Space photo of the day for July 14, 2025
A recent unexpected frost graced high-altitude peaks in Chile, dusting the Southern Astrophysical Research (SOAR) Telescope with a delicate layer of snow.
What is it?
The 13.4 foot (4.1 meter) telescope has been a major hub for researchers in the Southern Hemisphere using optical and near-infrared astronomy to study the stars. According to NOIRLab, the telescope was initiated in 1987 by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. It's run by an international consortium which includes Brazil, Chile, Michigan State University and the University of North Carolina.
Only a short distance away on the same peak is the Gemini South telescope, which also looks at the stars in both visible and infrared wavelengths.
Where is it?
The SOAR Telescope sits on the peak of Cerro Pachón, part of the Chilean Andes mountain range.
Why is it amazing?
Recently, a rare winter storm swept across the Atacama desert, bringing snow to the driest place on Earth. While the event created a beautiful landscape, its impact varied among the observatories located in the remote part of Chile.
For the SOAR telescope, high up in the Chilean Andes, the snow was a gentle dusting that coated the observatory, making for some stunning images.
However, lower down in elevation, the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) facility at Chajnantor Plateu faced more severe conditions, forcing all scientific operations to be suspended since June 26, 2025. ALMA's remote location and reliance on sensitive electronics made it especially vulnerable to weather extremes, even brief ones.
Want to learn more?
You can read more about telescopes like SOAR and astronomy happening in the Atacama desert.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Prime Video has an underrated sci-fi thriller I can't stop thinking about — and you'll be hooked, too
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Some movies captivate me without any rhyme or reason. It's not always the one with the best ratings, either. When struggling to find something to watch one night, I came across "Arctic Void" after getting tired of all my usual options. Usually, I avoid films with abysmally low IMDb ratings, but the film's thumbnail image pulled me in to watch. It depicted an isolated boat cast out amid an icy tundra with looming dark clouds above; I couldn't help but give it a try. Directed and co-written by Darren Mann, and starring Michael Weaver, Tim Griffin, and Justin Huen, "Arctic Void" chronicles what happens after three men are left in the middle of a frigid nowhere after everyone else disappears from a seemingly unexplainable event. Although not without its flaws, "Arctic Void" is a slow-burn sci-fi thriller that held my attention and quickly became a personal favorite. And it's streaming now on Prime Video, so you can get hooked, too. What is 'Arctic Void' about? "Arctic Void" begins with two best friends, Alan (Tim Griffin) and Ray (Michael Weaver), arriving on one of the Norwegian islands. The dynamics of their relationship are quite clear from the start: Ray's energy thrives on his fame as the star of their travel show, while Alan, his director and producer, battles a growing concern about their trip and, most of all, a desire to return to his family and work on his marriage. They arrive at a port to catch the boat that will take them on a tourist expedition into the Arctic. There, they meet their cameraman, Sean (Justin Huen), whom they've never worked with before. He's not the friendliest and is somewhat strange. Ray can't help but notice that he wears headphones linked up to an old-fashioned metal lunchbox. Curious, when Sean heads to the bathroom, Ray puts them on only to discover it's the sound of whales. Except that's not the only weird thing. While their guide on the boat (played by the goofy and charming Rune Temte) engages the tourists, Ray and Alan notice the animals are acting odd. A seagull is seen without eyes, and a sea lion is spotted eating its young. Something is amiss, but everyone else on the boat seems to be fine. 30-day free trial for Amazon Prime! Why pay for Prime Video when it's included with Amazon Prime? Try it free for 30 Deal And then something happens: An unexplainable, unknown event causes everyone on the boat, except for Ray, Alan, and Sean, to disappear. Confused and puzzled, the three make their way off the boat and venture into a nearby town. This is when the haunting nature of the film begins. No one is there, either. Slowly, pieces of the puzzle emerge. Alan starts to feel sick while Ray frantically searches for answers. More happened on that boat than a simple, unexplainable event. Why you should stream 'Arctic Void' on Prime Video Amidst the cold tundra is a mystery that doesn't easily get explained. However, I loved the setting of this film and how it evolves into something that isn't entirely impossible. Tim Griffin does a good job of displaying his character's fear, especially as his health dwindles. While Justin Huen remains a character of mystery, Ray's evolution from being someone overly pompous to realizing his life isn't entirely untouchable. While this movie doesn't tie up all the loose ends, it's still a worthy sci-fi thriller. I've rewatched it several times since my first viewing and enjoy it every time. And I especially enjoy the music throughout, composed by Nick Donnelly, which adds to the spooky atmosphere. Stream "Arctic Void" on Prime Video More From Tom's Guide Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. Best free streaming services Looking for a binge-watch? 3 free shows on Tubi I recommend The best Roku devices to stream your favorite movies and shows Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Scientists hit quantum computer error rate of 0.000015% — a world record achievement that could lead to smaller and faster machines
