Citing moon over Mars commitment, Senate committee advances Isaacman nomination to head NASA
The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation voted 19-9 to allow the two-time space traveler's nomination to move forward. Isaacman testified before the committee on April 9 and won the support of both committee Chairman Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and the Ranking Member Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Washington.
The bipartisan support came after Isaacman told the committee that the Artemis missions to the moon would remain a priority despite Trump and SpaceX founder Elon Musk's pushes to refocus on Mars.
Hearing could set up billionaire Isaacman for full Senate vote to lead NASA
'Mr. Isaacman is a successful entrepreneur with a bold, boundary-pushing vision for space exploration. As we heard at his nomination hearing earlier this month, (Isaacman said) 'NASA was built to do the near impossible.' I agree, but NASA's plans for space must remain grounded in reality and align with our strategic interests,' Cruz said during opening comments.
Cruz at the earlier hearings had demanded a commitment from Isaacman to support the current Artemis moon mission plans.
'Existing law directs NASA to establish a 'sustained human presence in cislunar space or on the moon.' Federal law explicitly calls the moon a 'stepping stone to reaching Mars.' In other words, our path to predominance in space begins with the Artemis missions.'
Cruz said Isaacman had his support because he would follow the law, even though he intends to push for Mars objectives concurrently if confirmed.
Cantwell also threw her support to Isaacman commending both his business and space experience.
'I do think that innovators at this point in time, with a commitment to keeping on to the moon mission, is the key requirement that we have to have in this position,' she said. 'While it's not clear to me where the Trump administration will ultimately end up on the NASA budget, and I have concerns about some of their proposed cuts today, Mr. Isaacman seems to be committed to the the current plan for both lander redundancies, space launch systems and returning to the to the moon as fast as possible.'
Isaacman made his fortune with Shift4, a credit card processing company, and also founded Lakeland-based Draken International, which trains fighter pilots. He funded two missions to space flying on SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft leading the Inspiration4 flight in 2021 and last year's Polaris Dawn flight.
During the hearing, he testified he wouldn't call Musk a close friend, and that he was simply a customer. He also said he had had no contact with Musk since he was officially nominated by Trump. He said he would support the current Artemis plans to the moon, which would use the pricey and delayed Space Launch System rocket for the Artemis II flight around the moon as soon as next year followed by a landing mission on Artemis III as soon as 2027.
Launches beyond Artemis III, though, could be up for reconsideration with Isaacman pushing for NASA to use less expensive commercial options such as SpaceX's Starship and Blue Origin's New Glenn rockets. Both companies already have lunar landers incorporated into Artemis mission plans.
The threat of China making it to the moon before America's planned return played heavily for both party members during the confirmation hearings.
'I think this is a very big competitive issue for the United States of America that competitiveness is not just a goal, it's a reality that someday we may wake up and find ourselves falling behind,' Cantwell said. 'So today, I will support his nomination and hope that we will continue to get leadership out of the administration on clarification of supporting a robust NASA budget.'
Isaacman is likely to receive confirmation by the full Senate, but the date for that vote has yet to be set.
