Brazil to join South Africa's Gaza genocide case against Israel at ICJ
South Africa filed a case in 2023 asking the ICJ to declare that Israel was in breach of its obligations under the 1948 Genocide Convention. The case argues that in its war against Hamas fighters, Israel's military actions go beyond targeting Hamas alone by attacking civilians, with strikes on schools, hospitals, camps and shelters.
Other countries – including Spain, Turkey and Colombia – have also sought to join the case against Israel.
In its statement, the Brazilian government accused Israel of violations of international law "such as the annexation of territories by force" and it expressed "deep indignation" at violence suffered by the civilian population.
Israel denies deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians, saying its sole interest is to annihilate Hamas. Lawyers for Israel have dismissed South Africa's case as an abuse of the genocide convention.
The Israeli embassy in Brasilia said the Brazilian statement used "harsh words that do not fully portray the reality of what is currently happening in Gaza," while Brazil also "completely ignored" the role of Hamas within Gaza's reality.
Brazil's National Israeli association CONIB said in a statement in response to Wednesday's decision, "The breaking of Brazil's long-standing friendship and partnership with Israel is a misguided move that proves the extremism of our foreign policy."
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has long been an outspoken critic of Israel's actions in Gaza, but Wednesday's decision carries added significance amid heightened tensions between Brazil and Israel ally the US. The Trump administration announced 50 per cent tariffs on all Brazilian goods this month.
A diplomat familiar with the thinking of the Lula administration told Reuters that Brazil does not believe its decision to join South Africa's case will impact its relationship with Washington.
The US has opposed South Africa's genocide case under both Democratic former President Joe Biden and Trump, a Republican. In February, Trump signed an executive order to cut US financial assistance to South Africa, citing in part its ICJ case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
2 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Time for international organisations to adapt and change
29 July 2025 01:16 By: OBAID FAISAL ALKAABIThe international organisations and their role in today's world have become a subject of debate, not only in the Global South but also in the western corridors of power. Over the past decade, some western countries have taken the lead in criticising international organisations and blocs with some even opting to withdraw from them, claiming that these bodies no longer serve their interests or align with their policies, with the United States at the forefront during the first and second administrations of President Donald the most recent US decisions in this regard was its withdrawal from UNESCO; it has already left the World Health Organization, the Paris Climate Agreement, and the Human Rights Council. Trump's return to the White House has renewed this trend, as his administration once again reviews America's membership in various United Nations-affiliated bodies. Official justifications for these decisions often centre around claims of bias, lack of independence, poor crisis management, and failure to achieve US interests. The United States contributes significantly more funding to these organisations than many other, more populous countries. The change has gone to the point that a Republican senator introduced a bill in the Senate urging the US to quit the United moves significantly weakened the activity of some organisations and perhaps paralysed others, whether due to funding cuts or by banning their operations in certain from official reasons, Trump is not convinced by the post-World War II global order, which was established by the US and led to the creation of international political and economic institutions, chief among them the United Nations and its agencies. While the multiple US withdrawals from international organisations and treaties may diminish its global role to some extent, Washington views this as a principled rejection of multilateral mechanisms, even as international law is largely dependent on such Trump, the United States adopts a transactional attitude towards global engagement. As such, membership in international organisations is evaluated through a cost-benefit lens, especially in terms of economic cutting costs may be one factor, the more decisive motive remains the 'America First' policy. Accordingly, Washington places little value on organisations that do not align with its inward-focused policies and its preference for domestic over international before Trump came to power, there was another example from the western part of the world. In 2016, the United Kingdom chose to leave the European Union for reasons connected to immigration, economics, and sovereignty. This marked a return of protectionist measures to the global economic scene, culminating in today's widespread tariff hikes, although many believed such practices had been dismantled in the post-World War II transformations take time, there seems to be a shift toward alternative mechanisms that may marginalise international organisations, especially if this western vision is not merely a passing phase tied to certain political figures. Yet, we must also acknowledge the shortcomings of international organisations in the face of global conflicts. Some international organisations' handling of wars and crises has often exposed institutional bias, either embedded within their structures or forced upon them by dominant global powers seeking to legitimise their geopolitical end of World War II ushered in a new era of global governance, where sovereign equality among nations would be enshrined through the United Nations. But it seems that the current US administration wants to reshape the world in a way that advances its own interests and reinforces its dominance and values. It seeks to rewrite the rules on global issues like trade, cyberspace, and emerging technologies. Meanwhile, many countries in the Global South remain disillusioned by the current global system that has yet to fulfill their aspirations. They now call for a multi-polar world order that respects sovereignty and ensures economic and social these diverging global visions, international organisations find themselves at a critical juncture: Will they remain entrenched in the current world order, or will they evolve to become foundational institutions in the coming era as well? The columnist is a staffer at the think-tank firm TRENDS Research & Advisory
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli air strikes on Gaza City and Nuseirat refugee camp kill at least eight Palestinians
At least eight Palestinian civilians were killed and several others injured on Monday in two separate Israeli air strikes on Gaza City and the Nuseirat refugee camp, Wafa news agency reported. Israeli drones targeted a group of civilians on al-Rasheed Street in Gaza City, leading to the death of five people and injuring several others. Three more civilians were killed in another Israeli air strike on a tent in the Nuseirat refugee camp in central Gaza. The official death toll in the Gaza Strip has reached almost 60,000 people.
Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US calls Saudi and French-led conference on two-state solution a 'publicity stunt'
The United States on Monday lashed out at a United Nations conference promoting a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict that was hosted by its close allies France and Saudi Arabia. The US State Department labelled the three-day event "unproductive and ill-timed", as well as a "publicity stunt" that would make finding peace harder. The diplomatic push is a "reward for terrorism", the statement said. The US deployed even harsher words against French President Emmanuel Macron, calling his decision to recognise a Palestinian state last week 'counterproductive', saying its Nato ally's decision 'undercuts our diplomatic efforts'. France is hoping that the UK will follow its lead. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters More than 200 British members of parliament voiced support for the idea on Friday, but Prime Minister Keir Starmer has resisted. Middle East Eye has revealed that the US pressured both the UK and France against recognising Palestine earlier this year. The conference kicked off on Monday in New York City, with participants reaffirming that there is "no alternative" to the conflict besides a two-state solution. France and Saudi Arabia's leadership of the event underscores how the US's unchecked support for Israel's war on Gaza is putting its diplomacy at odds with key partners. "Only a political, two-state solution will help respond to the legitimate aspirations of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security. There is no alternative," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said at the start of the three-day meeting. UN secretary general Antonio Guterres said at the meeting that "the two-state solution is farther than ever before", decrying Israel's "creeping annexation" of the occupied West Bank and "the wholesale destruction of Gaza". The meeting comes as Gaza descends into famine as a result of Israel's siege of the enclave. Hundreds of starving Palestinians have been killed trying to obtain food from the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation that is backed by the US and Israel. Deaths from famine and malnutrition have soared in recent days. US asked Saudi Arabia to send missile interceptors to Israel during Iran conflict. Riyadh refused Read More » US President Donald Trump was asked about the famine on Monday and did not dispute it. 'That's real starvation stuff,' Trump said. 'I see it, you can't fake that.' 'Those children look very hungry,' he said. 'We have to get the kids fed.' But Trump has continued to fault Hamas for the crisis, claiming the group is stealing aid despite a US government assessment contradicting that accusation. More than two dozen of the US's allies - including countries traditionally close to Israel - have accused it of 'drip feeding' aid into Gaza. The Trump administration has clashed with Israel on several issues - including striking an independent ceasefire with the Houthis in Yemen and condemning Israeli strikes on Syria - but has given it full backing for Israel to wage war on Gaza. Last week, Trump announced that the US was pulling out of ceasefire talks. He blamed Hamas for the impasse, a move analysts say was in keeping with more than two years of US messaging to provide cover to Israel for acts of genocide in Gaza, according to two major Israeli human rights groups and scores of western organisations. "It's widely understood that there are no real strategic objectives to fulfill militarily unless the ultimate goal is displacement," Michael Hanna, a Middle East expert at the International Crisis Group, told MEE previously. "In the meantime, it appears the US is willing to stand by as famine deepens throughout Gaza." Even as the US criticised the UN summit, its top participants tried to entice Trump back to talks. Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan al-Saud said Trump could be a "catalyst" to ending the war in Gaza and jump-starting the two-state solution. Trump has regularly said he wants to strike a normalisation deal with Saudi Arabia and Israel, building on the 2020 Abraham Accords, which he considers a signature foreign policy achievement. Riyadh says to achieve that goal, Israel would need to take irreversible steps towards the creation of a Palestinian state, with a ceasefire in Gaza the first precondition. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has said publicly that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Beyond facilitating conditions for the recognition of a Palestinian state, the three days of meeting will focus on three other issues, including the reform of the Palestinian Authority, disarmament of Hamas and normalisation of relations with Israel by Arab states as part of a two-state solution.
