logo
The human cost of Biden's shameful 'Children's Crusade' at the border

The human cost of Biden's shameful 'Children's Crusade' at the border

Fox News6 hours ago
Around the year 1212, a boy preached to children in France that they should take up the cross and follow him to the Holy Land. Thousands did. None reached Jerusalem. Most gave up before leaving Europe. Others were shipwrecked or sold into slavery in the Islamic caliphate of Tunisia.
Centuries later, the Biden administration's facilitation of mass illegal entry by unaccompanied alien children (UACs) and releasing them into the hands of unvetted adults has caused misery on an even larger scale.
The seed was planted years earlier. As Lora Ries, a former official with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, wrote, a 2008 law called the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) created incentives to "entice parents to send their children across the border unaccompanied to receive immigration benefits and gain a foothold in the U.S. so their families could hopefully later follow."
In the early 2000s, between 4,800 and 8,200 UACs were encountered at the border per year. After the TVPRA, numbers rose, hitting 68,000 in 2014.
Under Biden, federal agencies became the last leg in an international smuggling business that brought millions of inadmissible aliens to the U.S. from around the world, including 550,000 minors. As expert witness Tara Rodas testified to the House Homeland Security Committee in November 2024, "Criminal sponsors are defrauding the U.S. government by using this government program as a logistical chain in their trafficking operation."
While illegal alien parents and labor-exploiting employers paid for UACs to get to the U.S. border, it was often our tax dollars that brought them inside the country and delivered them into the hands of barely vetted adult sponsors.
Inadmissible UACs from further than Mexico who try to enter the U.S. illegally become the responsibility of the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR).
Under Biden, children were released to putative sponsors in a matter of days. Verification of the sponsors' identities was inexcusably lax. HHS released children to sponsors with whom they had no blood relation and allowed adult sponsors to send photos of identification documents rather than come in personally. There was little follow-up to check on the children's welfare after placement with the sponsors.
A February 2024 HHS inspector general's report looked at 342 of 16,790 UACs they had released to parents or sponsors in March and April of 2021. In 16% of cases, there was no evidence that required sponsor safety checks had been done. Almost one in five UACs were "released to sponsors with pending FBI fingerprint or State child abuse and neglect registry checks" – and when those results came in, the files were never updated. In a third of the cases, the identification documents the sponsors submitted "contained legibility concerns" – a nice way of saying ORR couldn't read them properly to confirm they were valid.
What if the sponsors weren't caring for the children or were exploiting them? No one knew. ORR's follow-up was in most cases only a phone call.
In 22% of cases HHS examined, "ORR did not conduct timely Safety and Well-Being Follow Up Calls," and in another 18% of cases they didn't document those calls in the case files. That was in early 2021 – and the UAC numbers got worse later in the Biden years. As this chart shows, every year from 2021 – 2024 saw more than 100,000 UACs apprehended entering illegally – nearly all of whom would have been released into the U.S.
Under our immigration laws, UACs should be removed unless they are given asylum or other protection. But incredibly, ICE failed to issue Notices to Appear in immigration court to over 291,000 UACs they released between 2019 and 2024, according to the DHS Inspector General. And when they did, more than 43,000 of them never showed up for a hearing.
The New York Times reported that "[m]igrant children have ended up working dangerous industrial jobs in violation of child labor laws across the country — in slaughterhouses, factories, construction sites and elsewhere… Some have been gravely injured or killed."
Having ended Biden's catch-and-release at the border, the Trump administration is now repairing the damage done over four years of recklessness and negligence. This means not only arresting, detaining, and deporting adult illegal aliens, but also finding thousands of UACs whom HHS has lost track of. The aim is to return as many children as possible to their parents, ideally back in their home countries. So far, the Trump administration has found 13,000 of the UACs who dropped off the radar.
Today, ORR is requiring proper identification, with fingerprints, photos, DNA samples, as well as background checks and financial records before they release children. Alien adults in the U.S. who have pending asylum claims – even bogus or fraudulent ones that will ultimately fail – can still pick up their children from ORR and keep custody pending the family's immigration process. Many don't, because they aren't really relatives. Or they fear due process because they are here illegally and haven't taken even basic steps to try and legalize their status.
Now that ORR is strictly verifying parent and sponsor identities, the average time children remain in ORR custody has grown from a few weeks to months. That is testament to how weak the vetting standards for sponsors have been for the last four years. Many teens who came to work here leaving their parents abroad are opting to go home rather than stay longer in ORR custody.
Federal law requires the government to "ensure that unaccompanied alien children in the United States are safely repatriated to their country of nationality." That should be the priority now. Then, Congress needs to close the UAC loopholes in immigration law and return custody responsibility from HHS back to DHS, so that never again will so many children be at risk of serious harm and fall through the cracks of an immigration system spread among too many federal agencies.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump told Melania to ‘go forward' with legal action against Hunter Biden over Epstein relationship comments
Trump told Melania to ‘go forward' with legal action against Hunter Biden over Epstein relationship comments

CNN

time2 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump told Melania to ‘go forward' with legal action against Hunter Biden over Epstein relationship comments

President Donald Trump confirmed Thursday morning that Melania Trump's attorneys are threatening legal action against Hunter Biden, saying he told her to 'go forward.' 'You know, I've done pretty well on these lawsuits lately. And I said, go forward. Jeffrey Epstein has nothing to do with Melania and I introducing. But they do that. They make up stories,' he told Brian Kilmeade on Fox News radio. The legal threat centers on a claim Biden made in an interview on YouTube about the Trumps' relationship to Jeffrey Epstein, according to the journalist who conducted the interview and a copy of the attorney letter obtained by Fox News. Andrew Callaghan, host of the YouTube series Channel 5, said on his channel that he had received a legal demand from the first lady asking to retract a video from last week, which currently has 1.3 million views. Melania Trump is seeking $1 billion in damages if they don't take down the video. She also wants a formal apology from Hunter Biden. 'In my hand is a legal demand letter addressed to Mr. Hunter Biden from the first lady of the United States, demanding a retraction of Channel 5's video called 'Hunter Biden returns' in which Mr. Biden here makes some speculative comments about the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein, Melania Trump and Donald Trump,' Callaghan said at the beginning of a follow-up interview with Biden posted on Thursday. Fox News also posted a copy of a letter, addressed to Hunter Biden and his lawyer, that asked Biden to 'retract the false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements made about Mrs. Trump' during the YouTube interview. 'First Lady Melania Trump's attorneys are actively ensuring immediate retractions and apologies by those who spread malicious, defamatory falsehoods. The true account of how the First Lady met President Trump is in her best-selling book, 'Melania,'' her spokesperson Nick Clemens said in a statement when asked about the letter. Hunter had a defiant response to the request for an apology telling Callaghan in another video interview posted on August 14, 'F**k that. That's not gonna happen.' The legal demands center on an August 5 video of Callaghan's show, in which Hunter Biden spoke about the Trumps' relationship with Epstein, citing Michael Wolff. In Callaghan's latest interview with Hunter Biden, the two discuss the legal demand from the first lady, and Biden suggests it could result in the president and first lady clarifying their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein in a deposition. 'I have this to say to them: If they want to sit down for a deposition and clarify the nature of the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein — if the president and the first lady want to do that and all the known associates around them at the time, whatever time that they met, I'm more than happy to provide them the platform to be able to do it,' Biden said in the interview released on Thursday. 'Fact of the matter is that, you know, I don't think that these threats of a lawsuit add up to anything other than a design distraction, because it's not about who introduced whom to whom. I don't know how that in any way rises to the level of defamation to begin with,' Biden added.

Trump and Putin to meet Friday in Alaska for Russia-Ukraine war summit: What to know
Trump and Putin to meet Friday in Alaska for Russia-Ukraine war summit: What to know

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump and Putin to meet Friday in Alaska for Russia-Ukraine war summit: What to know

Trump wants a deal to end the war — but expectations are low for a major breakthrough. President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska to discuss a way forward in the Russia-Ukraine war. It will be the first face-to-face sit-down between the two leaders since 2019, and perhaps the most significant since they met alone the following year (alongside interpreters) for more than two hours in Helsinki, Finland. It will also be Putin's first meeting with a U.S. president since the start of his invasion. He previously met with former President Joe Biden in June 2021. Friday's summit comes at what could be a pivotal point in the conflict, which escalated when Putin's forces invaded Ukraine in February 2022. The fighting has since caused a staggering number of casualties on both sides. Trump has been trying for months to secure a deal to end the war, but Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was not invited to Friday's summit and foreign-policy experts question Putin's desire for peace. Expectations are low for any sort of major breakthrough. 'This is really a feel-out meeting,' Trump said Monday. 'Probably in the first two minutes I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made.' Here's everything you need to know ahead of Friday's summit in Alaska. Why is Trump meeting Putin now? Trump has a long history of praising Putin, and his relationship with Zelensky is fraught. When campaigning for reelection in 2024, Trump vowed to end the war during his first 24 hours back in office; he later paused U.S. assistance to Ukraine. As a result, experts have questioned whether Trump is positioned to broker a deal that both sides could agree to. Yet in recent weeks, Trump has also expressed frustration with Putin's intensifying attacks on Ukrainian cities and civilians and his seeming indifference to peace talks. When Russian missiles pounded Kyiv earlier this year, Trump accused Putin of "needlessly killing a lot of people," adding in a social media post: "He has gone absolutely CRAZY!" "I am very disappointed with President Putin," Trump told reporters on July 13, shortly before announcing a plan to send weapons to Ukraine via NATO. "I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. And he'll talk so beautifully and then he'll bomb people at night. We don't like that." In turn, that disappointment may have 'pushed the president into closer alignment with NATO allies and even Zelensky,' according to Politico. On Wednesday, Trump participated in a video call with Zelensky and other European leaders and reportedly agreed to 'five principles' for the talks with Putin. They include keeping Ukraine 'at the table' for follow-up meetings and refusing to discuss peace terms — like swaps of land between Russia and Ukraine — before a ceasefire is put in place. For his part, Trump has framed Friday's meeting as a preliminary step in a larger process, saying that a trilateral meeting with Putin and Zelensky could follow. 'First, I'll find out where we are,' Trump said Wednesday. 'If the first [meeting] goes okay, we'll have a quick second one. I would like to do it almost immediately.' At the same time, Trump insisted Putin would face 'severe consequences' if he doesn't seem serious in Alaska about ending the war. 'There may be no second meeting,' the president added, 'because I didn't get the answers that we have to have.' So far, Trump has resisted imposing tariffs or further sanctions on Russia in an effort to bring Putin into negotiations. Last month, Trump told Putin that he would have to agree to a ceasefire by Aug. 8 or face 'very severe tariffs' and a new wave of sanctions. When that deadline passed without a ceasefire deal, Trump instead invited Putin to talk in person. According to Axios, Trump told Zelensky and other European leaders on Wednesday that his goal is to get Putin to agree to a ceasefire at Friday's meeting. Why is Putin meeting Trump now? The international community has largely isolated the Russian leader since the start of the war, with both the U.S. and Europe moving to cut off Moscow's access to western markets and its fossil fuel export revenues. But sanctions have done nothing to curb Putin's aggression in Ukraine. 'I have said many times that I consider the Russian and Ukrainian peoples to be one people. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours,' Putin told guests at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum in June. 'We have an old rule. Wherever a Russian soldier sets foot is ours.' Analysts say that Putin sees Trump as the rare Western leader who, in his desire to make a deal, could pressure Ukraine into accepting major concessions — adding that even Trump's invitation to meet on American soil (despite Putin's international arrest warrant for war crimes) is likely seen by the Russian president as its own reward. Putin's goal Friday, as Politico recently put it, will be to 'try to repair his personal relationship with Trump in a private meeting while convincing him that Ukraine shares the blame for the prolonged conflict.' Trump has repeatedly signaled that he does, in fact, blame Zelensky as well as Putin, most recently on Monday. "I get along with Zelensky, but, you know, I disagree with what he's done — very, very severely, disagree,' the president told reporters. 'This is a war that should have never happened.' Trump has also suggested freezing most current battle lines in place, with additional "land swaps' to be agreed upon by Putin and Zelensky — an idea that Zelensky has rejected, claiming it violates his country's constitution. What does Zelensky have to say about the meeting? Zelensky has long claimed that by continuing to insist on maximalist objectives — international recognition of seized areas of Ukraine as part of 'new Russia'; promises that Ukraine will be forever barred from NATO — Putin is deliberately making demands that he knows Ukraine cannot accept in order to convince Trump that Zelensky is the problem. 'We understand the Russians' intention to try to deceive America,' Zelensky said in his evening address on Sunday night. 'We will not allow this.' Zelensky has long called for a complete ceasefire as a precondition for negotiations; he has also said he would talk directly with Putin in any format. Putin has rejected both offers. In the meantime, the two sides are intensifying their efforts on the battlefield in order to bolster their negotiation positions. Russia's troops recently 'broke through a segment of Ukraine's defensive line near the city of Pokrovsk, a longtime stronghold,' according to the New York Times — a move that shows, in Zelensky's words, that Putin is 'redeploying [his] troops and forces in ways that suggest preparations for new offensive operations.' Putin is 'not preparing for a cease-fire or an end to the war,' Zelensky claimed. Similarly, Kyiv has 'ramped up attacks on Russian oil refineries, doubling down on its strategy of pressuring Russia … by targeting the Kremlin's main revenue source to fund the war,' according to the Times.