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Scientists have achieved the lowest quantum computing error rate ever recorded — an important step in solving the fundamental challenges on the way to practical, utility-scale quantum computers. In research published June 12 in the journal APS Physical Review Letters, the scientists demonstrated a quantum error rate of 0.000015%, which equates to one error per 6.7 million operations. This achievement represents an improvement of nearly an order of magnitude in both fidelity and speed over the previous record of approximately one error for every 1 million operations — achieved by the same team in 2014. The prevalence of errors, or "noise," in quantum operations can render a quantum computer's outputs useless. This noise comes from a variety of sources, including imperfections in the control methods (essentially, problems with the computer's architecture and algorithms) and the laws of physics. That's why considerable efforts have gone into quantum error correction. While errors related to natural law, such as decoherence (the natural decay of the quantum state) and leakage (the qubit state leaking out of the computational subspace), can be reduced only within those laws, the team's progress was achieved by reducing the noise generated by the computer's architecture and control methods to almost zero. Related: Scientists make 'magic state' breakthrough after 20 years — without it, quantum computers can never be truly useful "By drastically reducing the chance of error, this work significantly reduces the infrastructure required for error correction, opening the way for future quantum computers to be smaller, faster, and more efficient," Molly Smith, a graduate student in physics at the University of Oxford and co-lead author of the study, said in a statement. "Precise control of qubits will also be useful for other quantum technologies such as clocks and quantum sensors." Record-low quantum computing error rates The quantum computer used in the team's experiment relied on a bespoke platform that eschews the more common architecture that uses photons as qubits — the quantum equivalent of computer bits — for qubits made of "trapped ions." The study was also conducted at room temperature, which the researchers said simplifies the setup required to integrate this technology into a working quantum computer. Whereas most quantum systems either deploy superconducting circuits that rely on "quantum dots" or employ the use of lasers — often called "optical tweezers" — to hold a single photon in place for operation as a qubit, the team used microwaves to trap a series of calcium-43 ions in place. With this approach, the ions are placed into a hyperfine "atomic clock" state. According to the study, this technique allowed the researchers to create more "quantum gates," which are analogous to the number of 'quantum operations' a computer can perform, with greater precision than the photon-based methods allowed. Once the ions were placed into a hyperfine atomic clock state, the researchers calibrated the ions via an automated control procedure that regularly corrected them for amplitude and frequency drift caused by the microwave control method. In other words, the researchers developed an algorithm to detect and correct the noise produced by the microwaves used to trap the ions. By removing this noise, the team could then conduct quantum operations with their system at or near the lowest error rate physically possible. Using this method, it is now possible to develop quantum computers that are capable of conducting single-gate operations (those conducted with a single qubit gate as opposed to a gate requiring multiple qubits) with nearly zero errors at large scales. This could lead to more efficient quantum computers in general and, per the study, achieves a new state-of-the-art single-qubit gate error and the breakdown of all known sources of error, thus accounting for most errors produced in single-gate operations. This means engineers who build quantum computers with the trapped-ion architecture and developers who create the algorithms that run on them won't have to dedicate as many qubits to the sole purpose of error correction. RELATED STORIES —'The science is solved': IBM to build monster 10,000-qubit quantum computer by 2029 —Scientists forge path to the first million-qubit processor for quantum computers after 'decade in the making' breakthrough —'Quantum AI' algorithms already outpace the fastest supercomputers, study says By reducing the error, the new method reduces the number of qubits required and the cost and size of the quantum computer itself, the researchers said in the statement. This isn't a panacea for the industry, however, as many quantum algorithms require multigate qubits functioning alongside or formed from single-gate qubits to perform computations beyond rudimentary functions. The error rate in two-qubit gate functions is still roughly 1 in 2,000. While this study represents an important step toward practical, utility-scale quantum computing, it doesn't address all of the "noise" problems inherent in complex multigate qubit systems.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Rogue black hole found terrorizing unfortunate star in distant galaxy
