15 Reasons More Women Are Opting Out Of Marriage Entirely
1. Financial Independence Is A Priority
You've worked hard to establish your career and become financially independent. Marriage could feel like a potential risk to your financial stability, especially if it involves sharing debts or uneven financial habits. According to a study by Pew Research Center, women are increasingly the primary or sole breadwinners in their households, which might lessen the perceived need for a financial partnership. Being financially independent gives you the power to make decisions based on your own wants and needs without compromise. You might prefer to maintain control over your finances and prioritize your own economic security.
On the flip side, managing finances as a single person can be less complicated. You have the freedom to spend, save, and invest your money as you see fit. The absence of financial disputes can lead to a more peaceful and stress-free life. You might also feel more empowered because you can set and achieve personal financial goals on your own timeline. This independence can be incredibly rewarding and is a valid reason to consider opting out of marriage.
2. Career Goals Take Center Stage
Your career is important to you, and marriage might not fit into your professional plans right now. You're driven, ambitious, and focused on achieving your career goals, which could mean relocating frequently or working unconventional hours. Marriage might feel like an additional responsibility that could detract from your career ambitions. You want the freedom to pursue opportunities without needing to consider a partner's career or location preferences. For you, personal satisfaction and professional success can be more fulfilling than traditional family life.
While being career-focused, you might find that the traditional roles associated with marriage don't align with your vision. You feel more liberated and capable when you don't have to balance home duties typically expected in a marriage. Choosing not to marry can mean one less thing to think about when making career moves or accepting promotions. You might prefer this independence, as it allows you to shape your life around your aspirations without having to compromise. This can be a powerful way to ensure you reach your full potential professionally.
3. Desire For Personal Growth
Personal growth and self-discovery might be at the top of your priority list. Marriage could potentially limit your self-exploration, as it often involves focusing on the needs and growth of the partnership. Dr. Bella DePaulo, a social psychologist known for her research on single life, suggests that being single provides more opportunities for self-development and self-reflection. You want the time and space to pursue your passions, learn new things, and evolve as an individual. This personal journey can be incredibly fulfilling and rewarding.
Additionally, you might feel that marriage could impose certain expectations or roles that don't align with your vision for your life. You're interested in defining your identity on your own terms without societal pressures. Being free from the constraints of a traditional marriage allows you to explore different facets of your character and lifestyle. You can embrace change more readily and take on new challenges with a sense of freedom. This autonomy can lead to a more authentic and fulfilling life experience.
4. The Appeal Of Freedom And Flexibility
Freedom and flexibility are appealing and significant factors for you. Marriage often comes with responsibilities that can tie you down, such as joint decision-making and shared obligations. Being single allows you to make spontaneous choices and adapt to life's changes without needing to consider a partner's preferences. You enjoy the ability to travel, explore, and live life on your own terms. This flexibility can be both exhilarating and liberating.
Married life can sometimes mean prioritizing couple goals over personal ones. For you, the idea of being unrestricted in your decisions is more attractive. You want the ability to pivot your life direction without the need to consult with someone else. This autonomy allows you to live authentically and pursue opportunities that might not be feasible within a marriage. Ultimately, this freedom can lead to a more adventurous and fulfilling life.
5. Changing Societal Perspectives
Society's views on marriage and relationships are shifting, and you might find that traditional marriage isn't as appealing as it once was. More people are questioning the necessity of marriage, focusing instead on the quality of their relationships. Researchers at the University of Michigan found that younger generations are more likely to prioritize personal happiness over conforming to societal expectations. This shift means there's less pressure to conform, and more room to make choices that align with your values and desires. You're empowered to make decisions based on what feels right for you, not what's expected.
Part of this changing perspective is the recognition that there are many ways to lead a fulfilling life. You might value experiences, personal achievements, and relationships outside of a traditional marriage. The societal acceptance of diverse lifestyles means you can craft a path that reflects who you truly are. This freedom to choose and define your own success is a powerful motivator in deciding to forgo marriage. Embracing this outlook allows you to live authentically and happily, on your own terms.
