Dispersal orders put in place across Surrey
Spelthorne Beat said an order was in place in part of Sunbury, while Runnymede Beat said it was implementing one for Thorpe Industrial Estate.
Elmbridge Beat also issued dispersal orders at Cobham services on the M25 and Brooklands Industrial Estate in Weybridge.
All the orders, which are in place from 06:00 GMT Saturday to 06:00 BST Monday, were granted following reports of anti-social behaviour or its possibility, according to the force.
The police beat teams said the orders meant officers could direct someone who is believed to be committing or may commit anti-social behaviour to leave the area.
Failing to do so could lead to arrest, they added.
"Anti-social behaviour will not be tolerated across our county," said Insp Matthew Walton, borough commander for Spelthorne.
"We will deal with offences robustly," he added, in a comment repeated by the other teams.
Officers from all three beats will be patrolling their respective dispersal areas over the weekend, police said.
They urged anyone who sees anti-social behaviour to contact them.
Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook or X. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
Police suicides spark calls for better trauma care
Police warn public to take action after van thefts
Anti-social behaviour crackdown sees 93 charges
Surrey Police

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What are the punishments for catcalling? Police officers pose as runners to tackle harassment
Surrey police said one of their plainclothes officers was catcalled within 10 minutes of starting their run. Female police officers in Surrey have been jogging in plainclothes to catch out catcallers in part of a wider attempt to clamp down on violence against women. The Jog On campaign from Surrey sees the officers, who have volunteered to run, contact support teams if they are victims of catcalling. A support team will then try and talk to the perpetrators and advise them against such behaviour. They said the tactic has been used in Reigate and Banstead but is now being rolled out elsewhere. Inspector Jon Vale said their research shows catcalling is significantly underreported, with almost half of women not getting in touch with police when they were catcalled. He said: "To date, we have made a number of interventions following reports of harassment of our plainclothes runners. In these cases, it was deemed appropriate to provide education around anti-social behaviour. 'For repeat offenders or where the behaviour is more serious, we will robustly pursue all criminal justice outcomes." Vale told LBC: 'One of our officers was honked at within 10 minutes, then another vehicle slowed down, beeping and making gestures just 30 seconds later – that's how frequent it is." PC Abi Hayward, who was one of the officers taking part in the trial, said she was a keen runner said she felt "diminished" and "uncomfortable" whenever she was catcalled. She said: "It makes me feel uneasy, and then instantly it's just ruined my run." What is catcalling? Catcalling is the act of shouting something sexually suggestive to another person. It is usually done by a man directed at a woman. It is a form of harassment, and more often than not, the people involved have never interacted before in their lives. It can be extremely uncomfortable for someone to experience, especially when the catcaller is part of a wider group shouting at a woman on her own. The phrase was first used to describe people who jeered and made disapproving sounds towards theatre performers in the 1600s, but over time, it took on more sexual connotations. Is catcalling a crime? There is no direct law that makes catcalling illegal, but someone who catcalls may be charged with harassment under certain circumstances. In 2023, the government passed a bill that updated laws around harassment to include street harassment as a specific crime for the first time. The specific crime of street harassment was created to encourage more people report when they think they've been a victim of the crime. The new rules criminalised: Deliberately walking closely behind someone as they walk home at night Making obscene or aggressive comments towards a person Making obscene or offensive gestures towards a person Obstructing a person's path Driving or riding a vehicle slowly near to a person making a journey In the wake of the Sarah Everard murder, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) also tightened its guidance on street harassment in 2022. The CPS says in the specific instance of verbal harassment, rather than physical assault, people can be charged under two circumstances. If the intention is to cause (and thereby causing) harassment, alarm, or distress to a specific victim by words or behaviour. Or, a less serious incident of sexually threatening or abusive words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour directed towards a stranger in public. How widespread is the problem? A study published by the University of Manchester in 2024 found that two-thirds of women have experienced harassment while running. The survey, which focused on women in the north east of England, found just 5% of victims reported it to the police. And 68% of the survey respondents said they had experienced some form of abusive behaviour. The most common type was verbal abuse, with 58% of the women who responded reporting that they had experienced this. However, a substantial number of women also said they had been followed while out running (19%), flashed at (7%), or received other types of abuse from men in vehicles (13%). And 82% of them said they were worried about their personal safety when running. One of the women who took part in the survey told The Guardian that when she was on one run, she was followed by a group of "10-year-olds on bikes" who made extremely offensive sexual comments about her. The woman, who only identified as Lucy, said: "What shocked me was that these children had learned this behaviour and thought it was totally OK to do this. It was daytime. At the time, I thought I was OK, but I stopped running shortly after … it made me feel pretty unsafe." How many people have been arrested? Surrey police said they had not arrested anyone specifically in relation to the Jog On campaign, as it was being implemented as a "preventative measure". A spokesperson told Yahoo News UK: "We have used these interactions to educate individuals on how this behaviour can make a woman or girl feel and the consequences, in an effort to prevent future behaviour occurring." They said they had made 18 arrests overall in their increased efforts to tackle violence against women and girls, incorporating other tactics such as the use of plain clothes officers to tackle harassment in nighttime economy venues such as pubs and clubs. Exact figures on how many arrests specifically relating to street harassment are hard to come by. But in a Freedom of Information request in 2023, Dorset Police said they had made 138 arrests relating to the changes to the CPS's advice on street harassment in a 12-month period. Of these, 96 of the arrests related to "intentional Harassment, alarm or distress. What are the punishments? When the specific laws for street harassment were introduced, the punishments were increased from six months to two years' jail time. Stylist reported in 2022 that a man was issued a £100 fine for catcalling in Ilford, believed to be the first time someone was punished in the UK specifically for the offence.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What time is Trump meeting Putin? Everything we know about Alaska summit
