logo
How Cuba's beggars led to the fall of its labour minister

How Cuba's beggars led to the fall of its labour minister

First Posta day ago
Cuban Minister for Labour and Social Security resigned after claiming Cuba, a communist-run nation around 150 kilometres from Florida, has no beggars. But what happened exactly? Why have her remarks sparked such a backlash? read more
A woman searches through a dumpster looking for useful items, in Havana, Cuba. Cuban Minister for Labour and Social Security resigned after claiming Cuba, a communist-run nation around 150 kilometres from Florida, has no beggars. AP
Cuba's labour minister has been forced to resign.
And it's all because of the country's beggars.
Cuban Minister for Labour and Social Security resigned after claiming Cuba, a communist-run nation around 150 kilometres from Florida, has no beggars.
But what happened exactly? Why have her remarks sparked such a backlash?
Let's take a closer look:
What happened?
Marta Elena Feitó-Cabrera, Cuba's Minister for Labour, said there were no such things as beggars in Cuba.
Cabrera claimed that people were begging and going through rubbish in order to make 'easy money'.
Feitó-Cabrera made the remarks during a session of Cuba's National Assembly.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'We have seen people, apparently beggars, (but) when you look at their hands, look at the clothes these people are wearing, they are disguised as beggars, they are not beggars,' she said.
'There are no beggars in Cuba. There are people pretending to be beggars to make easy money', she said.
She said that those cleaning windshields use the money to 'drink alcohol.'
She accused those of going through the garbage as being 'illegal participants in the recycling service'.
She said they are recovering materials 'to resell and not pay tax.'
Feitó-Cabrera's remarks went viral in no time.
She was heavily criticised by both people in Cuba and Cubans abroad.
Many even called for her to be removed from office.
Even Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel took aim at her – albeit not by name.
Vendors wait for customers next to the trunk of their American classic car stuffed with homemade crisps and bread, in Havana, Cuba. The economic situation in Cuba is going from bad to worse. AP
Díaz-Canel succeeded Raul Castro in 2019, though Castro remains a huge influence both within the party and the country.
He said Cuba's representatives cannot 'act with condescension' or be 'disconnected from the realities' of the Cuban people.
'The lack of sensitivity in addressing vulnerability is highly questionable. The revolution cannot leave anyone behind; that is our motto, our militant responsibility', Díaz-Canel later wrote on X.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Cuban economist Pedro Monreal wrote on X: 'It must be that there are also people disguised as 'ministers''.
Some Cuban activists and intellectuals also published an open letter demanding her impeachment.
The letter said her remarks were 'an insult to the Cuban people'.
Feitó-Cabrera resigned on Tuesday.
Her resignation has been accepted by the Cuban Communist Party and the government.
Cuba's Presidency wrote on X that she 'acknowledged her errors and submitted her resignation' over a 'lack of objectivity and sensitivity' for issues that are 'at the centre of political and governmental management'.
Why such a backlash?
Her remarks came at an extremely unfortunate time.
The situation in communist Cuba, which has been under US sanctions for decades, is getting from bad to worse.
America imposed sanctions on Cuba in 1960 after the revolution led by Fidel Castro.
The US in 1961 launched a failed invasion of Cuba known as the 'Bay of Pigs'.
The operation, authorised by the John F Kennedy administration, is widely seen as one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in America's history.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The US over the years also made numerous attempts to eliminate Castro.
While Barack Obama tried to thaw relations with Cuba during his time in office, his successor Donald Trump reversed the policy.
The sanctions on Cuba remain widely unpopular throughout the world.
Though 185 of 193 countries at the UN have voted to condemn US sanctions, Cuba remains under embargo.
Poverty levels are rising and food shortages are increasing.
The crisis has resulted in some people, particularly the elderly, being seen begging or going through garbage.
Some are even cleaning windshields at corners for change.
Fidel Castro was sworn in as premier of Cuba in 1959. America imposed sanctions on Cuba after the revolution led by Castro.AP/File Photo
Cuba's GDP in 2024 fell by 1.1 per cent. Over the past five years, it has shrunk by 11 per cent.
Travel and tourism remains a vital part of Cuba's economy. The island nation sees millions of tourists visit every year.
While many over the years praised Cuba for providing several benefits to its citizens including universal healthcare and pensions, the government has since cut back on several essential services.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This isn't even enough to buy a single carton of eggs.
Those who have families abroad can survive on what they send back.
Others simply go without.
'They are elderly people who count on a pension that does not exist. They cannot even buy a carton of eggs. It is the reality we are living in Cuba,' Enrique Guillén, who is self-employed, said.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Only 1 Of 3 Iranian Nuclear Sites Destroyed In US Strikes: Report
Only 1 Of 3 Iranian Nuclear Sites Destroyed In US Strikes: Report

NDTV

time35 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Only 1 Of 3 Iranian Nuclear Sites Destroyed In US Strikes: Report

A new US assessment has found that American strikes in June destroyed only one of three Iranian nuclear sites, NBC News reported on Thursday, citing current and former US officials familiar with the matter. President Donald Trump rejected a military plan for further comprehensive strikes on Iran's nuclear program, which would have lasted several weeks, the report added. Reuters could not immediately verify the report.