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A rogue, middle-mass black hole has been spotted disrupting an orbiting star in the halo of a distant galaxy, and it's all thanks to the observing powers of the Hubble Space Telescope and Chandra X-ray Observatory. However, exactly what the black hole is doing to the star remains in question as there are conflicting X-ray measurements. Black holes come in different size classes. At the smaller end of the scale are the stellar-mass black holes born in the ashes of supernova explosions. At the top end of the scale are the supermassive black holes, which can grow to have many millions or billions of times the mass of our sun, lurking in the hearts of galaxies. In between those categories are intermediate-mass black holes (IMBH), which have mass ranging from hundreds up to 100,000 solar masses, or thereabouts. "They represent a crucial missing link in black hole evolution between stellar mass and supermassive black holes," Yi-Chi Chang of the National Tsing Hua University in Hsinchu, Taiwan said in a statement. The problem is that intermediate-mass black holes are hard to find, partly because they tend not to be as active as supermassive black holes or as obvious as a stellar-mass black hole when its progenitor star goes supernova. However, occasionally, an IMBH will spark to life when it instigates a tidal disruption event. This happens when a star or gas cloud gets too close to the black hole and gravitational tidal forces rip the star or gas cloud apart, producing bursts of X-rays. "X-ray sources with such extreme luminosity are rare outside galaxy nuclei and can serve as a key probe for identifying elusive IMBHs," said Chang. In 2009, Chandra spotted anomalous X-rays originating from a region 40,000 light-years from the center of a giant elliptical galaxy called NGC 6099, which lies 453 million light-years from us. This bright new X-ray source was called HLX-1, and its X-ray spectrum indicated that the source of the X-rays was 5.4 million degrees Fahrenheit (3 million degrees Celsius), a temperature consistent with the violence of a tidal disruption event. But what followed was unusual. The X-ray emissions reached a peak brightness in 2012 when observed by the European Space Agency's XMM-Newton X-ray space telescope. When XMM-Newton took another look in 2023, it found the X-ray luminosity had substantially dwindled. In the meantime, the Canada–France Hawaii Telescope had identified an optical counterpart for the X-ray emission, one that was subsequently confirmed by Hubble. There are two possible explanations for what happened. The first is that Hubble's spectrum of the object shows a tight, small cluster of stars swarming around the black hole. The black hole might have once been at the core of a dwarf galaxy that was whittled down — unwrapped like a Christmas present — by the gravitational tides of the larger NGC 6099. This process would have stolen away all the dwarf galaxy's stars to leave behind a free-floating black hole with just a small, tight grouping of stars left to keep it company. But the upshot of this is that the cluster of stars is like a stellar pantry to which the black hole occasionally goes to feast. It seems certain that a tidal disruption event involving one of these stars is what Chandra and Hubble have witnessed, but was the star completely destroyed? One possibility is that the star is on a highly elliptical orbit, and at its perihelion (closest point to the black hole) some of the star's mass is ripped away — but the star managed to survive for another day. This would potentially explain the X-ray light curve: The emission from 2009 was as the star was nearing perihelion, while the peak in 2012 was during perihelion, and the latest measurements in 2023 would be when the star was farthest from the black hole and not feeling its effects so much. We might then expect another outburst of X-rays during its next perihelion, whenever that might be. However, there's an alternative hypothesis: The star may have been stripped apart a piece at a time, forming a stream of material around the black hole. When Chandra first detected the X-ray emission from the tidal disruption event, this stream was just beginning to wrap back on itself, the self-intersection giving rise to shock-heating that produced X-rays. Then, the 2012 measurements would have been of a fully-fledged hot accretion disk of gas, the star by now completely ripped apart. The material within this disk would have spiraled into the black hole's maw, thus depleting the disk, which would explain why it is much less luminous in X-rays in 2023. Picking out the correct scenario apart will require further surveillance. "If the IMBH is eating a star, how long does it take to swallow the star's gas? In 2009, HLX-1 was fairly bright. Then, in 2012, it was about 100 times brighter, and then it went down again," Roberto Soria of the Italian National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF), who is a co-author of a new study describing the observations of HLX-1, said in the statement. "So now we need to wait and see if it's flaring multiple times, or if there was a beginning, a peak, and now it's just going to go down all the way until it disappears." Making new observations of an IMBH such as HLX-1 is key to better understanding the role they play in the black hole ecosystem. One model suggests that supermassive black holes might form and grow through the merger of many IMBH, but nobody knows how common intermediate-mass black holes are in the universe. "So if we are lucky, we're going to find more free-floating black holes suddenly becoming X-ray bright because of a tidal disruption event," said Soria. "If we can do a statistical study, this will tell us how many of these IMBHs there are, how often they disrupt a star, [and] how bigger galaxies have grown by assembling smaller galaxies." RELATED STORIES — Rogue black hole spotted on its own for the first time — Astronomers may have discovered the closest black holes to Earth — Hubble Telescope sees wandering black hole slurping up stellar spaghetti Alas, Chandra, XMM-Newton and Hubble all have small fields of view, meaning that they only see small patches of the sky. Because we don't know where the next tidal disruption event might take place, the chances of our space telescopes looking in the right place at the right time are slim. In essence, Chandra got lucky back in 2009. Fortunately, help is now on hand. The Vera C. Rubin Observatory comes fully online later this year to begin a 10-year all-sky survey, and spotting the flares of tidal disruption events will be a piece of cake for it. Once it finds such an event, Hubble and Chandra will know where to look and can follow up on it. IMBHs have remained mostly hidden for now, but their time in the shadows is coming to an end. The findings were published on April 11 in The Astrophysical Journal.
