
Students canvass for Kalispell Public Schools high school levy
Mar. 28—Students from Flathead and Glacier high schools are making sure their voices are heard by the voters who will decide a $2.97 million levy request in May that will affect their education.
Three students from One Brave Pack, a political action committee composed of students, parents and business leaders, shared how they have been canvassing for "Yes" votes on Kalispell Public Schools' proposed high school general fund levy through social media and door-to-door visits with taxpayers.
"Our goal is to hit 1,000 homes in like the Kalispell proper area," Glacier High School junior Josh Lee said.
Lee and Flathead High School juniors Vikram Vatti and Mitchell Johnson, who arrived straight from a track practice, sat down for an interview recently at the offices of McGarvey Law, which serves as One Brave Pack's headquarters. Lee and Vatti said they began mobilizing classmates at their respective schools and joined forces when they learned about each other's efforts.
The high school general fund levy seeks to cover a budget shortfall and fully fund the high school district, which encompasses Flathead, Glacier, the H.E. Robinson Agricultural Center and Linderman Education Center, the alternative high school. The high school district is currently 90% funded, according to officials.
The general fund is the main budget that covers costs related to operating schools, such as salaries, instructional materials, student support services, utilities and extracurriculars not covered by the student activities fund, for example.
The three students agreed there is more awareness of this levy among the student body because of what's at stake if it doesn't pass.
"With so much on the line a lot more students are having it brought to their attention. Teachers are talking about it a lot more and my circle of friends," Lee said. "There's been a lot of word of mouth [and] people talking about the levy."
What's on the line is a reduction of 20.5 full-time equivalent positions in the high school district, which will primarily be achieved through attrition (retirements and resignations). Positions are also being eliminated in the elementary district. Staff cuts will in turn affect the number of classes/sections that can be offered.
As a member of Flathead's speech and debate team, Johnson said the impetus to join One Brave Pack and advocate for the levy's passage came after learning longtime speech and debate head coach and English teacher, Shannon O'Donnell, and assistant coach and history teacher, Sean O'Donnell, are retiring. KPS offered a retirement incentive to all staff under the looming budget shortfall.
"They gathered us up all before state and basically told us about the retirement and I was really upset about it, and I left the room. I knew I had to do something about it because I don't think it's OK that teachers have to give up their job and give up what they love ..." Johnson said.
"... When you have teachers like that who choose to retire just to try to save younger teachers that's something that should never be happening, right, like we should have the community caring and investing," added Vatti, who is also on the speech and debate team.
The district is also proposing phasing out legacy programs if the levy doesn't pass. Legacy programs are what Kalispell Public Schools' is calling programs and extracurriculars that have been offered to generations of high school students including athletics, FFA, speech and debate, theater, trades classes (house construction, welding and mechanics), internships, apprenticeships and music.
"[Kalispell Public Schools] offers a lot of extra opportunities to students, a lot more than other school districts do, and yet, we're the lowest funded AA school district in the state," Lee said.
In addition to a diploma, high school students may obtain college credit, career-specific certifications and work experience. The students said this gives them a head start in their pursuits after graduation.
Vatti views extracurriculars as an integral part of students' education. Sports games, music concerts, theater performances, speech and debate tournaments, county fair participation and volunteering through the extracurriculars all serve as a place for students to showcase their talent while providing a source of community entertainment.
"There's a lot of ways to look at the levy, but I think the main way to look at it is that it's about freedom. It's about giving freedom to our children, our youth within the community, to be able to do what they want with their lives," Vatti said.
"I agree. That's a good way of putting it," Lee said. "Voting yes on the levy is really like voting yes for students to be able to have a choice to do the things they care about, do the things they enjoy and the things they want to do to become not only better students, but better community members in the future ... voting for a better future for students."
People who can vote on the high school general fund levy includes residents in Kalispell and 13 surrounding elementary school districts whose students feed into Glacier and Flathead.
If the $2.97 million high school levy is approved, owners of homes with assessed values of $200,000 can anticipate annual taxes to increase by about $33.04. Owners of homes with assessed values of $300,000 can expect annual taxes to increase by $49.56.
"It's $73[.80] a year for the average home," Lee said, referring to the estimated tax increase on a home valued at $447,000.
"The average home is paying $6 a month. I mean, that's one trip to Starbucks. That is less than a Netflix subscription. That's less than a Spotify subscription," he added.
Vatti urged residents to reinvest in their community with a "yes" vote.
