ICTU calls proposed VAT cut 'economic vandalism'
Following the publication of the Summer Economic Statement yesterday, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe said that the cost of the VAT cut would be almost €1bn, using the majority of the €1.5bn identified for tax measures.
"The proposal to cut the VAT rate at a time of huge economic uncertainty flies in the face of all available evidence, and would amount to nothing less than economic vandalism," said General Secretary of ICTU Owen Reidy.
"Hospitality is a sector rife with low paid employment and poor conditions, and all evidence suggests that the reduction in VAT will not be passed on to consumers or staff, but pocketed by employers," Mr Reidy said.
SIPTU said private sector workers have been short-changed by a Government which has broken commitments on pensions, increased sick days and measures to offset the cost of living crisis while announcing tax breaks for business.
"This morning on national radio, the Taoiseach, Micheál Martin, stated that there was a prior commitment to the hospitality sector on a VAT reduction," said SIPTU Deputy General Secretary Greg Ennis.
"However, what about the Government's prior commitments to workers with regard to increasing statutory occupational sick pay from five to seven days in 2025, progression towards a living wage in 2026, which has now been shelved until at least 2029, and the abolition of sub-minimum wages for young workers," Mr Ennis said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Slovenia bans imports from Israeli settlements over Gaza war
Slovenia has introduced a ban on imports of goods produced in Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories and approved an additional aid package for Palestinians in Gaza, the government said in a statement. "The government today banned the import of goods originating from settlements in the occupied territories, including a ban on circumventing the ban on these imports," the statement on the government website said. The statement did not specify whether the ban refers to all goods produced in the territories or just Israeli goods. The Slovenian government also instructed the competent ministries to consider banning the export of goods from Slovenia intended for these Israeli-occupied settlements. "Israeli government's actions, including the construction of illegal settlements, expropriations, the forced displacement of the Palestinian population, the destruction of their serious and repeated violations of international humanitarian law," Prime Minister Robert Golob said in statement quoted by the STA news agency. "These actions not only threaten the lives and dignity of the Palestinian population, but also the foundations of the international order," it added. The news agency said the volume of goods affected is extremely low at under €2,000 in 2023. A demonstration was held in the capital Ljubjana to draw attention to the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza. Most of the international community considers the settlements illegal. The Israeli government deems settlements legal under its own laws, while some so-called "outposts" are illegal but often tolerated and sometimes later legalised. Last month, a cross-party Oireachtas foreign affairs committee report on the Occupied Territories Bill "strongly recommends" services as well as goods should be included in any Government legislation. The committee has been tasked in recent weeks with drawing up a pre-legislative scrutiny report on the long-awaited Occupied Territories Bill, which will include a series of non-binding recommendations that will subsequently be considered by Government. The question of whether the bill should be limited to goods from what it describes as the Occupied Territories or be extended to services as well has been a key subject of debate in recent weeks due to the potential economic impact such a move could cause.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Worker forced to retire at 65 awarded €18,000 by Labour Court
A factory worker who was forced to retire at 65 has been awarded €18,000 by the Labour Court . Liam Murphy had worked as a general operative at Deepak Fasteners in Shannon, Co Clare for 45 years. When he turned 65 in February 2022, he asked to continue working but this was rejected by the company. While Mr Murphy did not appeal that decision at the time, he lodged a claim in July of that year with the Workplace Relations Commission claiming he had been discriminated against on the grounds of age. When the WRC found that his complaint was not well founded, he appealed the decision to the Labour Court. READ MORE Company chief executive Seamus McGiff told the court the company was concerned about the age profile of his workforce and the need to make new hires with specific skills as the loss-making business tried to pivot in a new direction. However, given that there was no mandatory retirement age in Mr Murphy's contract of employment and there had been no issues with his performance, concentration or health and safety concerns, the court found in his favour. It found the company 'did not engage in any meaningful way with the complainant's request' and concluded 'that there was no objective justification' the company could rely on to support its decision to force him to retire simply because he reached the age of 65. Welcoming the decision, Rachel Hartery of trade union Siptu 's Workers Rights Centre, which represented Mr Murphy, said: 'Our member was simply discarded by this employer after 45 years of loyal service, as was evidenced by the complete lack of consideration given to his requests to work on for one year beyond age 65.' Siptu said there appeared to be no urgency in Government to advance legislation introduced earlier this year to allow but not compel workers to remain in their employment until they reach the State pension age.
The Journal
12 hours ago
- The Journal
Ireland's young population is keeping public spending down - for now, says IFAC
IRELAND'S YOUNG POPULATION means the State is spending less on pensions and healthcare than other European countries, according to the budgetary watchdog. As a result, the Irish State needs to prepare for a growth in spending as demographics shift and the demand for public services increase. Analysis by the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) found that while Ireland appeared to be a low-tax, low-spend country, public spending is low relative to national income. The fiscal advisory body said this was mainly due to Ireland's young population and a buoyant economy. But as Ireland's population ages, public spending on pensions and healthcare is expected to rise, IFAC said, bringing it closer to levels in other European countries. Currently, Irish Government spending is 3.3% of national income lower than other European countries, while it collects 4.7% of national income, or €2,600 per person. When excess corporation tax from several multinationals located in Ireland is excluded, Ireland collects 8.6% of national income or €4,700 per person less than other European countries. Advertisement Employers and employees in Ireland pay less in social insurance than is typical across Europe. The fiscal watchdog said that additional pressures will be put on the budget in the years ahead, driven by an ageing population and climate change. Since 2015, the number of people aged 65 years and over in Ireland has increased by 37%. The Government's new savings funds – the Future Ireland Fund and the Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund – will help cover some of the costs but will not cover them all. Author of the report Niall Conroy said Ireland needed to prepare for higher levels of public spending in the future. 'Ireland collects a lower level of government revenue than most other high-income European countries,' he said. 'This is mostly driven by social insurance paid both by employees and employers. When exceptional corporation tax is excluded, government revenue in Ireland is 4,700 euro per person lower than the European average. 'As a result, the Government will need to raise additional revenue or reallocate existing spending. 'The more the Government saves today, the easier it will be to navigate these challenges.'
