Israel to decide next steps in Gaza after ceasefire talks collapse
Last Saturday, during a visit to the country, US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff had said he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza.
But Israeli officials have also floated ideas including expanding the military offensive in Gaza and annexing parts of the shattered enclave.
The failed ceasefire talks in Doha had aimed to clinch agreements on a US-backed proposal for a 60-day truce, during which aid would be flown into Gaza and half of the hostages Hamas is holding would be freed in exchange for Palestinian prisoners jailed in Israel.
After Netanyahu met Witkoff last Thursday, a senior Israeli official said that 'an understanding was emerging between Washington and Israel,' of a need to shift from a truce to a comprehensive deal that would 'release all the hostages, disarm Hamas, and demilitarize the Gaza Strip,' — Israel's key conditions for ending the war.
A source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Sunday that the envoy's visit was seen in Israel as 'very significant.'
But later on Sunday, the Israeli official signalled that pursuit of a deal would be pointless, threatening more force:
'An understanding is emerging that Hamas is not interested in a deal and therefore the prime minister is pushing to release the hostages while pressing for military defeat.'
'Strategic clarity'
What a 'military defeat' might mean, however, is up for debate within the Israeli leadership. Some Israeli officials have suggested that Israel might declare it was annexing parts of Gaza as a means to pressure the militant group.
Others, like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir want to see Israel impose military rule in Gaza before annexing it and re-establishing the Jewish settlements Israel evicted 20 years ago.
The Israeli military, which has pushed back at such ideas throughout the war, was expected on Tuesday to present alternatives that include extending into areas of Gaza where it has not yet operated, according to two defense officials.
While some in the political leadership are pushing for expanding the offensive, the military is concerned that doing so will endanger the 20 hostages who are still alive, the officials said.
Israeli Army Radio reported on Monday that military chief Eyal Zamir has become increasingly frustrated with what he describes as a lack of strategic clarity by the political leadership, concerned about being dragged into a war of attrition with Hamas militants.
A spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) declined to comment on the report but said that the military has plans in store.
'We have different ways to fight the terror organization, and that's what the army does,' Lt. Col. Nadav Shoshani said.
On Tuesday, Qatar and Egypt endorsed a declaration by France and Saudi Arabia outlining steps toward a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which included a call on Hamas to hand over its arms to the Western-backed Palestinian Authority.
Hamas has repeatedly said it won't lay down arms. But it has told mediators it was willing to quit governance in Gaza for a non-partisan ruling body, according to three Hamas officials.
It insists that the post-war Gaza arrangement must be agreed upon among the Palestinians themselves and not dictated by foreign powers.
Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar suggested on Monday that the gaps were still too wide to bridge.
'We would like to have all our hostages back. We would like to see the end of this war. We always prefer to get there by diplomatic means, if possible. But of course, the big question is, what will be the conditions for the end of the war?' he told journalists in Jerusalem.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
13 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Man executed by Iran for nuclear espionage was nuclear scientist: State media
Rouzbeh Vadi, who state media said was executed on Wednesday for giving information on Iran's nuclear program to Israel's Mossad spy agency, was himself a nuclear scientist, state broadcaster IRIB said on Thursday. The judiciary's news outlet Mizan had said on Wednesday that Vadi was convicted of spying for Israel and passing on information about a nuclear scientist killed in Israel's June air strikes on the Islamic Republic. 'Key facilities were Fordow and Natanz (uranium enrichment plants), for which I sent information. I told them I knew this and that about Fordow, they (Mossad agent) told me to send everything,' Vadi said in what IRIB described as a confession video it ran on the air. 'The entry and exit of nuclear material into the Uranium Conversion Facility (UCF) and Fuel Manufacturing Plant (FMP) were very important to them,' Vadi, who held a PhD in nuclear engineering from Amir Kabir University of Technology, added. A voiceover in the video said that Vadi met five times with Mossad agents while in Vienna and was asked to open a cryptocurrency account to receive payment for his services. The defendant said in the video that Mossad had promised him a foreign passport should he complete a long-term collaboration. IRIB on Thursday shared a screenshot of an academic paper presented at an Iranian nuclear conference in 2012 that was written by Vadi as well as Ahmad Zolfaqar and Abdolhamid Minouchehr - two nuclear scientists killed in June by Israel. In the document, Vadi is introduced as a nuclear researcher at the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, the country's top nuclear body. Executions of Iranians convicted of spying for Israel have significantly increased this year, with at least eight death sentences carried out in recent months. Israel carried out 12 days of air strikes in June, targeting Iran's top generals, nuclear scientists and sensitive nuclear installations. Iran retaliated with barrages of missiles and drones at Israel.
