Lake County Judge Calvin Hawkins gets 30-day suspension for sexually harassing court employees
The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications said Wednesday it will suspend a Lake County civil judge in East Chicago for 30 days for sexually harassing court employees.
The vote was 3 to 2, with Chief Justice Loretta Rush and Justice Christopher Goff dissenting, saying Judge Calvin Hawkins, 79, of Gary, should be removed from the bench 'due to his repeated acts of sexual harassment.'
The suspension is from March 31 to April 30. Hawkins will also have to complete sexual harassment training via the National Center for State Courts.
'The parties agree that an appropriate sanction is a thirty-day suspension without pay,' according to the decision. 'A judicial suspension is a very severe sanction, and it is fully warranted here.'
Hawkins' lawyer James Voyles could not be immediately reached.
At least three women accused him of inappropriate behavior, according to filings.
Hawkins' staff had to move a civil trial to Lake Superior Court in Hammond on Oct. 19, 2023, after technical difficulties stopped them from recording it in his East Chicago courtroom.
One female staffer in Hammond said Hawkins started to rub her shoulder when he introduced himself and stared at her chest.
Later, a secretary was kneeling over to help fix recording equipment in the Hammond courtroom. Hawkins said she was 'on her hands and knees.'
The woman interpreted it as a sexual reference due to how 'he was looking at her,' filings show. Another staffer in the room shared her conclusion.
Investigators allege Hawkins hugged and kissed another woman on his staff last year. He testified he kissed her on the cheek or head. He said he was a hugger.
'It has a negative effect, but there's a certain aspect of it, one's humanity,' he said in his deposition. 'And I don't want to demean the fact that if that's not something you're sensitive to, you can go crazy with it. Okay? And you could become a…predator.'
'My characterization of when I got this, the only person that I felt could have had any kind of feeling would be the young lady (the initial Hammond staffer) that I had met for the very first time.'
Gov. Mitch Daniels appointed Hawkins to the bench in 2007 to replace Judge Robert A. Pete, who died during his term.
U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan briefly honored Hawkins on the House floor for Black History Month in Feb. 2023, citing his commitment to civil rights and his stay-in-school program.
Hawkins previously told the Post-Tribune that he grew up in Washington, D.C., and attended the March on Washington in 1963 days before he moved to Indiana to go to Huntington College.
mcolias@post-trib.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
DEI law cosponsor calls Ohio State's Juneteenth guidelines an ‘intentional overreaction'
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Just days before Pride Month, Ohio State University disabled its LGBTQ+ webpages and issued limiting guidelines for how university groups can celebrate 'cultural and awareness recognitions and events' like Pride and Juneteenth. University spokesperson Ben Johnson said the changes fell under compliance efforts for Senate Bill 1, which opponents say is a sweeping anti-diversity, equity and inclusion bill that goes into effect for Ohio universities on June 27. The bill's cosponsor, Rep. Gary Click (R-Vickery), said Ohio State is wildly misinterpreting the bill in its cultural event guidelines, which only allow recognition of events without advocacy or voicing opinions. Ohio Senators work to ensure groups like LifeWise can send items back with students 'As is typical, this is an intentional overreaction and misrepresentation designed to misinform the public on what the legislation actually says and does,' Click told NBC4. Senate Bill 1 prohibits public universities from endorsing or taking a position on any 'controversial belief or policy,' which includes any politically controversial topic, including climate change, foreign policy, elections, immigration, abortion, marriage and DEI. Senate Bill 1 does not define DEI or what it encompasses. 'We are in the process of implementing the law, and there is an ongoing review of DEI programming,' Johnson said. Ohio State said university organizations are allowed to acknowledge 'cultural and awareness celebrations and events,' but they cannot do anything further. OSU said anything beyond recognizing an event, including taking a position, engaging in advocacy or further expanding on the celebration, is not permitted in university spaces. This includes speaking in a university capacity and using school email or social media. Events celebrating Pride or other celebrations also cannot be 'for' or 'primarily benefit' any underrepresented group. The university used Women's History Month, Black History Month, Pride Month and Juneteenth as examples. Ohio State announces every student will use AI in class Juneteenth stands out among the list because it is a state and federal holiday, and the university will close on June 19 in honor of the occasion. Juneteenth recognizes when the last enslaved Americans learned about the Emancipation Proclamation. Although Senate Bill 1 said universities cannot endorse controversial topics, it does clarify that the law does not apply to state and federal holidays. Click alleged Ohio State was purposefully misunderstanding the law by issuing those guidelines for Juneteenth and Black History Month. As the bill originated in the state Senate, NBC4 also reached out to Senate Republicans but did not immediately receive a response. Ohio State also did not respond to Click's allegation by publication. Ohio State referred to its guidelines as a 'pause' on further commentary as the university examines the extent of Senate Bill 1's limits on controversial topics. 'It's too soon to say what exact programs and services will be available in the fall,' Johnson said. Ohio State athletics department launches new NIL group after NCAA House ruling The university is complying with Senate Bill 1, but the law does not go into effect until June 27. NBC4 asked why these changes were implemented ahead of the law going into effect, and the university responded that it is part of Senate Bill 1 implementation. Despite the new guidelines, the College of Social Work is marching in this weekend's Columbus Pride parade. Ohio State still includes Columbus Pride in its suggestions to explore Columbus. Ohio State University Marching Band alumni and current members will perform together at Pride. Before discontinuing Ohio State's LGBTQ+ webpages, the website offered support for LGBTQ+ students and allies. An archived version of the webpage shows it offered educational materials, support services and resources for LGBTQ+ students. It is not the only discontinued support page; although Ohio State still links to its Inclusion and Student Engagement and Support pages, both are no longer available. Ohio State's new guidelines do not apply to Ohio State faculty, staff or students expressing their individual beliefs separately from university channels or programming. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