6. Prioritizing Mental Health
Your mental health is important, and marriage might not always support that priority. Relationships can be stressful, and the demands of marriage could add pressure to your life. You might find peace and stability in being single, with fewer obligations and emotional entanglements. This allows you to focus on your well-being and happiness without the additional stress of managing a shared life. Prioritizing your mental health can lead to a more balanced and fulfilling life.
Being single also means having the time and space to engage in self-care practices. You have the freedom to create routines that support your mental health without needing to accommodate another person's schedule or preferences. You can dedicate time to therapy, meditation, or other wellness activities that help you maintain a healthy mindset. This focus on self-care can lead to greater emotional resilience and overall well-being. Opting out of marriage might be the best choice for maintaining your mental health and happiness.
7. The Rise Of Alternative Relationships
Alternative relationship models are becoming more popular, and you might find these more appealing than traditional marriage. Concepts like cohabitation, open relationships, or partnerships without legal ties offer flexibility and customization. According to Dr. Elisabeth Sheff, an expert on polyamory, many people are finding happiness in non-traditional relationships that allow for personal growth and freedom. This trend reflects a shift towards valuing the diversity of relationship experiences over traditional norms. Exploring alternative models allows you to shape your relationships based on mutual respect and understanding.
These alternative relationships can offer more honesty and communication, as they require defining boundaries and expectations clearly. You have the opportunity to craft a partnership that fits your lifestyle, without the constraints of legal marriage. This flexibility can lead to healthier dynamics and more fulfilling connections. You might appreciate the ability to redefine what a successful relationship looks like, free from societal pressure. Choosing an alternative relationship model could be more satisfying and sustainable for you.
8. Focus On Friendships And Community
You might place a high value on friendships and community, seeing them as equally important, if not more so, than a marital relationship. Building a network of supportive, meaningful connections can provide a sense of belonging and happiness. Friendships often offer long-lasting support and companionship, without the formalities and expectations of marriage. You might find that spending time nurturing these relationships leads to a richer and fuller life. This focus can provide emotional comfort and stability that are sometimes sought in marriage.
Being part of a community offers a diverse range of interactions and experiences. By surrounding yourself with a variety of people, you create a broader support system that can meet different emotional needs. This network can provide a sense of family and connection, reducing the need for a marital partner. You might find more satisfaction in building these bonds and enjoying the freedom that comes with them. For you, a strong community can be the foundation of a joyful and fulfilling life.
9. Avoiding The Pressure Of Traditional Roles
Marriage often comes with traditional roles and expectations that might not align with your personal beliefs or desires. You want the freedom to define your identity without conforming to predetermined roles of spouse or partner. Being single allows you to escape expectations related to gender roles or familial duties. You can define your roles and responsibilities in a way that suits your personality and goals. This freedom can lead to a more authentic and satisfying life.
By opting out of marriage, you have the opportunity to challenge and redefine societal norms. You can create a lifestyle that reflects your values and ambitions, rather than those imposed by tradition. This independence allows you to explore different identities and roles without the pressure of meeting someone else's expectations. You can focus on what makes you happy and fulfilled, on your own terms. This autonomy is a powerful reason to consider forgoing marriage.
10. The Importance Of Lifestyle Choices
Lifestyle choices can be a big factor in your decision to stay single. Marriage might require compromises on how you want to live your life, from where you live to how you spend your time. You might prefer the flexibility to make lifestyle decisions without needing to consider a partner's preferences. This freedom allows you to create a life that truly reflects your values and desires. Choosing your own path can lead to a more satisfying and harmonious existence.
Your lifestyle choices might include travel, hobbies, and living arrangements that don't align with traditional marriage expectations. You value the ability to direct your life in ways that bring you joy and contentment. Living without the constraints of marriage lets you explore and pursue your interests fully. You have the opportunity to live authentically and make choices that enhance your happiness and well-being. This freedom of choice is a compelling reason to consider remaining unmarried.
11. The Need For Personal Space
Personal space can be important for your comfort and well-being. Marriage often involves sharing your life and space closely with another person, which can feel overwhelming at times. By staying single, you have the autonomy to create boundaries and maintain your personal space. This allows you to retreat and recharge when needed, without the obligation to be constantly available. This space can lead to greater emotional balance and personal satisfaction.