Amid clashes with Druze minority & Israeli bombardment, death toll in South Syria crosses 500
Amid clashes with Druze minority & Israeli bombardment, death toll in South Syria crosses 500

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Amid clashes with Druze minority & Israeli bombardment, death toll in South Syria crosses 500

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that among the dead were 79 Druze fighters and 154 civilians from Sweida. This includes 83 individuals who were summarily executed by members of the defence and interior ministries read more Members of the Druze minority and their supporters protest outside the US Embassy in Jerusalem, amid the clashes between Syrian government forces and Druze armed groups in the southern Syrian city of Sweida. AP At least 516 people have been killed in the Sweida province of southern Syria, according to a war monitor's report on Thursday (July 17). This updated toll follows several days of clashes that prompted the deployment of government forces. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that among the dead were 79 Druze fighters and 154 civilians from Sweida. This includes 83 individuals who were summarily executed by members of the defence and interior ministries. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The clashes also resulted in the deaths of 243 government personnel and 18 Bedouin fighters, along with three members of Bedouin tribes who were executed by Druze fighters. Additionally, fifteen government personnel were killed in Israeli airstrikes. With inputs from AFP

From drain the swamp to 'Epstein Hoax': How Epstein files broke MAGA - and turned some in the base against Donald Trump
From drain the swamp to 'Epstein Hoax': How Epstein files broke MAGA - and turned some in the base against Donald Trump

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

From drain the swamp to 'Epstein Hoax': How Epstein files broke MAGA - and turned some in the base against Donald Trump