"I would say to people who are anti-tax in general is, out of all the things you can spend your money on, this has to be very important. You are directly helping our community. You are investing in the youth who are going to run the businesses that are within the Flathead Valley in the future.
A high school levy hasn't passed since May 2007. In the years since, the high school district footprint has grown along with academic programming. In 2024, voters shot down a $700,000 high school general fund levy request, which would have cost taxpayers who owned a $300,000 home about $12 annually.
Historically, Kalispell Public School's last major budget cut was $1.5 million that went into effect over 2017 and 2018. Of that amount, about $866,291 was cut from the high school budget alone. To cover budget shortfalls and inflationary increases, the district has also used money in an interlocal fund.
Rather than tap into one-time funding in the interlocal fund to cover ongoing costs, Kalispell Public Schools has pivoted strategies under a new administration and school board in efforts to stop pushing the problem down the road. The interlocal fund, which is a savings account of sorts, contains a combination of high school and elementary funds, (primarily any remaining year-end money). Currently it holds $5.77 million — with portions of it earmarked for items such as textbook purchases and replacing the artificial turf at Legends Stadium, for example.
"What I've been telling people is, imagine if you had to work with the amount of money that you had 17 years ago and you were just out of college, right, you just got your first apartment and you had a certain amount of money. Now, you have a full family with three kids and you're trying to live in a bigger home to accommodate all those people — but with the same amount of money you had 17 years ago. It just doesn't work," Lee said.
The three said anyone interested in joining their efforts can, whether it's canvassing or putting up a yard sign. People may join One Brave Pack's efforts by filling out a form at https://onebravepack.org.
For more information about the levy visit Kalispell Public Schools www.sd5.k12.mt.us.
Reporter Hilary Matheson may be reached at 758-4431 or hmatheson@dailyinterlake.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
L.A. law enforcement's treatment of journalists during protests is once again under scrutiny
Abraham Márquez, a reporter with the nonprofit investigative news startup Southlander, was filming a tense standoff between Los Angeles County sheriff's deputies and immigrant rights protesters in Paramount on Saturday night when he saw a deputy aim a "less-lethal" launcher in his direction. Sensing a confrontation, Márquez said, he raised his press credential and "kept yelling press, press, press,' even as he turned and began running in the opposite direction. He barely made it a few feet before he felt a stinging pain as first one foam round, then another slammed into his buttocks and his back. "They just unloaded," he said of the deputies. He was nearly struck again a short time later, when deputies riding by in an armored vehicle sprayed foam rounds into a gas station parking lot where Márquez and a KTLA-TV news crew had sought cover, he said. He was shaken, but said that he felt compelled to keep reporting. 'I got hit and whatnot but I'm glad I was there to document it," he said. The incident was one of dozens in which journalists have been shot with less-lethal police rounds, tear-gassed, shoved and detained while chronicling the ongoing civil unrest and military intervention in the nation's second-largest city, according to interviews and video footage reviewed by The Times. The police actions have drawn angry condemnation from public officials and 1st Amendment advocates. There have been multiple reported instances of reporters not only being struck by projectiles, but also having their bags searched, being threatened with arrest and getting blocked from areas where they had a right under state law to observe police activity. Among those hit by police projectiles were several Times reporters in the course of covering protests in downtown L.A. over the past few days. The LAPD and L.A. County Sheriff's Department have faced criticism and lawsuits over their treatment of news media during past crises, but some covering the recent events say the situation has only gotten worse with the inflammatory anti-media messaging coming from the Trump White House. "The price for free speech should not be this high," said Arturo Carmona, president and publisher of Caló News, a news site that covers issues that matter to English-speaking Latinos. "Several of our reporters, several of whom are women of color, have been harassed and attacked by law enforcement." In one high-profile case, a CNN reporter was briefly detained by officers while doing a live on-air segment. In another, Australian TV news reporter Lauren Tomasi was shot in the leg by a less-lethal round by an riot gear-clad officer moments after she wrapped up a live on-air segment. The incident became an international affair, with Australian Prime Minister Tony Albanese calling it "horrific." L.A. Mayor Karen Bass said it "sends a terrible message," and several city councilmembers referenced it while grilling LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell on Tuesday about his department's response to the protests. In a statement, the Sheriff's Department said it was reviewing video footage from several incidents involving the news media to determine whether any of its deputies were involved. The department said it is "committed to maintaining an open and transparent relationship with the media and ensuring that journalists can safely perform their duties, especially during protests, acts of civil disobedience, and public gatherings." "Our goal is to support press freedom while upholding public safety and operational integrity," the statement said. LAPD Deputy Chief Michael Rimkunas said that two of the roughly 15 complaints the department was investigating as of Tuesday involved possible mistreatment of journalists — a number that is expected to grow in the coming days and weeks. Rimkunas said the department decided to launch an investigation of the Tomasi incident on its own, but has since been in contact with the Australian consulate. A coalition of 27 press and civil liberties advocacy groups wrote to U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Tuesday 'to express alarm that federal officers may have violated the First Amendment rights of journalists covering recent protests and unrest related to immigration enforcement in the Los Angeles area.' Multiple journalists who covered the protests told The Times that officers and deputies used physical force or the threat of arrest to remove them from areas where they have a right to be. In doing so, the journalists said, police were ignoring protections established by state law for journalists covering protests, as well as their own departments' policies adopted after mass protests after George Floyd's murder in 2020 and over the clearance of a homeless encampment in Echo Park in 2021. On Saturday, journalist Ben Camacho was documenting the scene in Paramount, where images of people vandalizing and burning cars dominated the nightly newscasts. Wearing his press pass and with a camera hanging around his neck, he watched in shock as law enforcement opened fire on the crowd with less-lethal munitions, striking Nick Stern, a British news photographer, who crumbled to the ground in front of him. After helping carry Stern to safety, Camacho said he too was struck by a round in the kneecap. "I start to screaming pretty much at the top of my lungs," he said. 'It was like a sledgehammer." He noted that many people are working on freelance contracts that don't offer medical insurance, and said officers sometimes brush aside reporters with credentials from smaller independent outlets, which have an important role in monitoring events on the ground. Some police officials — who were not authorized to speak publicly — said officers try their best to accommodate reporters, but the situation on the street involves split-second decisions in a chaotic environment where they find themselves being attacked. They also contend that journalists from newer outlets or those who primarily post on social media act in adversarial or confrontational ways toward officers. Los Angeles Press Club Press Rights Chair Adam Rose said he has been collecting examples of officers from local, state and federal agencies violating the rights of journalists — seemingly ignoring the lessons learned and promises made the wake of past protests. Rose said many of the incidents were documented in videos that journalists themselves posted on social media. As of Wednesday morning, the tally was 43 and counting. The mistreatment of journalists at the recent protests are part of a "history of ugly treatment by police," Rose said, which included the 1970 killing of one of the city's leading Latino media voices, Ruben Salazar, who had been covering a Chicano rights protest when he was struck by a tear-gas canister fired by a sheriff's deputy. Even in cases where police abuses are well-documented on video, discipline of the offending officers is rare, Rose said. With plunging revenues leading to the downsizing of many legacy newsrooms, a new generation of citizen journalists has taken a vital role in covering communities across the country — their reporting is as protected as their mainstream counterparts, he said. "The reality is police are not the ones who're allowed to decide who is press,' he said. Some larger news companies have taken to hiring protective details for their reporters in the field, largely in response to aggressive crowds. On Saturday, L.A. Daily News reporter Ryanne Mena was struck in the head by a projectile fired by law enforcement during a demonstration in Paramount. She wasn't sure whether it was a tear gas canister or less-lethal munition, but said she later sought medical treatment and was diagnosed with a concussion. The day before she was hit in the thigh by another projectile while reporting downtown outside the jail, she said. Covering a few prior protests had taught her to always be mindful of her surroundings and to "never have my back toward anyone with a weapon." 'It's still kind of unbelievable that that happened," she said of her concussion. "It's unacceptable that that happened that other journalists were targeted.' Times staff writers Connor Sheets and David Zahniser contributed to this report. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Office of the Mayor releases statement on name change to Fort Gordon
AUGUSTA, Ga. (WJBF) – Augusta Mayor Garnett Johnson released a statement Wednesday afternoon concerning the name change of the military installation, Fort Gordon. Fort Gordon, which was changed to Fort Eisenhower 2023, has now been named for Medal of Honor recipient Master Sgt. Gary I. Gordon after President Donald Trump made an announcement Tuesday. 'While we believe the Fort Eisenhower name was a fitting tribute, given President Dwight D. Eisenhower's deep personal connection to Augusta, at the same time, we are proud to honor the legacy of Fort Gordon's new namesake, Master Sergeant Gary I. Gordon,' Johnson said. 'A true American hero and Medal of Honor recipient, Master Sergeant Gordon's valor and sacrifice during the Battle of Mogadishu represent the highest ideals of service. His name carries great meaning, and we are honored to have his legacy forever tied to our region.' The name change was effective immediately. Mayor Johnson said the base will continue to remain a 'vital part of Augusta's identity and plays an essential role in national defense, cybersecurity, and innovation.' 'We are proud of the enduring partnership between the City of Augusta and the installation,and we will continue to support our military community with unwavering dedication,' he said. 'Together, we look ahead with deep respect for the past, confidence in our shared future, and gratitude for all who serve.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mike Lee reinstates language to sell Utah public land in Trump tax bill
