New law to protect China's private enterprise can spur greater growth
Advertisement
The lack of clarity has left them with a reputation as a neglected stepchild when compared to favoured state-owned enterprises, and exposed them as easy targets of fines and fees by local governments keen to replenish their dwindling coffers.
At long last, China's parliament has provided some welcome legal clarity.
The Private Economy Promotion Law, crafted to provide legal protection and promotion of the non-state sector was passed yesterday by the National People's Congress Standing Committee and is due to take effect on May 20.
The law was to have been a highlight of the March meetings of parliament and its top advisory body, but was delayed. This was due not to cold feet, but because Beijing recognised the need to reassure the private sector it was providing genuine measures to address their concerns rather than lip service.
Advertisement
The law now promises to promote fair market competition, encourage private sector involvement in science and technology development, and protect their economic rights and interests.
Its passage confirmed the Communist Party's long-term support for the development of the private sector, and its core role in national rejuvenation efforts. It already produces more than 60 per cent of GDP, 70 per cent of hi-tech innovation and 80 per cent of urban jobs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
4 days ago
- HKFP
Chinese leaders take aim at ‘pointless' meetings and ‘bureaucratism'
China's top lawmakers are telling officials across the country to hold fewer meetings and give shorter speeches in a bid to root out 'pointless formalities', state media reported on Wednesday. Streamlining meetings and capping documents at 5,000 words were among suggestions in a detailed government notice issued to 'free grassroots officials from bureaucratism and pointless formalities', state news agency Xinhua said. Cutting out unnecessary paperwork and having fewer meetings would 'reduce burdens' on cadres and help them 'devote more energy to implementation', according to a government notice uploaded by state news agency Xinhua. The 21-point directive on 'rectifying formalism' is more than 4,000 words long, according to an AFP count. All regions were to strictly implement the rules, it said. The notice — jointly issued by the Communist Party's Central Committee and the State Council — follows refreshed rules against lavish spending and vanity projects. In May, the two lawmaking bodies updated regulations set in 2013 targeting excessive spending within government ranks, including a ban on serving alcohol at work meals and restrictions on travel. Officials were also prohibited from having flowers or backdrops at work meetings, according to the directive. Chinese President Xi Jinping has waged a relentless campaign against official corruption since coming to power more than a decade ago. Hundreds of thousands of officials have faced disciplinary action, according to China's top anti-graft body, with some executed for 'serious violations of the law' — a euphemism for corruption. Supporters say the anti-corruption drive promotes clean governance, but critics say it serves as a tool for Xi to oust political opponents.
South China Morning Post
5 days ago
- South China Morning Post
China's top court showcases how landmark private sector law is being enforced
China's Supreme People's Court has released a series of court rulings to illustrate how a wide-ranging private sector law passed this year is safeguarding the rights and interests of entrepreneurs. Advertisement 'The release of these cases demonstrates how the courts are applying the law to safeguard the private economy... and aims to boost public confidence – particularly among private business owners,' the court said in a recent statement. The 12 rulings, drawn from courts at various levels across the country, are also intended to guide the judiciary in their efforts to improve legal protections for private sector development, the court added. The move was reported on Tuesday by the People's Daily, the ruling Communist Party's mouthpiece, and came as Beijing seeks to restore private investor confidence amid economic headwinds, including a slowing economy and the US-China trade war Enacted on May 20, the Private Economy Promotion Law consists of 78 articles aimed at ensuring fair market competition, encouraging private sector participation in science and technology projects, and strengthening legal protections for businesses. Advertisement The rulings highlighted by China's top court last week focused on equal treatment before the law, safeguarding innovation, protections for businesses engaged in international trade, and fostering the lawful, healthy growth of private companies. Most of the cases involved disputes between private firms and state-backed entities. In one ruling, a small-to-medium-sized medical device manufacturer sued a state-backed hospital that had failed to pay nearly 3 million yuan (US$417,404) after purchasing diagnostic equipment.
AllAfrica
5 days ago
- AllAfrica
Why Trump shouldn't attend Xi's 'Victory Day' parade
As rumors swirl about President Donald Trump possibly attending China's 'Victory Day' parade this September, it's worth sounding an alarm. Such a visit to Beijing would be a strategic blunder that undermines Washington's Indo-Pacific posture, undercuts American allies and sends a troubling message to the wider world. On its face, this kind of diplomatic invitation may be tempting at this delicate juncture in bilateral relations. Trump has long shown an affinity for grand displays of military prowess, high-stakes diplomacy and face-to-face theatrics. A handshake with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in front of goose-stepping soldiers might make for dramatic television. If Beijing officials dangle the promise of a new trade agreement, it might even be a transactional win. But the costs would far outweigh the optics. First, there is the history and symbolism of Victory Day itself. China's September 3 commemoration is not merely a celebration of the end of World War II. It's a well-worn anti-Japanese ritual. While framed as a tribute to China's role in defeating fascism, the parade often serves as a thinly veiled nationalist spectacle aimed at disparaging modern Japan and legitimizing the Communist Party's historical narrative. This is not to suggest that Japan's actions during World War II were innocent or justified — far from it. But China's Victory Day parade is more about nationalist messaging and historical revisionism than sober remembrance, and ultimately aims to serve Beijing's current strategic goals. The irony is that most of the conventional resistance to Japan came not from Mao Zedong's Communist forces, but from Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist army — the same Nationalists who later fled to Taiwan. By standing alongside Xi and possibly even Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump would risk endorsing this misleading version of history. That, in turn, would alienate two of America's strategic partners in East Asia, namely Japan and Taiwan. Taiwan, in particular, would have reason to feel betrayed. Its very identity is rooted in the struggle against the same Chinese Communist Party that now seeks to erase its role, and seemingly its existence, from the annals of history. South Korea, too, would draw the wrong conclusions. Lee Jae-myung, the left-leaning president, has reportedly decided not to attend the same ceremony as a quiet signal of the importance of maintaining his country's alignment with Washington. Trump's presence could undercut this calculation, emboldening voices within Seoul that favor a tilt toward Beijing. It would surely sow confusion among American allies in East Asia at a time when Washington is demanding their deeper support for its Indo-Pacific strategy to counter China. There is also precedent to consider. In 2015, then-President Park Geun-hye of South Korea attended the same parade as the only US ally to do so. While she sought to strike a delicate diplomatic balance, the visit spectacularly backfired. Her decision raised significant eyebrows in Washington and Tokyo, and the political backlash at home was even greater. To this day, her appearance standing between Putin and Xi atop Tiananmen Tower is remembered not as a diplomatic gambit but as a major miscalculation. The stakes in 2025 are even higher. The world is witnessing the most dangerous moment for the global order since the end of the Cold War. China is waging an economic war against the West and flirting with military adventurism in the Taiwan Strait. Russia, meanwhile, remains entrenched in a war of aggression in Ukraine. For Trump to attend a parade that implicitly legitimizes both of these regimes would hand Beijing and Moscow a propaganda victory. Even more troubling is the message it would send about America's military posture in the Indo-Pacific. Chinese military parades prominently feature missiles and weapons systems explicitly designed to threaten US bases, forces and partners, including in Guam, Japan and Taiwan. Trump's attendance at the celebration could be interpreted as tacit approval of Beijing's growing ambitions and invite serious doubt about Washington's security resolve. There is also the potential domestic political cost. Trump built his election campaign on confronting China, restoring American strength, and putting 'America First.' Attending a parade that glorifies communist China's military might would hand his critics a damning visual contradiction. To national security conservatives and China hawks, it could look like a compromise of the very principles Trump claims to represent and defend. It would likewise undercut the recent efforts of Republican foreign policy voices such as Elbridge Colby and Brian Mast, who have been urging America's East Asian allies to take on a more assertive role in Washington's broader efforts to counterbalance China. Trump would thus be well advised to stay home on September 3. Kenji Yoshida is a Seoul-based correspondent for JAPAN Forward
