Flutter Entertainment plc announces launch of fourth tranche of share repurchase program
The Buyback will commence on October 1, 2025 on the New York Stock Exchange, and will end no later than December 31, 2025. The purpose of the Buyback is to reduce the share capital of Flutter. This Buyback is the fourth tranche of the multi-year share repurchase program of up to $5bn announced on September 25, 2024. In 2025, we expect to return approximately $1bn to shareholders via the program.
Davy Securities UC will conduct the Buyback on Flutter's behalf and will make trading decisions under the Buyback independently of Flutter in accordance with certain pre-set parameters. The maximum number of ordinary shares which may be acquired pursuant to the Buyback is an aggregate of 17,674,003 ordinary shares less the total amount of ordinary shares acquired as part of the first tranche of our share buyback programme announced on November 13, 2024, the second tranche of our share buyback programme announced on March 5, 2025, and the third tranche of our share buyback programme announced on May 8, 2025.
The Buyback will be conducted within the parameters prescribed by (i) Rule 10b5-1 and Rule 10b-18 under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and (ii) the EU Market Abuse Regulation (596/2014) and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1052 as such legislation forms part of law in the United Kingdom pursuant to the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (as may be amended, extended and/or supplemented from time to time). The repurchased ordinary shares will be cancelled.
Any decision in relation to the amount and timing of any future buyback tranche will be based on an ongoing assessment of the capital needs of the business and general market conditions.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including with relation to our share repurchase program. These statements reflect our current expectations as to future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. In some cases, you can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as "outlook", "believe(s)", "expect(s)", "potential", "continue(s)", "may", "will", "should", "could", "would", "seek(s)", "predict(s)", "intend(s)", "trends", "plan(s)", "estimate(s)", "anticipates", "projection", "goal", "target", "aspire", "will likely result", and or the negative version of these words or other comparable words of a future or forward-looking nature. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. Factors that could cause the Company's results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be found in Part I, "Item 1A. Risk Factors" of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other periodic filings with the SEC, which are accessible on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in the Company's filings with the SEC. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law.
About Flutter Entertainment plc
Flutter is the world's leading online sports betting and iGaming operator, with leading positions in markets across the world, including the US. Our ambition is to leverage our significant scale and our challenger mindset to change our industry for the better. By Changing the Game, we believe we can deliver long-term growth while promoting a positive, sustainable future for all our stakeholders. We are well-placed to do so through the distinctive, global competitive advantages of the Flutter Edge, which gives our brands access to group-wide benefits to stay ahead of the competition, as well as our clear vision for sustainability through our Positive Impact Plan.
Flutter operates a diverse portfolio of leading online sports betting and iGaming brands including FanDuel, Sky Betting & Gaming, Sportsbet, PokerStars, Paddy Power, Sisal, tombola, Betfair, MaxBet, Junglee Games, Snaitech, Betnacional and Adjarabet.
To learn more about Flutter, please visit our website at www.flutter.com.
The person responsible for arranging release of this Announcement on behalf of Flutter is Edward Traynor, Company Secretary of Flutter.
Enquiries:
Investor Relations: Investor.relations@flutter.com
Media Relations: corporatecomms@flutter.com
Links:
Sign up to our RNS and SEC alerts here
Sign up to our Press Releases here
Follow Flutter Entertainment on LinkedIn or X
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Couple making $180K say they're one mistake away 'from losing everything' — Ramit Sethi says their problem is 'not math'
Dominique, 33, and Chris, 34, make a combined income of $180,000 per year — and while that may sound like a lot of money, they're still living paycheck to paycheck. They're one 'f–ck-up away from losing everything,' Dominique told Ramit Sethi on his I Will Teach You To Be Rich podcast. At that moment, Chris has just $64.18 in his checking account. While on paper they have 'an amazing income,' their short-term money mindset 'has them living very, very tightly with their finances,' said Sethi. For example, they bought a second house 'based purely on vibes.' Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now The dilemma Dominique and Chris have been together six years; they're engaged and raising a toddler. They bought a second house, which they're currently renting, but that's costing them $1,000 to $2,000 a month — though if they offload the house in this market, they could end up losing about $40,000. Their childcare costs are also set to quadruple. But they spend without thinking and don't crunch the numbers, even on major purchases, leaving them financially unstable. There's also a disconnect around how much they each contribute. Dominique manages parenting, full-time work, and the household finances, which makes her increasingly resentful. But Chris tunes out their financial issues, becoming more and more disengaged. Chris wasn't working for a while 'and it just felt like everything was piling on and piling on, especially because we don't communicate about finances together or… work things out as a team,' Dominique told Sethi. 