Follow the latest updates on Trump's meeting with Putin here What time is Trump meeting Putin? Where is the summit? Will Putin be arrested in Alaska? What can we expect from the talks? Donald Trump will meet with Vladimir Putin 'one-on-one' today to discuss the war in Ukraine. The highly-anticipated summit, which Ukraine has been shut out of, will be attended only by the two leaders and their interpreters. What time is Trump meeting Putin? The talks are scheduled to start at 11.30am local time (8.30pm BST) and will be followed by a press conference. 'This will be followed by negotiations between the delegations, which will continue over a working breakfast,' Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said. Putin and Mr Trump will then hold a press conference, during which they will 'summarise the results of the negotiations,' Mr Ushakov added. Where in Alaska is the summit? The leaders will come face-to-face at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. Mr Trump has visited the military base a number of times since he first took office in 2017. With Alaska's closest point to Russia being just three miles across the Bering Strait, the location appears to be a win for both leaders. Mike Dunleavy, Alaska's Republican governor, described the northwestern state as a 'bridge between nations'. He said it is 'the most strategic location in the world,' given its close proximity to Russia, and it 'stands ready to host this historic meeting'. Alaska also used to be Russian territory. Tsar Alexander II sold Alaska to the US in 1867 for $7.2m (£5.4m), and Russian nationalists have long dreamed of reclaiming it. Will Putin be arrested in Alaska? Putin is indicted by the International Criminal Court, accused of ordering the theft of thousands of children from Ukraine to be sold to childless couples in Russia. Holding the meeting in US territory means he can avoid the risk of arrest, as the country does not recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC. What can we expect from the talks? The US president previously said that within two minutes of meeting the Russian leader he would know 'exactly whether or not a deal can get done' to end the conflict. Mr Trump added that he would seek an immediate second meeting, this time involving Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, after the initial talks. 'If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one. I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky and myself, if they'd like to have me there,' he said. Tempering expectations of a breakthrough, the White House insisted the summit was a 'listening exercise' for Mr Trump. However, the US president is preparing to offer Putin access to rare earth minerals to incentivise him to end the war in Ukraine, The Telegraph revealed. The US president will present money-making opportunities, including opening up Alaska's natural resources to Moscow and lifting some of the American sanctions on Russia's aviation industry. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Navy veteran stakes surprising ownership claim for overgrown island on major river: 'I hope he wins'
Navy veteran stakes surprising ownership claim for overgrown island on major river: 'I hope he wins' According to Idaho News 6, a 72-year-old Navy veteran is taking on the city of Boise and a canal company in two lawsuits over a patch of land along the Boise River. His lawsuits have begun a debate about property rights, development, and local conservation in Idaho. Christopher Burdge has claimed ownership of Sawmill Island, a narrow, overgrown strip of land wedged between the Boise River and a canal near a golf course. Burdge has alleged that the city of Boise and the Boise City Canal Company are trying to forcibly remove him to develop the land. According to court filings, Burdge said he has openly lived on and maintained the island since 2017. Burdge is filing the lawsuit on the grounds of adverse possession — a legal doctrine that allows individuals to claim land if they occupy it continuously and without permission. In a federal lawsuit filed earlier this year, Burdge accused the city of assigning a tax parcel number to the land to justify his alleged arrest in June 2025 and claimed his constitutional rights were violated. Burdge is seeking $5 million in damages and $10,000 for every day that the charges remain pending. In a separate state lawsuit, Burdge said the canal company trespassed and destroyed the land while he was away, allegedly clearing "historic ruins and wildlife habitat" in preparation for development.A state judge recently ruled that Burdge has standing to sue for trespass, even without holding a legal title, which has reinforced his right to defend his claim in court. In a video that Idaho News 6 released, Burdge was seen giving a tour of the land. "I always finish a mission," he said in the clip. The dispute comes at a time when the U.S. continues to lose roughly 150 acres of natural land and 40 acres of farmland every hour, according to the Land Trust Alliance. Burdge's legal fight underscores the importance of local action in protecting dwindling natural spaces that shape communities and ecosystems. Do you think your city has good air quality? Definitely Somewhat Depends on the time of year Not at all Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. For some locals, Burdge's battle reflects growing concern over disappearing wild spaces. "I hope he wins," one Facebook user commented on a local newsreel. "I say let him have it," another wrote. "The guy fought for our country, he's earned it." While not everyone can take their battle to court, individuals can support local land preservation by donating to or volunteering with local land trusts, planting natural lawns, and participating in public hearings. As development pressures rise, community-driven efforts to safeguard natural land have never been more vital. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword