logo
Florida lawmakers may allow lawsuits to move property insurance claims

Florida lawmakers may allow lawsuits to move property insurance claims

Yahoo27-03-2025

Something strange is going on in the current session of the Florida Legislature. State lawmakers are actually considering consumer-friendly legislation that would allow policyholders to legally challenge insurers' claims denials to address Florida's ongoing property insurance crisis. The 180-degree turnaround is welcomed, even if it is belated.
House Bill 1551, proposed by state Rep. Hillary Cassell, R-Dania Beach, would restore the ability to sue insurance companies that don't want to pay outstanding claims. The legislature and Gov. Ron DeSantis removed that bit of leverage from policyholders in 2022 during a barrage of bills lawmakers said was needed to protect the insurance industry's ability to operate in Florida. Lawsuits, the mantra surrounding the policy, was the primary reason insurers were fleeing the state.
That so-called tort reform obviously helped insurers that have long lambasted lawsuits as the cause of their difficulties operating in the Sunshine State. However, while litigation against insurers dropped, a new report found that insurers doing business in Florida paid millions to shareholders and billions to affiliates while reporting big losses. The disclosure prompted an outcry from frustrated policyholders and forced lawmakers to re-consider the consumer.
The legislation currently making its way through the Florida House would make insurers pay for plaintiffs' attorneys fees in some cases. It advanced on a bipartisan 15-1 vote out of the Insurance and Banking Subcommittee, much to the chagrin of the Florida Chamber of Commerce. The bill still faces heavy headwinds. The insurance industry is pushing back, claiming that a renewal of lawsuits would only result in increased rates, higher premiums and a renewed reluctance of insurers to provide property insurance coverage in Florida.
More: Report on Florida insurers' big payments to 'affiliates' fuels push to change lawsuit rules
Yet, state lawmakers should take the industry protests with an ample grain of salt. The payouts outlined in the above-mentioned 2022 report happened while insurers were canceling policies, raising rates and claiming insolvency. Worse, state regulators knew about it but didn't complete the report or share its contents with the public. No wonder a bill that brings a small change to the process is finding bipartisan support.
By 2022, Floridians were experiencing the apex of a crisis. A changing climate and an increase in damaging storms had prompted insurers to cut bait and leave Florida or stay and either raise premiums or reduce coverage. To hold down costs, the governor and state lawmakers pushed changes that restricted litigation while providing funding to help insurers meet rising reinsurance costs. These measures passed with promises that rates would fall within two years.
Time went by. The rates didn't drop. Months after the law that curbed lawsuits went into effect, the Post Editorial Board asked the Insurance Information Institute, an association of the nation's top insurers when policyholders might see some relief. The answer? Years. Litigation, Institute officials told the Post then, remained a big problem, despite two special sessions of the Florida Legislature and a regular session in which the insurance industry pretty much got everything it said it needed to reduce the impact of lawsuits, which supposedly would lead to lower rates.
Today, there are signs of improvement. Litigation is much less a problem for the industry as more insurance companies have opened for business in the state, and increases in insurance rates have been modest or largely flat and definitely nowhere near the annual rate increase requests the state had seen a few years ago.
More: Insurance still tops concerns for Floridians despite legislative changes, survey shows
Still, policyholders aren't satisfied. Rates haven't dropped as much as promised and the legislative committee hearings have started to see more property owners complaining about the industry's slow response to claims and the ongoing reluctance to pay for damages, even if litigation has dropped. Cassell's bill, along with another bill that would require insurers' decisions to deny claims to be reviewed, approved and signed off on by qualified human professionals and not AI, amount to a breath of fresh air in a state capitol that has longed prioritized the industry over its consumers.
Last year, Cassell's efforts to bring balance to the insurance crisis only resulted in a committee conversation. The fact that her bill is moving through one legislative chamber is progress, but lawmakers in both chambers need to step up and pass this legislation.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Florida may allow lawsuits to move insurance claims | Editorial

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More than 1,000 attend peaceful 'No Kings' protest in Naples
More than 1,000 attend peaceful 'No Kings' protest in Naples