Arab News
13 minutes ago
- Arab News
Lebanon cabinet to meet again on Hezbollah disarmament
BEIRUT: Lebanon's cabinet is set to meet again on Thursday to discuss the thorny task of disarming Hezbollah, a day after the Iran-backed group rejected the government's decision to take away its Washington pressing Lebanon to take action on the matter, US envoy Tom Barrack has made several visits to Beirut in recent weeks, presenting officials with a proposal that includes a timetable for Hezbollah's the US pressure and fears Israel could expand its strikes in Lebanon, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said Tuesday that the government had tasked the army with developing a plan to restrict weapons to government forces by the end of decision is unprecedented since the end of Lebanon's civil war more than three decades ago, when the country's armed factions — with the exception of Hezbollah — agreed to surrender their government said the new disarmament push was part of implementing a November ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities between Israel and conflict culminated last year in two months of full-blown war that left the group badly weakened, both politically and said on Wednesday that it would treat the government's decision to disarm it 'as if it did not exist,' accusing the cabinet of committing a 'grave sin.'It added that the move 'undermines Lebanon's sovereignty and gives Israel a free hand to tamper with its security, geography, politics and future existence.'The Amal movement, Hezbollah's main ally headed by parliament speaker Nabih Berri, also criticized the move and called Thursday's cabinet meeting 'an opportunity for correction.'Iran, Hezbollah's military and financial backer, said on Wednesday that any decision on disarmament 'will ultimately rest with Hezbollah itself.''We support it from afar, but we do not intervene in its decisions,' Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi added, saying the group had 'rebuilt itself' after the war with ministers affiliated with Hezbollah and the Amal movement walked out of Tuesday's meeting on disarmament in described the walkout as a rejection of the government's 'decision to subject Lebanon to American tutelage and Israeli occupation.'Citing 'political sources' with knowledge of the matter, pro-Hezbollah newspaper Al Akhbar said the group and its Amal allies could choose to withdraw their four ministers from the government or trigger a no-confidence vote in parliament by the Shiite bloc, which comprises 27 of Lebanon's 128 — which routinely carries out air strikes in Lebanon despite the ceasefire, saying it is targeting Hezbollah fighters and infrastructure — has already signalled it would not hesitate to launch destructive military operations if Beirut failed to disarm the strikes in south Lebanon killed two people on Wednesday, according to the Lebanese health ministry.
Arab News
13 minutes ago
- Arab News
Grok, is that Gaza? AI image checks mislocate news photographs
PARIS: This image by AFP photojournalist Omar Al-Qattaa shows a skeletal, underfed girl in Gaza, where Israel's blockade has fueled fears of mass famine in the Palestinian when social media users asked Grok where it came from, X boss Elon Musk's artificial intelligence chatbot was certain that the photograph was taken in Yemen nearly seven years AI bot's untrue response was widely shared online and a left-wing pro-Palestinian French lawmaker, Aymeric Caron, was accused of peddling disinformation on the Israel-Hamas war for posting the a time when Internet users are turning to AI to verify images more and more, the furor shows the risks of trusting tools like Grok, when the technology is far from said the photo showed Amal Hussain, a seven-year-old Yemeni child, in October fact the photo shows nine-year-old Mariam Dawwas in the arms of her mother Modallala in Gaza City on August 2, the war, sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Mariam weighed 25 kilograms, her mother told she weighs only nine. The only nutrition she gets to help her condition is milk, Modallala told AFP — and even that's 'not always available.'Challenged on its incorrect response, Grok said: 'I do not spread fake news; I base my answers on verified sources.'The chatbot eventually issued a response that recognized the error — but in reply to further queries the next day, Grok repeated its claim that the photo was from chatbot has previously issued content that praised Nazi leader Adolf Hitler and that suggested people with Jewish surnames were more likely to spread online mistakes illustrate the limits of AI tools, whose functions are as impenetrable as 'black boxes,' said Louis de Diesbach, a researcher in technological ethics.'We don't know exactly why they give this or that reply, nor how they prioritize their sources,' said Diesbach, author of a book on AI tools, 'Hello ChatGPT.'Each AI has biases linked to the information it was trained on and the instructions of its creators, he the researcher's view Grok, made by Musk's xAI start-up, shows 'highly pronounced biases which are highly aligned with the ideology' of the South African billionaire, a former confidante of US President Donald Trump and a standard-bearer for the radical a chatbot to pinpoint a photo's origin takes it out of its proper role, said Diesbach.'Typically, when you look for the origin of an image, it might say: 'This photo could have been taken in Yemen, could have been taken in Gaza, could have been taken in pretty much any country where there is famine'.'AI does not necessarily seek accuracy — 'that's not the goal,' the expert AFP photograph of a starving Gazan child by Al-Qattaa, taken in July 2025, had already been wrongly located and dated by Grok to Yemen, error led to Internet users accusing the French newspaper Liberation, which had published the photo, of AI's bias is linked to the data it is fed and what happens during fine-tuning — the so-called alignment phase — which then determines what the model would rate as a good or bad answer.'Just because you explain to it that the answer's wrong doesn't mean it will then give a different one,' Diesbach said.'Its training data has not changed and neither has its alignment.'Grok is not alone in wrongly identifying AFP asked Mistral AI's Le Chat — which is in part trained on AFP's articles under an agreement between the French start-up and the news agency — the bot also misidentified the photo of Mariam Dawwas as being from Diesbach, chatbots must never be used as tools to verify facts.'They are not made to tell the truth,' but to 'generate content, whether true or false,' he said.'You have to look at it like a friendly pathological liar — it may not always lie, but it always could.'