If confirmed, he would become the 15th administrator taking over the role vacated by Bill Nelson who left the position at the end of the Biden administration. Janet Petro has been acting administrator, vacating her role as director of Kennedy Space Center, since Trump took office.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
The Army's acquisition process for new weapons systems is still broken
To the surprise of many, the U.S. Army, long considered to be the most bureaucratically hidebound of the military services, appears to have successfully reoriented itself toward the demands of a potential war in the western Pacific. For example, at this month's Talisman Sabre military exercise with Australia and Singapore, the Army employed its Typhon missile system, which entered service in 2023, to sink a maritime target at a distance of over 100 miles. And in that same exercise, it employed the HIMARS rocket artillery system in conjunction with the other two nations to demonstrate interoperability among them. Recognizing the growing threat from China, the Army began to reorient itself during the Biden administration and has therefore easily and quickly adapted itself to the Trump administration's priorities. But notwithstanding its strategic reorientation, the Army's acquisition processes continue to suffer from a long-standing inability to consistently field major new weapons systems. The Army continues to operate Abrams tanks, Bradley infantry fighting vehicles and Apache helicopters that, although upgraded over the years, are fundamentally products of the mid-1970s. The list of failed Army programs is both long and troubling. In 1982, the Department of Defense canceled the Roland short-range air defense missile system, originally a Franco-German product that the Army unsuccessfully sought to modify and integrate. Three years later, Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger canceled the Sergeant York Division Air Defense gun which, like Roland, had been in development since the mid-1970s. The Sergeant York not only had spiraling costs but was also unable to track low-flying targets and suffered from a range too short to attack missiles fired from Soviet helicopters. In 1987, the Army had to cancel its Aquila remotely piloted vehicle program — the forerunner to today's drones. The Aquila suffered from cost overruns and development delays, as well as an inability to carry the payloads and data links for which it had been designed. In 2002, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld terminated the Crusader self-propelled howitzer, which also suffered from cost overruns and was too heavy for the expeditionary operations that became the military's priority after 9/11. Two years later, Rumsfeld canceled the Comanche reconnaissance helicopter. The cancellation represented the latest in the Army's decades-long failure to replace the late 1960s vintage OH-58 Kiowa Warrior. The Army tried again with its Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter program, and in 2008 this too was terminated. The Army's armor programs at best have had mixed results. The service successfully fielded the lightweight Stryker vehicle, which has seen a number of upgrades and variations since it was first entered full-scale production in 2005. But that was not the fate of the Manned Ground Vehicle, a key element of the Future Combat System, which was meant to be a lightweight companion to the Abrams tank. The Pentagon terminated the Future Combat System program in 2009 due to cost overruns and technological challenges, and the Manned Ground Vehicle, which suffered from the same shortcomings, collapsed with it. In June, the Army terminated its M-10 Booker combat vehicle program, previously known as Mobile Protective Firepower. The Booker was meant to be a lightweight air-droppable vehicle that could be carried on a C-130 aircraft. After having taken delivery of 80 of them, the Army determined that the M-10 was too heavy for the aircraft and a poor fit for the service's operational requirements. The common thread in all these failures is the Army's manifest inability to anticipate evolving requirements, to control costs and to avoid program delays. As the war in Ukraine has demonstrated, cutting-edge technologies will be critical to success on future battlefields. To be effective in any future contingency, the Army will have to overhaul its entire acquisition system. It simply cannot tolerate the program delays and cost growth that have stymied so many previous development programs. Moreover, the Army must carefully assess its requirements for new systems, focusing on a range of future contingencies and not limiting itself to any one of them. It is therefore critical that as the Army contemplates acquiring a follow-on to the M-10, and for that matter replaces key weapons systems like the Abrams tank, it should not restrict its requirements and programs to contingencies in the western Pacific, where it is likely to do no more than to supplement Navy, Marine and Air Force operations. Instead, the Army should look beyond both its current Pacific orientation and expected forthcoming reductions in its European presence. Its future program development and acquisition should also account for its ongoing and critical role in support of NATO's ability to deter an aggressive and predatory Russia that seems likely to continue menacing Europe for many years to come. Dov S. Zakheim is a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and vice chairman of the board for the Foreign Policy Research Institute. He was undersecretary of Defense (comptroller) and chief financial officer for the Department of Defense from 2001 to 2004 and a deputy undersecretary of Defense from 1985 to 1987.
