Latest USDA cut removes 700,000 pounds of meat, dairy, and eggs from Columbus food bank
The Mid-Ohio Food Collective told The Dispatch the USDA has canceled deliveries of $1.4 million worth of mostly meat, dairy and eggs, amounting to a loss of 697,000 pounds of food. Matt Habash, CEO of Mid-Ohio Food Collective, said that while MOFC is losing assistance, demand for food banks is at an all-time high.
"These are your neighbors," Habash said. "When you think of poverty issues and hunger issues, we get this image of a single person in the homeless shelter. The vast majority (of food pantry users) are people your kids go to school with, that live in your neighborhood."
The Mid-Ohio Food Collective is being hurt by USDA reductions in several programs, including The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), as well as changes to the Commodity Credit Corporation and Section 32, which helps the government offload surplus commodities.
The canceled USDA programs are just among the number of challenges that are now facing food banks in the region, including inflation, proposed cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and a proposed Ohio budget that strips $7.5 million from food pantries.
The USDA also recently canceled money for the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA), which supplies assistance to local food banks, schools and organizations in underserved communities. The LFPA program provided more than $1 million in purchasing power to the collective, The Dispatch previously reported.
Habash said all these factors add up to a stretching of MOFC's resources to provide high-quality, healthy food to the 20-county region it serves. Last year, MOFC distributed more than 83 million pounds of food to over 500,000 people across its service area.
"There's going to be a lot of hungry people," Habash said. "It's just going to be less food available for people that need it now."
Habash said that if SNAP benefits are cut, it will have a cascading effect on non-profits like MOFC, which are already seeing high levels of demand.
"There's no amount of local private funding that will make up for that," Habash said. "
He said there is a misconception that people who use SNAP and local food pantries are lazy, or don't want to work. When the reality is, he said, that most people using food pantries work one or even two jobs to try and make ends meet.
Oftentimes, he said, that amid monthly expenses, many people who are "living on the edge" choose to cut their own food budgets to make ends meet.
"Nobody wants to come and get emergency food, they would rather provide for themselves," Habash said. "That's a big misnomer in this, that these people are not working. They say 'Go get a job,' well these people already have one."
The cuts and uncertainty also threaten MOFC's mission of providing fresh food to people. Last year, 64% of the food MOFC serves was fresh, according to MOFC data.
The desire for making sure people have access to healthy food, Habash said, coincides with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' initiative, and said that food banks have been working on a national "food is medicine" strategy.
"I suggest that we're a high-value, low-cost health care strategy," Habash said. "We're getting product from farmers and being able to give that directly to people that see better health outcomes. And not having those dollars puts us far behind in terms of being able to do that work."
While food drives and volunteering may be helpful, Habash said, the MOFC is not going to make up federal and potential state losses with private charity. Instead, Habash encouraged those concerned to call their state and federal lawmakers and tell them that these cuts are unacceptable.
"Charity giving is not going to be an answer," Habash said. "(The community) has to say: 'This is not okay. We should not have a hunger problem in America.' Go down and talk to the legislature and say 'this is our livelihood.'"
Cole Behrens covers K-12 education and school districts in central Ohio. Have a tip? Contact Cole at cbehrens@dispatch.com or connect with him on X at @Colebehr_report
This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: USDA cuts: Mid-Ohio Food Collective loses $1.4M, 700k pounds of food
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
After Recent Earnings, What's the Investment Thesis for Snap Now?
Key Points Snap's slower second-quarter growth compared to its peers includes an important footnote. The company's willingness to perpetually evolve and improve its app is no minor detail. Some of these efforts will pay off. Snap is just going to need a bit of time to prove its approach is increasingly marketable. 10 stocks we like better than Snap › It's been a rough past few days for Snap (NYSE: SNAP) shareholders. The Snapchat parent's stock is trading down more than 20% since posting its second-quarter numbers last Tuesday, in fact, and still testing lower lows. The company's revenue miss clearly rattled investors. The question is, is yet another disappointing quarter enough of a reason to finally give up on Snap? Or is this stock's recent setback a chance to step into a compelling story at an even better price? Snap's second-quarter numbers Snap's Snapchat app is a social media platform, albeit a very different one than Meta Platforms' Facebook or X (formerly known as Twitter). Namely, Snapchat doesn't feature a "news" feed like X and Facebook do in the center of their user interfaces. Snapchat's focus is instead on messaging and sharing pictures specifically with friends. The core business is still ultimately the same as any social media site's, though: advertising. More users and usage of the Snapchat app means more opportunities to monetize the platform. And Snap did a fair amount of business during the three-month stretch ending in June. The top line of $1.34 billion for the recently ended quarter was up 9% year over year, lifted by a 9% increase in the average number of daily users (469 million) and 7% growth in average monthly users (932 million). Most of that user growth took shape outside of Europe and North America. Although the company remains in the red with a reported net loss of $262.6 million, or $0.16 per share, free cash flow swung from a negative $73.4 million to a positive $23.8 million this time around. Problem? The analyst community was calling for a top line of $1.35 billion and a per-share loss of $0.15, matching the year-ago quarter's loss. Sales growth guidance for the third quarter (now underway) was in line with estimates, but investors also noticed that these numbers still trail those being reported by Meta and other social media companies. In addition, "an issue related to our ad platform" crimped both the top and bottom lines by underpricing Snap's ad inventory. A company as developed as Snap shouldn't face such self-created glitches. Nevertheless, this stock's subsequent setback is far more of an opportunity than an omen. (Much) more to like in the long run than not Snap's got plenty to figure out. Even while the technical glitch was temporary, it's concerning that user growth has outright stalled in North America and Europe, where average per-user revenue is highest. It's also simply not growing as briskly as its rival platforms are, and perhaps never will. As RBC Capital Markets analyst Brad Erickson noted, last quarter's numbers "will continue to reinforce the bear case that Snap cannot break out of being a smaller ad platform lacking the ability to durably grow its direct response business in line with the market." Just don't lose sight of the bigger, longer-term picture. And that picture is still pretty bullish for a handful of reasons. One of those reasons is Snap's never-ending willingness to learn from its past failures as well as past successes, and then evolve as merited. Case in point: In June, the company announced the augmented reality glasses it's been working on for a while now will be ready for launch sometime in 2026. Its first go-around with "Spectacles" back in 2016 ended up being a bit of a disaster. But those glasses were only a camera, and AR technology has come a long way since then. Undeterred by its previous flop, Snap's next shot at stand-alone hardware is a reasonable risk. In the meantime, the company's doing something far more practical by adding artificial intelligence-powered tools (including AI-generated ads) to its advertisers' toolkit. Its relatively new Sponsored "Snaps" are also producing 20% more conversions than ordinary ads. Perhaps the overarching argument for betting on beaten-down SNAP shares despite them going nowhere since their 2021/2022 rout is that Snapchat still has a long growth path ahead of it. It's difficult to quantify, or even see. But the world is growing weary of the toxicity on Facebook and X. Consumers are increasingly looking for alternative online gathering places where they're in control of what they're exposed to. They're finding less-crowded and more decentralized corners of the web on platforms like Discord, Bluesky, and yes, Snapchat. Indeed, the Snapchat app lends itself to providing what its biggest cohort of users -- the Gen Z crowd, ages 16 to 30 -- craves to the point of demanding it: advertiser authenticity. According to recent research from Target's retail media network Roundel, 73% of Gen Z regularly watch influencers' shopping videos. That's more than 40% above the average. And website hosting service provider WPEngine says 82% of Gen Z is more likely to trust a company that uses real people (like Snapchat's creators) rather than paid actors in its ads. Ads on Facebook and X tend to lack this authenticity, while Snapchat's heavily featured ads from the platform's well-followed creators is about as authentic as it gets. Focus on the long-term marketability of the business It's tough to get excited about buying into any promising business while that business's results are lackluster, and Snap's are. The stock's lingering lethargy isn't helping the bull thesis either. Just bear in mind something that Warren Buffett said long ago that still applies in the modern market environment: "If you aren't thinking about owning a stock for 10 years, don't even think about owning it for 10 minutes." Snapchat's got the right idea and formula. It's just going to take a while to prove it. It's going to take even longer for the market to fully see it. On the other hand, as other investors increasingly do see it, they'll at least start pricing in Snap's promising future. That's why it might be wiser to go ahead and wade into a position now while nobody else is thinking about doing the same. As Buffett has also said, "Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful." You can control your total risk just by adjusting the size of the Snap stake you take on. Should you buy stock in Snap right now? Before you buy stock in Snap, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Snap wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms and Target. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. After Recent Earnings, What's the Investment Thesis for Snap Now? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio


Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Walmart gives employees a generous new perk
Walmart, the world's largest retailer, has long been criticized for paying its employees wages so low that many must rely on public assistance programs to make ends meet. A 2020 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report revealed that millions of full-time workers earning poverty-level wages qualify for federal benefits such as Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); Walmart was among the top employers of SNAP and Medicaid recipients in the states included in the report, according to the Los Angeles Times. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Of course, many other large retail and food businesses have been found to underpay their workers, shifting the burden of supporting low-wage employees onto taxpayers. Amazon (AMZN) and McDonald's (MCD) are big organizations with significant numbers of employees who depend on assistance programs. (The U.S. Military, while not a private corporation, is another massive organization with many members who rely on government assistance.) Critics point out that taxpayers effectively subsidize employees' wages at profitable corporations, allowing these companies to maintain low labor costs while raking in substantial profits. This situation raises questions about the fairness of a system where taxpayers support corporate profits through public assistance programs. Employees and worker advocates alike have criticized Walmart, and the company is trying to improve its employees' financial well-being. The company introduced initiatives like the "Live Better U" program, which offers employees affordable education and skills training. The latest Walmart (WMT) employee perk is a 10% discount on groceries, and it's meant to ease employees' financial strain. Walmart announced on LinkedIn changes to its Walmart Associate Discount Card and will offer all U.S. employees the discount on groceries, including meat and dairy. Previously the discount was offered only during the holidays. The program applies to both full- and part-time employees. It is intended to help with the rising costs of food and household essentials affecting nearly every U.S. citizen. Related: $4 Trader Joe's bags are going viral (again), so grab one while you can Additionally, Walmart has raised its starting wages in certain locations and implemented bonuses for long-term employees. However, some worker advocates argue that these measures are insufficient and that a more comprehensive approach, including higher base wages and improved benefits, is necessary to reduce workers' dependence on public assistance. The Walmart program has plenty of critics. They point out that perks and discounts are helpful but do not replace fair compensation. Walmart's starting wages in the U.S. currently range from $15 to $17 per hour; every state has a different minimum wage. This rate is well above the federal minimum of $7.25, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, but is still often insufficient to cover the cost of living in many parts of the country, especially for employees who are supporting families. Even full-time workers at the upper end of the hourly scale may struggle with rent, health care, and child care costs, forcing them to turn to government programs to fill the gap. More Retail: Walmart CEO sounds alarm on a big problem for customersTarget makes a change that might scare Walmart, CostcoTop investor takes firm stance on troubled retail brandWalmart and Costco making major change affecting all customers The new grocery discount may provide immediate relief for Walmart employees, but it does not solve the systemic challenge of inadequate pay. Inflation and the cost of living continue to rise, so every little bit helps, and some see Walmart's move as a potential model. Others point out that perks are no substitute for a living wage. Related: Trader Joe's quietly pulls popular product, confuses fans The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wheat Sneaking Higher to Start Friday
Wheat is showing gains across most contracts early on Friday. The wheat complex fell back lower on Thursday, closing with weakness across all three markets. CBT soft red wheat futures were down 3 to 4 cents on the day. KC HRW futures posted 2 to 2 ½ cent losses in the front months on Thursday. Preliminary open interest was up 8,739 contracts on Thursday. MPLS spring wheat was down 3 to 4 cents on the session. Export Sales data from USDA this morning indicated sales backing off slightly from last week to 722,846 MT, though that was still on the higher side estimates. That was the second largest for the marketing year only behind last week and more than double the same week last year. The largest buyer was South Korea at 130,000 MT, with 114,900 MT sold to Mexico. More News from Barchart Coffee Prices Extend Wednesday's Rally Coffee Prices Extend Wednesday's Rally Grain Market Update: Could a Rate Cut, Inflation Spur Fund Buying in Wheat, Soybeans, and Corn? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. A South Korean importer purchased 50,000 MT of US wheat in their tender overnight. Sep 25 CBOT Wheat closed at $5.03 1/2, down 3 3/4 cents, currently up 2 3/4 cents Dec 25 CBOT Wheat closed at $5.24 1/2, down 3 3/4 cents, currently up 1 1/2 cents Sep 25 KCBT Wheat closed at $5.04 1/4, down 2 1/2 cents, currently up 2 3/4 cents Dec 25 KCBT Wheat closed at $5.26, down 2 cents, currently up 1 3/4 cents Sep 25 MGEX Wheat closed at $5.73 1/4, down 3 3/4 cents, currently unch Dec 25 MGEX Wheat closed at $5.92 1/4, down 3 3/4 cents, currently up 1/4 cents On the date of publication, Austin Schroeder did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data