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

More than 1,000 attend peaceful 'No Kings' protest in Naples

A mixture of chants, honking and cheers filled the air as more than a thousand people participated in the No Kings rally outside of the Collier County Courthouse in Naples June 14. The cluster armed with signs, flags and bullhorns spilled onto the sidewalks stretching from the intersection of U.S. 41 and Palm Drive to Airport Road South. Attendees aired myriad grievances with President Donald Trump, who was celebrating his 79th birthday in Washington, D.C. Saturday evening with a $40 million military parade for the Army's 250th anniversary. Collier's was one of 2,000 such demonstrations natinwide. The two-hour long protest remained peaceful despite a few middle fingers and derogatory remarks uttered from passing cars. Collier County Sheriff's Office deputies were stationed at points throughout the crowd. Parts of the property such as the fountain near the courthouse steps and the sign near Airport and U.S. 41 were cordoned off to prevent protestors from climbing on them. Dozens of volunteers helped the group remain safe throughout the duration of the rally. Many also brought packs of water to hand out to help manage the heat. Things stayed calm, confirming what Indivisible cofounder Ezra Levin told USA Today earlier in the week: "I think we will see the largest peaceful single-day protests that this country has seen certainly since the first Trump term." Levin is one of the organizers of the "No Kings" effort Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis had said the state is ready to 'quell any violence,' telling Fox News that local law enforcement, the state highway patrol and the National Guard would be ready to stop any violence or 'unrest' at the statewide protests. Holding a sign that said, "The only orange monarch I like is the butterfly," Naples resident Debbie Cahill had gone to the Fort Myers protest. She said she wanted to represent "everybody that doesn't agree with what's happening now with our three-branch system being dominated by one (Trump)." This article originally appeared on Naples Daily News: 1,000 protesters in Naples gather for 'No Kings' demonstration

UF's DeSantis-aligned board chair backed a star president and lost. Now what?
UF's DeSantis-aligned board chair backed a star president and lost. Now what?

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

UF's DeSantis-aligned board chair backed a star president and lost. Now what?