WASHINGTON — Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, reinstated language to make public land in Utah eligible for sale, adding the proposal back to President Donald Trump's massive tax package after it was removed by GOP leaders in the House last month. The proposal would pave the way to sell off a small percentage of Utah's public lands, as well as other Western states, to be used for affordable housing and increase revenue for conservation projects. The public land sale proposal is tucked into a larger section of energy-related provisions headed by Lee as chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, which released its portion of Trump's reconciliation bill on Wednesday. 'This is President Trump's agenda: cut the Green New Scam, reduce the deficit, and unleash American energy,' Lee said in a statement. 'We're cutting billions in unused Biden-era climate slush funds, opening up energy and resource development, turning federal liabilities into taxpayer value, while making housing more affordable for hardworking American families. This is how we make government smaller, freer, and work for Americans.' The move comes after the House stripped language to sell more than 211,000 acres across Utah and Nevada, an amendment led by Utah Rep. Celeste Maloy, R-Utah, who said she drafted the provision upon request from local officials. However, the language was ultimately removed from the House version amid pushback from some Republicans as well as concerns it did not adhere to strict reconciliation rules. Under the reconciliation process, all provisions in the massive package must adhere to what is known as the 'Byrd rule,' which prohibits policies that are unrelated to budget changes or that outweigh budgetary effects. To comply with the Byrd rule, Lee made substantive changes to Maloy's amendment that would refrain from using specific maps to target land in the western states. The updated language also excludes specific acreage, instead instructing the interior secretary to sell off between just 0.5% to 0.75% of federal lands in specific states. The states listed include Utah as well as Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming. However, the bill carves out specific guardrails for what land can be sold, excluding at least 15 categories of protected land from the list. That means national parks, monuments, and land dedicated to wilderness reserves would not be included. Instead, GOP aides stressed it would only sell 'unused or underused federal lands adjacent to cities or metropolitan areas.' To adhere to Byrd Rule requirements that policies must contribute to deficit reduction, the provision would stipulate that the money made from land sales goes toward conservation efforts, maintenance projects, infrastructure improvements for roads and utilities, and school funding. Maloy worked with Lee to draft the updated version of the land sales to be included in the final package, arguing it was crucial to affordable housing projects in the two western states. The proposal was also backed by Trump, who campaigned on the issue throughout the 2024 election. About 63% of Utah's land is owned by the federal government, the most of any state in the country aside from Nevada. But the initial proposal was met with pushback from some Republicans who have historically opposed public land sales, such as Rep. Ryan Zinke, R-Mont., the co-chairman of the newly created Public Lands Caucus. Lee's office worked closely with Montana Sens. Steve Daines and Tim Sheehy to assuage concerns from the state delegation about public land sales. The reconciliation language exempts Montana from any sales, but much of the framework was inspired by the Montana senators' suggestions to ease concerns about lack of a public process. The provision would require the interior secretary to consult with state and local governments as well as any Indian tribes before facilitating any sort of sale, according to the bill. That way, aides noted, it created a 'public participant process.' Democrats have also expressed opposition to the proposal, including Sen. Catherine Masto Cortez, D-Nevada, who contended much of the land being sold couldn't be converted into housing anyway. 'Their reconciliation package included federal land sales…that weren't even near areas where you could actually do affordable housing,' Masto said to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum during a Senate hearing on Wednesday. The land is 'in the middle of the desert. There's no infrastructure. I don't know any builder who is going to build housing in the middle of the desert, it makes no sense.' The proposal is also likely to face pushback from some public lands organizations. More than 100 groups penned a letter to Lee and other Senate leadership earlier this week urging them not to include language that would greenlight any land sales. However, GOP aides argued the land sales would help with housing affordability crises in Western states, especially for those who live close to national parks where housing prices are expensive. The public land sales proposal is tucked into a larger section of energy-related provisions, which also includes provisions paving the way for increased lease sales in Alaska, permitting reform, repealing Biden-era clean energy policies, and more. The full section must now be approved by the Senate parliamentarian, who will determine whether the contents adhere to the Byrd Rule and can be included in the final reconciliation package.