Middle ground needed in healthcare dispute for the sake of public
Across the Government's Budget, Health NZ is competing with the funding needs of housing, education, transport and more, all amid a cost-of-living crisis for the average Kiwi.
Health NZ offered nurses a 3% pay rise over 27 months, plus two lump sum payments of $325.
The NZNO sought a 5% pay rise over two years, along with $2000 flat rate increases for senior positions. The union also sought to restore a tikanga Māori allowance.
ASMS executive director Sarah Dalton earlier told the Herald hospital specialists sought a 12% pay rise but were being offered an increase of less than 1% per year.
Health NZ has described its offers to nurses and senior medical staff as 'fair'.
Dalton acknowledged at the time that 12% may not be achievable but said the dispute may not be settled without a better offer.
There is room for Health NZ to manoeuvre between 1% and 12%. Dalton's acknowledgment shows that compromise, at least where ASMS is concerned, is not impossible.
Health Minister Simeon Brown estimated 4300 procedures, such as hip and knee operations, were delayed because of the 24-hour strike on May 1.
Wait times for elective surgeries have already ballooned since the Covid pandemic, and the wait for specialist appointments and operations has continued to grow in many regions.
In February, the Herald reported all of the country's hospital emergency departments were failing to assess patients with 'imminently' or 'potentially' life-threatening conditions on time.
Striking doctors and nurses have rightfully pointed out staffing issues, with Health NZ recognising another 4100 nurses were needed in the next decade, on top of 2250 nursing vacancies, despite half of nursing graduates not getting job offers from Health NZ last year.
Another 3450 doctors were needed in the next decade to keep up with demand.
Concessions are needed from both Health NZ and its striking staff.
Sign up to the Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
3 hours ago
- 1News
Trump once hailed mRNA vaccines as 'miracle', RFK now halting advancement
President Donald Trump hailed as a 'medical miracle' the mRNA vaccines developed to combat the deadly Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Now, his health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is effectively halting the vaccine technology's advancement. Kennedy announced Wednesday that the federal government is cancelling US$500 million (NZ$843 million) worth of mRNA research development contracts, putting an end to US-backed hopes for the vaccine technology to prevent future pandemics, treat cancer or prevent flu infections. It's a sharp pivot from how Trump and top officials described the technology during his first term. Here's a look at what Trump and some of his closest advisers have said about mRNA vaccines that were credited with slowing the pandemic five years ago. Robert Redfield, Trump's director of the Centers for Disease Control ADVERTISEMENT 'A Covid-19 vaccine is the thing that will get Americans back to normal everyday life,' said Redfield, in a September 16, 2020, statement. Americans were still donning face masks as one of the few ways of protecting themselves from a virus that had killed nearly 200,000 in just over six months. Redfield promised that the new vaccines — developed for the first time using mRNA technology — would offer a return to normalcy. Trump wanted to make sure Biden didn't get credit 'Don't let Joe Biden take credit for the vaccines ... because the vaccines were me, and I pushed people harder than they've ever been pushed before. The vaccines are — there are those that say it's one of the greatest things. It's a medical miracle.' Trump said on November 26, 2020, during a news conference in the White House. Weeks earlier, Trump had lost the election in a bitter race against Democrat Joe Biden. As the Republican grappled with leaving Washington and continued to plan for the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines, he reminded reporters that he oversaw the development of the new shots. 'They say it's somewhat of a miracle and I think that's true,' Trump said on December 8, 2020, during a speech at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. The event celebrated Operation Warp Speed, the government-funded project that accelerated vaccine development with pharmaceutical companies. Trump was promoting the shots as the government prepared to offer them to frontline health workers. ADVERTISEMENT Trump's first-term health secretary, Alex Azar 'It's clear that many Americans are learning these vaccines are safe and extraordinarily effective,' Azar said on December 16, 2020, at a news conference. The government was shipping out mRNA vaccines to states, preparing to distributed it to the masses. Azar noted that a vast majority of Americans — between 70% to 80%, according to polls — intended to get the new Covid-19 vaccine that would be available to the public in the coming months. Gen. Gusave Perna, Trump's chief operating officer for pandemic response 'It takes somewhere between five and 10 years to put a vaccine on the street. Look what we did. Now, that's because of the great work of the scientists who had done the research on mRNA vaccines and others because of industry working on this, they just didn't wake up one day and start working on it,' Perna said during a podcast interview that aired on May 9, 2023. Reflecting in an interview about his time overseeing Operation Warp Speed, Perna credited the mRNA technology with the government's ability to get shots in arms mere months after the pandemic started claiming lives in the US in 2020. Trump supporters boo his vaccine accomplishments ADVERTISEMENT 'Take credit because we saved tens of millions of lives. Take credit. Don't let them take that away from you,' Trump said on December 19, 2021 during a live interview with former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly. Daily Covid-19 deaths had ticked down to 1500 compared to 3000 from a year earlier after Americans began receiving their first doses of the mRNA vaccines. Trump revealed to O'Reilly and the audience that he had just gotten a Covid-19 booster. The crowd booed.
