Pope Leo XIV has shared criticism online of Trump, Vance over policies
President Donald Trump has wished the new pope well in his role, calling Leo's election 'such an honor for our country'. But it comes days after Trump posted an artificial intelligence-generated image of himself dressed as pope amid days of official mourning for Pope Francis. That act raised eyebrows at the Vatican and was denounced by former Italian Premier Romano Prodi as indecent political interference in matters of faith.
And last month, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops announced the end of a half-century of partnerships with the federal US government to serve refugees and migrant children, saying the 'heartbreaking' decision followed the Trump administration's abrupt halt to funding.
The majority of Leo's posts on the X platform are related to or in support of Catholic news and church initiatives. He rarely writes original content, but a look back through his social media timeline shows numerous posts sharing viewpoints opposed to moves aimed at restricting acceptance of migrants and refugees in the US
Vance, a convert to Catholicism, is the most high-profile Catholic in American politics. He's drawn attention from the man who now leads the global church, prompting Leo to return to X after a nearly two-year absence to share criticism of the vice president's views.
In early February, Leo shared an article from a Catholic publication with the headline, 'JD Vance is wrong: Jesus doesn't ask us to rank our love for others'.
It came days after Vance — in discussing critiques of the Trump administration's immigration policies — in a Fox News interview had referenced a Christian tenet 'that you love your family and then you love your neighbor, and then you love your community, and then you love your fellow citizens, and then after that, prioritise the rest of the world'.
In response to online criticism of his position, Vance posted on X, 'Just google 'ordo amoris.' Aside from that, the idea that there isn't a hierarchy of obligations violates basic common sense'.
'Ordo amoris,' a historic Catholic tenet, translates to 'order of love'.
Ten days after his initial post, Leo shared another piece from a Jesuit publication, titled, 'Pope Francis' letter, JD Vance's 'ordo amoris' and what the Gospel asks of all of us on immigration'.
Prior to his first February post, Leo had been dormant on X since July 2023.
After Leo's election today, Vance posted congratulations on X, adding, 'I'm sure millions of American Catholics and other Christians will pray for his successful work leading the Church. May God bless him!"
The pope's final post as Cardinal Robert Prevost was a recirculation on April 14 of a post by church chronicler Rocco Palmo about Trump's Oval Office meeting with El Salvador President Nayib Bukele.
Bukele said it was 'preposterous' for his country to bring a Maryland man who was wrongly deported there in March back to the US, despite a Supreme Court ruling calling on the administration to 'facilitate' Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return.
Leo reposted Palmo's link to an article by Washington-area Bishop Evelio Menjivar — who was born in El Salvador — asking, 'Do you not see the suffering? Is your conscience not disturbed? How can you stay quiet?'
As Trump's campaign ramped up in July 2015, Leo posted to X a Washington Post op-ed by Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the archbishop of New York, with the headline, 'Why Donald Trump's anti-immigrant rhetoric is so problematic'.
In the wake of Trump's first election in 2016, Leo reposted a homily in which Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez — characterising the fear among many, including schoolchildren who 'think the government is going to come and deport their parents, any day now" — said that America is 'better than this'.
Days later, Leo also posted an article by a Catholic outlet quoting Democrats as saying that, in her loss, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton 'ignored pro-lifers at her own peril'.
In September 2017, months into Trump's first term, Leo recirculated a post by author-activist Sister Helen Prejean saying she stands 'with the #Dreamers and all people who are working toward an immigration system that is fair, just, and moral'.
He also reposted church chronicler Rocco Palmo's piece with the teaser, 'Saying Trump's 'bad hombres' line fuels 'racism and nativism,' Cali bishops send preemptive blast on DACA repeal'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Putin plays with ‘peace'
The bizarre President Trump pantomime on Ukraine persists. Although it may be presumptuous to predict the failure of "peace" efforts, Russian President Vladimir Putin holds the prime position. He has been the puppet master pulling the strings. President Putin has conceded nothing so far. Instead, he has gained international stature and a domestic boost, thanks to the red-carpet treatment from the United States leader on US soil. Not bad for an alleged war criminal facing arrest in countries that accept the International Criminal Court's jurisdiction. Mr Putin has secured Mr Trump's support to recognise Russia's control over Crimea and large parts of eastern Ukraine. U.S. President Trump And Russian President Putin. PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES According to Mr Trump, Mr Putin is willing to accept one major concession: international security guarantees for Ukraine. Mr Putin, however, has remained silent. Why should he concede anything when Mr Trump does his bidding? It is highly doubtful he would reverse earlier bottom lines and agree to security guarantees that are effective, long-term, and trustworthy, even if talks progressed that far. Perhaps Mr Putin would settle for the territorial gains discussed with Mr Trump, including a crucial strategic area of the Donbas still held by Ukraine. Meanwhile, he has not even had to accept a ceasefire, a condition Mr Trump earlier insisted upon. His tactic is to sever Mr Trump's support for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. He and Mr Trump have reached an understanding that he knows is virtually impossible for Mr Zelenskyy to accept, both for constitutional reasons and due to Ukrainian public opinion. Ceding territory through force is also entirely illegal under the United Nations Charter. In the end, direct talks, if they ever properly start, will go nowhere. Mr Zelenskyy may receive the blame in Mr Trump's mind, and crucial US intelligence, military, and other support could be cut off. Meanwhile, Russia continues grinding down Ukraine and grinding out more territory. Mr Trump's earlier threats of secondary sanctions aimed at crippling Russia's