TUT vice-chancellor faces legal action from Bapedi Kingdom if campus issue remains unresolved
Image: Thobile Mathonsi / Independent Newspapers
The Bapedi Kingdom has given Tshwane University of Technology (TUT) Vice-Chancellor Professor Tinyiko Maluleke 14 days to respond to their letter regarding the establishment of a campus in Sekhukhune, or face a legal challenge.
The legal letter, dated Friday, May 23, 2025, now has less than a week for Maluleke to respond to.
The kingdom claims that TUT has failed to honour its commitment to establish a campus in Sekhukhune, despite a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed in 2021.
The dispute between the Bapedi Kingdom and TUT centres around the university's decision to establish a campus in Giyani, which the kingdom views as a violation of the duty of good faith.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The kingdom argues that the idea of establishing a campus was conceived by the late King Thulare III for Sekhukhune, and that TUT cannot appropriate this idea for a different area and community.
It further claims that Maluleke hijacked the project and shifted it to Giyani despite the 2021 MoU between the two bodies.
Last month, the Kingdom, through the founder of the establishment project, William Maphutha, submitted a formal complaint to Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka, concerning allegations of TUT sabotaging the Sekhukhune university project.
The four-year delay has continued to dominate headlines and sparked outrage among the Bapedi nation, who feel betrayed, especially after President Cyril Ramaphosa endorsed the project in his visit during the burial of the late King Thulare III, also in 2021.
In a legal letter written to Maluleke on May 23 by the Bapedi Kingdom's legal representative, Rudolph Baloyi, the kingdom wished to have this matter resolved amicably and in line with the wishes of the late King of the Bapedi, King Thulare III, and in honour of his legacy.
Baloyi further stated that the kingdom has sought to engage amicably with Professor Maluleke and has also solicited the intervention of the State through the Minister of Higher Education and the highest office of the land.
'The university approached the Department of Higher Education and Training to obtain the necessary permission and approval as per the provisions of the Higher Education Act 101 of 1997.
'In response thereto, on February 26, 2020, the department requested the university to conduct a market feasibility study before it could endorse the request… It was in this context that the market study was conducted.
'In pursuance of this decision, on May 20, 2021, the MOU was concluded between the parties to give effect to the decision taken by the university to establish the University Campus in Sekhukhune subject to compliance with the requirements specified by the department,' Baloyi wrote in the letter.
Baloyi has warned that if a satisfactory response is not forthcoming from Maluleke within 14 days (now less than a week), they will approach a court of law for appropriate relief.
'The Bapedi Kingdom hopes to resolve the matter amicably, but is prepared to take legal action if necessary,' Baloyi wrote.
TUT spokesperson Phaphama Tshisikhawe had not yet confirmed if Maluleke had received the letter or if they were going to respond by the due date.
However, in a leaked letter, Maluleke had written to the Bapedi Kingdom on May 16, appreciating the hospitality they received while visiting the kingdom during a meeting the day before.
'It was an honour and a privilege for our delegation to connect with the Bapedi Kingdom and to discuss opportunities for mutual growth… TUT is eager to continue this journey with the Bapedi Kingdom. We look forward to future engagements,' Maluleke wrote.
Although it was not clear what was discussed in that meeting, a source close to the kingdom said that the meeting did not bear any fruit.
mashudu.sadike@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
PRASA's Crisis of Accountability: Why the Boardroom Must Be Investigated and Raided
Law enforcement agencies — particularly the Hawks — have launched search and seizure operations against PRASA executives and administrative staff. Laptops are confiscated. Documents are removed. Offices are raided. However, board members remain untouched, says the writer. Image: Jacques Naude/Independent Newspapers By any standard of governance — legal, constitutional, or ethical — the failures plaguing the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) can be traced directly to its board. What is less ordinary, and far more disturbing, is the way accountability has been applied so selectively. Time and again, executives and senior officials are suspended, investigated, or dismissed, often amid significant public attention. Yet board members — the very individuals tasked with oversight — remain untouched. That pattern is not only unfair, it is deeply damaging to the principles of the rule of law, institutional integrity, and public trust. PRASA, like all state-owned entities, has a functioning board that carries legal and fiduciary responsibilities. The tenders that are awarded, the procurement decisions that are made, and the operational directions taken are all the product of board-sanctioned processes. Executives do not act in a vacuum. They work within governance frameworks that require decisions to be reviewed, approved, and frequently initiated by the board. This raises a critical question. If some of the executives who have faced disciplinary action or criminal investigation were simply implementing board-approved decisions, then what role did the board play in those decisions? And more importantly, why has there been so little accountability at that level? The standard narrative — that executive management failed while the board remained passive or uninformed — begins to fall apart under scrutiny. It is not a theoretical concern. In terms of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), PRASA's board is not an advisory body. It is the accounting authority. That status carries with it binding legal obligations. Section 51 of the PFMA makes this crystal clear. Accounting authorities must ensure effective, efficient, and transparent systems of financial and risk management. They must prevent irregular, fruitless, and wasteful expenditure. The Companies Act reinforces this by imposing fiduciary duties on directors to act in good faith and the best interests of the company, or in the case of PRASA, in the public interest. Take the Afro 4000 procurement scandal. The board approved it. Technical warnings were reportedly raised about the specifications of the locomotives. The trains were incompatible with South Africa's rail infrastructure — too tall for existing tunnels and bridges. Yet the deal, worth R2.65 billion, went ahead. That decision was not made in isolation by a single executive. It would have passed through multiple governance layers and ultimately received board approval. That failure is emblematic of a deeper problem — one of institutional decay, negligence, and possibly complicity. During the 2018 and 2019 financial years, PRASA's board reportedly held meetings for a full year without keeping formal minutes. The chairperson at the time is said to have received over R1.2 million in remuneration for those undocumented meetings. The failure to record official board decisions is more than a lapse in procedure. It is a fundamental breach of governance practice. It suggests an environment where oversight was neither practised nor valued. And yet, when a scandal erupts, it is executives who are dismissed or paraded before the public. Their reputations are often destroyed long before any formal finding is made. Meanwhile, board members continue to serve or exit quietly, with little to no scrutiny of their role in the dysfunction. This imbalance begs the question: Is the lack of board accountability a matter of political convenience? Board appointments in state-owned entities are often political. Holding executives accountable may temporarily satisfy public outrage. But investigating a board risks exposing the very political networks that put them there in the first place. That makes such action far less likely. Which brings us to a recent and increasingly bizarre pattern. Law enforcement agencies — particularly the Hawks — have launched search and seizure operations against PRASA executives and administrative staff. Laptops are confiscated. Documents are removed. Offices are raided. But in all of this, not once has a current or former board member been subjected to similar treatment. Not one home has been searched. Not one board office has been entered. Not one director has faced the same intensity of scrutiny. That is not just strange. It is alarming. If wrongdoing occurred at the level of governance — and there is mounting evidence that it did — then failure to investigate the board undermines the entire justice process. The law does not distinguish between an executive who signs off on a questionable contract and a board member who authorises or enables it. In public entities, the board is the final line of defence. If mismanagement or corruption took place with board approval, or worse, with its silent consent, then it is not less serious — it is more so. The Zondo Commission taught the nation a vital lesson. State capture did not begin at the operational level. It began in the boardroom. It began with individuals who had oversight powers and either abused them or looked away. PRASA cannot afford to repeat this history. It would be naïve to believe that collapses of governance on this scale happened without the knowledge or involvement of the board. The idea that executives alone engineered PRASA's failures while the board watched passively stretches the limits of both logic and law. If justice is to be done — and be seen to be done — then the boardroom must be subjected to the same investigative scrutiny as the executive corridor.
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Defence Minister defends SANDF's DRC deployment amid casualties
Defence Minister Angie Motshekga said the presence of the SADC Mission in the DRC in various areas of South Kivu from January 2024 provided safety, security, and stability for the people of the City of Goma and the surrounding areas. Image: Phando Jikelo / Independent Newspapers Defence Minister Angie Motshekga still maintains that the deployment of the SANDF to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) was a success despite the tragic loss of 14 soldiers and 174 injuries. Motshekga said the presence of the SADC Mission in the DRC in various areas of South Kivu from January 2024 provided safety, security, and stability for the people of the City of Goma and the surrounding areas. 'This was demonstrated by the communities coming back to their places of residence or homesteads as well as their livelihoods. 'The fights among various illegal armed groups, the M23 as well as the DRC Armed Forces were drastically reduced and with minimal displacement of communities in the far mountain areas,' she said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Motshekga was responding to IFP MP Russel Cebekhulu, who noted the controversy surrounding the SAMIDRC (SADC Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo) and loss of life and conflicting accounts of its success. He wanted to know what Motshekga based her claim of success on, despite the rebels still in control of key areas such as Goma and Sake, while the peace efforts were elusive. Motshekga said the positive assessment of the SADC Mission's performance was demonstrated by the UN Mission reports as well as the positive reports by the UN headquarters in New York. 'A number of commendable statements of the positive work of SAMIDRC were issued by the UN.' She also said the success of the mission was demonstrated and has to be gauged on the ultimate achievement of the presence of the mission, leading to the engagement among the warring parties in North Kivu. Motshekga stated that there was a standing and planned session of the SADC Organ on Peace and Security to undertake a session on the lessons learned for future peace support operations. 'Reforms of future peacekeeping and or regional support missions reside in the domain of the region as a collective. Safety of peacekeepers is embedded in all peace support missions and or deployments as per the UN prescripts.' She stated that the SANDF will be involved as part of the collective that will undergo the SADC standing operating procedure of undertaking readiness review of deployments, including SAMIDRC. Motshekga added that all SANDF capabilities, including and not limited to intelligence, logistics support, and coordination with other role-players in SADC in SADC and AU missions, will be strengthened. According to Motshekga, the deployment in Goma, DRC, has confirmed and reiterated their position and outcry for the express requirement of adequate funding provision by the government to acquire an acceptable level of new and modern prime mission equipment. 'The lessons learnt will be utilised in our training centres and schools as scenarios as well as applied in our planning sessions at various levels to ensure improvement in the conduct of future peace-keeping missions,' said Motshekga when responding to ANC MP Dakota Legoete. Legoete asked about valuable insights the SANDF gained from its deployment in the DRC. Meanwhile, Motshekga also said there were lessons learnt in training and operations from the Battle of Bangui regarding the deployments of the SANDF. 'The lessons have been integrated into training by, for example, choosing terrain forms similar to the area of deployment. The integration into operations is based on our concept of train as you fight." She also said there were no deficiencies that were identified regarding accountability at the Battle of Bangui. 'Bearing in mind that our soldiers were outnumbered, they had fought bravely,' she said when asked about measures to prevent future operational failures and loss of soldiers' lives.
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
King Khoisan SA's fight for Khoisan rights continues after eviction from Union Buildings
King Khoisan SA vows to continue fighting for Khoisan recognition in South Africa. Image: Thobile Mathonsi / Independent Newspapers King Khoisan SA has vowed to continue advocating for the recognition of the Khoisan people as South Africa's first nation, despite being forcibly removed from the Union Buildings lawn in February after a five-year protest. The eviction, which was carried out following a Gauteng High Court order, has not deterred King Khoisan from pursuing his demands, which include recognition of the Khoisan people's rights, land ownership, and abolition of the term "coloured". King Khoisan SA said on Tuesday that he is determined to push forward with a demand to have the Khoisan people recognised as the first nation in the country. He has started a nationwide mobilisation effort, visiting different provinces to regroup and rally support. He said he has already visited the Western Cape and is currently crisscrossing the Eastern Cape, with plans to stage a massive action towards the end of this year or early next year. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ "The advocacy to have the Khoisan recognised as the first nation is still ongoing. I have actually now started to visit different provinces, speaking to leadership and trying to regroup," he said. He said his legal team has discovered that the eviction was potentially illegal, and preparations are under way to wage a legal battle against the government. He claims that the government broke its promise to keep their possessions safe, resulting in losses estimated at R80 million to R90 million. "We have lost close to R80 million to R90 million. For example, we had paintings there which were over R50,000," he said, adding that some awards bestowed upon him, including one from the African Nations, are missing. The Department of Public Works and Infrastructure, which obtained an eviction order, cited that the Union Buildings are a heritage site where no temporary structures are allowed. The department previously said no appeals or opposition were received against the court order for the eviction of the Khoisan community from the Union Buildings. According to the department, they complied with all high court orders, which included consulting with stakeholders like other government departments and the City of Tshwane, to assist individuals willing to return home. King Khoisan SA said the local Khoisan group has allied with their counterparts in Namibia and Botswana, and is mobilising Africans from different tribes to support their cause.