You might find that having control over your environment contributes to your happiness. Being able to design your living space and routines to suit your preferences brings comfort and stability. You value the freedom to decide when and how to engage with others, based on your needs and energy levels. This control over your personal space can enhance your well-being and sense of independence. For you, the ability to maintain personal space is a significant factor in choosing not to marry.
12. The Appeal Of Self-Sufficiency
Self-sufficiency might be a core value for you, and marriage could feel like a step back in that regard. You take pride in being able to manage your life independently, without relying heavily on someone else. This independence can be empowering, allowing you to tackle challenges and enjoy successes on your own terms. Being self-sufficient means you can navigate life with confidence and resilience. This sense of autonomy is a fulfilling and rewarding way to live.
Choosing not to marry allows you to maintain and enhance this self-sufficiency. You have the freedom to make decisions and solve problems without needing to consider a partner's input. This autonomy can lead to a stronger sense of self and personal satisfaction. You might find that living independently gives you the opportunity to grow and develop in ways that align with your values. Embracing self-sufficiency is an empowering reason to consider remaining unmarried.
13. The Freedom To Travel And Explore
Travel and exploration might be a significant part of your life, and marriage could potentially limit these experiences. You value the freedom to pick up and go, exploring new places and cultures at your own pace. Being single allows you to make spontaneous travel plans without needing to consider a partner's schedule or preferences. This freedom can lead to a life rich with adventure and personal growth. You might find that living on your own terms enhances your experiences and satisfaction.
Traveling solo can lead to deeper self-discovery and understanding of the world. You have the opportunity to immerse yourself fully in new experiences without distractions. This can lead to a more authentic and meaningful exploration of different cultures and perspectives. You might find that these adventures contribute significantly to your happiness and personal development. This love for travel and exploration is a compelling reason to consider remaining single.
14. Avoiding The Stress Of Relationship Conflicts
Relationship conflicts can be stressful, and marriage might amplify these challenges. You might prefer to avoid the potential for ongoing disputes over finances, household duties, or personal habits. Being single allows you to steer clear of the emotional turmoil that can come with marital disagreements. This choice can lead to a more peaceful and harmonious life. You have the freedom to create a stress-free environment that nurtures your well-being.
Without the stress of relationship conflicts, you can focus on your personal goals and happiness. This freedom allows you to maintain emotional balance and resilience. You can build a life that minimizes stress and maximizes joy by choosing who you spend time with and how you engage with them. This autonomy can lead to a more fulfilling and stress-free existence. Choosing to avoid the potential conflicts of marriage can be a major factor in your decision to stay single.
15. Embracing A Lifestyle Of Minimalism
Minimalism might resonate with you, and marriage can sometimes contradict this lifestyle choice. You appreciate simplicity and the freedom that comes from living with less. Marriage might require accumulating more possessions and responsibilities, which can feel burdensome. By staying single, you have the flexibility to live a minimalist lifestyle that aligns with your values. This simplicity can lead to greater peace and contentment.
Living minimally allows you to focus on what truly matters, such as experiences and personal growth. You have the freedom to declutter both your physical space and your life choices. You might find that this lifestyle brings clarity and enhances your well-being. Embracing minimalism can lead to a deeper sense of freedom and happiness. For you, the simplicity of single life is a powerful reason to consider forgoing marriage.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Digital Trends
21 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
Our pick for the best iPad is already on sale with a $150 discount
The 11-inch Apple iPad Air M3 was just rolled out a few months ago, but surprisingly, it's already part of Best Buy's iPad deals. The 128GB model, originally sold for $599, is on sale for only $449, which is an excellent price for this amazing tablet. This offer is probably already drawing a lot of attention from shoppers though, so you need to act fast and complete your purchase before the $150 discount expires or the stocks up for sale sell out. Why you should buy the 11-inch Apple iPad Air M3 The Apple iPad Air M3, which we reviewed with a score of 4 stars out of 5 stars, has taken the top spot in our list of the best iPads. At the tablet's heart is the powerful M3 chip, which not only enables smooth performance, but also improves power efficiency for a battery that can last up to a full day without requiring a recharge. The 11-inch Liquid Retina display, meanwhile, is sharp and colorful, and its size is great for watching streaming shows and tasks like browsing and online shopping while maintaining portability, according to our guide on the best iPad screen size. If you're interested in trying out the capabilities of Apple Intelligence, the Apple iPad Air M3 is a fantastic choice as it's built to maximize the technology. The tablet is also a nice laptop alternative if you invest in the Magic Keyboard, and it's compatible with the Apple Pencil Pro and Apple Pencil USB-C if you're planning to draw or take down notes with the Apple iPad Air M3. For security, the device is protected by Apple's Touch ID fingerprint recognition system, which can be used to sign in apps and make payments with Apple Pay. Apple deals are always in high demand, and we don't expect anything different with Best Buy's offer for the 11-inch Apple iPad Air M3. You can currently get the tablet's 128GB model for just $449, following a $150 discount on its sticker price of $599, but probably for not much longer. If you don't want to miss this chance to enjoy huge savings when buying the relatively new 11-inch Apple iPad Air M3, you should push forward with your transaction for it as soon as possible.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Buffett bought UnitedHealth. I bet on Caterpillar. Why Berkshire Hathaway's picks are smarter.
