logo
Israel could attempt to destroy Iran's Fordow nuclear facility

Israel could attempt to destroy Iran's Fordow nuclear facility

Daily Mail​19-06-2025
Israel could attempt to damage or destroy Iran's Fordow nuclear facility by deploying a team of special forces if the US is unwilling to deploy its 'bunker-busting' bombs, an official has claimed. The Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FEP), buried deep beneath the mountains near the holy city of Qom, is one of Iran's most secretive and heavily fortified nuclear facilities.
Enrichment centrifuges housed within its secured chambers are capable of producing uranium at near-weapons-grade levels, and access to the site is tightly controlled by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Built in defiance of international pressure and revealed to the world only after Western intelligence agencies exposed its existence in 2009, the site was constructed some 90 metres (285ft) underground to shield it from aerial bombardment. Only the US has the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) munitions capable of reaching the facility, but Trump on Wednesday said: 'We have the capability to do it, but that doesn't mean I am going to do it.'
Hours later, a US official told Axios that Israel had informed the Trump administration that while they may not be able to reach deep enough into the mountain with bombs, they may 'do it with humans'. This raises the prospect of a daring boots-on-the-ground operation - and one that is not without precedent. In September, Israeli special forces deployed to Masyaf in Syria where they conducted a raid on an underground missile production facility they claimed was 'the flagship of Iranian manufacturing efforts in our region'. And Israel's Mossad spy agency has proven its capability to operate on Iranian soil, having constructed a clandestine base of attack drones used to sabotage Iran's air defence systems prior to Friday's initial assault.
But Fordow is one of Iran's most prized and protected nuclear assets, and any Israeli military operation would surely be met with huge resistance. Israeli Defence Forces Lieutenant Colonel Nadav Shoshani told reporters earlier this year about the special forces' bold operation to destroy the missile production site in Syria. 'This facility was designed to manufacture hundreds of strategic missiles per year from start to finish, for Hezbollah to use in their aerial attacks on Israel,' he said.
The plant, dug into a mountainside, had been under observation by Israel since construction began in 2017. The IDF claimed it was on the point of being able to manufacture precision-guided missiles, some with a range of up to 300km (190 miles). 'This ability was becoming active, so we're talking about an immediate threat,' Lt. Col. Shoshani said.
Shoshani added that the nighttime raid was 'one of the more complex operations the IDF has done in recent years'. Accompanied by airstrikes, it involved dozens of aircraft and around 100 helicopter-borne troops, he said. 'At the end of the raid, the troops dismantled the facility, including the machines and the manufacturing equipment, themselves,' he claimed.
However, there is no telling whether Israeli special forces could pull off the same feat in an attack on Fordow. Since launching the first round of attacks on Friday, Israel's warplanes have now struck hundreds of targets linked to Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes, and Israeli military officials boasted the Islamic Republic's military leaders were 'on the run'. Despite Israel's early success, questions have already arisen over whether the Jewish state is capable of reaching its targets as described by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu . Speaking on Monday, Netanyahu said Israel was 'pursuing three main objectives' in Iran: 'The elimination of the nuclear programme, the elimination of ballistic missile production capability, and the elimination of the axis of terrorism.'
But many analysts believe Jerusalem is incapable of achieving those aims unless its most powerful ally decides to enter the fray. 'Without active US military participation, Israel's operational ceiling remains constrained,' Dr Andreas Krieg, an expert in Middle East security and senior lecturer at King's College London's School of Security Studies, told MailOnline. So far, Israel has targeted multiple Iranian nuclear sites and has damaged the Natanz FEP. But Israeli security officials confirmed earlier this week that the air force has not attempted any strikes on Fordow.
To have any hope of eliminating it without resorting to its own nuclear weapons - or if an elite commando raid is deemed unlikely to succeed - Israel would need to harness the power of some of the world's most powerful conventional bombs. The 30,000-pound (14,000-kilogram) GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), a US-made bunker-busting bomb that uses its weight and sheer kinetic force to reach deeply buried targets, could manage to take Fordow out. This terrifying munition can penetrate some 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. In theory, the MOP could be dropped by any plane capable of carrying the weight.
But Israel has neither the bomb, nor the capability to deliver it. 'Only the US Air Force's B-2 Spirit stealth bomber is capable of deploying the MOP,' Krieg explained. 'Without these assets, Israel's capacity to destroy the core of Iran's enrichment infrastructure is severely limited.' And, even if Fordow could be destroyed, a successful strike would not erase Iran's nuclear ambitions, according to Krieg. 'The fundamental challenge remains that Iran's nuclear programme is not just a collection of facilities. It is also a body of knowledge, personnel, and dispersed technical infrastructure. Much of the scientific expertise survives the bombings. Iran has long decentralised and concealed aspects of its programme precisely in anticipation of such scenarios. This means that unless there is sustained international pressure, robust inspections, and political change within Iran, the regime can, and likely would, rebuild over time thanks to its scientific base and global black-market procurement networks,' Krieg said.
Krieg also claimed that continued attacks by Israel may have the opposite of their intended effect. Going after Iran's nuclear programme could 'reinforce Tehran's belief that a nuclear deterrent is not only justified but essential for regime survival'. 'Rather than halting Iran's nuclear trajectory, the strikes may serve as a powerful vindication of the logic that drives Iran's long-term nuclear ambition - deterrence through capability,' he said.
Tehran has repeatedly insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful and that it has never intended to make a bomb, despite the fears of Israel and the West . However, its ever-growing stockpile of enriched uranium – needed to produce an atomic weapon – had triggered major concerns.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog, said Iran's activity was a 'matter of serious concern'. On June 12, the day before Israel's sudden attack, the IAEA ruled that Iran was in breach of its safeguard obligations. Iran criticised the 'politically motivated' decision, announcing it would bolster its nuclear programme with a new enrichment facility in a 'secure location'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Benjamin Netanyahu launches his most personal attack on Anthony Albanese yet - despite local Jewish groups calling for calm
Benjamin Netanyahu launches his most personal attack on Anthony Albanese yet - despite local Jewish groups calling for calm

