bill — could be thrown out by the parliamentarian, which would exacerbate budget pressues. Reconciliation measures, which are immune to filibusters, are supposed to be strictly focused on budgetary matters, though lawmakers frequently try to include other provisions that can be deleted by the parliamentarian. Behind closed doors, lawmakers are still massaging the tax portion of the plan, and it's possible they will add new offsets to help bring down the cost. Much of the difference between the cost of the House and Senate plans is driven by Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo's drive to make many more of the provisions a permanent part of the tax code. He'd do that not only with a trio of business provisions projected to cost $566 billion, but a number of other tax breaks as well. At the same time, he added new provisions like a new charitable break for people who don't itemize that's projected to cost $63 billion. Crapo (R-Idaho) partly makes up the difference by squeezing or throwing out altogether a number of proposals approved by the House. His draft includes smaller breaks for tips and overtime demanded by Trump while dumping plans to expand health savings accounts and spending less on a deduction for owners of unincorporated businesses. Crapo has also antagonized House Republicans by phasing out green energy credits created during the Biden administration more slowly than they'd like while cutting more out of the politically sensitive Medicaid program.