I told MarketWatch readers on Aug. 14 that Warren Buffett was about to reveal one big mystery elephant for Berkshire Hathaway's portfolio — one $5 billion investment in the shares of an industrial giant. The most likely candidate? Caterpillar CAT. I ventured that Deere DE, UPS UPS and Honeywell International HON had a shot as well. It would be just like Chubb CB. Just like Chevron CVX. Just like every other time Buffett has played this SEC 13-F filing confidentiality game. 'I've been kept in poverty': Do I take a $70K job at 74 and lose my Section 8 housing allowance? 'I am a senior citizen': My car needs $3,500 for repairs, but only has a trade-in value of $6,000. Do I bother fixing it? You could receive up to $7,500 from the AT&T settlement. Here's how class-action suits work. I'm a senior who barely survives on $1,300 a month. No way could I live on $1,000. Buffett bought shares of six different companies instead. When $4.8 billion showed up in Berkshire's BRK.A CO:BRKB 'Commercial, industrial and other' category, I did what any pattern-matching monkey would do: I looked for one $5 billion company. Caterpillar fit perfectly. The investment narrative sang. And the stock showed a healthy 26% increase in daily trading volume. But while I was hunting for one elephant, Buffett was rounding up a herd. Six companies, one theme: betting on what Americans need. The beautiful irony? My industrial thesis was actually right. Buffett did put $4.8 billion into commercial and industrial companies. He just spread it around like peanut butter instead of dropping it like a brick. Here's what Berkshire actually bought. The big three: The smaller plays: That's $4.2 billion in new elephants, with spare change for the old herd. Read: Warren Buffett places new bets on UnitedHealth and a residential builder, sending their stocks soaring Warren Buffett just put $1.57 billion into UnitedHealth, a company that discovered the perfect business model: running American healthcare like a casino where the house performs your surgery. UnitedHealth isn't competing in healthcare. Through its Optum tentacle, it owns the doctors, the pharmacies, the data and the payment systems. Here's the beautiful part: The stock trades at 30%-50% below value because of 'regulatory concerns.' Translation: Politicians are grandstanding about Medicare Advantage rates. Buffett's seen this movie before. Congress threatens, UnitedHealth reminds them who processes healthcare for 53 million voters, Congress caves. You don't kill the company that's keeping grandma's insulin flowing. UnitedHealth's numbers are obscene: $20 billion in free cash flow annually. Pure profit after feeding all the lawyers and lobbyists. Every day, 10,000 Americans turn 65 and stumble into Medicare. UnitedHealth owns 29% of that market and is using artificial intelligence to 'optimize patient outcomes' — Silicon Valley speak for 'charge more, deliver less, but with algorithms.' At around $300 a share currently, you're buying a tollbooth to the cemetery at a big discount. The only question is whether you can stomach profiting from a system where getting sick is the only growth industry that never disappoints. Lennar and D.R. Horton build the architectural equivalent of Wonder Bread: bland, identical suburban boxes that offend aesthetes and delight mortgage brokers. Buffett just put $1.47 billion into these merchants of mediocrity, and the math is gorgeous. America is 4 million homes short. Not 4 million mansions or condos with exposed brick. Four million basic shelters. The average millennial is 33 years old now, which means they've finally accepted that their band isn't getting signed and it's time to buy a lawn mower. Gen Z is right behind them, about to discover that 'authenticity' is harder to maintain with a mortgage. Lennar got $1.23 billion of Berkshire's money because it's the of home