oil sales to China and India have come to nothing. Other stricter direct sanctions have also not been applied. When agreements are not reached, possible international security guarantees lose their relevance. It was little wonder that Europe's premier leaders rushed to Washington DC to support Mr Zelenskyy. Mr Putin's manipulation of Mr Trump and lack of commitments are plain to them. Their tactic is to show willingness by pushing for a ceasefire, something Mr Trump, parroting Mr Putin, no longer deems necessary. While their obsequiousness towards Mr Trump is sickening, what alternative do they have when facing an erratic, narcissistic bully who leads the world's most powerful nation? Mr Zelenskyy has learned the hard way the necessity of grovelling. The lessons of history are clear. Hitler's Germany absorbed Austria and occupied the Sudetenland in 1938, and the world complied. Appeasement failed, and Poland was next. Mr Putin has not even had to commit to meeting Mr Zelenskyy. He has persuaded Mr Trump, shifting the pressure on to Ukraine and its president. Hopefully, Mr Putin has overreached. Part of us might wish the West, including the US, would support Ukraine with all guns blazing: smash Russia inside Ukraine with shock and awe, and apply full force in every other way short of invasion. After all, Mr Putin, like Mr Trump, respects only power. Of course, that cannot happen. The stakes are sky-high, and the consequences — intended or otherwise — are terrifying. Becoming deeply entangled in other people's wars almost always ends badly. Mr Putin's earlier rumblings about nuclear retaliation remain a warning. Even if he is highly unlikely to go that far, the consequences would be so catastrophic that even a slim chance is a gamble not worth taking. Realistically, Crimea, occupied since 2014, is lost to Ukraine. In the end, other territory may also have to be forfeited. Yet Ukraine is not ready to capitulate, and Mr Putin has invested too much to pull back. Mr Trump is right about one thing: Ukraine and most of the world want the killing to stop. Whether Mr Putin does is another matter entirely.
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Zelensky says he wants 'strong' US reaction if Putin not ready to meet
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wanted to sit down with Russian President Vladimir Putin. (File photo) Photo: Maxym Marusenko / NurPhoto via AFP Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Kyiv would like a "strong reaction" from Washington if Russian President Vladimir Putin was not willing to sit down for a bilateral meeting with him. US President Donald Trump is seeking to broker peace between the two warring countries but has conceded that Putin, with whom Zelensky has sought a one-on-one sitdown, may not be willing to make a deal. "I responded immediately to the proposal for a bilateral meeting: we are ready. But what if the Russians are not ready?" Zelensky said in comments released on Thursday from a briefing with reporters in Kyiv a day earlier. "If the Russians are not ready, we would like to see a strong reaction from the United States." Despite a flurry of diplomacy in recent days between Trump and his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts, the path to peace remained uncertain as Washington and allies worked out what security guarantees for Kyiv might look like. Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and now holds just under 20 percent of its neighbour, making gradual advances in the east of late though the conflict has become largely attritional. Zelensky said it was unclear what concessions regarding territory Moscow was willing to make to end the war. Trump has previously said Kyiv and Moscow will both need to cede land. "To discuss what Ukraine is willing to do, let's first hear what Russia is willing to do," Zelensky said. "We do not know that." Responding to a question about the Hungarian capital Budapest serving as a potential location for future Ukrainian-Russian talks, Zelensky said it would be "challenging". Hungary, Russia's closest ally in the European Union, has twice offered to host peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said on Thursday. - Reuters
Otago Daily Times
18 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed
A US judge says the Trump administration is in a better position than federal courts to release materials that would satisfy public curiosity about the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case. In rejecting the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted Epstein in 2019, Manhattan-based US District Judge Richard Berman wrote that the 70-odd pages of materials the grand jury saw paled in comparison to the 100,000 pages the government has from its Epstein investigation but is not releasing. The judge said the bid to persuade him to unseal the records was an apparent distraction from the Justice Department's decision in July not to release its files and directly cited another judge's decision earlier this month not to release similar materials from the grand jury that indicted Epstein's longtime girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. "The instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession," Berman wrote. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Berman's decision came as President Donald Trump has faced criticism from his conservative base of supporters and congressional Democrats over the Justice Department's decision not to release the files from its Epstein investigation. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. 'DIVERSION' To try to quell the discontent, Trump in July instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. Justice Department investigations typically collect more material than prosecutors ultimately present to grand juries. Some of that evidence is sometimes eventually disclosed to the public during criminal trials. The Justice Department does not routinely disclose its evidence in cases where a defendant pleads guilty or, like Epstein, never faces trial, but it would not require judicial approval to release such materials. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and saw a PowerPoint presentation and call logs, Berman wrote. On August 11, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied the Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from Maxwell's case, writing that the material was duplicative of public testimony at her 2021 trial. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein. "A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion - aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such," Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review her case.