The University of Florida is staying the course — and so too, for now, is Mori Hosseini. That's the message Gov. Ron DeSantis sent this week when he reappointed Hosseini — a strong-willed and politically formidable Volusia County real estate magnate — as chairman of UF's board of trustees, even after prominent conservatives called for his resignation over the failed effort to install Santa J. Ono as UF's next president. The reappointment injects fresh certainty into an volatile moment for Florida's flagship university, which remains without a permanent president and with no clear plan for finding one after the state university system's Board of Governors voted 10-6 last Tuesday to reject Ono's nomination. At a UF board meeting last Thursday — just two days after Ono's candidacy was torpedoed — Hosseini read a prepared statement later blasted out through the university's social media accounts. He defended the search process and called Ono's rejection 'deeply disappointing,' but urged the board and the broader university community to 'move forward with strength, purpose, and an unshakable belief in UF's future — with or without Mori Hosseini.' A week later, that future remains murky. Interim President Kent Fuchs has previously said he does not plan to extend his contract beyond its July 31 expiration. As of Thursday, UF has not announced any contingency plan or next steps for restarting the presidential search — raising questions about how the university will navigate a pivotal budgetary and academic planning stretch without a permanent leader in place, as well as how its influential board chairman will be able to regain his footing and continue his mission to make UF the top-ranking state school after losing a battle with Florida's ideological purists. The rejection of Ono — a three-time university president and the sitting president of the University of Michigan — came as a shock to many in academia. Hosseini, along with the rest of the UF board, had framed their poaching of Ono as a signal of the university's rising national stature. UF has long aspired to surpass Michigan in U.S. News & World Report's public university rankings, where Michigan currently holds the No. 3 spot; UF sits at No. 7. Hosseini, for his part, has not hidden his ambitions to raise UF's national standing vis-à-vis rankings. The board chair proudly declared in December that he was 'laser-focused' on the rankings climb, pulling language from a recent New York Times article that suggested former President Ben Sasse's resignation that summer had to do with a disagreement with Hosseini over rankings. Under Sasse, UF lost its heralded No. 5 title. For Hosseini, losing out on Ono is also potentially bruising on a personal level. He once lamented in a Tampa Bay Times op-ed that his eldest daughter refused to consider any Florida university and instead enrolled at — and graduated from — the University of Michigan. In his remarks on Thursday, Hosseini's frustration over Ono's ouster was palpable. 'We believe Dr. Ono was uniquely qualified to lead this University at this moment,' Hosseini said. 'The symbolism and substance of a sitting president of a university as prestigious as the University of Michigan choosing to come to the University of Florida should not be lost.' For critics of Ono's appointment this was a concerted victory. Christopher Rufo, a New College of Florida trustee who celebrated Ono's rejection as 'another scalp on the wall,' and on Friday urged Hosseini to resign as UF's board chairman, calling him prestige-obsessed and 'delusional' for backing an 'ultra-leftwing ideologue' to lead the state's flagship university. But those on the Board of Governors who voted against Ono pointed to what they saw as a lack of conviction and honesty, pointing out his wishy-washy reversal on diversity and climate change initiatives, as well as his delayed response to antisemitism and pro-Palestinian encampments that sprung up on campus under his watch at Michigan. By the end of last Tuesday's grueling three-hour interview, the board's view was clear: Ono wasn't the right ideological fit for Florida. Scott Yenor, a Boise State University political science professor and leading conservative critic of higher education, faulted UF's board for prioritizing prestige over ideology, calling their enthusiasm for Ono a sign of the state's continued 'obsession' with elite validation — a mismatch with Florida's new political mission for public universities. He called Ono a 'confirmation convert' who had softened his left-leaning edges to win over Florida's conservative academic leaders. Within the Board of Governors — which Hosseini once chaired — several current members appeared to challenge not only Ono's unanimous recommendation by UF trustees, but Hosseini's influence. Hosseini, visibly frustrated, called the push to derail Ono 'heartbreaking' and accused fellow board members of trying to 'take somebody down' for political sport. The episode more broadly sets the stage for future clashes between Hosseini and those who opposed Ono — including members of the Board of Governors — who effectively challenged the trustees' unanimous pick and, by extension, Hosseini's judgment and authority. Aubrey Jewett, a political science professor at University of Central Florida, said the public nature of the breakdown has created awkward crosscurrents for Republican-aligned power players who are normally in lockstep. 'It was a pretty unusual situation to have such a high-profile conflict between people who supposedly are all representing the same party and ideology and all beholden to the same governor, DeSantis, and yet they came up with quite different conclusions on the suitability of Ono,' Jewett said. 'It's a slap in the face to the UF board to have come to an agreement unanimously and then have the state board overturn them.' Jewett said he suspects Hosseini is not only frustrated but personally insulted by the vote and the implications it carried. 'Personally, you feel like, 'we're supposed to all be on the same team, right? I'm a conservative Republican who's given a ton of money and golf machines to DeSantis. And now we get this group that's calling into question our judgment and suggesting somehow that we would install a liberal or progressive who would work against those ideas. It's insulting on a personal level, I'm sure.' 'I'm sure he is pretty disappointed and ticked about what happened,' Jewett added. 'It's a lot of work to see undone.' Yet DeSantis' reappointment of Hosseini — made public Monday — signaled that the governor is standing by one of his closest allies. Their relationship runs deep; Hosseini lent his private jet to the DeSantis' 2024 presidential campaign and helped bankroll a golf simulator at the governor's mansion. But Hosseini's now-precarious standing with other prominent Republicans underscore the growing fissures within the party over UF's leadership. He's been a major donor to Republican politicians like U.S. Senator Rick Scott, who publicly condemned Ono's nomination and criticized UF's search team. Now, as UF's de facto leader, Hosseini faces the twin challenge of winning back conservative confidence while trying to restart a presidential search that's become a national cautionary tale. UF may struggle to find a qualified leader after Ono's bid embarrassingly collapsed on a national stage. Moreover, at least two executive search firms have sworn off working for Florida universities because of the ordeal, The Chronicle of Higher Education reported Friday. And given that the UF board's composition is staying intact, Yenor said 'it's not clear that a conservative would want to come.'

Ron DeSantis Says Drivers Have Right to Hit Protesters—Is He Right?
Ron DeSantis Says Drivers Have Right to Hit Protesters—Is He Right?

Newsweek

timea day ago

  • Newsweek

Ron DeSantis Says Drivers Have Right to Hit Protesters—Is He Right?

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has been accused of "overstating the protections that drivers have" if they hit individuals who surround their vehicles during a demonstration. Tray Gober, the managing director of the law firm Lee, Gober & Reyna, told Newsweek that the governor appeared to "conflate civil protections with criminal immunity" and risked "sending a dangerous message." Why It Matters Since June 6, Los Angeles has been rocked by a series of protests against Immigration and Custom Enforcement raids. Some of the demonstrations have turned violent, with individuals burning vehicles and throwing rocks at the police. In response, President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of 4,000 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines against the wishes of California Governor Gavin Newsom. Anti-ICE protests have since spread to other cities, and Texas Governor Greg Abbott has also deployed National Guard troops in his state. On Saturday, the Trump administration is holding a military parade in Washington, D.C., to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. The "No Kings" movement has organized more than 1,500 demonstrations across the country to take place on the day, which is also Trump's 79th birthday. A large number of protests nationwide could mean increased interactions between drivers and people demonstrating on roads. What To Know During an appearance on The Rubin Report on Wednesday, DeSantis said drivers could legally hit demonstrators with their vehicles if fleeing for their safety. "We also have a policy that if you're driving on one of those streets and a mob comes and surrounds your vehicle and threatens you, you have a right to flee for your safety," DeSantis said. "And so if you drive off and you hit one of these people, that's their fault for impinging on you." Gober, who has worked as a criminal defense attorney and covered civil cases involving vehicle collisions, said the governor's comments were based on a misunderstanding of the law. "Governor DeSantis' comments appear to conflate civil protections with criminal immunity, which are distinct in both intent and effect," Gober said. "Florida's HB 1 passed in 2021 provides an affirmative defense in civil lawsuits for injuries caused to someone 'acting in furtherance of a riot.' But that is not the same as granting drivers a carte blanche to hit protesters without consequence." Florida Governor Ron DeSantis speaking during a news conference at an ICE Enforcement and Removal Operation office in Miramar, Florida, on May 1. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis speaking during a news conference at an ICE Enforcement and Removal Operation office in Miramar, Florida, on May 1. Joe Raedle/GETTY In 2021, DeSantis signed House Bill 1, nicknamed the "anti-riot" bill, into law. The legislation grants drivers some civil protection if they hit protesters with their vehicles while feeling threatened but not criminal immunity. "In a civil context, the Florida statute (HB1) provides that if a person is injured while participating in a riot, and they then sue for damages, the defendant can raise the plaintiff's riot participation as an affirmative defense," Gober said, adding: "In a criminal context, HB 1 does not create blanket immunity for drivers who injure protesters. Florida criminal law still requires that use of force is justified only when it meets the legal standard for self-defense." "So while DeSantis's rhetoric suggests a driver can simply 'drive off' and harm someone without legal risk, that's not what the law actually says," he continued. Gober added, "DeSantis is overstating the protections drivers have. The law he's citing offers limited civil protection in very specific cases. It does not give blanket criminal immunity for injuring or killing protesters. It also risks sending a dangerous message that civil unrest justifies indiscriminate harm." What People Are Saying Bryan Griffin, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' communications director, told Newsweek: "It's simple: don't protest in Florida by blocking traffic or threatening people in their cars, and you won't have a problem. Even you Newsweek activists and your Experts™ should be able to keep that straight." Lorella Praeli, a co-president of Community Change Action, which is backing Saturday's protest, previously told Newsweek: "Look around—Trump and his allies are deploying the tools of authoritarianism: silencing dissent, targeting immigrants, punishing oversight, and even staging military displays for personal glorification. These aren't isolated incidents; they're part of a broader effort to delegitimize democratic norms. "This isn't normal. It's manufactured chaos, designed to instill fear and consolidate power. When a sitting U.S. Senator is handcuffed for asking a question, it should be a five-alarm fire for anyone who believes in democracy. We have to name this moment for what it is—and organize with the clarity and courage it demands." What Happens Next Demonstrations are expected across the U.S. on Saturday. Organizers of the No Kings protests have said: "All No Kings events adhere to a shared commitment to nonviolent protest and community safety. Organizers are trained in de-escalation and are working closely with local partners to ensure peaceful and powerful actions nationwide."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store