
How NASA fund cuts offer a chance for transformation
NASA is facing an unprecedented budget crisis that threatens to reshape the agency dramatically. The White House's fiscal year 2026 'skinny' budget proposal, released in May 2025, calls for a nearly $6 billion cut about 25% less than NASA's 2025 funding. Science programs face the harshest blow with a proposed 50% reduction. Traditional pillars like the Space Launch System (SLS), Orion spacecraft, and the Gateway lunar outpost are set to be phased out or cancelled after the Artemis 3 mission. While these cuts spark concern, many experts see this moment as a rare opportunity to transform NASA into a leaner, more agile agency that can thrive in a new era of space exploration.
Historic scale of NASA fund cuts and their impact
The scale of these cuts is historic. Adjusted for inflation, NASA's funding would revert to levels seen in the early 1960s, before the Apollo program. This level of reduction inevitably threatens thousands of jobs potentially up to 30,000 civil servants and contractors and imperils longstanding programs. The science division, responsible for some of NASA's most high-profile missions, faces the largest reductions, with key projects like Mars Sample Return cancelled and others like NEO Surveyor in uncertain limbo. Space technology efforts critical to future lunar and Mars exploration are also slated for sharp cuts.
Uncertainty surrounding human spaceflight and the ISS
Despite the severity, NASA's leadership has been cautious, awaiting full budget details to understand which missions might survive. The International Space Station (ISS), a symbol of international collaboration, faces cuts that could reduce crew size and accelerate retirement plans. More fundamentally, the budget signals that NASA will likely no longer operate human-rated spacecraft within five years, relying entirely on commercial providers for crew transport and exploration.
Challenges of a fully commercialised human spaceflight future
This potential 'commercialization' of human spaceflight raises questions about NASA's identity and public support. However, it also reflects a strategic shift that some argue NASA must embrace to remain competitive, particularly with China's expanding lunar ambitions. Experts like Alex MacDonald of CSIS and Dan Dumbacher of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics highlight the risk of workforce erosion and industrial base losses similar to those seen after Apollo and the Space Shuttle programs.
Reinventing NASA through commercial partnerships
Yet, amid this crisis lies opportunity. Many voices in the space community emphasize that NASA's traditional model is due for reform. The agency's bureaucratic inertia and risk aversion have hampered agility and innovation. Leveraging commercial partnerships more deeply, as NASA did during the successful COTS program that birthed SpaceX's cargo missions, could enable faster, cheaper, and more sustainable exploration.
Envisioning a lunar COTS model and international collaboration
Peter Garretson of the American Foreign Policy Council envisions a future where NASA acts as a central mission planner, outsourcing infrastructure development and operations to private firms through incentive-driven programs. This 'lunar COTS' model could stimulate new industry growth, keep international partners engaged by shifting focus to lunar surface contributions, and streamline NASA's core functions.
Turning crisis into long-term success
In sum, while the proposed 2026 budget presents severe challenges, it forces NASA to confront an urgent question: what should the agency look like for the next half-century? The difficult decisions ahead could break NASA free from outdated paradigms, enabling it to innovate, collaborate, and lead human space exploration in a more sustainable and impactful way. As MacDonald puts it, 'There is a new NASA that can emerge one that leverages commercial capabilities, operates leaner, and continues to do amazing things.'
