
Area districts respond to OSPI immigration guidelines
The OSPI report comes after President Donald Trump's Executive Order 14148 rescinded a policy that limited Immigration and Customs Enforcement's ability to operate in schools, hospitals and places of worship.
"We are aware that the federal government has removed the 'protected areas' designation, which previously limited immigration enforcement actions on school grounds," Quincy School District Superintendent Nik Bergman said via email. "While we are closely monitoring these changes, our district's commitment remains the same: every student deserves to feel safe, seen, valued, and accepted so they can focus on learning."
Othello School District Superintendent Pete Perez said the difficulty of the changes comes with the speed at which policies are evolving and confusion surrounding them.
"Ultimately, schools, for the most part, have been about local control. Then what's happening at the federal level, that then hits the state level in Olympia, it trickles down to a place like Othello," Perez said. "It has created confusion for a number of folks. We're doing our best every day to provide as much clarity and connect dots for folks, because that uncertainty certainly contributes to the tension, and I think our responsibility is to provide clarity, to bring that tension down, and to focus on what we're supposed to do, which is teach every kid who comes into our schools every day."
Despite the executive order, the OSPI report said public schools have Constitutional and moral obligation to offer free, high-quality education to all students.
"If you're a student residing in the Othello School District, you come to our schools, and we're going to give our best effort every day to make sure you feel comfortable there," Perez said.
Ephrata School District Superintendent Ken Murray echoed Perez.
"At Ephrata Schools, our mission is to support kids and their learning. We do that by creating a safe, welcoming and encouraging environment for students and their families," Ephrata School District Superintendent Ken Murray wrote in a statement. "We believe that schools are more than just places of education — they are centers of growth, connection and community. We remain deeply committed to safeguarding the well-being of every student entrusted to our care. Immigration policies are at the forefront of national conversations. We understand that some may have concerns about how potential actions could impact our children and our schools."
The OSPI report cites state and federal laws prohibiting discrimination based on race, color or national origin. It also notes that Washington state law prohibits discrimination on the basis of citizenship or immigration status.
The report also specified that public school districts cannot engage with federal immigration authorities solely to share student information.
In Ephrata, multiple school policies and chapter 43.10.310 of the Revised Code of Washington prevent proactive reporting of legal residency to ICE and other authorities.
"School staff cannot assist or facilitate immigration enforcement or grant interviews with immigration authorities unless those requests are legally mandated by a valid judicial warrant," Murray said in his statement.
According to the guidelines established in the report, school districts are encouraged to adopt key practices to uphold state and federal law. These include ensuring timely enrollment of all students, collecting only necessary personal information and providing educational services without discrimination. Under no circumstances should schools deny enrollment or treat students differently based on their immigration status.
"MLSD will continue to protect students' rights within the scope of the law, protect student records and comply with privacy laws, provide equal access to academic programs and support services and train staff on relevant policies and procedures to ensure compliance," Moses Lake Superintendent Carol Lewis wrote in a statement to the Columbia Basin Herald. "We will implement these guidelines in accordance with the law while continuing to support our students and families."
OSPI's report says schools cannot ask families to disclose immigration statuses. Instead, schools are instructed to facilitate enrollment by creating alternate methods to verify student age and residency.
As part of the guidance, OSPI urges schools to maintain student privacy. It emphasizes that under federal laws, particularly the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, or FERPA, education records should not be disclosed to anyone who isn't a legal guardian off the student. This includes federal immigration authorities without appropriate legal justification.
"Moses Lake School District is committed to ensuring all students have access to a safe and supportive learning environment, as required by state and federal law," reads a statement from Lewis. "The OSPI Guidelines for the Protection of Immigrant Students provide clarity on enrollment, student privacy and access to educational services."
Moreover, schools must have policies addressing requests for student information related to immigration enforcement, ensuring they are in compliance with privacy laws.
The state has protections including RCW 28A.600.475 which prevents school districts from releasing information without the written consent of a student's parent or guardian. The procedures must also be in compliance with the FERPA. School districts can provide information only when directed by a court order or lawfully issued subpoena. According to RCW 13.40.480 parents and or guardians must be notified of such actions.
"District Policy 4300 and Procedure 4300, aligned with RCW 43.10.310, limits school involvement in immigration enforcement, which ensures that schools remain safe and inclusive spaces for all students, regardless of immigration status," Bergman wrote. "School staff cannot assist or facilitate immigration enforcement unless legally required, such as when presented with a valid judicial warrant. Additionally, these policies restrict the sharing of student information or allowing interviews by immigration authorities without proper legal authorization."
The report also addresses food services for immigrant students, clarifying that eligibility for free and reduced-price meals is not contingent upon citizenship or immigration status.
OSPI emphasizes the importance of providing equal access to special education services, affirming that citizenship is not a condition for receiving support under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. School districts are required to engage in proactive outreach efforts to identify undocumented students who may require special education services, ensuring comprehensive support for all students with disabilities.
Language access requirements are also outlined by OSPI. Schools are urged to designate language access liaisons and adopt policies to facilitate meaningful communication with parents and guardians who have limited English proficiency. The OSPI document says the goal is to ensure language barriers do not impede education.
"As we carefully review how these federal changes impact our schools, our priority is to protect students' privacy while complying with federal, state, and local laws," Bergman said. "We will communicate openly with our community if new developments occur. Families with questions or concerns are encouraged to contact their child's school or the district office."
Additionally, OSPI indicated the necessity for schools to develop trusting relationships with immigrant families. By dispelling concerns about immigration enforcement, schools can encourage greater family engagement and enhance student attendance among those concerned about their immigration status, the report said.
"I think the particular incident that I'm aware of involves one of our high school students and his family and some of the media that was attracted to that story," Perez said. "It created an opportunity for people to step up and say, 'This is how we're supporting our students.' It also created an opportunity for families to have really hard conversations about immigrant safety plans that they're forced to have because of their status. So has there been increased tension, I think, and fear amongst our families? Absolutely."
The report follows the enactment of the Keep Washington Working Act of 2019, which mandates schools uphold the rights and dignity of all residents, including those without legal immigration status.
Perez said the focus remains on following the law and OSPI guidelines.
"We continue to be responsive through either mental health support or social support or that whole network of things that schools do day to day to make sure that every kid feels safe," he said.
The focus remains on students and making sure they're taken care of, regardless of the politics involved, Perez added.
"I think it's important in an area like the Columbia Basin that's so dependent on the skill and labor of folks who come to our country looking for more opportunity, that we balance our responsibility and our thoughts about sort of the national politics around us and really focus on what matters in our community and for our constituents, and you know that we treat everybody with dignity because they all deserve that," Perez said.
For further information and access to the full report, visit: bit.ly/ImmigrationOSPI.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
15 hours ago
- New York Times
Immigration Enforcement Takes Key Role in Trump's D.C. Crime Crackdown
Many working-class immigrants who run the hotels, restaurants and tourist sites of Washington, D.C., say they had long wanted the city to do more about homelessness and crime. Some said they had watched violence intensify on the very streets where they work overnight shifts or walk on early mornings as they open up shops. But in recent days, workers, small business owners and street vendors say they have found themselves at the center of two crackdowns: one on crime, another on illegal immigration. With Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents appearing alongside National Guard members and federal agents as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on crime in Washington, these workers say they worry that the federal show of force may only complicate efforts to lower violence in the city. Immigrants interviewed in and near Washington in recent days described a new sense of anxiety, whether they were undocumented or had legal status in this country. And some said they worried that the result could be the opposite of the president's intended goals, fracturing relationships between immigrants and local authorities, deterring immigrants from reporting crimes and, in the end, making the city less safe. 'My friend told me to be careful because they are squarely picking up everyone, simply for having a Hispanic face,' said Aracely, a legal resident who was wiping windows outside a furniture store near U Street. Like many of those interviewed, she declined to provide her full name for fear of retaliation from the authorities or of reprimands from employers. As the Trump administration stepped in this month, announcing that it was taking control of law enforcement in the city, immigration enforcement has emerged as a key element. Of 308 people arrested since the federal push began on Aug. 7, 135 were unauthorized immigrants, according to the White House. Attorney General Pam Bondi has also sought to end D.C. policies that bar local police from most collaboration with federal immigration authorities and from arrests of people solely for being in the country illegally. That issue is still being contested as part of a court battle expected to continue this week, but a federal judge allowed the administration on Friday to require the city's help on immigration enforcement for now. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


USA Today
17 hours ago
- USA Today
Democratic-led states sue Trump admin over restrictions on funding for victims of crimes
Democratic attorneys general said states are being strong-armed into supporting Trump's immigration policies. Democratic attorneys general are suing the Trump administration over its attempt to condition federal funding for the victims of crimes on states' cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. In a suit filed on Aug. 18 in Rhode lsland, the attorneys general called the move a brazen attempt by the Justice Department to 'strong-arm' states into supporting President Donald Trump's immigration policies. 'We won't be bullied or manipulated by the Trump administration,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta told reporters. The Trump administration has threatened to sue and withhold federal funds from more than 20 "sanctuary" states, cities and counties, because of their lack of cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. "Sanctuary policies impede law enforcement and put American citizens at risk by design," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in an Aug. 5 statement. There's no specific legal definition of a sanctuary city, state or other jurisdiction, but Bondi's office criticized policies like failing to collaborate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, providing government benefits to undocumented immigrants or refusing to share immigration information about jail detainees. See Trump's target list Is your community an immigrant sanctuary? The states argue the administration can't threaten to withhold the more than $1 billion in federal grants from a program created in 1984 to bolster support for crime victims. The grants fund compensation programs to cover such costs as medical bills, funeral costs and lost wages for survivors. The federal funding also pays for counseling, emergency shelter, crisis hotlines and legal support. New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin said the administration is using the victims of gun violence, domestic violence, sexual assault survivors and others as political pawns. The attorneys general are asking a judge to block the administration from imposing new estrictions on the funding, arguing the money has already been approved by Congress.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democratic states sue to force Trump to hand over crime grant money in immigration fight
Twenty states and Washington, DC, sued the Trump administration on Monday, alleging that it is improperly withholding hundreds of millions of dollars meant to help victims of crimes in order to force states into cooperating with federal immigration enforcement efforts. The states, all of which have Democratic attorneys general, are asking federal judge to strike down the conditions the Justice Department has established to receive the grant money, which are used to help crime victims with things like medical bills, funeral costs, counseling, emergency shelter, crisis hotlines and legal support. If the threats came to fruition, the states allege, states would be forced to choose between fully cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, or having to scale back or shut down those programs. 'This brazen attempt to use funding that supports our most vulnerable residents to strong-arm California and states nationwide into doing the federal government's job for it, is blatantly beyond the power of the president,' California Attorney General Rob Bonda said in a statement. The demand is the latest in a series of battles between the administration and individual states over Trump's hardline immigration crackdown. Trump and his Justice Department have prioritized their work to expel migrants who are here illegally and to dismantle state and local-level protections, often referred to as sanctuary policies. Attorney General Pam Bondi published a list of places that have sanctuary policies, which includes 12 states and Washington, DC, 4 counties, and 18 cities. The department has also filed several lawsuits against sanctuary jurisdictions in an effort to push them into complying with immigration enforcement, including suits against Illinois and New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles.