
Trump announces 25% tariff on India and unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil - Economy
The new tariffs were part of a flurry of trade activity that included a series of executive actions regarding Brazil, copper, and shipments of goods worth less than $800, as well as a reduced 15% tax on imports from South Korea, including its autos.
It was all a prelude to Friday when Trump's new tariff regime is scheduled to start, an event the White House has portrayed as a testament to Trump's negotiating skills even as concerns persist about the taxes hurting growth and increasing inflationary pressures.
India 'is our friend,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform announcing the taxes, but its tariffs on U.S. products 'are far too high.'
The Republican president added India buys military equipment and oil from Russia, enabling Moscow's war in Ukraine. As a result, he intends to charge an additional 'penalty' starting on Friday as part of the launch of his administration's revised tariffs on multiple countries.
Trump told reporters on Wednesday the two countries were still in the middle of negotiations on trade despite the tariffs slated to begin in a few days.
'We're talking to India now," the president said. "We'll see what happens.'
The Indian government said Wednesday it's studying the implications of Trump's tariffs announcement.
India and the U.S. have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial' bilateral trade agreement over the last few months, and New Delhi remains committed to that objective, India's Trade Ministry said in a statement.
Trump on Wednesday also signed separate orders to tax imports of copper at 50% and justify his 50% tariffs on Brazil due to their criminal prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro and treatment of U.S. social media companies.
Trump also signed an order saying that government now had the systems in place to close the tariff loophole on 'de minimis' shipments, which had enabled goods priced under $800 to enter America duty-free, largely from China.
The South Korea agreement will impose a 15% tariff, instead of the 25% Trump had threatened. South Korea would also buy $100 billion in energy resources from the U.S. and provide $350 billion for 'investments owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself, as president,' Trump said.
There is also an agreement with Pakistan that includes the development of its oil reserves. Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent briefed Trump on trade talks with China.
Trump's view on tariffs
Trump's announcement comes after a slew of negotiated trade frameworks with the European Union, Japan, the Philippines and Indonesia — all of which he said would open markets for American goods while enabling the U.S. to raise tax rates on imports.
The president views tariff revenues as a way to help offset the budget deficit increases tied to his recent income tax cuts and generate more domestic factory jobs.
While Trump has effectively wielded tariffs as a cudgel to reset the terms of trade, the economic impact is uncertain as most economists expect a slowdown in U.S. growth and greater inflationary pressures as some of the costs of the taxes are passed along to domestic businesses and consumers.
There's also the possibility of more tariffs coming on trade partners with Russia as well as on pharmaceutical drugs and computer chips.
Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, said Trump and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would announce the Russia-related tariff rates on India at a later date.
Tariffs face European pushback
Trump's approach of putting a 15% tariff on America's long-standing allies in the EU is also generating pushback, possibly causing European partners as well as Canada to seek alternatives to U.S. leadership on the world stage.
French President Emmanuel Macron said Wednesday in the aftermath of the trade framework that Europe 'does not see itself sufficiently' as a global power, saying in a cabinet meeting that negotiations with the U.S. will continue as the agreement gets formalized.
'To be free, you have to be feared,' Macron said. 'We have not been feared enough. There is a greater urgency than ever to accelerate the European agenda for sovereignty and competitiveness.'
Seeking a deeper partnership with India
Washington has long sought to develop a deeper partnership with New Delhi, which is seen as a bulwark against China.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has established a good working relationship with Trump, and the two leaders are likely to further boost cooperation between their countries. When Trump in February met with Modi, the U.S. president said that India would start buying American oil and natural gas.
The new tariffs on India could complicate its goal of doubling bilateral trade with the U.S. to $500 billion by 2030. The two countries have had five rounds of negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement.
While U.S. has been seeking greater market access and zero tariff on almost all its exports, India has expressed reservations on throwing open sectors such as agriculture and dairy, which employ a bulk of the country's population for livelihood, Indian officials said.
The Census Bureau reported that the U.S. ran a $45.8 billion trade imbalance in goods with India last year, meaning it imported more than it exported.
At a population exceeding 1.4 billion people, India is the world's largest country and a possible geopolitical counterbalance to China. India and Russia have close relations, and New Delhi has not supported Western sanctions on Moscow over its war in Ukraine.
The new tariffs could put India at a disadvantage in the U.S. market relative to Vietnam, Bangladesh and, possibly, China, said Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations.
