DWP confirms Winter Fuel Payment dates and exact amount pensioners can get
TO YOUR BENEFIT DWP confirms Winter Fuel Payment dates and exact amount pensioners can get
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THE DWP has confirmed key dates for the Winter Fuel Payment including the exact amounts pensioners can get.
The Gov.uk website has been updated with eligibility criteria and how much people will receive based on their circumstances.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Millions of pensioners will get a Winter Fuel Payment this financial year
Credit: Getty
The up to £300 payment was axed for millions of pensioners last winter and only those on certain benefits qualified.
But this winter it will be paid to individuals with a taxable income over £35,000 following pubic outcry.
The U-turn means nine million pensioners will get a Winter Fuel Payment this year.
But there is still eligibility criteria to meet including your age and where you live.
Who is eligible?
You can get a Winter Fuel Payment if you were born before September 22, 1959, and live in England and Wales.
The amount you will receive is based on when you were born and your circumstances between September 15 and September 21 this year.
This is known as the "qualifying week".
If you live alone or no one you live with is eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment you will get either:
£200, if you were born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959
£300, if you were born before 22 September 1945
If you live with someone else who's eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment and are not on benefits you will get a payment of:
Keir Starmer confirms huge winter fuel payment U-turn
£100, if you and the person you live with were both born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959
£100, if you were born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959 but the person you live with was born before 22 September 1945
£200, if you were born before 22 September 1945 but the person you live with was born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959
£150, if you and the person you live with were born before 22 September 1945
If you and your partner jointly claim one of the following benefits, you will receive a different amount: Pension Credit, Universal Credit, income-based Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA), income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) and Income Support.
If you are on one of these benefits, one of you will get a payment of either:
£200 if both of you were born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959
£300 if one or both of you were born before 22 September 1945
The payment will be made into the bank account your benefits are usually paid into.
If you get any of the same above benefits, but not as part of a joint claim, you'll get a payment of either:
£200 if you were born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959
£300 if you were born before 22 September 1945
However, in all the above cases, if your taxable income is more than £35,000, your Winter Fuel Payment will be taken back either through PAYE or through Self Assessment.
If you are living in a care home will get either:
£100, if you were born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959
£150, if you were born before 22 September 1945
Do I need to claim?
Most people eligible for a Winter Fuel Payment don't need to claim it and will receive it automatically.
You do not need to claim if you get any of the following benefits:
State Pension
Pension Credit
Universal Credit
Attendance Allowance
Personal Independence Payment (PIP)
Carer's Allowance
Disability Living Allowance (DLA)
Income Support
income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
income-based Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA)
awards from the War Pensions Scheme
Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit
Incapacity Benefit
Industrial Death Benefit
If you do not get any of these, you need to claim if either of the following apply:
you've not got the Winter Fuel Payment before
you've deferred your State Pension since your last Winter Fuel Payment
You can claim the payment by post from September 15, or by phone from October 13.
The ultimate deadline to claim for this winter is March 31, 2026.
More details on how to claim can be found via www.gov.uk/winter-fuel-payment/how-to-claim.
Most Winter Fuel Payments are made in November or December.
If you are eligible, you should receive a letter in October or November telling you how much you're in line to get.
If you don't receive one by January 28, 2026, contact the Winter Fuel Payment Centre on 0800 731 0160.
Are you missing out on benefits?
YOU can use a benefits calculator to help check that you are not missing out on money you are entitled to
Charity Turn2Us' benefits calculator works out what you could get.
Entitledto's free calculator determines whether you qualify for various benefits, tax credit and Universal Credit.
MoneySavingExpert.com and charity StepChange both have benefits tools powered by Entitledto's data.
You can use Policy in Practice's calculator to determine which benefits you could receive and how much cash you'll have left over each month after paying for housing costs.
Your exact entitlement will only be clear when you make a claim, but calculators can indicate what you might be eligible for.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.
Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
One year of Labour: City's patience fades as bond market signals damning verdict
Labour swept to power exactly a year ago armed with a sizeable majority and pledge to revive an increasingly frail British economy. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and cabinet colleagues immediately launched a City charm offensive in the wake of their July 2024 victory, hoping to persuade businesses and investors to back Labour's economic strategy. But while many appeared cautiously optimistic after several years of uncertainty under multiple Tory leaders, patience is rapidly wearing thin. Economic growth remains tepid, business and consumer confidence are increasingly weak, and UK inflation expectations continue to surpass those of global peers. The watering down of welfare reform and the winter fuel allowance U-turn, while welcomed by activists, has eroded the policy certainty associated with a large parliamentary majority and damaged hopes Labour can get a grip of an increasingly fragile fiscal position. And while Reeves appears to have the Prime Minister's confidence for now, the market response to this week's dramatic PMQs demonstrates market anxiety over Britain's ability to get its house in order. Higher employer national insurance contributions and a living wage hike since April have only exacerbated the dilemma, with higher labour costs simultaneously weighing on economic output while ramping-up broader inflation. The result has been to see double-digit increases in longer-term gilt yields – the interest on government debt – with 10- and 30-year yields up 36 and 67 basis points, respectively, over the last year. There is also now a huge gap between the yield on UK government bonds compared to global peers. Market veteran Michael Browne, currently an investment strategist at Franklin Templeton, told This is Money: 'The markets are telling you that there is a persistent inflation concern in the UK, which is approximately two-to-three times that of Germany. 'It's telling you there is a lack of confidence in the bond market at the moment about our inflationary position.' Playing a tough hand While Labour's complaints of a 'fiscal blackhole' left by the Tories appear to have been met with limited sympathy among media and voters, market participants are aware the UK's economic woes are not a new phenomenon. '[Labour inherited] a debt-to-GDP ratio of 95 per cent, rising interest rate costs occurring in a period where growth rates were extremely poor and were likely to remain pretty poor,' said Browne. 'Inflation was also running at 3.5 to 4 per cent, so the Bank of England were never going to cut rates very much to help you out.' He notes Labour have yet to 'disrupt markets' since coming to power, 'especially relative to some of their recent predecessors'. Browne also praised 'really sensible' efforts to separate day-to-day spending from capital expenditure, and adjustments to the Government's fiscal rules to allow for headroom earmarked for capital projects spending. Similarly, chief economist at Panmure Liberum Simon French said governing an advanced economy 'with an ageing population, underinvested infrastructure, fiscal liabilities designed under more favourable cost of capital conditions… and almost 20 years of sluggish productivity growth is not an easy task'. 'Overlay this with a generational shift in defence spending and threats of unprecedented international trade disruption and that task begins to look insurmountable,' he added. French also noted UK GDP is still 'closely tracking' the G7 median since the election, up 0.8 per cent on a compound basis over the three quarters of available data, despite an economic slowdown being a common symptom of a 'change election'. He said: 'A slowdown in activity as the private sector responds to a new regulatory and taxation counterparty, and as the public sector reprofile their activity to new ministerial priorities, is the experience of previous UK change elections in 1979, 1997 and 2010.' The deterioration of the geopolitical environment, as well as the imposition of damaging trade tariffs, have not helped. However, French scores Labour's economic track record as 'a modest six-out-of-10 – clear room for improvement'. 'That score acknowledges the context of a challenging domestic and international backdrop, soft economic trends that were entrenched pre-election, but also some own goals,' he said. Labour's job tax hikes weigh The Consumer Price Index was at 3.4 per cent for the 12 months to May, according to the most recent Office for National Statistics data. Though this was down from 3.5 per cent the previous month, CPI is not expected to fall back to the BoE's 2 per cent target for some time. Economists point to above inflation increases to public sector pay, as well as the living wage and NI hikes, as driving a decoupling of UK CPI from peers in the G7 and ending a trend of parity that had persisted in the run-up to last year's election. At the same time, higher labour costs have already started to hit the jobs market with unemployment inching higher from historic lows and the vacancy rate shrinking. Chief economist at the Institute of Directors Anna Leach said Labour's tax increases on business 'have already undermined' its industrial strategy's ambition 'to make the UK the best country to invest anywhere in the world'. She added: 'The reality is that the government has been much more radical in taxing business than it has been in removing blockers to growth. 'We need to see faster progress and greater ambition on de-regulation – particularly planning reform – and a reconsideration of the tax landscape for business if we're to change the UK's economic fortunes.' Economic momentum also faces battered consumer confidence, which has seen Britons prefer to crowd cash into savings rather than spend. The Office for Budget Responsibility slashed its full-year forecasts for GDP growth from 2 to 1 per cent for 2025 in March, with the economy expected to expand by around 1.5 per cent over the next five years. But the BoE is reticent to come to the Government's rescue to avert further economic deterioration with bumper interest rate cuts. The central bank has consistently signalled a slow-and-steady approach to keep inflation under control. The BoE is still expected to cut rates twice more this year, taking base rate from 4.25 to 3.75 per cent. While the US Federal Reserve is also cutting slowly, the European Central Bank has already reduced its key policy rate to 2 per cent. Franklin Templeton's Browne said: 'If you have an imbalance - if monetary policy and fiscal policy are out of sync - then that's going to remain the case for a long time.' Bond market demands: Cuts or tax hikes? A slow-and-steady approach to interest rate cuts amid higher inflation is likely to keep long-term government borrowing rates at already painful levels, even as the UK issues even more gilts. 