Chris Packham backs call for delayed report into autistic deaths to be published
He is among campaigners who have written to Health Secretary Wes Streeting to say the country is 'standing by year after year while vulnerable people die'.
The latest Learning from lives and deaths report (LeDeR) – expected to show data for 2023 – was due to be published around November last year but it is understood it has been held up over 'practical data issues'.
The LeDeR programme was established in 2015 in an effort to review the deaths of people with a learning disability and autistic people in England.
Annual reports are aimed at summarising their lives and deaths with the aim of learning from what happened, improving care, reducing health inequalities and preventing people with a learning disability and autistic people from early deaths.
In the letter to Mr Streeting, signed by various groups including charities Autism Action and Mencap as well as bereaved families, the delay to the latest report was branded 'unacceptable'.
They said: 'It took at least 17 years for the Government to establish this vital initiative after the 1998 finding that people with learning disabilities were 58 times more likely to die before the age of 50 than the general population.
'Although it was established to 'get to the bottom of why people with learning disabilities typically die much earlier than average, and to inform a strategy to reduce this inequality,' 10 years later – too many people are still dying premature, preventable deaths.
'In response, the Government is showing a shocking lack of urgency and has let the only discernible tool to understand and act on these deaths be caught up in delay and bureaucracy.'
The most recent report, which showed data for 2022, confirmed care and outcomes for people with learning disabilities are still often below acceptable standards compared with the general population.
Of the 2,054 adults with a learning disability who died that year and had a completed recorded underlying cause of death, 853 (42%) had deaths classified as avoidable.
This was down on the 2021 figure of 50% of avoidable deaths among adults with a learning disability, but was 'significantly higher' than the percentage for the general population across Great Britain, which was 22.8% in 2020 – the latest data available at that time.
Last month, the parents of an autistic teenager who died after being prescribed medication against his and his parents' wishes hailed the publication of guidance they hope will safeguard others as a 'significant milestone'.
A report in 2020 found 18-year-old Oliver McGowan's death four years earlier at Southmead Hospital in Bristol was 'potentially avoidable'.
He died in 2016 after being given the antipsychotic Olanzapine and contracting neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) – a rare side-effect of the drug.
An independent review later found that the fit and healthy teenager's death was 'potentially avoidable' and his parents, Paula and Tom McGowan, said their son died 'as a result of the combined ignorance and arrogance of doctors' who treated him.
In June, his parents – who have campaigned since his death for improvements in the system – welcomed the publication of new guidance aimed at ensuring safer, more personalised care for people with a learning disability and autistic people.
Learning disability charity Mencap described the delay to the latest LeDeR report as 'disappointing and worrying', and said the Government must 'not shy away from the uncomfortable truth that for many years the healthcare system has failed people who are already marginalised in so many ways'.
Autism Action chief executive Tom Purser accused the Government of 'systemically devaluing the lives of autistic people and those with learning disabilities' by delaying the long-awaited annual report and giving campaigners and families 'empty reassurances'.
He added: 'There must be systemic changes in the way this information is collected, recorded, shared and acted upon – and it needs to be accountable and written into law. We are calling on this data to be published annually and independently of the Government and the NHS.
'Without these changes the Government has nothing to learn from and more vulnerable lives are at stake.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'We inherited a situation where the care of people with a learning disability and autistic people was not good enough and we recently published a code of practice on training to make sure staff have the right knowledge and skills to provide safe and informed care.