building — that is, if Amazon sold only one product that took six months to deliver. Lennar owns land positions that smaller builders can't touch and the stock trades at 10 times earnings, while the housing shortage gets worse faster than Congress can pretend to fix it. D.R. Horton got $240 million for building starter homes, those peculiar American inventions where 'starter' means you'll die there but with a slightly better kitchen. The company doesn't build dreams; it builds the boxes where dreams go to set up 30-year payment plans. At current prices, both stocks are priced for a housing crash that demographics won't permit. Every day, more millennials realize their parents were right about everything — including homeownership. Buffett's $1.47 billion investment in housing says: Americans will keep procreating and wanting doors that lock, regardless of interest rates, recessions or whoever's pretending to run things in Washington. While I was tracking bulldozers, Buffett put $860 million into Nucor, buying American steel wrapped in the flag. Nucor wins from every angle: Politicians treat foreign steel like a national-security threat, federal contracts require American metal, and tariffs protect domestic prices. Nucor throws off $2.5 billion in free cash during recessions and has paid dividends for 52 consecutive years. This is Buffett's perfect hedge: If America builds, he wins on demand. If America just blocks imports, he wins on artificial scarcity. Buffett's own BNSF Railway needs Nucor's steel, creating a circle where he pays himself. Lamar Advertising ($160 million investment) owns billboards that can't be blocked from view. Its prime highway signage is locked up for decades to come. The stock yields more than 5% and has paid 11 years of consecutive dividends. Allegion ($110 million) makes locks and security systems. The stock has a modest 1.22% yield, but the company has raised dividends for 11 straight years. Until humans stop locking doors, Allegion profits from paranoia. These aren't must-own stocks unless you're cosplaying as Buffett. They're just the Oracle of Omaha collecting rent on businesses too boring to disrupt. If you bought Caterpillar on my recommendation, you own a great company with a $37.5 billion backlog whose shares are trading at a discount. You just didn't get the Buffett blessing. The real lesson? Buffett bought inevitabilities, not possibilities. Aging is guaranteed. Housing shortages are mathematical. That's the playbook: Bet on what must happen, not what might happen. Bet on human nature. While I tracked bulldozers, Buffett counted birthdays and bedrooms. While I bet on what America might build, he bet on what Americans must have. The Oracle counts things that can't be stopped: aging, procreating and protecting domestic industries from competition. That's not investing; that's actuarial arbitrage. I'll keep swinging for the fences, because someone has to. That's what separates financial writers from index funds: We're wrong in public, with style, and occasionally we nail something spectacular enough to justify our existence. Class dismissed. Crow digested. I'm long on humility and short on bulldozers. . Also read: Here's the real reason Berkshire Hathaway holds almost $350 billion in cash right now More: Trump is creating a perfect tax for corporate America — one it'll pay. Here's what to watch. Why UnitedHealth? Buying the stock was actually a 'classic Buffett move.' My wife and I are in our 50s and have $11 million. We're not leaving it to our kids. Is that wrong? Dow ends just shy of record after touching new intraday high, as Buffett gives Wall Street a boost Homeowners rush to refinance as mortgage-rate plunge opens window of opportunity


Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
Zuckerberg Squandered His AI Talent. Now He's Spending Billions To Replace It.