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Wisconsin Republican faces angry town hall over Trump agenda
Rep. Bryan Steil (R-Wis.) was heckled and booed during a Thursday town hall in his district over a slate of GOP policies, including immigration, the 'big, beautiful bill,' and President Trump's tariffs. Steil faced particular criticism of the administration's aggressive deportation campaign, drawing jeers from the crowd as he attempted to answer. 'What I view is the moral hazard created by the Biden administration by allowing the U.S.-Mexico border to remain unsecure,' he began, before pausing and shrugging his shoulders as the audience began to boo. An audience member later in the town hall referred to Alligator Alcatraz, the recently constructed detention center in the Florida Everglades, as a 'concentration camp.' Other audience members went after Steil for being too closely aligned with Trump. 'I am so disappointed in how you represent us, as the citizens of Walworth County. Southeast Wisconsin is not represented by you,' one man said. 'President Trump seems to run southeast Wisconsin, through you.' The event's moderator stepped in at multiple points to attempt to quiet the crowd, CNN reported, and called out a specific audience member for being 'very obnoxious and very disrespectful.' Angry voters at GOP town halls also made headlines during the House's last recess in March, with constituent ire often focused on cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The backlash escalated to a point where House Republican leaders urged their members to avoid live, in-person town halls. Republicans have also accused Democrats of organizing the public pushback. Steil also faced questions about Trump's tariff policies as new, elevated rates were set to kick in Friday (the town hall took place before the president announced a series of new tariffs would go into effect next week). 'I would like to know what dire economic circumstances put Trump in position of throwing tariffs on over 190 countries,' one voter said, drawing cheers and clapping from the audience. Steil defended the policies as forcing other countries to treat the U.S. fairly in trade. Steil, who represents a district just south of Milwaukee once held by former House Speaker Paul Ryan (R), wrote on X after the 'listening session' that he was committed to holding future events. 'Despite a handful of individuals attempting to disrupt the discussion, we had a great dialogue about the issues that matter most,' he wrote. Last week, Steil was the target of a demonstration in which a group of elderly protesters left what appeared to be a cardboard coffin in front of his home, chastizing him for supporting the 'big, beautiful bill.' Democrats have hoped to use the massive legislation package, which cuts Medicaid and other social services along with extending tax cuts, as a cudgel against Republicans in the midterms.
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Cooper has early lead over Whatley in North Carolina Senate race, survey shows
Former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D) has an early lead over Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley in the state's Senate race as the candidates appear poised for a general election matchup. The Emerson College Polling survey, released Friday, shows Cooper leading Whatley by 6 points, 47 percent to 41 percent, with 12 percent undecided. The former governor also starts out with a considerable advantage in name recognition, with 84 percent having a view — either favorable or unfavorable — of him while only a third seemed to have a view of the RNC chief. 'With over a year to go until the North Carolina U.S. Senate race, Whatley's low name recognition presents both a challenge and an opportunity, while only 17% view him favorably, nearly two-thirds of voters either don't know him or are unsure,' Spencer Kimball, the executive director of Emerson College Polling, said in the release. 'That leaves room for his campaign to define him before his opponent does.' Just over half of respondents said they view Cooper favorably while a third view him unfavorably. Meanwhile, Whatley is viewed favorably by 17 percent and unfavorably by 16 percent, putting his net favorability about even, according to the poll. The percentage of voters who aren't familiar with a candidate usually drops as the campaign advances, but its effect on polling of the race and the candidates' favorability is uncertain. Cooper's lead is largely powered by a 19-point advantage among independents, 47 percent to 28 percent, and a 25-point lead among voters under 50, 54 percent to 29 percent. Whatley's advantage comes with voters over 50, ahead 52 percent to 41 percent, the survey shows. The poll comes after both Cooper and Whatley entered the race this week and is one of the first of the potential general election matchup. Both seem to be clear favorites for their nominations with the parties largely coalescing around them, respectively. Cooper first joined the race on Monday after months of speculation and raised $3.4 million in the first 24 hours of his campaign. Democrats see the seat, currently held by retiring Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), as one of their best pickup opportunities in 2026. Whatley launched his candidacy on Thursday already with an endorsement from President Trump, and he quickly received the support of top Senate GOP leaders like Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), the chair of Senate Republicans' campaign arm. The poll was conducted from June 28-30 among 1,000 registered voters. The credibility interval, similar to a margin of error, was 3 percentage points.
