Andhra Liquor scam: YSRCP MP Midhun Reddy produced before court
Midhun Reddy
, an accused in the alleged liquor scam was produced before
Vijayawada ACB court
on Sunday, said a police official.
The Special Investigation Team (SIT) arrested Reddy on Saturday in the alleged Rs 3,500 crore liquor scam during the previous YSRCP regime.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
healthcare
Degree
Others
CXO
Digital Marketing
PGDM
Data Science
Product Management
Healthcare
Project Management
Artificial Intelligence
Leadership
Public Policy
Data Science
MCA
Management
Technology
MBA
Operations Management
Finance
Cybersecurity
others
Design Thinking
Data Analytics
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
11 Months
IIM Lucknow
CERT-IIML Healthcare Management India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
The SIT probing the alleged liquor scam grilled Reddy for several hours on Saturday and followed it up with his arrest at around 7:30 pm in Vijayawada.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
How Much Does It Cost to Rent a Private Jet - The Prices May Surprise You!
Private Jet I Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
Earlier this morning, SIT officials took Mithun Reddy to a government hospital in Vijayawada, where doctors conducted medical examination.
"The medical team found no health complications; hence, he was presented before the court as per legal protocol," the police official told PTI. Reddy represents
Rajampet constituency
in Andhra Pradesh.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
28 minutes ago
- NDTV
1993 Fake Encounter Case: Ex Punjab Police Officer Sentenced To 10 Years In Jail
Chandigarh: A CBI court in Mohali has sentenced a former Punjab Police officer to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment in a 1993 fake encounter case of two police constables. The court of special CBI Judge Baljinder Singh Sra also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on Paramjit Singh, who was then the station house officer of Beas in Amritsar. Singh (67) retired as a superintendent of police. In its order on Wednesday, the court acquitted three other accused -- the then inspector Dharam Singh (77), the then assistant sub inspector Kashmir Singh (69) and the then ASI Darbara Singh (71) -- in the case. Another accused, the then sub-inspector Ram Lubhaya died during the trial of the case. Constable Surmukh Singh of Muchhal village in Baba Bakala and constable Sukhwinder Singh of Khiala village were picked up by police on April 18, 1993. Surmukh Singh was taken from his home by the then SHO Paramjit Singh of Beas police station, while Sukhwinder was picked up by then SI Lubhaya in a scooter theft case. The parents of Sukhwinder visited the Beas police station but were not allowed to meet their son. Later, the Majitha police claimed that two unidentified militants had been killed in an encounter. Their bodies were cremated without identification, according to the CBI investigation. A week later an untraced report was filed by the then SHO, claiming that there was no need for further investigation in the matter. However, the CBI during its probe found that the encounter was staged and police fabricated documents to make it appear genuine. The CBI, which carried out the investigation on the directions of the Supreme Court in 1995, probe found that the two unidentified militants who were killed in the encounter were actually the two police constables. Referring to the families of the dead constable, the court in its order stated, "The court can very well imagine the plight of the family members who have been running from pillar to post since 1993 to seek justice. They must have incurred a lot of expenses for that and need monetary compensation for their rehabilitation." The court directed the secretary, district legal service authority Mohali to consider the case of the victims' families for award of compensation. CBI public prosecutor Anmol Narang, assisted by advocates Sarabjit Singh Verka, Pushpinder Singh Natt and Jagjit Singh represented the complainants.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is return to UAE possible after deportation? Everything to Know about laws, process, and exceptions
A deported foreigner may apply to the Federal Authority for Identity and Citizenship to lift the deportation order and seek permission to return to the UAE/ Representative Image What Is Deportation? Deportation refers to the legal removal of a non-citizen from a country. In the UAE, deportation is a serious measure that applies to foreign nationals who commit certain offenses or are deemed a threat to public safety, security, or morals. The process is enforced under strict legal provisions and, once executed, can permanently bar the individual from re-entering the country unless an exemption is granted. There are two main types of deportation in the UAE: Judicial (Legal) Deportation Administrative Deportation Each type is governed by different laws, authorities, and procedures, which determine whether a person is permanently expelled from the country, the possibility of return, and how appeals can be made. Judicial Deportation: Court-Ordered Expulsion Based on Criminal Conviction Judicial deportation is issued by a court after a foreign national is convicted of a crime. This type of deportation is governed by Article 121 of Federal Law No. 3 of 1987 (UAE Penal Code), as amended by Federal Law No. 34 of 2005 and further amended by Federal Decree-Law No. 7 of 2016. What Article 121 States: A foreign national must be deported if convicted of a felony (serious criminal offense) for which a custodial punishment (i.e., prison sentence) is imposed. Mandatory deportation also applies to crimes involving sexual assault or related offenses. In other misdemeanors (less serious offenses), the court has discretion to: Issue a deportation order Replace the prison term with deportation Allow the individual to remain, depending on the specific case This means that for serious crimes like drug trafficking, rape, or violent assaults, deportation is not optional, it is automatically imposed by law. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Anne Hegerty And Her Partner, Who You Will Easily Recognize Sport Pirate Undo In contrast, for minor offenses such as bounced cheques or verbal disputes, the decision is up to the court's assessment. Administrative Deportation: Authority-Issued Expulsion for Public Interest Administrative deportation is not tied to a criminal conviction. It is executed by competent government bodies when a foreign national is deemed a threat to public safety, morals, or health, or lacks sufficient means of living. This type of deportation is issued under: Ministerial Decision No. 360 of 1997 (Executive Regulations of Law No. 6 of 1973 on Entry and Residency of Foreigners) As amended by Decree Law No. 17 of 2017 Who Has the Power to Order Administrative Deportation? The Federal Public Prosecutor or his legal representative The Chairman of the Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Ports Security (ICP) or his authorized representative Even if the foreign national holds a valid visa or residency permit, a deportation order may still be issued if deemed necessary for: Threats to public safety, public morals, public health, or national security Lack of apparent means of living Other discretionary reasons considered to be in the public interest The deportation order may also include dependents of the individual, such as a spouse or children, if they rely on that person for financial support. Even minors can be deported under judicial deportation if deemed necessary by the court. For example, repeat juvenile offenders involved in theft or violence may face expulsion, particularly if their actions threaten public order. Institutional Authority: The Role of ICP Under Federal Decree Law No. 3 of 2017, all powers and responsibilities related to: Nationality Passports Entry and Residency of Foreigners ...originally under the Ministry of Interior, are now transferred to the Federal Authority for Identity and Citizenship (now known as ICP). The ICP exercises full legal jurisdiction to manage deportation cases, entry permits, and related matters as part of its national mandate. Execution of Deportation and Financial Obligations Once a deportation order, judicial or administrative, is finalized: Once a person is deported, they are added to an electronic blacklist used by UAE immigration systems They are removed from the UAE, often after completing any prison sentence or paying a fine Illegal return, including attempts using false identities or forged passports, is a criminal offense and strictly monitored. UAE law enforcement collaborates with international security partners, airlines, and travel agencies to prevent re-entry by blacklisted individuals Expenses of Deportation (As per Law by Decree): According to Article 17, the Chairman of the Federal Authority may direct that deportation-related costs be recovered from: The deported person's own funds, if available The employer, if in violation of labor or residency law Otherwise, the government (ICA) will cover the costs Grace Period for Settling Interests in the UAE A deported individual may have business dealings, employment, properties, or family responsibilities that require time to resolve. Under the law: A grace period may be granted to settle personal or financial matters This is subject to the approval of the ICP The individual must submit a financial guarantee (bail) The maximum period allowed is three months This window is not automatic, it must be requested and is considered on a case-by-case basis. Can Deportation Be Lifted or Cancelled? Yes. A foreigner who has been deported may, in certain cases, apply for special permission to return to the UAE. This applies to both judicial and administrative deportations, though not all applications are accepted. Legal Basis for Re-entry: Article 18 of Federal Law by Decree No. (29) of 2021 concerning Entry and Residence of Foreigners states: A foreigner who has beendeported may not return to the UAE unless he obtains special permission from the Chairman of the Federal Authority for Identity and Citizenship (ICP). Application Process: Submit a formal request to the naturalization and residency department of the relevant emirate Include: Details of past residency Reasons for original deportation Justifications for returning Changes in personal or legal circumstances Supporting documents (employment offers, family ties, rehabilitation records, etc.) Alternatively, the individual may appoint a legal representative or lawyer to handle the process. Dubai-Specific Process: In Dubai, applications for lifting deportation can be submitted online via the Public Prosecution's website. A special legal committee reviews each case and makes a decision based on: Severity of the original offense Whether the crime was intentional or first-time Applicant's behavior before and after deportation Any new risks posed to public safety There are no fixed requirements for what documents must be submitted, but stronger supporting evidence increases the chances of approval. This content is for general awareness only.
NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
Gold Coins, Rs 1.5 Crore Cash And Counting: Odisha Forest Officer Raided
Bhubaneswar: The Odisha Vigilance Department on Friday raided six locations linked to a forest official after detecting disproportionate assets beyond his known sources of income and recovered at least Rs 1.44 crore in cash. During the early morning raids at the six locations linked to deputy ranger Rama Chandra Nepak, four gold biscuits and 16 gold coins weighing 10 grams each were also found. Multiple teams of senior officials were deployed to raid Nepak, who worked at the Jaipur forest range. The operations were continuing, officials said. The huge amount of cash was recovered from his flat in an apartment in Jaipur. A currency-counting machine had to be brought to his house during the raid. Raids were also ongoing at a flat he owned in the same apartment. Searches were also ongoing at his office, a house built on his ancestral land in Jaipur, his in-laws' house in Jaipur, and his brother's flat in Bhubaneswar. Second Forest Officer Raided In 1 Week A Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) in Keonjhar was raided last week, with officials finding 115 land plots in his name, gold weighing 200 grams, a small armoury containing rifles, and other assets worth crores. During raids at seven places of Nityananda Nayak on Sunday, the officials also recovered cash worth Rs 1.55 lakh, one four-storeyed building in Angul, two four-wheelers and four two-wheelers, and a collection of teak artefacts. He had the highest number of properties owned by any government officer.