'We are committed to improving care for people with a learning disability and autistic people. The Learning from Lives and Deaths report will help identify key improvements needed to tackle health disparities and prevent avoidable deaths.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
34 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
NHS England approach to doctors' strike ‘seriously risky', BMA warns
British Medical Association (BMA) deputy chairwoman Dr Emma Runswick told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday that guidance issued by the health service to keep most planned care running during the walkout could cause dangerous confusion and overstretch staff. 'We've had proven systems over the last decade that have made sure that where we have to take strike action, senior doctors cover urgency and critical care,' she said. 'This time round, NHS England are pushing for the continuation of non-urgent and scheduled care in a way that we think at best is confusing and will create on-the-day cancellations – and at worst could be risky and lead to harm in emergency departments and on wards, because senior doctors cannot physically be in two places at once. 'We think that a notional guidance from NHS England which is saying that basically all scheduled work should continue to go ahead has potential to be seriously risky for patients.' Her comments come amid an escalating row between NHS bosses and the BMA over how hospitals should respond to the strike, which is due to begin at 7am on Friday. During previous rounds of industrial action in 2023 and 2024, NHS England told trusts to cancel large volumes of non-urgent care so that consultants could step in to cover emergency services. But under the leadership of new NHS England chief executive Sir Jim Mackey, hospitals have now been instructed to cancel non-urgent work only in 'exceptional circumstances' – and only with prior approval. The BMA argues this new approach risks spreading non-striking doctors too thinly, with Dr Runswick warning: 'Senior doctors are needed to be freed up in order to provide urgency and critical care. 'We think the vast majority of planned and unscheduled care should be shifted. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has ruled out any additional pay rise (Lucy North/PA) 'There are always, in every hospital, local medical managers, local clinical leaders, who will make decisions about what is safe to go ahead – but trying to maintain scheduled care during this strike is not safe in many cases.' When asked why the union could not avoid strikes altogether, she said walkouts can be delivered safely if planned properly. 'Strikes by doctors do not have to be risky,' she said. 'Strikes by doctors have been run safely in 2016 and 2022, 2023, 2024. 'We are entirely capable of running strikes safely – they just have to be planned for with local medical leadership, and we've done that before. We can do it again.' She said the BMA was still hopeful a resolution could be reached before the walkout begins and was 'keen to work with NHS England to ensure they are best planned for the safest care'. Talks between the Government and the BMA have continued in recent days, with Health Secretary Wes Streeting ruling out any additional pay rise this year but indicating other aspects of the contract – such as student debt, exam fees and working conditions – may be up for negotiation. Resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, were awarded an average 5.4% pay increase this financial year, following a 22% rise over the previous two years. However, the BMA says real-terms pay has still fallen by around 20% since 2008, and is pushing for full 'pay restoration'.
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Can Wes Streeting avert the junior doctors's strike?
In just a few days, doctors across England will stage strikes for five days. Hospitals are preparing for staff shortages from Friday until next Wednesday, hoping that bulked-up locum rates will attract enough 'scabs' to mitigate the walkouts. But now the BMA has taken aim at NHS bosses, warning that the decision not to cancel all routine appointments between 25 and 30 July will mean consultants are 'spread too thinly', leaving patients at risk. During the last round of industrial action – which spanned 44 days across 2023 and 2024 – 1.5 million appointments were cancelled, with the strikes costing the health service around £1.5 billion. This time around, as up to 50,000 medics prepare to picket for better pay in action that could affect up to a quarter of a million patients, Health Secretary Wes Streeting has hit out at the BMA's 'completely unreasonable' demands and warned of the potential cost of strikes to patients. While both sides agree the relationship between Labour's Department of Health and the doctors' union has been more 'constructive' than under previous Conservative governments, Streeting has remained firm that demands for full pay restoration – a pay rise of around 29 per cent – cannot be met this year. The Health Secretary held a 90-minute meeting in Westminster with the union's co-chairs last Thursday, with talks dragging on past the hour that had been pencilled in. While Streeting refused to reopen negotiations on this year's pay uplift of 5.4 per cent, other ways of improving working conditions were discussed. Changes to pensions and student loan debt have been floated in recent weeks. The talks were lauded by both sides as being constructive, with more in the works – although as BMA co-chair Dr Melissa Ryan pointed out at the subsequent presser: We have precious few days in order to make sufficient progress in order to avert strike action. Hopefully we can meet at a pace that is sufficient and reasonable. Streeting is lucky that – for now – he is seen in a relatively positive light by the union: BMA officials begrudgingly praise his ability to understand the pay and working condition complexities facing the NHS. ('Wes gets it,' an insider told me.) But while some hospitals have started rescheduling outpatient appointments and procedures that would have fallen in the strike dates, NHS England chief Sir Jim Mackey is urging health service bosses to keep elective operations going 'to the fullest extent possible' and only cancel in 'exceptional circumstances'. It's a new approach: in previous instances, a 'Christmas Day' attitude was adopted, with all but urgent care cancelled during periods of industrial action. It's a move designed in part to put pressure on the doctor's union – and the BMA has been quick to lambast Mackey's decision. While the union adheres to the 'derogation' process – where hospitals call striking doctors back