'I kind of shut down in those situations because I don't like confrontation,' Chris admitted to Sethi. Chris is now working, and when Sethi breaks down the numbers, he finds that Chris makes a gross monthly income of $9,240 versus Dominique's $5,709. 'Their finances are driven mostly by emotion, not by math. And if they don't make a change, they are at risk of losing everything they've built,' said Sethi. This money mindset is the culprit 'behind everything from their daily spending to their hesitation around investing,' he added. 'There's not a lot of conscious spending, conscious saving, conscious investing. It's pretty reactionary.' Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. The cost of living reactively A short-term money mindset usually involves living paycheck to paycheck, making impulse purchases, and overusing credit cards, as well as avoiding savings and investments. But if you make impulse decisions on major purchases like a house, car, or vacation — especially if those decisions are based on fear — 'you will pay the price,' said Sethi. That price can be financial, like higher costs over time (such as putting a major purchase on your credit card that you can't afford to pay off right away, leading to accruing interest charges). Or, it could mean you're more vulnerable to emergencies (if you don't have savings or an emergency fund). But it can also lead to stress, anxiety, and even major health problems. An Intuit consumer survey found that 61% of those aged 18 to 35 experience financial anxiety, with the main culprits being rising living expenses (76%), job uncertainty (48%) and increasing housing costs (46%). That financial anxiety ties into their overall mental and physical health, with 58% saying that managing their finances improves their quality of life. Yet, 49% still live paycheck to paycheck and 32% struggle to plan for unexpected expenses. Ongoing stress and financial fears can lead to negative mental health side effects, such as anxiety, depression, relationship problems, and even problem substance abuse, according to the Newport Institute. A recent Health is Wealth report found that 66% of U.S. adults experienced trouble sleeping (40%) and headaches (37%) due to financial stress, while 67% say inflation has negatively impacted their physical or mental health. But it doesn't have to be that way. Shifting to a long-term mindset Sethi says there's a difference between being problem-oriented and solution-oriented. 'You can be someone who talks about problems or you can be someone who finds solutions,' he said during his podcast. As for Dominique and Chris? They've 'spent years in problem mode, spinning their wheels, going in circles, arguing, avoiding, reacting.' If they really want to change, Sethi said they need to shift 'from being problem-oriented to solution-oriented.' Sethi's advice to Dominique and Chris is to start by learning the basic language of personal finance. That might mean reading books, watching videos, or taking workshops; it could also mean financial counseling. They also need to start communicating about money — and their future goals. That could mean setting aside a regular meeting time to discuss money matters and start setting goals for their future together. From there, they can create a budget, open a joint savings account, set money aside for emergencies and automate their bill payments, savings and investments. 'It needs to happen every month consistently, automatically,' said Sethi. They'll also need to make a decision on their second house, which they'll take a loss on if they sell (which may or may not be the right decision after they crunch the numbers). But a major factor that could influence whether they're successful or not is whether they can shift away from their short-term money mindset toward a solution-oriented, long-term mindset. 'That's a profound shift,' Sethi said. 'That means going from 'can you believe this?' to 'how would I fix this?'' What to read next Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Frontier Airlines CEO Issues Bleak Warning About the Future of Domestic Air Travel — Including Costs and Convenience
NEED TO KNOW Frontier Airlines CEO Barry Biffle warned that domestic airline travel may get less convenient and more expensive for travelers He made the comments during the airline's recent second-quarter earnings call Biffle said domestic flights are not profitable for airlines due to a lack of demand, compared to the supplyFrontier Airlines CEO Barry Biffle has issued a bleak warning about the future of affordable airline travel. 'There's going to continue to be reductions in capacity in this industry,' Biffle said during the company's second-quarter earnings call on Aug. 5, per The Economic Times. Biffle added that airlines will likely be forced to cut the number of flights and routes they provide to travelers, as many domestic-focused ones are proving unprofitable, The Street reported. This would ultimately translate to fewer flight options and fewer budget fares for customers. 'I'm talking about domestic fares in the domestic marketplace,' Biffle said on the call. 