&w=3840&q=100)
US Army helicopter crash that killed 67 people in Washington was facing technical issues, NTSB finds
Jennifer Homendy, chair of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), looks on as US President Donald Trump speaks during a briefing about the mid-air crash between American Airlines flight 5342 and a military helicopter in Washington, in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on January 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. File Image / AFP
An investigative hearing into a deadly mid-air collision of a US Army helicopter and a passenger plane that killed 67 people in Washington has revealed a discrepancy in the chopper's altitude displays.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the US agency tasked with examining major accidents, held hearings from Wednesday to Friday, with rigorous questioning of experts and various other parties including regulators and air traffic controllers.
There were no survivors in the January 29 mid-air collision involving the Sikorsky Black Hawk military helicopter and a Bombardier CRJ700 operated by a subsidiary of American Airlines.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The passenger plane from Wichita, Kansas was coming in to land at Reagan National Airport – just a few miles from the White House – when the Army helicopter on a training flight collided with it.
After examining flight recorder data, the NTSB first reported a discrepancy in the helicopter's altitude readings on February 14.
As part of the investigation, tests were conducted with three of the same helicopter models – Sikorsky Black Hawk Lima – belonging to the same battalion.
The findings revealed this week showed differences between the altitude indicated by the radar altimeter and the barometric altimeter on the aircraft.
Investigator Marie Moler noted that the altimeters 'showed an 80- to 130-foot (24- to 40-meter) difference in flight' although the differences were within 20 to 55 feet in a controlled test environment.
'Once the helicopter rotors were turning and producing lift and thrust, the altimeter readings lowered significantly and stayed lower throughout the flights,' Moler said.
NTSB chair Jennifer Homendy called the discrepancy significant, calling for more investigation.
'I am concerned. There is a possibility that what the crew saw was very different than what the true altitude was,' Homendy said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'A 100-foot difference is significant' in this case, she added.
In the Potomac River area where the collision occurred, helicopters are required to stay below 200 feet, officials said during the hearings.
President Donald Trump was quick to blame diversity hiring policies for the accident although no evidence has emerged that they were responsible.
Federal Aviation Agency air traffic control specialist Clark Allen told the hearing there was sufficient supervisory staff present in the control tower that night.
The collision was the first major plane crash in the United States since 2009 when 49 people were killed near Buffalo, New York.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
In numbers: Trump doubles tariffs, targets India over Russian oil trade
US President Trump will double tariffs on India to 50% this month, punishing New Delhi for buying Russian oil, citing its continued imports of Moscow's IT MATTERS This sharp escalation comes on top of a previous 25% tariff set to take effect overnight, effectively doubling the trade penalty. The move follows failed US–Russia talks over the Ukraine war and deepening tensions between Washington and New Delhi. India's energy ties with Moscow — and its role in the Brics bloc — are now at the centre of a growing geopolitical NUMBERS25% — Additional tariff rate imposed by Trump on Indian goods.21 days — Time until the new duties take effect.25% — Existing country-specific tariff already scheduled to start overnight. IN DEPTHThe measure stacks on top of the existing 25% tariffs already set to take effect, doubling the penalty for affected Indian exports. The order frames India's Russian oil trade as part of an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to US national security, putting New Delhi in the crosshairs of Washington's Russia sanctions policy. It also signals to other countries that buying Russian crude could bring similar US trade retaliation. Signed on August 6, the executive order uses emergency powers under US law. It expands earlier measures that banned Russian oil imports and targeted Moscow's hostile actions says India is "directly or indirectly" importing Russian Oil, either buying it outright or through intermediaries. In the White House's view, those purchases help fund Russia's war in Ukraine and prolong the conflict. BIG PICTUREThis is the most aggressive trade move against India since Trump's first term. This move is the sharpest escalation in US–India trade tensions in years. In 2019, Trump stripped India of special tariff-free treatment under the Generalised System of Preferences. Now, the White House is framing India's energy policy as a direct challenge to US foreign policy on Russia. WHAT THEY SAID"They're fuelling the war machine. And if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy." — Donald Trump, US President- Ends
NDTV
35 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Have To Act Accordingly": Shashi Tharoor Slams US For Additional 25% Tariffs
New Delhi: Slamming the United States for "double standard" for imposing an additional 25% tariff on India for buying Russian oil, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor on Wednesday said US President Donald Trump's move will make "our goods unaffordable to a lot of people in America." He pointed out that while China imports various materials, including more Russian oil than India, the country has received a "90-day break" from the US tariffs. "Uranium, Palladium, there are various things they (US) are importing from Russia. There is, unfortunately, a certain double standard involved. They have given the Chinese a 90-day break, but the Chinese are importing far more Russian oil than we are. So clearly this has not been a particularly friendly gesture from a country we thought was well disposed towards us, an administration that we thought was well disposed," Mr Tharoor told reporters. Suggesting that tariffs also might signal how the friendly relations between India and the US have been affected, the Congress leader mentioned the possibility of "pressures within India" for imposing reciprocal tariffs on American exports to India. "Very clearly, we have to act accordingly, and we will have to learn our lessons from this experience. I think there is certainly a likelihood that there will be some pressure within India now to impose comparable reciprocal tariffs on American exports to India. So I think we're going to have to really start looking at other trading partners much more in these circumstances," Mr Tharoor mentioned. "I don't think that's particularly good news for us and that takes our total tariffs to 50 per cent then that's going to make our goods unaffordable to a lot of people in America and in particularly when you're looking at these percentages you have to compare them with the tariffs being levied on some of our competitors," Mr Tharoor told ANI. Comparing the tariffs on other countries like Pakistan (19 pc), Bangladesh (20 pc), Philippines (19 pc), Indonesia (19), or even Vietnam (20 pc), the Congress leader said that this will effect Indian goods being bought in US, as people will look for the cheapest option. "This means we need to very seriously diversify to other countries and other markets that may be interested in what we have to offer. We now have an FTA with the UK. We are talking to the EU. There are many countries in which hopefully we would be able to, but in the short term, it is definitely a blow," Mr Tharoor told ANI. US President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order on August 6 imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India. Trump cited matters of national security and foreign policy concerns, as well as other relevant trade laws, for the increase, claiming that India's imports of Russian oil, directly or indirectly, pose an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United States. Terming the United States' move to impose additional tariffs on India over its oil imports from Russia as "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable," the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) declared that New Delhi will take "all actions necessary to protect its national interests. "In an official statement, the MEA said, "The United States has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia. We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India." "It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest," the statement added.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Trump Cracks Down On Foreign Students, College Applications Rise Outside US
LONDON: In China, wait times for US visa interviews are so long that some students have given up. Universities in Hong Kong are fielding transfer inquiries from foreign students in the US, and international applications for British undergraduate programs have surged. President Donald Trump's administration has been pressuring US colleges to reduce their dependence on international enrollment while adding new layers of scrutiny for foreign students as part of its crackdown on immigration. The US government has sought to deport foreign students for participating in pro-Palestinian activism. In the spring, it abruptly revoked the legal status of thousands of international students, including some whose only brush with law enforcement was a traffic ticket. After reversing course, the government paused new appointments for student visas while rolling out a process for screening applicants' social media accounts. The US remains the first choice for many international students, but institutions elsewhere are recognising opportunity in the upheaval, and applicants are considering destinations they might have otherwise overlooked. The impact on US universities - and the nation's economy - may be significant. New international enrollment in the US could drop by 30% to 40% this fall, according to an analysis of visa and enrollment data by NAFSA, an agency that promotes international education. That would deprive the US economy of $7 billion in spending, according to the analysis. Many international students pay full price, so their absence would also hurt college budgets. As the second most popular destination for international students, Britain is positioned to benefit. The country's new Labour government has vowed to cut migration, and officials have imposed time limits on post-study visas, allowing graduates to stay and work. But admissions consultants say the United Kingdom is still seen as the most welcoming of the traditional "big four" English-speaking destinations in higher education - the US, UK, Canada and Australia. After declining last year, the number of international applications for undergraduate study in the UK this fall grew by 2.2%, official figures show. A record number of applications came from China, up 10% compared with the previous year. Applications from the US also reached nearly 8,000 students - an increase of 14% and a 20-year high. Acceptances of international students for graduate programs in the UK grew an estimated 10% from last year, driven by demand for business and management courses in particular, according to data from UniQuest, which works with many British universities on admissions. Data showing the extent of any impact will not be available until fall, said Mike Henniger, CEO of Illume Student Advisory Services, a consultancy that works with colleges in the US, Canada and Europe. "But the American brand has taken a massive hit, and the UK is the one that is benefiting," he said. Demand from Chinese students has risen rapidly for university places in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia, said Will Kwong, managing director of AAS Education, a consultancy in Hong Kong. Many Western universities have offshore campuses there that are more affordable than going to the US or the UK. "Opting for study in Asia has been a trend since the easing of COVID-19," Kwong said. "But it's been exacerbated by the change of administration in the US" Some Asian families have told him the U.S. is no longer their clear first choice because of political turbulence and visa difficulties; many are still waiting for US visa interviews and will likely miss the start of the fall term, Kwong said. Chinese college student Alisa, who is studying data science, plans to attend an exchange program this fall at the University of California, Berkeley. She hopes to pursue a master's degree in the US. But she is also looking into other options, "just so I could still go to school if the extreme scenario occurs," said Alisa, who spoke on condition of partial anonymity out of fear of being targeted. Hong Kong will welcome any students who are denied entry to the US, the city's leader, John Lee, has said. Last year, the Chinese territory decided to allow international students to work part-time. Hong Kong University said it has received over 500 inquiries from students in the US and is processing around 200 applications for transfer. At another school, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, international undergraduate applications have surged by 40% from last year, said Alison Lloyd, associate provost for institutional data and research. Countries, including the United Arab Emirates, have invested heavily in attracting international students by partnering with universities elsewhere to host branch campuses. These arrangements could appeal to students who fear being denied access to the US. Dubai, which has designs on becoming a global education hub, hosts dozens of international institutions' satellite campuses. It saw international student numbers grow by a third in 2024-2025. Lisa Johnson, principal of Dubai's private American Academy for Girls, said her mostly Emirati student body is increasingly looking away from the US for college. "Every student wants and dreams to go to Harvard," she said. "But as college options increase in the United Arab Emirates, more and more students are staying." Kazakhstan has similar ambitions, said Daniel Palm, who has helped US universities set up campuses abroad. Illinois Tech and the University of Arizona are among colleges offering degree programs in the Central Asian country, drawing students mostly from China and Russia. "All of a sudden, US colleges are asking how to provide diversity, provide access," Palm said, "because you have students who want to come to the US and can't." (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