in emergencies – it doesn't support returning medics from the picket line for non-urgent work. As the Times splashes this morning, BMA council chair Dr Tom Dolphin and deputy chair Dr Emma Runswick have written to the NHS England chief, urging him to tell hospitals to cancel all non-urgent care as current plans will, they believe, 'put patients at risk'. Union reps say the decision to try and run the service as normal will not only affect patient safety in emergency situations but also in planned procedures too – while likely leading to more same-day cancellations for patients. Analysis by right-leaning think tank Policy Exchange suggests that each day of strike action could cost £17.5 million a day. Former Tory health secretary Victoria Atkins has warned Labour not to 'cave in…on pay, on student loans or other exceptional terms' – in a statement that underlines the fraught relationship between previous Conservative administrations and the doctors' union. There does remain a concern that any movement on the salary uplift could prompt issues with other public sector workers, particularly nurses who are not happy with their uplift of 3.6 per cent. While the BMA is concerned solely with doctors, insiders are not particularly worried about this potential knock-on effect – saying that they also believe nurses are underpaid. With less than three days to go until the strike is due to start, Streeting doesn't have long to avert the action. Could pushing the problem away for a year or two work? 'I think on pay, what we're seeing is not this year,' Streeting's parliamentary private secretary (and surgeon) Zubir Ahmed told me. 'It doesn't mean we'll never be able to move on pay in the future.' While positive noises were made after last week's discussions, the Health Secretary's refusal to budge on pay makes any other package – whether on student loans, pensions or exam fees – a harder sell. An eleventh-hour halt will be quite something to pull off.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Relatives of dead infected blood victims will get compensation
Relatives of dead infected blood victims will be eligible for compensation payments under Government plans. The change follows a heavily critical report into the way victims of the worst treatment disaster in NHS history were being compensated. A 'long overdue' memorial for thousands of victims of the scandal will also be created. Earlier this month, the Infected Blood Inquiry made a series of recommendations to improve compensation for people who were both infected with contaminated blood and those indirectly affected by the scandal. Sir Brian Langstaff, chairman of the inquiry, said the number of people who have been compensated to date is 'profoundly unsatisfactory' as he called for 'faster and fairer' compensation for victims. The investigation found victims had been 'harmed further' by the compensation scheme's failings. Responding to the report, the Government said that it was immediately accepting a number of the recommendations and will consult on others. It is not rejecting any of the recommendations. Affected people's claims will no longer 'die with them' and their payments will be passed on to their estates. People infected with HIV before 1982, who were previously ineligible, will be compensated - and the requirement for people with hepatitis to provide a date of diagnosis will be abolished. It said it will consult on a number of issues including: how the scheme recognises the impact of interferon treatment for hepatitis which has been linked to severe side effects; how the scheme recognises severe psychological harm; and it will also consult on the scope of how victims of unethical research are to be compensated. Elsewhere, the Government announced further interim payments to the estates of people who have died. It also confirmed that Clive Smith, president of the Haemophilia Society, will be the chairman of the Infected Blood Memorial Committee. Mr Smith will lead the work to create a national memorial to the victims of the scandal and will 'support memorials in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland'. Cabinet Office Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds said: 'When I appeared before the inquiry in May, I said that I would take a constructive approach and, carefully, consider the issues that had been put to me. 'I have concentrated on removing barriers to quicker compensation, working with IBCA, and am determined to deliver improvements based on this new report. 'Our focus as we move forward must be working together to not only deliver justice to all those impacted, but also to restore trust in the state to people who have been let down too many times.' David Foley, chief executive of IBCA, added: 'The community is at the heart of everything we do. We can only grow the service, and implement these new recommendations by listening to and acting on the views of the community. 'Some of the recommendations will take longer to implement, which we know may cause frustration and upset for some in the community. 'We will always act with transparency. That is why I can confirm that we will create a registration process, so that the community can tell us that they intend to make a claim. 'We will also develop the service for all groups, paying the first claims before the end of 2025. And we will improve transparency by sharing more of our processes, documents, data and plans on our website.' Incoming memorial committee chairman Mr Smith said: 'A memorial to the thousands who have died from the contaminated blood scandal is long overdue. 'It is a great privilege to be asked to lead this important work on behalf of the community. 'I look forward to working with the whole community across the UK on building an appropriate memorial to those we have lost and to act as a lasting memorial to the nation of what can happen when patient safety is not prioritised.' More than 30,000 people in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C after they were given contaminated blood and blood products between the 1970s and early 1990s. More than 3,000 people have died as a result, and survivors are living with lifelong health implications. The Infected Blood Inquiry published its main report on the scandal in May last year, and a compensation scheme was announced a day later. But in the same week a general election was called and officials from the IBCA have described how in the early days of the organisation it consisted of two men, a laptop and a phone. Some £11.8 billion has been allocated to compensate victims, administered by the IBCA. As of July 15, 587 people have had their compensation paid totalling more than £400 million.