Hunter Biden delivers profanity-laced response to Melania Trump's $1B notice for 'defamatory' Epstein remarks
Hunter Biden delivers profanity-laced response to Melania Trump's $1B notice for 'defamatory' Epstein remarks

Fox News

time41 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Hunter Biden delivers profanity-laced response to Melania Trump's $1B notice for 'defamatory' Epstein remarks

Hunter Biden, in another profanity-laced interview, brushed off first lady Melania Trump's recent $1 billion legal notice over what she claims are "false, defamatory, disparaging and inflammatory statements." "F--- that. That's not gonna happen," Biden said during an interview with "Channel 5" podcaster Andrew Callaghan that was published to YouTube Thursday. Callaghan had offered Biden the opportunity to apologize to the first lady for a previous video interview titled "Hunter Biden Returns" earlier in August, when the former first son claimed "Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The connections are, like, so wide and deep." "Mrs. Trump is seeking $1 billion in damages if we don't take the video down, and if Hunter here doesn't issue a formal apology to Mrs. Trump," Callaghan told Biden, before the former first son brushed off the notice. "So now we're here maybe to give you the platform to apologize to the first lady for your statements that you made about her possible connection to Jeffrey Epstein." Biden doubled down in his most recent interview, and welcomed sitting down at a deposition over the matter. "I also think they're bullies, and they think that a billion dollars is going to scare me," he said. "I have this to say to them: if they want to sit down for a deposition and clarify the nature of the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein – if the president, the first lady, want to do that, and all of the known associates around them at the time of whatever time that they met – I'm more than happy to provide them the platform to be able to do it." Fox News Digital exclusively obtained the letter that Alejandro Brito, an attorney serving as litigation counsel for the first lady, sent to Biden and his attorney, Abbe Lowell, Aug. 6. Brito demanded that Biden "immediately retract the false, defamatory, disparaging and inflammatory statements made about Mrs. Trump," which were contained in the "Channel 5" video published to YouTube in early August. "Failure to comply will leave Mrs. Trump with no choice but to pursue any and all legal rights and remedies available to her to recover the overwhelming financial and reputational harm that you have caused her to suffer," Brito wrote. Biden had also claimed in the earlier interview that "Jeffrey Epstein introduced Melania, and that's how Melania and the first lady and the President met." "These false, disparaging, defamatory and inflammatory statements are extremely salacious and have been widely disseminated throughout various digital mediums," Brito wrote. "Indeed, the video has since been re-published by various media outlets, journalists, and political commentators with millions of social media followers that have disseminated the false and defamatory statements therein to tens of millions of people worldwide." Brito added: "Consequently, you have caused Mrs. Trump to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm." Brito demanded, on behalf of the first lady, that Biden "immediately issue a full and fair retraction of the video and any and all other false, defamatory, disparaging, misleading and inflammatory statements about Mrs. Trump in as conspicuous a manner as they were originally published." He also demanded, on behalf of the first lady, that Biden "immediately issue an apology for the false, defamatory, disparaging, misleading and inflammatory statements about Mrs. Trump." Fox News Digital reached out to Biden attorney Lowell's office for any additional comment on the matter, but did not immediately receive a reply.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store