Donald Trump has always styled himself as a magician of American politics—a man who could escape any scandal, dodge every consequence, and emerge not only unscathed but stronger. Impeachments? He shrugged them off. Criminal indictments? He wore them as badges of honour. Assassination attempts? They only reinforced his legend. But now, with the renewed firestorm over the Jeffrey Epstein files, Trump looks less like Houdini and more like a cornered conjurer. The chains are tighter, the audience is booing, and the trapdoor under the stage is creaking. The Epstein scandal, long believed to be politically neutralised, has returned—resurrected not by the liberal media or Democrats, but by Trump's own people. And unlike in previous crises, the president is finding it hard to control the narrative, let alone escape it. His responses have become erratic, his tone defensive, and for the first time since 2015, cracks are appearing in the MAGA base. On Truth Social, Trump lashed out at his own supporters, calling those demanding transparency over Epstein's files 'weaklings' who had 'bought into this b*******, hook, line, and sinker.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read More Undo The insult stunned many longtime allies. Even the usually sycophantic Trump War Room refused to repost the outburst, a silent sign of discomfort within the inner sanctum. What was once a unified political religion now resembles a schismatic cult. The New Heretics of MAGA The Epstein controversy has exposed a fault line running through the MAGA movement. On one side are the populists who believe in the original Trump promise: drain the swamp, expose the elites, punish the predators. For them, Epstein is not just a disgraced financier or a dead man in a cell—he is the symbol of a system that shields the powerful from accountability. Leading this insurgent camp are firebrand congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene and libertarian-leaning Thomas Massie. Together, they have introduced a discharge petition that would force a House vote to release the Epstein files. Greene, never one to mince words, declared, 'I will never protect pedophiles or the elites and their circles.' Massie has echoed the demand for transparency, noting that government secrecy in such matters breeds only suspicion and rage. Former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has gone even further, hinting at foreign intelligence entanglements and accusing the political establishment of facilitating crimes against children. Online influencers like Mike Cernovich and Jack Posobiec, once loyal foot soldiers in Trump's culture war, now suggest that Trump is betraying the very anti-elite values that brought him to power. Julie Kelly, a MAGA-aligned journalist best known for her reporting on the January 6 trials, has expressed deep frustration at the vague and evasive statements coming from the Justice Department under Attorney General Pam Bondi. Her implication is clear: something is being hidden, and the people deserve to know. Tucker Carlson, once the nightly voice of MAGA America, has returned to the Epstein issue with renewed fervour. On his independent show, Carlson revived the long-simmering theory that Epstein was working for foreign intelligence, accused the Justice Department of covering up evidence, and hinted that senior officials—including those in the current administration—are shielding names to protect themselves. Then there is Elon Musk. The tech billionaire, who once flirted with Trump-world alliances, has become one of the loudest critics. In a now-deleted post, Musk wrote: 'Amazing how Ghislaine's in prison for a hoax. Not a single Epstein client has been prosecuted.' He went further, openly questioning why Trump refuses to release the files and suggesting that his name may appear in them. The implication was explosive: that the man who built his brand on exposing the system may himself be part of it. The Gatekeepers of Denial Against this rising tide, Trump's defenders have circled the wagons. The official line from the administration is clear: there is nothing more to see in the Epstein files. Pam Bondi, the attorney general and longtime Trump loyalist, has insisted that the unreleased files are either non-incriminating or contain sensitive material such as child sexual abuse content that cannot be made public. In her telling, there is no smoking gun—only smouldering innuendo. Kash Patel, a key figure in Trump's inner legal circle, has echoed this view, calling the renewed Epstein obsession 'overblown media manipulation.' Steve Bannon, once the high priest of MAGA populism, has been conspicuously silent, redirecting his energies toward anti-China messaging and avoiding the Epstein minefield entirely. Lara Trump, co-chair of the Republican National Committee, dismissed the scandal as a 'distraction from Biden's border crisis.' Charlie Kirk, president of Turning Point USA and a reliable barometer of MAGA talking points, has shifted from occasional Epstein criticism to defending the administration's decision to keep the files sealed. Their argument is consistent: the Epstein narrative is a trap laid by Democrats, amplified by hostile media, and swallowed by naïve populists. Trump, they argue, has nothing to hide—his critics are merely indulging conspiracy theories that serve Joe Biden's reelection bid. The Silent and the Calculating In the wings of this unfolding drama are the political figures who have opted for strategic ambiguity. Vice President JD Vance, long seen as the intellectual heir to Trump's populist legacy, has remained silent, even as the scandal grows louder. MAGA-friendly podcaster Theo Von took note, asking Vance pointedly on X why he has not addressed the issue. Vance's office declined to comment, but the silence is beginning to speak for itself. Tucker Carlson's return to the fray suggests he is no longer interested in preserving the peace within Trumpworld. Elon Musk, though more volatile, continues to signal that the Epstein issue is far from resolved. Whether they remain merely critical voices or evolve into catalysts for a broader rebellion remains to be seen. The Political Stakes and a Bipartisan Alliance If Trump thought this was just another media storm to ride out, he may want to rethink. Ro Khanna, the Democratic congressman from California and a declared contender for the 2028 presidency, has seized the opportunity to outflank Trump from the populist left. In a rare bipartisan move, he partnered with Massie to introduce legislation that would force the declassification of all Epstein-related government documents. Khanna told Politico that the bill already has the support of over 200 Democrats and at least seven Republicans. 'People voted for Trump in part because they were so disgusted with a system that protects the wealthy and powerful,' he said. 'Epstein is the symbol of that system.' The bill ensures that the Epstein controversy will remain in the headlines through August and beyond, especially if the House is forced to take a vote. Trump, meanwhile, has shown no signs of conceding to pressure. When asked by CNN's DJ Judd whether he would consider appointing a special counsel to investigate the matter, he replied simply: 'I have nothing to do with it.' Yet sources within the White House suggest the idea of a special counsel is being floated—and just as quickly dismissed. Not only is it legally complicated, but it would also imply a conflict of interest that the Justice Department vehemently denies exists. Ed Martin, a senior DOJ official, has been rumoured as a potential candidate, but a spokesperson declined to comment. Then came the firing of Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey, who had prosecuted both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Her dismissal—reportedly issued without explanation and not initiated by her immediate supervisor—has only deepened the public's suspicion that something is being concealed. That she is the daughter of former FBI Director James Comey only adds to the conspiracy-theatre feel of it all. Finale: The Crisis of Faith Donald Trump's rise was powered by a sense of betrayal—by elites, institutions, and the hidden hand of the powerful. Now, he is on the other side of that mirror. For the first time, a large segment of his base sees him not as a saviour but as part of the cover-up. This is no longer about files or client lists. It is about whether the man who promised to burn down the castle has become just another occupant of the throne. The magician's greatest trick was always getting the audience to believe he was one of them. But now the chains are visible, the trapdoor is sealed, and the crowd is not applauding. In the Epstein files, Trump is facing the one thing he has never encountered: a scandal he cannot control because it was never his to begin with. And this time, it's not the media or the Democrats he has to worry about. It's his own believers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store