'Gilt market spreads signal concern over a deterioration in both the current budget balance and total government borrowing aggregates,' said Panmure Liberum's French. The passage of the Government's welfare reforms was intended to save as much as £5billion, but their dilution still leaves the Chancellor facing a multi-billion pound hole to fill if she is to maintain her fiscal rules. Reeves had hoped that improved economic growth would free her of the need for further painful spending cuts, or for her to break the Government's pledge not to hike taxes on individuals. In absence of any material growth, however, tough choices loom this autumn. Browne said: 'Her options are now [are]; one, tax more, no doubt focused on companies and wealth. Two, not care by pretending it's not a problem and lose all credibility, [or] three, find cuts elsewhere. 'Option one pushes the economy towards the doom loop of tax and spend. Option two scares the bond market as did Truss during her 44 day Premiership, [and] option three we know won't happen. Darius McDermott, managing director at Chelsea Financial Services, added: 'While Reeves' policies may be flawed, the real concern for investors is that a potential replacement could push the party further to the left at a time when markets are desperate for signs of credible fiscal leadership. 'Without a clear pivot towards tough decisions, the risk is this discomfort could spiral into a broader crisis of confidence in UK debt.' The large gap between yields on longer-term UK government debt compared to G7 peers demonstrates bond investors' inflation concerns
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Keir Starmer told me he'd met every challenge. But things look bad right now
Will Keir Starmer allow himself to celebrate his first anniversary as prime minister this weekend? Or will he be taking a long, hard look in the mirror and asking himself what went wrong?That is what is in my mind as he greets me in the Terracotta Room on the first floor of 10 Downing Street for a long-planned conversation about his first 12 months in office, this looks surprisingly relaxed, given that his chancellor, Rachel Reeves, had been in tears sitting behind him in the Commons just hours earlier. That triggered fevered speculation about how long she would last in the job, moving markets to sell the pound and increase the cost of that is the impression he wants to convey to me as he shares a story about his photo opportunity with Formula One cars parked outside his front door - the most famous door in the is determined that the problems of recent weeks - and boy there's been a long list of those - will not overshadow the achievements he believes deserve just as much attention."We have done some fantastic things," he tells me, "really driven down the waiting lists in the NHS, really done loads of improvements in schools and stuff that we can do for children - whether that's rolling out school uniform projects, whether it's school meals, breakfast clubs, you name it - and also [brought in] a huge amount of investment into the country. And of course we've been busy getting three trade deals."It's clear that, given the chance, his list would go on. And yet, I point out, there is another long list - of things he's recently admitted to getting the last year, he's said hiring Sue Gray - Starmer's former chief of staff who left Downing Street in October - was wrong. He's also held his hands up about plans to end winter fuel payments, about rejecting a national grooming gang inquiry, and cutting benefits for disabled people. That's not even the full list, yet it's quite a number of things that he's admitting to being a prime minister thinks I've rather crudely summarised his personal reflections on what he might have done better. He challenges the idea, which is prevalent in Westminster, that changing your mind represents weakness, or a "humiliating U-turn".Listen: The inside story of Starmer's stormy first yearInDepth: Why Sir Keir's political honeymoon was so short-livedThis is the fourth time we've sat down for an extended and personal conversation for my Political Thinking podcast."You know this from getting to know me," he says. "I'm not one of these ideological thinkers, where ideology dictates what I do. I'm a pragmatist. You can badge these things as U-turns - it's common sense to me."If someone says to me, 'here's some more information and I really think it's the right thing to do', I'm the kind of person that says, 'well in which case, let's do it'."There is, though, no doubt that scrapping so much of his welfare reforms was a U-turn - a costly and humiliating one. Starmer and his chancellor have not only lost authority and face, they've lost £5bn in planned savings, something that will have to be paid for somehow, through extra borrowing, lower spending or, most likely, higher taxes."I take responsibility," he says, "we didn't get the process right". But somehow he implies that it might have been someone other than the leader of the Labour Party's responsibility to persuade Labour MPs to back his plans. He doesn't spell out what he means by getting the process right and, perhaps more importantly, he dodges my attempts to get him to spell out clearly what story he's trying to tell the country about Labour be on the side of disabled people and people like his own mother, who had a crippling disease that meant she eventually had to have a leg amputated? Or should they adopt her unwillingness to be written off, which he described to me the last time we spoke? When told by her doctors that she wouldn't walk again she refused to listen. Wounded