Techday NZ
4 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Avast uncovers global fake pharmacy scam with 5,000+ domains
Researchers from Avast, a part of Gen, have identified a cybercriminal enterprise operating more than 5,000 domains that pose as legitimate pharmacies, targeting consumers with scam pharmaceutical sites in what Avast terms "PharmaFraud." Scale of the operation The Avast investigation unveiled a sophisticated global network where thousands of pharmacy websites, appearing professional and credible, are linked to a single organisational infrastructure. These sites use convincing design elements, fabricated reviews, and even live chat support to impersonate authentic pharmacies. Analysis by Avast revealed a particular focus on medications that are considered high in demand, associated with personal shame, or are potentially risky. Specifically, these include erectile dysfunction treatments, diabetes and weight-loss medication, antibiotics, steroids, hormones, fertility aids, and drugs associated with COVID-19 misinformation. Techniques and risks The illicit network employs advanced methods to avoid detection and prolong its activities. Security researchers note tactics such as hijacking genuine medical websites, manipulating search engine results, exploiting public hosting platforms, and utilising decentralised payment systems. These strategies are designed to obscure the criminal origin of the sites and make it difficult for users and authorities to differentiate scam sites from real ones. Email spam, digital advertising, and counterfeit review platforms are among the primary tools for drawing consumers to these fraudulent outlets. Once a user is engaged, the sites push for purchases through unsecured methods, frequently encouraging cryptocurrency payments or wire transfers which offer little to no protection for the buyer. The range of fake offerings Avast's research documented that the scam network markets a wide array of medications, often prioritising products that individuals may wish to obtain discreetly or without a prescription, or drugs that are subject to shortages and high prices. The following products were highlighted as common offerings: Erectile dysfunction drugs such as Viagra, Cialis, Levitra, along with their generic substitutes. Diabetes and weight-loss medications, including Rybelsus and Metformin. Hormonal treatments like Mircette and Estrace, fertility treatments such as Clomid. Common antibiotics and general medications, for example, Amoxil, Zithromax, Doxycycline, Prednisolone, Ventolin, and Lasix. Misrepresented or restricted drugs, including Stromectol (Ivermectin), Tretinoin, and Propecia. The report notes the danger of obtaining medications via these routes: "Many of these substances are dangerous without proper prescription guidance or are outright illegal to sell online in certain regions." This creates not only legal risk but significant health dangers due to the potential for counterfeit or contaminated products. Health and financial dangers According to Avast, the consequences of using such sites go beyond financial loss. "Counterfeit drugs can have life-threatening consequences: No active ingredients delay real treatment for serious conditions; toxic substances may contain heavy metals, pesticides, or even animal tranquillisers; intentional contamination that may severely impact your health." The products are often packaged convincingly, with forged labels, manufactured expiry dates, and barcodes, but the actual contents are unregulated and potentially harmful. PharmaFraud refers to the growing threat of fraudulent online pharmacies – scammers that pose as legitimate pharmacies while distributing counterfeit, contaminated, or entirely fake medications. These websites can steal your money or personal information and may even put your health at serious risk. Industry vigilance and consumer advice Avast emphasises that over 95% of online pharmacies are believed to operate illegally, putting significant numbers of consumers at risk. In the first six months of 2025, Avast states it helped protect nearly one million people from harmful online pharmacy operations. Several warning signs are identified to help users avoid scam pharmacies, including the lack of a prescription requirement, prices that seem unusually low, missing contact details or stated availability of a licensed pharmacist, poor localisation or grammar, non-clickable security logos, insistence on cryptocurrencies, and aggressive sales tactics such as limited time offers. Consumers are urged to observe best practices when purchasing medication online. Recommended precautions include using only verified and licensed pharmacy services, ensuring a prescription is mandatory for prescription drugs, consulting with a licensed pharmacist, steering clear of suspicious payment methods, and reviewing privacy policies to guard health-related data. Tools such as regulatory authorities, including Medsafe, are suggested as resources for consumers to check the legitimacy of online pharmacies. Individuals are encouraged to remain sceptical, be aware of online threats, and utilise available security software when navigating pharmaceutical purchases online.
NZ Herald
5 hours ago
- NZ Herald
HHS ends mRNA projects, public health experts raise concerns about the impact
The moves affect US$500 million ($843m) in projects, according to HHS, including Covid and flu therapeutics and vaccines. 'This represents a significant setback for our preparedness efforts in responding to infectious-disease outbreaks,' said Dawn O'Connell, the former assistant secretary of preparedness and response at HHS during the Biden Administration. If viruses change, mRNA can be quickly rebooted and manufactured. But HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy jnr has criticised mRNA vaccines, arguing that they are ineffective at fighting upper respiratory infections and keeping up with the mutations of a virus. Kennedy has a history of disparaging the mRNA coronavirus vaccines, in 2021 falsely calling them the 'deadliest vaccine ever made'. He has also said there was a 'poison' in it – claims refuted by medical experts. He has also been under pressure from anti-vaccine activists who say he has not done enough to remove mRNA vaccines from the market. The full scope of mRNA projects terminated was not immediately clear. Multiple companies mentioned by HHS did not immediately respond to questions. A spokesman for Moderna, which previously lost funding to develop an mRNA bird flu vaccine, said the company was not aware of new contract cancellations. The AstraZeneca programme that HHS is restructuring is an RNA-based pandemic influenza vaccine that is in early stages of development. The company is exploring options for next steps, a spokeswoman said. An inhaled mRNA treatment for flu and Covid being developed at Emory University was terminated. Some late-stage projects are proceeding, such as early human testing of an mRNA-based H5N1 candidate being developed by Arcturus Therapeutics 'to preserve prior taxpayer investment', according to HHS. Gritstone Bio, which HHS said had a project proposal rejected, already ceased operating earlier this year after declaring bankruptcy. A terminated contract to Tiba Biotech was for a H1N1 flu treatment that was not based on mRNA, but a different RNA technology. The company received a stop work order yesterday. 'This comes as a surprise given the Department's stated goal of winding down mRNA vaccine development,' Jasdave Chahal, Tiba's chief scientific officer, said in an email. 'Our project does not involve the development of an mRNA product and is a therapeutic rather than a vaccine.' 'It's going to deter innovations,' said Dorit Reiss, a professor at the University of California College of the Law at San Francisco, whose research focuses on vaccine law and policy. 'Why invest in new technologies if the government can not only refuse to fund them, but if it's going to cancel already promised contracts?' HHS said in its statement that 'other uses of mRNA technology', such as cancer treatments, are not affected by the announcement. But researchers are worried that the Trump Administration's criticism of the mRNA technology would have a chilling effect on one of the most promising fields in medicine. In 2023, Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman shared the Nobel Prize in medicine for fundamental work on mRNA that enabled the development of coronavirus vaccines. 'It's absolutely perplexing why this is happening,' said Jeff Coller, a professor of RNA biology and therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University who has studied mRNA for more than three decades. 'You have to sort of scratch your head to wonder why the secretary is directing these sort of actions against probably one of the most powerful platforms in medicine that has come along in the last 20 years.' Misleading assessments Six scientific and medical experts said Kennedy and HHS offered misleading assessments of mRNA technology as they announced the termination of research. Here are the issues they flagged with some of the statements: 'The data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like Covid and flu,' Kennedy said in a statement. It's true that mRNA vaccines can be ineffective at preventing coronavirus infections, although data from the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention shows they still offer some protection. But several scientific experts noted the primary purpose of vaccination is to prevent hospitalisations and death, which the mRNA vaccines have effectively done, according to CDC data. The FDA has not approved an mRNA flu vaccine, so experts said it was premature to make sweeping claims about its potential efficacy. The decision affects US$500 million in projects, including Covid-19 and flu vaccines. Photo / Getty Images 'One mutation and the vaccine becomes ineffective,' Kennedy said in a video. The coronavirus keeps evolving in a way that makes it easier to infect people who have some immunity from vaccination or prior infection. Medical experts said the mRNA vaccines have been resilient in maintaining protection against severe outcomes. Manufacturers have also been able to update formulas annually to better target new variants. 'That is actually one of the most powerful aspects of mRNA vaccines: that you can, in real time, develop new mRNAs against the virus as the virus changes,' Coller said. 'I'm not sure why that would be considered a bad thing.' 'We've seen now these epidemics of myocarditis,' Kennedy said at a news conference. Coronavirus vaccines designed using mRNA carry a very small risk of myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart, from the coronavirus vaccine, particularly in young men. However, medical experts said the data shows there is not an 'epidemic' of the condition; in fact, the rates of myocarditis and other heart illness are much higher from the virus instead of the vaccine. Jessica Malaty Rivera, an infectious-disease epidemiologist, said this rhetoric was part of the pandemic revisionist 'revenge tour'. 'Calling it an epidemic is absolutely misleading,' she said. 'Technologies that were funded during the emergency phase but failed to meet current scientific standards will be phased out in favour of evidence-based, ethically grounded solutions – like whole-virus vaccines and novel platforms' - HHS statement Scientific experts said a variety of vaccine types are often required to fight emerging infectious diseases. In some cases, whole-virus vaccines have been known to have serious side effects. Peter Hotez, a physician and co-director of the Texas Children's Hospital Centre for Vaccine Development, said he was surprised to hear HHS tout whole-virus vaccines because China had used a whole-virus vaccine for coronavirus that was 'pretty mediocre', Hotez said. Kennedy is 'pushing a technology that is actually probably the most problematic of all vaccines we could pick', Hotez said. Rachel Roubein, Sabrina Malhi and Daniel Gilbert contributed to this report.