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Benjamin Netanyahu launches his most personal attack on Anthony Albanese yet - despite local Jewish groups calling for calm

Benjamin Netanyahu has intensified his attacks on Anthony Albanese, declaring that the Australian Prime Minister 's record is 'forever tarnished' by his 'weakness'. The Israeli Prime Minister branded Albanese a 'weak leader' who 'abandoned' Australia's Jews over his decision to recognise Palestinian statehood and the diplomatic spat over revoked visas. Now, in an interview with Sky News to air on Thursday evening, Netanyahu has doubled down on his criticism, claiming Albanese has shown 'weakness' in the face of Hamas. 'I'm sure he has a reputable record as a public servant, but I think his record is forever tarnished by the weakness he has shown in the face of these Hamas terrorist monsters,' Netanyahu told Sky News. 'When the worst terrorist organisation on earth – these savages who murdered women, raped them, beheaded men, burnt babies alive in front of their parents and took hundreds of hostages. 'When these people congratulate the Prime Minister of Australia, you know something is wrong.' Health Minister Mark Butler said on Thursday that Netanyahu's personal attacks were 'frankly ridiculous'. This follows Immigration Minister Tony Burke claiming on Wednesday that 'strength was not measured by how many people you can blow up'. 'Strength is much better measured by what Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has done, which is when there's a decision we know Israel won't like he goes straight to Benjamin Netanyahu,' Burke told ABC Radio. Albanese, for his part, did not respond in kind, insisting he did not take the criticisms personally. 'My job is to represent the Australian national interest and I think very much that Australians want two things to happen,' he told reporters on Wednesday. 'One, they want people to stop killing each other. Whether it be Israelis or Palestinians. The second thing that they want is the conflict to not be brought here.' It comes as Executive Council of the Australian Jewry President Daniel Aghion called for an end to the 'war of words' between Australia and Israel, claiming that Netanyahu's description of Albanese as a 'weak' leader was 'inflammatory and provocative'. 'These comments have played straight into the hands of opponents of Israel and antisemites, to the detriment of the Australian Jewish community,' he ECAJ letter states. 'This deterioration in the diplomatic relations between two countries we love is causing us nothing but pain and anguish, and we will not suffer in silence.'

UK military chief meets US counterparts for Ukraine talks
UK military chief meets US counterparts for Ukraine talks

