
Why young Aussies are walking out of high-paying jobs and taking a salary cut despite cost-of-living crisis
Australia's median capital city house price is now above $1million, meaning only dual-income couples or individuals on high salaries can buy a home with a backyard.
But rather than work harder in a career role to afford a house, Australia's younger workers are less inclined to do stressful corporate jobs, long-term, if there isn't a meaningful reward or a work-life balance, despite there being a cost-of-living crisis.
Jin, 23, is graduating at the end of this year from the University of Sydney with a Bachelor of Science majoring in data science and accounting.
He will start a full-time graduate role in January next year and is bracing for the occasional weekend shifts as he helps prepare financial reports for big firms during the twice-yearly earnings seasons.
But he is aspiring for some work-life balance in his twenties, including some travel.
'I do think a balance is necessary - if we don't have the correct amount of sleep or just the correct amount of breaks to take our minds off things, it's just very hard for us to stay focused,' he told Daily Mail.
'I do want to explore the world outside of Australia. I want to see and experience different cultures.'
He is also hoping to work reasonable hours so he has time for family and a social life.
'I think I have a nice balance right now, where I spend my time with my family and my partner,' he said.
'Once or twice a year, I strive to take a one-week holiday or go on a break with my family or my partner.'
Jin will continue to live with his parents in Sydney as he saves up to eventually buy a place of his own, instead of spending an exorbitant amount on rent.
'The average salary of an auditor or any graduate role is not enough to have a balance - I would say 40 per cent of your salary will go to rent,' he said.
'How are people supposed to afford houses or go on holidays or have mortgages?'
Jamie MacLennan, the Asia-Pacific managing director of TELUS Health, said younger workers were less inclined to take on stressful roles, despite needing higher pay to cope with the cost of living crisis.
'People are trying to rebalance and balance the work-life component in a world where we're essentially on 24/7,' he said.
'Somewhere along the line, people have got to earn a living, but then the question is - "What's the cost of making that living?" - that's where people are rebalancing.
'You can't quit completely or at scale - there's always going to be an element of people who do that.
'Whether they take the traditional career paths, whether they aspire to those, creates a bigger dislocation.'
Mr MacLennan said the mental health effects of Covid on younger people would create succession planning issues for companies in coming years, as fewer of them aspired to be in senior roles.
'We haven't recovered from Covid - our brains have been rewired. There continues to be a mental health crisis - crisis is not an overstated term in Australian society and it's most acute in that younger generation coming through,' he said.
'People have that sense of missing out - they're in a situation where they can't afford to get what they want or they can't afford to live in the environment that they want.'
Stress is now a deal breaker for staff, with recruitment agency Randstad revealing 60 per cent of workers would rather have less stress than more pay. Unbearable demands had seen 40 per cent of workers switch to a lower-paid role.
Amelia O'Carrigan, Randstad's director of public sector and business support, said employers couldn't ask staff to work five days in the office without incentives.
'It's not a complete pull back on flexibility and expect that workers will agree to that. In fact, to completely say - "You need to be back into the office five days" I would say would be a risky strategy,' she said.
'As job confidence starts to return, you'd be at risk of employees looking elsewhere.'
The Randstad survey of 5,250 workers in Australia, Germany, Italy, Japan, Poland, the UK and the United States found stress to be a major issue.
Financial concerns are the biggest driver of personal stress in Australia, with 44 per cent nominating it as a problem, a survey of 1,000 people by TELUS Health found.
Unaffordable housing was also cited as a driver, with 18 per cent nominating their housing or living situation as a source of personal stress.
While many young people are reconsidering taking on stressful roles, Jin said he would be willing to make sacrifices to one day establish a data-oriented start-up for small businesses, that could use AI to audit their finances in real time.
'If I were to want to live comfortably, or think about having a better life, I would try to branch off into a different industry,' he said.
'If the corporate ladder doesn't work, I'll try my hand with something I like within data science, because I sacrificed it away for stability - I'll try to think about doing a start-up project on the side.
'Earning more money comes with more responsibilities so naturally you come with more stress - probably personally, I think I have pretty good stress management.'
'My goal, before I hit 30, I'll try to get a car that I like, I like sportscars, I want to work towards that. We need goals in life or what are we working for? If we're just working for a living - it's not hard, it would just be very boring.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Labor decision to lift ban on PwC ‘an insult' to inquiry that investigated Treasury scandal, Pocock says
The finance department has rejected a last minute plea from three senators who led parliamentary inquiries into PwC Australia urging it not to lift a ban on the consultancy firm competing for new government work. Last month, Guardian Australia revealed the finance department had recommended the end of a long-term ban triggered by a scandal involving the misuse of confidential Treasury information. Former PwC Australia partners no longer working at the firm remain under investigation by the Australian federal police. Finance's report into the ethical soundness of PwC Australia and its recommendation was due to be published on 25 July, until the finance minister, Katy Gallagher, requested the department consider the views of Greens senator Barbara Pocock, Labor senator Deborah O'Neill and Liberal senator Richard Colbeck. The three senators wrote to the department last month urging it not to lift the ban, which was introduced in April 2024, while the tax leaks scandal was being investigated by federal police. 'In our view, there is no meaningful justification for giving them the green light after such little time and while significant investigations remain ongoing,' the three senators wrote. The department wrote to the senators on Thursday and confirmed that while their views were respected, it would not be changing its position. 'Finance considers that it would not be appropriate to delay a decision on its assessment of the ethical soundness of PwC Australia,' the department wrote in a letter seen by Guardian Australia. PwC Australia cannot bid for consultancy work until 2028 due to a non-compete clause with spin-off advisory service Scyne, which was created after the firm sold its entire government services division for just $1 at the height of the scandal. But PwC Australia can bid for other work with the government, including audit services. The decision is also an important step for the firm as it seeks to rebuild its trust with the private sector, which is the primary focus of its business. All government departments have now been told they should 'treat PwC Australia equitably as they would any other potential supplier when undertaking procurement processes'. But the finance department will require PwC Australia to provide six-monthly updates on its internal cultural overhaul and closely monitor its conduct until 30 June, 2027. The PwC Australia's chief executive, Kevin Burrowes, thanked the finance department for its decision and said the firm was 'proud of the progress we've made over the past two years'. 'There is more work to do as we strive to become the pre-eminent professional services firm, with a focus on delivering exceptional outcomes for our clients, using our deep-industry sector expertise,' Burrowes said. But the decision has angered Pocock who said she was 'deeply disappointed in the government'. 'The government decision to let PwC back into the contracting consulting fold is an insult to the senators and MPs who worked on two parliamentary inquiries examining what went wrong at PwC,' Pocock said. 'We made a raft of recommendations which have yet to be enacted, while the Government renews its contracting relationship with this disgraced entity.'


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Rio Tinto says no economic incentive for green steel in Australia
MELBOURNE, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Rio Tinto ( opens new tab joined peer BHP ( opens new tab on Thursday to play down Australia's prospects of building out a "green iron" sector that would help decarbonise the steel industry because the country lacks the economic incentives to do so. Australia is the world's largest supplier of seaborne iron ore and has been striving to build a role as a reliable source of green metals. In February the government allocated A$1 billion ($652.4 million) to support the manufacture of green iron and its supply chains. Since Australia's iron ore is mostly too low-grade to be directly processed into steel with renewable energy, it needs an additional processing step. When this is undertaken with hydrogen made from renewable energy instead of coal, the product is called hydrogen direct reduced iron (DRI) or "green iron", a low-carbon base for making green steel. "Today I don't believe there is an economic incentive for anybody to move to a hydrogen DRI," Rio Tinto's chief technical officer Mark Davies said. The technology was unproven, and there were complications moving from existing processes using natural gas to hydrogen, he told a business lunch in Melbourne. "And doing it in Australia is expensive. It's an expensive place to build stuff," he said. Major miner BHP ( opens new tab said last month it was too costly for Australia to build a "green iron" industry, even after the country and China agreed to jointly work to decarbonise the steel supply chain, responsible for nearly a 10th of global emissions. A global carbon price of "a couple of hundred dollars" would be needed to create that incentive, Davies later told a press briefing. ($1 = 1.5328 Australian dollars)


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Fresh cost-of-living blow that every Aussie needs to know about
Australians could soon be paying a 15 per cent GST as a Teal MP argues an increase is necessary to help those worse off. The Goods and Services Tax has been kept at 10 per cent since it debuted in July 2000, with exemptions for fresh fruit and vegetables, meat, health and education. But Teal MP Kate Chaney, who represents the upmarket Perth seat of Curtin, has called for the GST to be raised to 15 per cent, with the existing exemptions removed. The GST proceeds are now distributed among the states and territories to help pay for things like transport infrastructure, schools and hospitals. But Chaney wants revenue from a higher consumption tax to fund a $3,300 rebate to every Australian adult, arguing this would benefit low-income earners. 'Under a progressive GST model, we could increase the rate of GST to 15 per cent and remove exemptions on food, education and health, bringing Australia in line with other OECD countries,' she said. 'But to ensure equity is maintained, the government could pay every Australian adult a $3,300 annual "basics rebate", which would effectively mean they pay no GST on their first $22,000 of expenses, making the lowest 60 per cent of income earners better off.' Chaney, whose father Michael Chaney is chairman of retail conglomerate Wesfarmers, cited Parliamentary Budget Office modelling to argue the GST, a regressive tax, would in fact help the poor if it funded compensation. 'PBO modelling shows that it is possible to broaden the GST base and increase the rate without shifting the burden disproportionately to lower-income earners, through a "basics rebate",' she said. 'In fact, the lowest 60 per cent of income earners could be better off under a progressive GST. 'GST is an efficient tax – it is hard to avoid – and with lower and middle-income groups potentially better off under this proposal, it can be progressive. 'Unlike personal income tax, it doesn't hamper productivity.' Treasurer Jim Chalmers in June revealed he would be open-minded about expanding the base of the GST to raise more government revenue, ahead of this month's Economic Reform Roundtable. 'What I'm going to try and do - because I know the states will have a view on it, I'm going to try not to dismiss every idea that I know that people will bring to the roundtable,' he told the National Press Club in Canberra at the time. 'I suspect the states will have a view about the GST - it's not a view that I've been attracted to historically but I'm going to try not to get in the process of shooting ideas between now and the roundtable. 'One of the ways that I am going to be inclusive and respectful in the lead-up to this roundtable is I suspect people will raise that question.' Items like fresh fruit and vegetables, bread, cooking oil, meat and unflavoured milk were exempted from the 10 per cent GST under a political deal reached in 1999 between former Liberal prime minister John Howard's government and the Australian Democrats in the Senate. Labor had lost the 1998 election campaigning against the Coalition's proposed GST and voted against it in Parliament. Personal income taxes now make up more than half of federal government revenue, with Treasury expecting to collect $349.7billion from income taxes in 2025-26. This means working-age Australians are disproportionately carrying the tax burden, with Treasury only forecasting Budget deficits in coming years. 'Intergenerational inequity is built into our tax system - younger generations are facing the growing burden of funding an ageing population and will bear the cost of future interest payments to cover the structural deficit forecast for the next decade,' Chaney said. 'We have to have courageous conversations about other revenue sources to avoid handballing this problem to future generations.'