'We are back to square one as Trump hasn't spelled out what the penalties would be in addition to the tariff,' Sahai said. 'The demand for Indian goods is bound to be hit.'
Follow us on:
Short link:
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East
12 hours ago
- Middle East
OPEN// FM participates in dialogue session at CSIS in Washington
CAIRO/WASHINGTON, July 31 (MENA) - Minister of Foreign Affairs, Emigration and Expatriates Badr Abdelatty participated on Thursday in a dialogue session with leaders from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington. The session was titled 'A Strategic Crossroads: Egypt's Response to Escalating Regional Challenges,' according to a statement by the foreign ministry. The session witnessed an exchange of views and assessments on the Egyptian-American strategic partnership and developments in the Middle East, including the latest developments in Gaza, Sudan, Libya, and Syria, in addition to challenges in the Red Sea and water security. Abdelatty reviewed the determinants of Egypt's position on regional crises and their repercussions on the security and stability of the region. (MENA) A I E/R E E


Al-Ahram Weekly
13 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
NCHR launches dialogue with civil society organizations on human rights
The National Council for Human Rights (NCHR), in partnership with the European Union, held its inaugural consultative meeting with civil society organizations. The meeting, titled "Mechanisms and Frameworks for Cooperation and Partnership," brought together human rights activists and experts to discuss the NCHR's plan to promote human rights. The event took place both in person and via Zoom, and was attended by several notable figures, including Mahmoud Karem, NCHR Chairman; Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat, an NCHR board member; and Hani Ibrahim, the NCHR Secretary-General. Legal expert Negad El-Borai was also present, along with representatives from the European Union and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The meeting underscored the NCHR's commitment to creating a consistent dialogue with civil society and to encouraging civil organizations to participate in spreading a culture of human rights, enhancing community oversight, and engaging with human rights issues. Karem emphasized that civil society is a vital pillar of democratic development and a key partner in implementing the National Human Rights Strategy. He stated that human rights organizations act as a crucial link between citizens and the state by identifying needs, monitoring challenges, and proposing solutions. Karem also highlighted the importance of an ongoing partnership with these organizations, recognizing their role in promoting transparency, accountability, and a culture of human rights. He noted that the NCHR plans to expand this cooperation through capacity-building programs and consultative meetings, with support from international partners like the European Union. According to El-Sadat, strengthening partnerships with civil society organizations and human rights activists is a core principle of the NCHR. He explained that the council has recently intervened in various humanitarian and social cases, such as assisting Egyptian citizens abroad who faced difficulties. El-Sadat also mentioned that the council has responded to inquiries from human rights organizations and other parties about the legal and health conditions of several pretrial detainees. He confirmed that the council contacted relevant officials and directly followed up on some of these cases to ensure legal guarantees and human rights standards were upheld. The NCHR's Secretary-General, Hani Ibrahim, stressed that building a trusting, sustainable relationship with civil society organizations requires clarity and discipline when developing and implementing action plans. He noted that the council has organized a series of sessions and dialogues, led by human rights experts and running through November. The goal of these sessions is to create a practical vision for a future action plan that establishes a participatory institutional model for managing human rights issues, he added. For his part, Negad El-Borai emphasized that the council serves as an advisory body that supports human rights reform processes through close cooperation with civil society organizations. He called for continued joint work to formulate realistic paths that activate constitutional provisions, develop practices in a way that meets citizens' aspirations, and consolidate the respect for rights and freedoms in practice. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Egypt Independent
16 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
US support for Israel's actions in Gaza drops, as Democratic opposition grows and MAGA movement splits
Americans' support for Israel's military actions in Gaza is dropping rapidly, prompting pro-Israel Democrats and some of President Donald Trump's long-time allies to warn that the country could permanently damage its standing in the United States. A Gallup poll released this week found that just 32 percent of US adults support Israel's military actions in Gaza — a record low since the war was launched in response to Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attack. The poll also found the strongest partisan split yet: Support among those who identify themselves as Republicans remained strong, at 71 percent. But just 8 percent of Democrats and 25 percent of independents say they back Israel's military actions. In perhaps the most ominous long-term sign for backers of Israel, the poll found just 9 percent support for its actions among those age 18-34 of all political parties. The shift in public opinion has crucial implications for both parties: Some key members of Trump's MAGA movement are vocally questioning whether the United States should keep supporting Israel, while plummeting backing for the country among Democrats will likely impact the party's primaries in key races in 2026 and 2028. The collapse in American support for Israel is part of a global trend. The United Kingdom said this week it would recognize a Palestinian state before the United Nations General Assembly unless Israel takes major steps to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The announcement followed France's decision to do so. United Nations agencies are warning that 'time is running out to mount a full-scale humanitarian response' in the besieged Gaza Strip. Data show that more than one in three people (39 percent) are now going days at a time without eating, the UN's World Food Programme said in a statement Wednesday, adding that over 500,000 people — almost a quarter of Gaza's population — 'are enduring famine-like conditions.' Rep. Brad Sherman, a California Democrat who co-chairs the bipartisan Congressional Israel Allies Caucus, told CNN that Israel is losing the battle for worldwide public opinion. He said Israel's military faces serious challenges in Gaza, where Hamas is willing to incur massive civilian casualties 'to undermine Israel's position in the world,' but said its objectives 'have to be balanced against each other.' 'Israel has to determine, what are its military objectives, and what casualties is it willing to incur to realize that national security includes your image around the world,' Sherman said. 'You can't get everything you want, and your worldwide image is important.' MAGA doubts Within the GOP, fissures over Israel's actions came into public view after Trump on Monday disputed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's weekend assertion that there is 'no starvation in Gaza.' 'That's real starvation stuff,' Trump said. 'I see it, and you can't fake that. So, we're going to be even more involved.' Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a prominent figure in Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement, appeared to become the first Republican in Congress to describe the crisis in Gaza as a 'genocide' with a Monday night social media post. 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene said. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene arrives for a House Republican meeting at the US Capitol on May 20 in Washington, comment came in a longer post criticizing Florida GOP Rep. Randy Fine, a staunch supporter of Israel. Fine told CNN that 'those who claim that Israel is engaged in genocide are either antisemites or idiots or both.' 'If Israel had wanted to commit a genocide in Gaza, they had the ability to do it. And it would have been done 18 months ago, and it would have been over in two days,' he said. 'Israel has the capability to kill everyone in Gaza, but they haven't. … Hundreds and hundreds of Israeli soldiers have died in order to minimize the deaths of Gaza Arabs.' He argued that Israel should stop putting its own soldiers at risk 'to minimize the deaths of the enemy.' Fine added: 'Israel needs to stop worrying about what the rest of the world thinks and take care of business. Political opinion does not win wars.' While many Republicans still agree with Fine, Steve Bannon, the former Trump chief strategist, said Tuesday on his podcast that there is 'very little support for Israel' within Trump's MAGA movement among those under age 30. 'And now, even people who support Israel are sitting there going, what in the hell's going on here?' Bannon said. 'Total mindset change' for Democrats Inside the Democratic Party, the issue of support for Israel proved to be a difficult one in 2024 for President Joe Biden and then his replacement atop the ballot, Vice President Kamala Harris, particularly in the battleground state of Michigan. That state, with its large Arab-American population, will host a competitive Senate contest in 2026. And Democrats who hope to run for president in 2028 will surely be pushed on their Israel policies in primaries across the country. Progressive Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee, who was one of six members of Congress to support a recent Greene amendment to strip $500 million in funding for Israel's missile defense systems from a defense appropriations bill, said in a statement that, 'The United States has a responsibility to demand a permanent ceasefire, stop funding and supplying the bombs being dropped, and call for unconditional humanitarian aid to enter Gaza immediately. It is good policy, good politics, and the right thing to do.' More establishment figures in liberal media have also sharpened their criticism of Israel in recent days — offering a preview of what could become a significant long-term shift in the party. The former aides to President Barack Obama who host the 'Pod Save America' podcast argued this week that Democratic candidates should stop supporting military aid for Israel. 'There has to be a total mindset change in the Democratic Party,' co-host Tommy Vietor, a former Obama National Security Council staffer, said. 'When the war ends, we are not going back to the pre-October 7 status quo. It's not where the party is. It's not where the world is.' Eric Fingerhut, the president and chief executive officer of the Jewish Federations of North America and a former Ohio Democratic congressman, said the Gallup findings numbers reflect 'overwhelmingly negative media coverage of the war.' 'There's no question that we are in a very partisan moment in America, and that that is an overlay on how people react to the situation in Israel and in the war in Gaza,' Fingerhut said. CNN's Nadeen Ebrahim and Ibrahim Dahman contributed to this report.