At Meta, a chaotic culture and lack of vision have led to brain drain, with rivals saying its AI talent is lackluster. But Zuckerberg's frenzied hiring spree hasn't stopped the departures. M eta was teeming with top AI talent, until it wasn't. Years before Mark Zuckerberg's high-profile shopping spree, the company employed the researchers and engineers that would ultimately depart to start major AI companies: founders of Perplexity, Mistral, Fireworks AI and World Labs all hailed from the Facebook parent's AI lab. And as the AI boom has spurred the build of ever more capable models, others have decamped to rivals like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. The brain drain of the last few years has been tough, three former Meta AI employees told Forbes. 'They already had the best people and lost them to OpenAI… This is Mark trying to undo the loss of talent,' one ex-Meta AI employee said. And even as Zuckerberg makes jawdropping offers for top tier AI researchers, the social media giant continues to lose those that are left. Today, when it comes to recruiting high-caliber AI researchers, Meta is often an afterthought. Insiders at some of Silicon Valley's biggest AI companies said that prior to the fresh hiring of the last few months, Meta's talent largely didn't meet their hiring bar. 'We might be interested in hiring some of the new people Mark is hiring now. But it's been a while since we were particularly interested in the people who were already there,' a senior executive at one of the major frontier AI companies told Forbes. 'Meta is the Washington Commanders of tech companies. They massively overpay for okay-ish AI scientists and then civilians think those are the best AI scientists in the world because they are paid so much.' An AI startup founder Google has hired less than two dozen AI employees from Meta since last fall, according to a person familiar with Google's hiring, compared to the hundreds of AI researchers and engineers it hired in that time frame overall. That person told Forbes the 'prevailing belief' is that Meta didn't have much talent left to poach from. Google declined to comment. This has lent an air of desperation to Zuckerberg's attempts to raid the likes of OpenAI and Thinking Machine Labs, the fledgling startup helmed by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, with nine-figure offers and promises of near-unlimited compute. In at least two cases, the Meta CEO has offered pay packages worth over $1 billion spread across multiple years, according to The Wall Street Journal. He reportedly poached at least 18 OpenAI researchers, but many have also turned him down, betting on bigger impact and better returns on their equity. 'Meta is the Washington Commanders of tech companies,' one AI founder told Forbes, referring to the NFL team in its pursuit of free agents. 'They massively overpay for okay-ish AI scientists and then civilians think those are the best AI scientists in the world because they are paid so much.' Meta strongly denied that it has had issues with AI talent and retention. 'The underlying facts clearly don't back up this story, but that didn't stop unnamed sources with agendas from pushing this narrative or Forbes from publishing it," spokesperson Ryan Daniels said in a statement. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has said he's spoken to Anthropic employees who have gotten offers from Meta who didn't take them, adding that his company wouldn't renegotiate employee salaries based on those offers. 'If Mark Zuckerberg throws a dart at a dartboard and hits your name, that doesn't mean you should be paid ten times more than the guy next to you who's just as skilled, just as talented,' he said last month on the Big Technology Podcast. Anthropic declined to comment. Anthropic has an 80% retention rate, the strongest among the frontier labs, according to a May report by VC firm SignalFire. The findings are based on data collected for all full-time roles including engineering, sales and HR, and not AI researchers specifically. In comparison, DeepMind has 78%, OpenAI 67% and Meta trails with 64%. An August report from the firm that focused broadly on engineering talent noted that Meta is aggressively hiring engineers across the company twice as fast as it is losing them. 'Some outbound movement helps explain why Meta is investing so heavily in rebuilding and expanding its technical bench,' said Jarod Reyes, SignalFire's head of developer community. 'It reflects the intensity of competition for senior AI talent and the pressure even top companies feel to backfill experience while scaling new initiatives.' In June, Zuckerberg hired Alexandr Wang, the 28-year-old former CEO of data labeling giant Scale AI and acquired a 49% stake in the company. Wang has been tasked with leading a new lab within Meta focused on building so-called 'superintelligence'— an artificial intelligence system that outperforms humans in a range of cognitive tasks. He was joined by Nat Friedman, a prominent AI-focused investor and former CEO of GitHub, as well as about a dozen top researchers freshly poached from OpenAI, Google DeepMind and Anthropic, some of whom had been reportedly offered $100 million to $300 million pay packages spread over four years. (Meta said the size of the offers was being misrepresented.) In late June, Meta hired Daniel Gross, prominent AI investor and former CEO of $32 billion-valued AI startup Safe Superintelligence, which he cofounded with former OpenAI research chief Ilya Sutskevar. The company has moved internal staff to the new team too. Nine staffers from Meta's infrastructure teams were reassigned to the superintelligence unit after some of them received offers from Thinking Machines Lab, the Wall Street Journal reported. 