South Wales Guardian

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Guardian

UK military chief meets US counterparts for Ukraine talks

Admiral Sir Tony Radakin met senior US defence officials alongside other European military chiefs in Washington DC on Wednesday to discuss military options to secure peace in Ukraine. He later attended a virtual meeting of Nato's military committee, described by its chairman Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone as 'candid'. On Tuesday evening, Admiral Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, had dined with his US counterpart General Dan Caine. The meetings come amid renewed planning for a 'coalition of the willing', led by the UK and France, that would guarantee Kyiv's security in the event of a ceasefire. Earlier in the week, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron co-chaired a meeting of the coalition, in which members of the group also discussed the possibility of further sanctions on Russia. Western security guarantees, strongly resisted by Moscow, are one of the central issues for any peace deal for Ukraine, which fears Russia could otherwise use a ceasefire to regroup and launch a renewed invasion. So far, only the UK and France have indicated they could commit troops to a peacekeeping force in Ukraine. In an interview on Tuesday Donald Trump ruled out an American ground contribution but suggested the US could be willing to provide some form of air support. His special envoy, Steve Witkoff, had earlier suggested the US could offer Ukraine a mutual defence agreement similar to Nato's Article 5, without Kyiv formally joining the alliance. Renewed talks among the 'coalition of the willing' follow last week's summit between Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska as the US president continued to push for an end to a conflict he had promised he could finish on his first day in office. Those talks appeared to result in little progress towards a deal, but sparked concern among some in Europe that Mr Trump could seek to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into accepting a deal without sufficient security guarantees. On Monday, Sir Keir and Mr Macron joined other European leaders in travelling to Washington in a show of support for Mr Zelensky during a meeting with Mr Trump. Meanwhile, the UK and Russia traded sanctions as London sought to increase the pressure on Moscow to end its invasion. Europe minister Stephen Doughty unveiled sanctions on a series of organisations linked to Kyrgyzstan's financial services sector, saying they had been involved in Kremlin attempts to 'soften the blow of our sanctions by laundering transactions through dodgy crypto networks'. Russia in turn sanctioned 21 individuals, including former Labour MP Denis MacShane, several journalists, and the Government-appointed independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall.

Donald Trump's new White House portrait criticised for 'Satanic theme'
Donald Trump's new White House portrait criticised for 'Satanic theme'

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Donald Trump's new White House portrait criticised for 'Satanic theme'

A fresh image of Donald Trump has been unveiled in the Oval Office - but it's already causing a stir online, with many branding it as "too accurate" A controversial new portrait of Donald Trump has sparked fierce criticism over its alleged 'Satanic themes'. ‌ Sebastian Gorka, the deputy assistant to the president, revealed a fresh image of Trump, which is now displayed in the Oval Office. ‌ The artwork shows Trump striding through rows of American flags with an orange glow behind him - compared to flames by critics - and was teased as just "one of the new" Trump-themed artworks decorating the White House. The new portrait comes amid reports of how Trump's Ukraine plans has prompted a Pentagon peace summit with UK military chiefs. ‌ The new portrait was created by Vanessa Horabuena, a self-described Christian worship painter. the Express. Not everyone was impressed with the portrait, with some branding it as "too accurate" and others as "too orange." Project Liberal questioned, "Why is the country on fire behind him?". This feeling resonated with many, as another user remarked, "fits. America is on fire in the background and Trump walks away." ‌ Others pointed to Trump's collection of self-portraits in the White House, especially after reports last week that portraits of Obama and Bush have been moved to a rarely-used stairwell, reports the Mirror US. Ignited uproar "The man can't get enough of himself," one user slammed. Another added: "As per usual, it's all about his ego." ‌ Another person slated the portrait's poor resemblance to Trump's real appearance. "Did you request the portrait to appear 60 lbs lighter than reality?" an X user questioned. The Mirror reached out to both the White House and the artist for a response, but none was immediately available. Trump's portraits and paintings displayed around the White House have previously sparked controversy, and a recent attempt to showcase them to other world leaders didn't go as smoothly as Trump had hoped. ‌ Assassination attempt His iconic photo from the Butler assassination attempt, featuring him with his fist raised in the air, is also a source of pride for the president, who often shows it off to visitors. Before a meeting in the East Room yesterday, the seven European heads of state gathered for a photograph with Trump and Zelensky in the Grand Foyer of the White House. ‌ As they stood together, the president gestured towards a painting depicting his bloodied ear following an assassination attempt during his 2024 campaign in Pennsylvania. "That was not a good day. Not a great day. See the picture?" Trump said, pointing to a wall on the group's right where the large painting is hung. However, not all the leaders shared Trump's enthusiasm for the image. Patriotic portraits Some of the leaders briefly glanced over, appearing to show minimal interest, while others, like French President Emmanuel Macron, continued to look straight ahead. The Republican leader has been giving the White House a makeover, including refurbishing the Rose Garden and adding numerous gold accents throughout the Oval Office. A substantial portion of these changes includes swapping out portraits of his predecessors. In a recent snap shared on X, Trump's patriotic portrait is proudly showcased between former First Lady Laura Bush and another first lady, nabbing the spot previously held by his long-standing adversary, Hillary Clinton. This comes after Joe Rogan revealed a startling new conspiracy theory about a potential assassination attempt on Trump in 2024.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store