Democratic-led states sue Trump admin over restrictions on funding for victims of crimes
Democratic attorneys general are suing the Trump administration over its attempt to condition federal funding for the victims of crimes on states' cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
In a suit filed on Aug. 18 in Rhode lsland, the attorneys general called the move a brazen attempt by the Justice Department to 'strong-arm' states into supporting President Donald Trump's immigration policies.
'We won't be bullied or manipulated by the Trump administration,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta told reporters.
The Trump administration has threatened to sue and withhold federal funds from more than 20 "sanctuary" states, cities and counties, because of their lack of cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
"Sanctuary policies impede law enforcement and put American citizens at risk by design," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in an Aug. 5 statement.
There's no specific legal definition of a sanctuary city, state or other jurisdiction, but Bondi's office criticized policies like failing to collaborate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, providing government benefits to undocumented immigrants or refusing to share immigration information about jail detainees.
See Trump's target list Is your community an immigrant sanctuary?
The states argue the administration can't threaten to withhold the more than $1 billion in federal grants from a program created in 1984 to bolster support for crime victims.
The grants fund compensation programs to cover such costs as medical bills, funeral costs and lost wages for survivors. The federal funding also pays for counseling, emergency shelter, crisis hotlines and legal support.
New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin said the administration is using the victims of gun violence, domestic violence, sexual assault survivors and others as political pawns. The attorneys general are asking a judge to block the administration from imposing new estrictions on the funding, arguing the money has already been approved by Congress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
a minute ago
- NBC News
'All of us want to finish this war': Zelenskyy optimistic after latest talks
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy thanked President Trump and European leaders taking part in talks at the White House after their first round of meetings. Zelenskyy described his conversation with Mr. Trump as "the best one" and noted that they discussed several sensitive points aimed at ending the 18, 2025
Vox
a minute ago
- Vox
The serious trend behind MSNBC's silly new name
is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He's worked at Vox since the site's launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker's Washington, DC, bureau. Goodbye MSBNC, and hello 'MS NOW.' In an announcement that has triggered widespread befuddlement and mockery, the progressive cable news network is getting rebranded. The new name isn't meant to call to mind Microsoft or the honorific 'Ms.' Instead, in the style of congressional bill-naming, MS NOW is purportedly an acronym for the following mouthful: 'My Source for News, Opinion, and the World.' Underneath this seemingly silly story, though, are currents of major change — and fear — in the mainstream media. Today, Explained Understand the world with a daily explainer, plus the most compelling stories of the day. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Because both MSNBC and its fellow political news network CNN are meeting the same fate; they're being jettisoned by the big corporate bethemoths that currently own them. Those corporate behemoths — Comcast owns MSNBC, while Warner Bros. owns CNN — have legitimate business reasons for making this change. Each is offloading these political news channels, as well as various other cable networks, to a new separate company, called by some a 'SpinCo' (spin-off company) and by others a 'ShitCo' (no explanation needed). This is because cable news is viewed as a declining business. Yet there's another clear implication. President Donald Trump loathes both MSNBC and CNN, and his administration has been willing and eager to wage personal and political vendettas against their corporate owners. Take, for instance, how Paramount had to grovel before Trump because he was annoyed at Paramount-owned CBS. The Federal Communications Commission held up Paramount's merger deal until the company agreed to pay a $16 million settlement in a bogus lawsuit Trump had brought against 60 Minutes. So now, with these spinoffs, Comcast and Warner Bros. will no longer have to worry about being punished by the federal government for MSNBC and CNN's coverage. To be clear: Comcast's spin-off of MSNBC and other cable properties was already in the works before Trump won his second term. And there's obviously no political motivation behind Comcast ditching its other cable properties, like the USA Network, SYFY, Oxygen, the Golf Channel, CNBC, and E! (Comcast is keeping NBC News and Universal Studios.) But since Trump began his second term, the company's thinking has apparently evolved on one point: whether MSNBC can keep its name. Back in January, the new CEO of MSNBC's SpinCo, Mark Lazarus, said that MSNBC would keep its name after the spin-off. So the announcement Monday of the new MS NOW name was a change of plan. This would, of course, create more obvious distance between whatever 'MS NOW' is up to and the existing NBC media empire. CNBC, in contrast, will get to keep its name despite being spun off. We don't know whether that's because they're less likely to displease Trump, less likely to cause problems for NBC's brand, or some other reason. What we do know is that, this year, Trump has normalized the weaponization of the government against corporations who have displeased him with shocking speed. For now, at least, this has to be part of companies' strategic calculations. Placating the president is the new cost of doing business in the United States of America.
Newsweek
a minute ago
- Newsweek
When Will Epstein Records Be Sent to House? Trump DOJ Provides an Update
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The House Oversight Committee announced Monday on X that the Department of Justice will send documents related to late convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein on Friday. The GOP Oversight account posted, "Chairman @RepJamesComer confirms DOJ will begin sending House Oversight documents related to Epstein on Friday: "Officials with the Department of Justice have informed us that the Department will begin to provide Epstein-related records to the Oversight Committee this week on Friday. There are many records in DOJ's custody, and it will take the Department time to produce all the records and ensure the identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted. I appreciate the Trump Administration's commitment to transparency and efforts to provide the American people with information about this matter." This is a breaking news article. Updates to follow.