NASA's budget crisis, though painful, may be the catalyst for transformation the agency needs to remain a space exploration pioneer in the 21st century.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Egos, power, and revenge: 8 ways the Musk-Trump war could escalate into a clash that rocks America
1. Musk may fund campaigns against Trump 2. Musk is testing support for a new political party 3. Musk accused Trump's team of hiding Epstein files 4. Musk's post triggered political response 5. Musk threatened to shut down a key NASA spacecraft Live Events 6. Trump wants to cut off Musk's government contracts 7. Bannon called for investigation into Musk's immigration and drug use 8. Trump could revoke Musk's security clearance and cancel his projects FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Musk gave over $250 million to support Trump before, now he might fund campaigns against Trump and Republicans instead. He called Trump's domestic bill a 'disgusting abomination' and slammed Republican leaders on his social media app, X. Musk might not give the last $100 million he promised to Trump's campaign, as per X, Musk posted a poll asking if America needs a new party that supports the 'middle 80%' and most people said 'yes.' Musk also agreed to a post that said 'Trump should be impeached', though it's not clear if he meant it claimed Trump's team delayed releasing Jeffrey Epstein files because they might contain Trump's name; he posted, 'The truth will come out,' as per the New York Times made House Democrats jump in fast, they're now demanding threatened to shut down his Dragon spacecraft but later said 'ok we won't decommission Dragon' after someone on X told them to cool off, as per posted on Truth Social that the government should cancel all contracts with Musk's companies like SpaceX and Tesla, says it'll save money. In 2023, Musk's companies got almost $3 billion in contracts from 17 U.S. Bannon said the U.S. should investigate if Musk is an illegal immigrant and deport him. Musk is a U.S. citizen from South Africa. Bannon also demanded a probe into Musk's drug use and his efforts to get military secrets about China. Bannon suggested Musk's top-secret security clearance should be taken away during these investigations, as per the New York Times has the power to revoke Musk's clearance fully, which would mess with his space contracts with NASA. Trump could sign executive orders to punish Musk or ask federal agencies like the DOJ to launch investigations. Trump might even cancel Musk's Department of Government Efficiency idea and other projects he supports, like his support for white South Africans, as stated in New York Times Musk spoke against Trump's policies and might stop supporting him with money or can cancel government contracts with Musk's companies and push for legal action or investigations.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Inside the Musk-Trump feud: This adviser is said to have triggered the most talked-about split in politics
President Donald Trump's recent surprise decision to withdraw Elon Musk's favored candidate for NASA chief has pushed the billionaire entrepreneur and the White House into a rare and public feud. The president canceled Jared Isaacman's nomination as NASA administrator just days after Musk left the White House, fueling tensions between two of the most powerful figures in the country. Why did Trump pull Jared Isaacman's NASA nomination despite Senate support? Jared Isaacman, a billionaire pilot and astronaut, was widely expected to be confirmed as NASA administrator this week after winning Senate committee approval in April. Isaacman is well-known for his role in Musk's Dragon program and for flying to space during Operation Polaris Dawn in 2024. But the nomination hit a snag because Isaacman had donated to several Democratic candidates, including those who challenged GOP senators Tim Sheehy of Montana and Bernie Moreno of Ohio in the 2024 elections. Reports from Axios reveal that Trump's top White House personnel official, Sergio Gor, played a key role in derailing the nomination. Gor, who manages White House staffing decisions, flagged Isaacman's Democratic donations to Trump, pushing the president to reconsider. Despite Musk's support and their private discussions about Isaacman, Trump decided the candidate's political ties were not suitable for the position, stating on Truth Social, 'I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA.' Musk expressed disappointment, calling Isaacman 'competent and good-hearted' on X. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No Gym. No Gimmicks. Just Walk: The Shoe That's Remaking the £4B Wellness Market showbizinsider Undo Who is Sergio Gor, and why did he oppose Elon Musk's pick? Sergio Gor is a powerful and influential White House aide responsible for overseeing personnel choices in the Trump administration. A longtime ally of Senator Rand Paul, Gor moved to Trump's team in 2019 and has close ties to Donald Trump Jr., even officiating Rep. Matt Gaetz's wedding in 2021. Gor also co-founded Trump Jr.'s publishing company and manages a pro-Trump super PAC that spent nearly $72 million in the 2024 election cycle. Sources suggest Gor and Musk have had a tense relationship, and Gor's decision to expose Isaacman's political donations was seen by insiders as a parting 'f**k you' to Musk. The Axios report highlights that Gor didn't appreciate Musk's involvement in personnel matters, adding friction between the two. Live Events How did the Trump-Musk fallout unfold publicly? The conflict between Trump and Musk exploded last week. After Musk publicly criticized Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' Trump retaliated by urging the deportation of the SpaceX founder and threatened to revoke Musk's multibillion-dollar government contracts. Musk responded sharply, calling for Trump's impeachment and linking him to Jeffrey Epstein, intensifying their bitter exchange. The feud hit Wall Street hard as Tesla's stock plummeted, wiping around $27 billion off Musk's net worth in one of his worst days financially. White House aides tried to mediate, even attempting to arrange a crisis call to patch things up, but talks fell apart by Friday morning. Can Trump and Musk reconcile despite their public spat? Bill Ackman, billionaire hedge fund manager, stepped in with a public appeal on X urging the two men to bury the hatchet 'for the benefit of our great country,' reminding them, 'we are much stronger together than apart.' Musk's brief reply, 'You're not wrong,' hinted at some willingness to find common ground. Still, with Gor's influence in the White House and the public nature of the feud, a quick fix seems unlikely. Trump emphasized the importance of loyalty to the Republican Party for government nominations and appeared firm on his decision regarding Isaacman. What does this conflict mean for NASA and U.S. space policy? With Isaacman's nomination withdrawn, NASA faces uncertainty about its next leader. The rift underscores how political loyalty now plays a big role in key appointments, even in scientific agencies like NASA. Elon Musk, once a close ally of Trump's campaign and administration, is now openly at odds with the president, complicating collaboration between the government and private space ventures. The dispute also raises questions about how much influence billionaires like Musk will have in shaping U.S. space policy amid growing partisan divides. For now, the clash remains a high-profile example of how politics can overshadow expertise and shared goals in America's space ambitions. FAQs: Why did Trump withdraw Jared Isaacman's NASA nomination despite Senate approval? Trump's advisor Sergio Gor highlighted Isaacman's donations to Democrats, leading Trump to pull the nomination over political loyalty concerns. How has the Trump-Musk feud affected NASA and space policy? The public clash disrupted NASA's leadership plans and raised questions about political influence on U.S. space initiatives.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump vs Musk: What happens to Nasa's ISS missions if SpaceX grounds Dragon capsule? Is Russia only other option?