'We believe that the entire industry is not making money [...] The domestic [side] is not making money. And that's because there is too much supply relative to demand.' While the budget airline made $929 million in profit in their second quarter of 2025, the airline had a net loss of $70 million, the company's public financial records show. United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby made similar comments about the lack of profitability of current airline models during the company's second-quarter earnings call as well, per The Street. Kirby said, 'If I dig deeper into it and I look at every airline that's not named United or Delta, I can find at every single one of them, a double-digit percentage of their route network that loses money. And the only way for them to get margins that are anywhere close to their [wholesale acquisition cost] is to stop flying places that lose money. And that is going to ultimately happen.' The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! However, not all airline execs are in agreement over the pessimistic prognosis of the industry. American Airlines CEO Robert Isom addressed Kirby's comments during his company's second-quarter call, stating, per Forbes, 'We don't run our airline based on other airlines' perception of our business." And while Islom acknowledged the 'reluctance of domestic travelers' to get more involved in the more profitable international travel 'game,' he added, 'We think that's going to change." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. These discussions come at a time when the airline industry has been under much public scrutiny. Back in March, CNN reported that the 'fear of flying' had driven down ticket sales in recent months, after several high-profile plane crashes. 'We saw a pretty immediate stall in both corporate travel and bookings,' Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian said at the time, per the outlet. 'Consumer confidence and certainty in air travel started to wane a little bit as questions of safety came in.' Several airlines have since implemented strategies to try to entice potential customers and stand out in the competitive market. Frontier Airlines previously announced that it would be offering a new option called "Economy Bundle" through Aug. 18, which includes a 'free carry-on bag, free seat selection, and free flight changes.' Read the original article on People Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Ron Wyden Warns Of Backdoor Social Security Privatization: 'It's Clear Trump Was Lying All Along'
As debate over the future of Social Security heats up once again, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) is sounding the alarm over what many see as a renewed effort to privatize the program — this time, through a provision in the recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The controversy began last week after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent referred to the Trump administration's new so-called Trump Accounts — a new savings program for children — as a "back door for privatizing Social Security." Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— A Return to an Old Fight Bessent's remarks have reopened a long-standing and politically sensitive issue. Proposals to privatize Social Security — which would shift the system from a government-run program to one based on personal savings accounts — have surfaced in the past, most notably under President George W. Bush. But those ideas have largely been set aside after public pushback. Millions of Americans rely on Social Security as a guaranteed source of income in retirement. Under privatization, individuals would be responsible for managing their own retirement savings, potentially exposing them to market risks and uncertainty. Trump Accounts Draw Scrutiny The program at the center of the latest debate is the Trump Account, a new savings vehicle created under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The account is designed to be opened for any baby born in the U.S., with a potential $1,000 initial deposit from the Treasury. Like an IRA, it allows for post-tax contributions — up to $5,000 a year — and could grow over time. "In a way, it is a back door for privatizing Social Security," Bessent said, speaking at a Breitbart News forum, about the Trump Accounts. This has sparked widespread concern that they are intended as a long-term replacement — not a supplement — to Social Security. Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Later that day, Bessent clarified his comments, saying the administration was committed to protecting Social Security. "This is not an either-or question," he wrote in a post on X. "Our administration is committed to protecting Social Security and to making sure seniors have more money." Wyden, Democrats React Swiftly Despite the clarification, Wyden and other top Democrats were quick to push back. "It's clear Trump was lying all along about protecting Social Security," Wyden said in a statement, accusing the president of paving the way for Wall Street interests to profit at the expense of retirees. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called Bessent's remarks "a stunning admission," saying they revealed the administration's true intentions. The Democratic National Committee echoed that view. Spokesperson Tim Hogan accused the Trump administration of scheming to dismantle the program through what he called a "backdoor scam."Social Security's Future Remains Uncertain The backdrop to this renewed debate is Social Security's long-term financial outlook. According to the program's trustees, the trust fund that pays benefits will no longer be able to cover full payments starting in 2034 unless changes are made. Trump, for his part, has repeatedly promised to protect Social Security. On the 2024 campaign trail, and after winning re-election, he said the program would remain untouched, other than possible efforts to make it more efficient. Still, for critics like Wyden, recent developments suggest a different story. "Calling this a five-alarm fire is an understatement," Wyden said. With millions of Americans counting on Social Security to fund their retirement, the debate over its future — and who's telling the truth about it — is far from over. Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Sen. Ron Wyden Warns Of Backdoor Social Security Privatization: 'It's Clear Trump Was Lying All Along' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