by the events of the past week, Starmer refuses to even address that choice. But surely, I suggest to him, the nation doesn't just want a problem-solver, or a chief executive of UK plc? Voters surely want a leader who has a story to tell?Starmer clearly knew this question - or a variation of it - was coming. I've pushed him on it every time we've spoken at length. "It's about a passion, if that's the right word," he says. "But certainly a determination to change the lives of millions of working people and, in particular, to tackle this question of fairness.""It's almost like a social contract," he adds, "that people are getting back what they're putting in, that there is a fairer environment for them that supports them and respects them."That's a bit long to sew on to an election banner, to chant in the streets, or write in a post on X, but it is a theme. He is a self-proclaimed pragmatist who doesn't want there to be something that can be labelled as "Starmerism", but at least we can now say that his guiding principle is fairness. In truth, what matters more than anything else to him is not losing, something he tells me he hates, whether in politics or on the five-a-side pitch playing football regularly with his mates - as he still does and has done for decades.I tell him people think he is losing now - some say he is the most unpopular prime minister since records began. He reacts with the defiance of a man whose football-playing friend recently described him as a "hard bastard". A man who served in Jeremy Corbyn's shadow cabinet and then had him thrown out of the party; who stood to be leader on promises to keep much of Corbyn's agenda before tearing up those promises to win power; and someone who hired then fired Sue Gray as his first Downing Street chief of staff. "Every challenge that's been put in front of me I've risen to, met it, and we're going to continue in the same vein," he says.I end our conversation by reminding him what they say about failing football managers who have "lost the dressing room". Has he lost the Labour Party dressing room? His reply is emphatic."Absolutely not," he says. "The Labour dressing room, the PLP, is proud as hell of what we've done, and their frustration - my frustration - is that sometimes the other stuff, welfare would be an example, can obscure us being able to get that out there."Almost as an afterthought he adds: "I'm a hard-enough bastard to find out who it was who said that, so that I can have a discussion with him." Knowing Starmer I suspect he's much more likely to deliver a crunching tackle on the pitch than a quiet word off the prime minister's message is clear to me: Don't count me out, however bad it looks now. To pretty much everyone other than him it currently does look bad. Very bad.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Labour accused of ‘hammering' Scots during first year in office
The Labour Government has been accused of heaping financial misery on 'ordinary Scots' after a 'catastrophic' first year in office. On the first anniversary of Sir Keir Starmer 's election win, the Scottish Conservatives said it had been marked by a string of 'broken promises and U-turns' that had hit hard-working Scots in the pocket. The Scottish Tories said a decision to end universal winter fuel payments for pensioners was 'another broken election pledge and a betrayal of some of our most vulnerable people, one which the SNP shamefully copied in Scotland'. The party pointed to a rise in employers' National Insurance contributions which it claimed had triggered job losses, as well as pay freezes for staff and higher prices for customers. It said inheritance tax rises had 'devastated' farming communities and that Labour's 'hostility' to North Sea oil and gas projects had caused job losses in the north-east of Scotland and higher energy bills. Rachael Hamilton, the Scottish Conservative deputy leader, said Scotland and the UK 'can't afford another four years of a Prime Minister who is hopelessly out of his depth'. She added: 'Keir Starmer's first year in office has been a catastrophic series of broken promises and U-turns that people up and down the country are paying for. Labour's jobs tax and family farm tax have been utterly devastating for the careers, pay packets and bills of ordinary people. 'Their hostility to North Sea oil and gas is not just crushing livelihoods and communities across the north-east, it's leading to higher fuel bills for everyone by making us more reliant on foreign imports. 'Starmer has betrayed all those who voted for him by breaking his vow not to raise taxes – and he'll have to hike them again in the autumn after his humiliating surrender to Labour MPs on welfare reform.' Labour won an overwhelming majority on July 4 last year, but Sir Keir's approval ratings have since fallen dramatically, while a number of surveys now put Reform UK ahead of the party in Scotland. Ian Murray, the Scottish Secretary, said millions of Scots were better off since Labour came to power. He pointed to rises to the minimum wage worth up to £1,400 a year to low-paid Scots, the introduction of the right to sick and parental leave from day one of a job, and the extension of fuel duty cuts for drivers. Mr Murray said the UK Government had given Holyrood a record settlement of £50 billion, with at least £14 billion in extra funding by 2029 when compared to Tory spending plans. He also took aim at the SNP, arguing that while NHS waiting lists have fallen in England, the Scottish health system 'remains under SNP mismanagement' with one in six Scots on an NHS waiting list and cancer waiting times 'at their worst ever level'. Stephen Flynn, the SNP Westminster leader, pointed to Labour U-turns on the winter fuel payment and welfare cuts while criticising Sir Keir's record on the economy. 'Voters were promised a new direction but instead they got more of the same Westminster cuts and failure,' he said. 'When people look back on the Labour Party's year in office they will remember the cuts to disabled people and pensioners' winter fuel payments, the betrayal of Waspi women and children in poverty, rising energy bills and food prices, and a Prime Minister who took thousands of pounds of designer clothes and freebies while imposing austerity cuts on the rest of us.'
