Judiciary is not a playground of partisan preferences
Opposition leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin has criticised the government's decision not to extend Tengku Maimun's tenure, saying it signals a lack of consideration for the future of the country's legal system.
For weeks prior to the chief justice's retirement, questions had arisen among legal practitioners , politicians over the lack of an extension for her and an announcement of a successor.
DAP came out late with a statement saying the judiciary is of paramount importance, and reiterated its position that the extension of the tenures 'would be consistent with the reformist agenda of the Madani government'.
It is obvious from these statements that Tengku Maimun has shown integrity and defense of judicial independence.
The question is does the Malaysian public's trust in the judiciary have to be confined to individuals, or would it be better that judges, whoever they are, are able to safeguard the independence and integrity of the judiciary?
Is it not the judiciary a guiding light to the objectivity of constitutional principles?
What the public aspires for is not only judges with integrity but also able to collectively safeguard constitutional principles that makes it truly independent.
If this is the case Tengku Maimun's retirement is not the issue to the people since whoever comes after will carry on the torch of justice through balance and enlighten interpretation of the constitution that protects the life and liberty of all Malaysians.
Therefore the Association for Welfare, Community and Dialogue (ACID) believes that it would be wise that judicial appointments should be separated from the preferences of the prime minister or politicians who have their own agendas.
Judiciary is the carrier of holistic constitutional principles, it cannot be a playground of partisan preferences or ideological battles. ‒ July 7, 2025
Ronald Benjamin is the Secretary for the Association for Welfare, Community and Dialogue.
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Main image: Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
16 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Court of Appeal judge Wan Ahmad Farid named Malaysia's 17th Chief Justice, swearing in set for July 28
KUALA LUMPUR, July 18 — On July 28, Court of Appeal Judge Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh will be sworn in as the country's 17th Chief Justice, succeeding Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who retired on July 2. This followed an announcement by the Office of the Chief Registrar of the Federal Court in a statement released late yesterday. Hailing from Kuala Terengganu, the 62-year-old jurist was appointed to the Court of Appeal on Nov 12 last year. He holds a Bachelor of Laws (LL.B Hons) from the University of West London, earned in 1985, and obtained a Certificate in Legal Practice (Hons) from Universiti Malaya in 1986. He began his legal career as an advocate and solicitor with Messrs Adnan & Wee in Kuala Terengganu, serving from 1987 to 2003. Beyond his legal career, Wan Ahmad Farid has been active in public administration and politics. He served as political secretary to former Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi from 2003 to 2008, before being appointed Deputy Home Minister from 2008 to 2009. He returned to legal practice between 2011 and 2015 as a partner at Messrs Wan Farid & Surin in Kuala Lumpur. Wan Ahmad Farid began his judicial career in 2015 as a Judicial Commissioner, serving in the High Courts of Shah Alam, Kuala Lumpur, and Kota Bharu until 2019. He was then elevated to High Court Judge from 2019 to 2024, with postings in Kota Bharu, Shah Alam (Special Powers Division), and Kuala Lumpur (Special Powers Division 3). In 2024, he played a key role in a landmark ruling involving a constitutional suit filed by lawyer Dr Syed Iskandar Syed Jaafar Al Mahdzar, which challenged the powers of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in declaring a state of emergency. In his judgment, Wan Ahmad Farid held that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's authority to declare an emergency under Article 150 of the Federal Constitution is a prerogative power that is non-justiciable and beyond the court's review. Wan Ahmad Farid was also among the members of the panel of judges who heard a case involving a dispute over 263.272 acres of land dubbed 'Duta Enclave' involving Semantan Estate Sdn Bhd in the Federal Court. — Bernama
The Star
34 minutes ago
- The Star
Revamped fisheries law to pack more bite
KUALA LUMPUR: Major amendments to the Fisheries Act 1985 will impose increased penalties on various offences, including intrusion by foreign fishermen into Malaysian territorial waters, says Agriculture and Food Security Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Sabu. He added that the amendments aimed to increase the punishment for offenders, although the increased penalties will still be lower than those in the regulations in Indonesia and Thailand. Mohamad said that among the other amendments is control on certain types of nets and equipment that will destroy sea life. 'The amended Act will also protect live turtles from being sold and ensure that these animals do not go extinct,' he said after opening the National Fishermen's Association (Nekmat) annual general meeting here yesterday. He said the amendments will go through their first reading in the Dewan Rakyat next week. Earlier in his speech, Mohamad said that the subsidised diesel will continue to be supplied for fishermen registered with Nekmat.
Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
Dapsy: GPS seat expansion about power, not rights
Lam says GPS appears to be 'confused' about the priority of the matter, mistakenly linking state seat expansion with federal parliamentary representation. KUCHING (July 18): The GPS-led Sarawak government's bid to increase state assembly seats is merely a move to entrench political dominance, not to restore constitutional rights, said DAP Socialist Youth (Dapsy) Sarawak Secretary George Lam. According to Lam, the Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) appeared to be 'confused' about the priority of the matter, mistakenly linking state seat expansion with federal parliamentary representation. 'Unfortunately, GPS seems to be confused about the priority of this issue, mistakenly believing that increasing state seats will lead to more federal parliamentary seats. 'In reality, their move is nothing more than an attempt to entrench their political dominance in Sarawak, and contributes nothing toward restoring our constitutional rights,' said Lam in a statement yesterday. Lam reiterated DAP Sarawak's firm support for increasing the number of parliamentary seats allocated to Sarawak, saying it was crucial for fair representation at the federal level and for the realisation of rights under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). 'Both DAP representatives — YB Chong Chieng Jen (Padungan) and YB Violet Yong (Pending) — have made our stand crystal clear during the Sarawak State Legislative Assembly sitting on July 7. 'If GPS is sincere about using their political influence in the Federal Government to push for more parliamentary seats for Sarawak, every single DAP MP will vote in support of that motion,' he said. However, Lam noted that to date, there has been no indication of such an effort from GPS at the federal level. 'Instead, we only hear loud statements made within Sarawak itself — a form of political self-talk with no meaningful action,' he said. Lam pointed out that GPS currently holds one Deputy Prime Minister position and five federal Cabinet posts in the Unity Government, which gives the coalition the political platform needed to raise the matter. 'With such representation in Putrajaya, they have the capacity to bring this proposal forward at the highest level. 'Yet, what we are seeing instead is a lopsided focus on increasing state seats, with no clear plan or numbers on how many federal seats Sarawak should rightfully receive,' said Lam. He said the real need lies in stronger representation in Parliament, which would enable Sarawak to negotiate more effectively for devolution of powers and fulfil MA63 obligations. 'Sarawakians know very well that what we truly need is an increase in federal parliamentary seats, not state seats. 'Increasing state seats, on the other hand, only serves to place more political figures into the State Assembly and does nothing to help our fight for equal rights,' Lam said. Lam also challenged GPS's rationale that Sarawak's vast geography necessitates more state constituencies. 'Let's be honest – what we need are people's representatives, not representatives for forests, rivers, and trees,' he said. Following the state seat increase bill's passage, Lam urged the Election Commission (EC) to ensure a fair, transparent, and independent redelineation process. 'The upcoming redelineation exercise must be conducted with greater fairness and caution to uphold the principle of 'one person, one vote' and ensure equal vote value,' said Lam. He highlighted that densely populated urban areas such as Kuching and Sibu are severely underrepresented and must be prioritised. 'Redelineation must prioritise these areas in order to reflect the true spirit of equality as enshrined in the Federal Constitution,' he added. Lam also outlined the legal redelineation process, where the EC must hold a one-month public display after preparing the proposed boundaries. During this period, he said any group of 100 or more registered voters from an affected constituency can file a formal objection. 'If this threshold is met, the EC must review and revise the boundaries, followed by a second round of public display. 'Once the second display concludes, no further objections can be submitted,' Lam explained. The final boundaries, he said, will be tabled in Parliament and gazetted before being implemented in the next general election. Calling the process a 'critical part of our democratic system,' Lam urged voters to educate themselves and take part actively. 'When the time comes, we must be prepared to act and stand up for a fair and just electoral map. 'DAP Sarawak will continue to promote voter education to ensure every Sarawakian understands their rights and is empowered to protect the principle of 'one person, one vote, equal vote value',' he said. DAPSY DUN George Lam gps lead seats expansion