'We're not offering people $2 billion to join. We don't need to. We also don't have $2 billion to offer.' One AI startup founder Zuckerberg has also tried to win back people Meta previously lost, re-hiring the company's former senior engineering director Joel Pobar and former research engineer Anton Bakhtin, who'd left to work at Anthropic in 2023, according to The Wall Street Journal. They did not respond to requests for comment. Meanwhile, people are still leaving the company. In 2024, the Facebook parent was the second most-poached tech giant across all full time roles, with 4.3% of new employees at AI labs coming from the company, according to the May SignalFire report. (Google — excluding its DeepMind unit — was the top-raided tech giant.) Last week, Anthropic hired Laurens van der Maaten, formerly a distinguished research scientist at Meta, who co-led research strategy for the social giant's flagship Llama models, as a member of Anthropic's technical staff. In June, enterprise AI startup Writer recruited Dan Bikel, a former senior staff research scientist and tech lead at Meta, as its Head of AI. At Meta, Bikel led applied research for AI agents, systems that can autonomously carry out specific actions. Cristian Canton, who led Responsible AI at Meta, left the company in May to join public research center Barcelona Supercomputing Center. The company lost Naman Goyal, a former software engineer at FAIR, and Shaojie Bai, a former senior AI research scientist, to Thinking Machine Labs in March. And Microsoft has reportedly created a list of its most-wanted Meta engineers and researchers, and has also mandated matching the company's offers, according to Business Insider. At French AI startup Mistral, at least nine AI research scientists have come directly from Meta since the startup's founding in April 2023, according to LinkedIn searches conducted by Forbes. At Meta, they worked on training early versions of Llama. Two of these hires were made within the last three months. And Elon Musk recently claimed xAI had recruited several engineers from Meta, without shelling out 'insane' and 'unsustainably high' amounts of money on compensation. Since January, xAI has hired 14 Meta engineers, Business Insider reported. A Culture of Chaos In December 2013, Meta started FAIR, its internal lab dedicated to AI. (Launched as Facebook AI Research, it repurposed the F to stand for 'Fundamental' after the company rebranded to Meta in 2021.) Led by renowned NYU professor Yann LeCun, it was regarded at the time as one of the best employers for people looking to build cutting edge AI. The lab contributed to pioneering research on computer vision and natural language processing. Those were the 'golden days of AI research,' said one former Meta research scientist. In February 2023, the company consolidated its AI research under a more product-focused team called GenAI instead of FAIR. While FAIR is still around, it has been 'dying a slow death' within Meta, where it has been allocated fewer compute resources and has suffered from major departures. 'Zuck should never have made FAIR less important,' that research scientist said. Meta denied at the time that FAIR has faded in importance and instead said that it is a new beginning for the lab, where it can focus on more longer term projects. Meta said FAIR and GenAI work closely together, which helps better coordinate across the two teams and make decisions faster. The newly-formed GenAI team was asked to sprint, working late nights and weekends to ship AI products, like Meta's conversational AI assistant and the AI characters that Zuckerberg would later unveil to the world at 2023's Meta Connect, the company's annual product conference, a third former senior researcher said. 'We basically had six months to go from pretty much nothing to shipping,' said that senior researcher, who was plucked from another team to join GenAI, which started with 200 to 300 employees and grew to almost 1,000. 'Llama 4 was a disaster.' A former Meta AI researcher As the AI race intensified, so did the sprint to continue shipping products in 2024 and 2025, they said. 'We went like bananas, working our tails off for the entire year.' But over time, the sprints started to feel more chaotic — senior leaders disagreed on technical approaches like the best way to pretrain models, teams were given overlapping mandates and people fought for credit, two ex-Meta AI employees said. Teams would be formed and disbanded in a matter of weeks, forcing researchers to frequently switch their focus on to different projects. One of the former AI researchers, who spent three years at Meta, said he shuffled through seven managers during his time there. One of the former senior AI researchers said the Metaverse — Zuckerberg's long term vision for a 3D world where people could interact with each others' avatars — was a messy roadblock. Having already drawn billions of dollars and resources, leaders at the company claimed the Metaverse was a priority for the tech giant in late 2022, even as AI grew in prominence. That year, the researcher was reassigned to Meta Horizon, the metaverse's platform for VR games and virtual spaces. 'They didn't really know what to do with all of us, and it was kind of an ill-fated move. And thankfully, the GenAI org formed and we got out of there,' they said. Meta spokesperson Daniels didn't comment on these claims. Got a tip for us? Contact reporters Rashi Shrivastava at rshrivastava@ or rashis.17 on Signal, and Richard Nieva at rnieva@ or RNieva.26 on Signal. Employees had to demonstrate business impact in biyearly performance reviews, like if their datasets were used to train models or if the models they worked on scored highly on specific benchmarks, a fourth former AI researcher told Forbes. Those who couldn't risked losing their jobs. 'People start grabbing scope, making sure that nobody else works on the projects that they're already working on, so that makes collaboration more difficult,' they said. Daniels said this review process is consistent for employees across the company. Many of these claims are echoed in a recent nine-page essay titled 'Fear the Meta culture' that Tijmen Blankevoort, a former AI research scientist at Meta, posted in the company's internal communication channel for the AI group. Blankevoort wrote in a public Substack post that he felt things at Meta 'were going off the rails.' 'Many people felt disheartened, overworked and confused,' he wrote, saying employees were afraid of being fired, team assignments changed regularly, and leaders had a 'wavering vision.' 'There is a humanity that I think is lost as I listened to candidates really describe the culture inside of the companies that they are leaving.' May Habib, CEO of enterprise AI startup Writer. Blankevoort did not respond to a request for comment, but after the essay leaked, he wrote a follow up post claiming that the document was meant for internal constructive criticism, and not meant to be a 'raging 'mic drop.'' Meta's Daniels said Blankevoort's account 'isn't surprising.' 'We're excited about our recent changes, new hires in leadership and research, and continued work to create an ideal environment for revolutionary research,' he said. Meta's AI reputation took a hit in April when it released Llama 4. The model was seen as a let down, both inside and outside the company, and was widely criticized for poor reasoning and coding skills. To make matters worse, the company was accused of artificially boosting Llama 4's benchmark scores to make its performance look better than it actually was, allegations the company denied. 'Llama 4 was a disaster,' one of the former researchers told Forbes. Now, Meta's flashy new superintelligence lab is raising more questions about where the company's efforts are headed. 'People are wondering where they fit in and they feel like they are being pushed to the side,' the ex-research scientist said. Merceneries versus Missionaires For rivals trying to fend off Zuckerberg's shock and awe financial incentives, the view is that he's appealing to mercenaries available to the highest bidder. The pitch is that they are antithetical to Meta because they attract true believers and 'missionaries.' 'I am proud of how mission-oriented our industry is as a whole; of course there will always be some mercenaries,' OpenAI chief Sam Altman wrote in a July letter to staff. 'Missionaries will beat mercenaries,' he added, noting 'I believe there is much, much more upside to OpenAl stock than Meta stock. But I think it's important that huge upside comes after huge success; what Meta is doing will, in my opinion, lead to very deep cultural problems.' OpenAI has responded to the pressure by reportedly adjusting salaries and giving bonuses of up to millions of dollars to research and engineering teams. 'Big tech has got such a mercenary view right now of this race of the need to control the output of the technology that we are all gunning towards, AGI,' said May Habib, CEO of enterprise AI startup Writer. 'There is a humanity that I think is lost as I listened to candidates really describe the culture inside of the companies that they are leaving.' One AI startup founder described a 'cultural shift' within Meta, saying he's started to see a larger pool of applicants from the company. 'We tend to hire more missionaries than mercenaries. So we're not offering people $2 billion to join. We don't need to. We also don't have $2 billion to offer people salaries,' he said. Facebook, of course, has also dealt with its share of baggage that might make it a difficult sell for newcomers. Over the last decade, the tech giant has limped through controversies related to election interference, radicalization, disinformation, and the mental health and well-being of teens. LeCun, who did not respond to interview requests, has previously acknowledged that those black eyes could impact public perception of the company's research lab as well. "Meta is slowly recovering from an image problem,' he told Forbes in 2023. 'There's certainly a bit of a negative attitude." ForbesBy Richard Nieva ForbesBy Rashi Shrivastava ForbesThwarted By Regulators, Vindicated By Wall Street: Design Startup Figma's CEO Is Now A Multi-BillionaireBy Iain Martin ForbesBy Emily Baker-White