President-elect Donald Trump listens as Elon Musk explains the operations ahead of the launch of the sixth test flight of the SpaceX Starship rocket, Nov. 19, 2024, in Boca Chica, Texas. (AP) As US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk exchanged barbs on social media on Thursday, Musk said he might stop using the Dragon spacecraft, which is used to take astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station (ISS). This came after Trump said he may cancel government contracts given to Musk's companies, SpaceX and Starlink. Musk responded on X, saying SpaceX "will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' It is not clear how serious Musk was. But the Dragon spacecraft is important for keeping the ISS working. Nasa also depends on SpaceX for other programs, such as launching science missions and, later this decade, taking astronauts to the moon. SpaceX and Nasa's partnership In 2006, a company named Space Exploration Technologies Corp, or SpaceX, got a Nasa contract to carry cargo and supplies to the ISS. At the time, SpaceX had not launched anything into orbit. Its first successful launch happened two years later with Falcon 1. In 2010, SpaceX launched the first Falcon 9 rocket. By 2012, it began sending cargo to the space station. Nasa gave money to help develop the Falcon 9 rocket. SpaceX then used the Nasa connection to attract other clients to launch satellites using its rockets. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo During the Obama administration, SpaceX also got a contract to take astronauts to the ISS. This happened for the first time in May 2020, during President Trump's first term. "Today the groundbreaking partnership between Nasa and SpaceX has given our nation the gift of an unmatched power a state-of-the-art spaceship to put our astronauts into orbit at a fraction of the cost of the space shuttle," Trump said in a speech at Kennedy Space Center in Florida on May 30, 2020, after that flight. He also praised Musk in the same event. As SpaceX made progress, other companies faced difficulties. Today, SpaceX is the main company handling both US civilian and military space activities. The US government now depends a lot on SpaceX. Musk started the company in 2002 with the goal of one day sending people to Mars. For now, the company is the only option the U.S. has to send people and equipment to space. Impact of decommissioning Dragon SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsules are used to take astronauts and cargo to the ISS for Nasa. If Musk follows through on his statement about decommissioning, it could affect the future of the space station. Later in the day, Musk seemed to take back the threat. But if he had followed through, SpaceX would likely bring back the Crew Dragon that is already docked at the space station, along with the four astronauts who plan to return in it. However, there would be no way to send the next group of astronauts to the ISS. Dragon capsule Right now, SpaceX is the only US company that can take crews to and from the ISS, using the Dragon capsule, which can carry four people. Another US company, Boeing, has a capsule called Starliner. But it has flown astronauts only once. That test flight had problems, and the two Nasa astronauts had to return to Earth using SpaceX in March. That was more than nine months after they launched last June. Starliner is still not ready to fly again. Nasa is deciding whether to do another test flight with cargo instead of a crew. SpaceX also uses Dragon capsules for its own private missions. The next such mission, managed by Axiom Space, is expected to launch next week. Cargo versions of Dragon are also used to carry food and other supplies to the ISS. Russia's Soyuz: The only other option The only other way to send crews to the ISS is using Russia's Soyuz capsules. Each Soyuz can carry three people. Usually, each Soyuz trip includes two Russians and one Nasa astronaut. Each SpaceX trip includes one Russian under a mutual agreement. This setup ensures that in an emergency, both US and Russian crew members have a way to return. When SpaceX started sending crews for Nasa in 2020, it reduced Nasa's dependence on Russia. Earlier, Nasa had to pay Russia tens of millions of dollars per seat. For cargo, Nasa also works with Russian spacecraft and a US company called Northrop Grumman.