06-06-2025
- Yahoo
New approach to domestic violence in Warren to help victims, hold suspects accountable
Domestic violence victims receiving in-person follow-up visits from police; offenders receiving court-ordered counseling as a condition of bond, and a dedicated court day for domestic violence cases are a few of the new ways Warren police and other partners are approaching domestic violence incidents in Michigan's third most populous city. The initiative is reflective of its name, Operation Cycle Break, and is an effort to break the cycle of domestic violence, reduce assaults, get help to victims and offenders and streamline the court process to resolve cases quicker in an effort to prevent more serious situations in Warren. Police Commissioner Eric Hawkins said a majority of major cases in the city, including many homicides, had a domestic violence nexus, with more than 9,000 domestic violence calls for service in the last two years. He and other stakeholders discussed details about the new initiative June 6 at Warren police headquarters. Hawkins said he believes this more proactive and wholistic approach will have a "profound" impact on the community and has seen some encouraging points in its first 30 days. Among them: Mandatory training for all officers with Turning Point Macomb. Eighty-eight percent of warrant authorizations for domestic incidents, a 33% increase in warrant authorizations for the same time period last year. More than 20 offenders have been mandated by the court to enroll in batterer intervention counseling as a condition of bond. Contact was made with about 80% of victims after an initial incident, making sure their needs are heard. Hawkins said 37 cases were victims who were unreachable by the court or prosecutor's office. In the past, those cases may have slipped through the cracks. Arrests were made in nearly 93% of cases where a warrant was authorized. "This past Wednesday alone, in court, (the new dedicated court day), all 12 domestic violence cases on the docket saw full participation, something that we've been told is very rare and may never happen, " Hawkins said. "Every victim had the chance to be heard, and all suspects were present and accounted for." Wayne State University will collect and review data about the strategy, providing information to refine and improve the effort. Warren Mayor Lori Stone said the idea is a result of "smart, forward-thinking public safety," with its core to break the cycle of abuse and educate and assist people to get the help they need. Macomb County Prosecutor Peter Lucido said the strategy confronts domestic violence head-on, provides early intervention, does not leave survivors behind and holds offenders accountable — an idea that he hopes other communities will implement. In 2023, he said, his office pursued more than 530 cases of domestic violence in the county, most for upper-level felonies, with cases trending the same way last year. "We're not making a difference. We're just going through the motions," he said, adding that he is optimistic the new initiative will change that. In 2019, Lucido said 29% of victims were receiving help. Now, he said, more than 65% of victims are getting help. Last year, he said, more than 5,000 victims were supported by the crime victim advocate program. The number of domestic violence incidents, offenders and victims has risen in Michigan from 2019 to 2023, according to Michigan State Police statistics, with 67,816 incidents in 2023 and 73,220 victims. Chief Judge John Chmura of Warren's 37th District Court said he has seen tens of thousands of domestic violence cases in his 29 years on the bench. What he hasn't seen are two new facets of this initiative, the first being a condition of bond for a defendant in a domestic violence case to get counseling. Chmura said the defendant will have to report to the court's probation department within 48 hours and be referred to a number of counseling centers to sign up for as a condition of bail. While counseling is not unusual in such cases, he said, it's not been required up front. "We've never seen anything like this," he said, adding that he hopes this will help break the cycle of violence. Chmura said the court also dedicated Wednesdays as the day to hear domestic violence cases. Any of the court's four judges can hear the cases, he said, and the hope is to get cases before a judge in 14 days or fewer. He said a defendant could be sent to jail if they don't do what is required. Sharman Davenport, president and CEO of Turning Point Macomb, said the need for this type of coordinated effort has become increasingly urgent. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, she said, there has been a rise in the frequency and lethality of domestic violence in the county. She said the criminal justice path can be long and traumatic for survivors, and abusers can use threats to force survivors back into silence. She said she believes this effort will approach these barriers head-on by imbedding advocacy in the first interaction and reducing the time to hold offenders accountable, reducing intimidation time. Hawkins said police moved resources around within the department's existing budget to ensure officers can do the visitations. Turning Point Macomb is anticipating more cases, Davenport said, and will work within its budget to accommodate survivors as well continue to accept donations and have events to raise money for the services it provides. More: Oakland County sheriff's deputies found loaded weapons at high school graduation in Pontiac Police said the initiative will fill in gaps that occurred in the past, such as follow-ups only being done by phone, not in person; victims and offenders not being connected with resources they needed, and victims getting a court date letter in the mail up to 90 days after an incident. Also, there were not unannounced welfare checks for victims or suspects routinely conducted; lethality assessments were not being completed; batterer intervention counseling was not offered at bond, and case progress was not systemically monitored for effectiveness. Now, officers will be required to complete a multi-question lethality assessment to identify high-risk situations and prioritize response. Suspects will receive a letter informing them police will monitor their behavior post-custody as well as a pamphlet with local services to seek help. Within 10 days of an incident, detectives personally will follow-up with victims to ensure they are safe and that offenders are complying with no-contact orders. The Wednesday court dates also allow police, victim advocates and others to be present. If a defendant fails to appear, police will locate them and bring them to court. Contact Christina Hall: chall@ Follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @challreporter. Support local journalism. Subscribe to the Free Press. Submit a letter to the editor at This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: New strategy to tackle domestic violence announced in Warren
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
Trump's birthright citizenship order lands in Seattle appeals court
Washington Attorney General Nick Brown, center, speaks to reporters alongside Solicitor General Noah Purcell, left, and Northwest Immigrant Rights Project Legal Director Matt Adams, right, outside a Seattle courthouse where federal appeals court judges heard arguments over President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. (Photo by Jake Goldstein-Street/Washington State Standard) SEATTLE — Federal appeals court judges in Seattle on Wednesday questioned a Trump administration lawyer and Washington's solicitor general over the president's executive order restricting birthright citizenship. The three-judge panel in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals appeared more open to the Trump administration's arguments than a federal judge in Seattle who in January called the order 'blatantly unconstitutional.' Perhaps the most pointed question came after a lengthy back-and-forth over what the writers of the 14th Amendment meant when they enshrined birthright citizenship into the U.S. Constitution. Hawkins asked Department of Justice attorney Eric McArthur, who clerked for conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, what the late Justice Antonin Scalia would think of his arguments. Scalia, an ardent originalist, anchored the Supreme Court's conservative wing alongside Thomas. 'He was widely critical of looking at congressional history and statements of senators opposing or supporting a particular thing, and famously said 'just the words,'' said Hawkins, a Clinton appointee. McArthur said he thought Scalia would have been 'very open to looking at all of the historic evidence.' After McCarthur's arguments, Hawkins told the Justice Department attorney he did a 'terrific job.' Trump's executive action, signed on the first day of his second term, aims to end birthright citizenship for babies born to a mother and father who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents. Since the aftermath of the Civil War, the country has automatically given citizenship to babies born on U.S. soil, no matter their immigration status. Wednesday was the first time the merits of Trump's order have come before a federal appeals court. The arguments from Washington's solicitor general, the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project and McArthur come a few weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court took up Washington's case on birthright citizenship and others. The justices focused on whether preliminary injunctions, like the one from Judge John Coughenor in Seattle at the center of Wednesday's hearing, should affect only the parties involved in a particular case or can be applied nationwide. The Trump administration contends such orders are judicial overreach. The Supreme Court's ruling-to-come could have implications far beyond the birthright citizenship case, potentially staunching the flow of temporary nationwide blocks that state attorneys general are relying on to stop what they see as the president's unlawful actions. In their May 15 hearing, the justices appeared wary of allowing different rules by state. On Wednesday, state Solicitor General Noah Purcell called Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship 'unconstitutional and unAmerican.' 'President Trump seeks to turn citizenship into a political football, denying that precious right to hundreds of thousands of babies born in this country simply because their parents are here to work, to study or to escape persecution or violence,' said Purcell, who argued successfully against the president's travel ban in court in 2017. As is customary, the 9th Circuit judges didn't rule from the bench Wednesday. They'll issue a written ruling in the coming weeks or months. Both sides told the judges it may be prudent to first wait for the Supreme Court to weigh in on the nationwide injunction question. Former President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, appointed two of the three judges who oversaw Wednesday's hearing. The other is a Trump appointee from the president's first term. Several other cases are currently awaiting similar appellate hearings after lower courts awarded preliminary injunctions. The Supreme Court will likely have the final say on the merits of Trump's order. Speaking to reporters after the Wednesday morning hearing, Washington Attorney General Nick Brown said 'the judges had a lot of pointed and difficult questions for both sides to grapple with.' Still, he said he is 'really confident moving forward that this court, and ultimately the Supreme Court, will rule in the states' favors.' The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution codified birthright citizenship in 1868. The amendment begins: 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.' Trump's order, initially set to take effect Feb. 19, focused on the 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' phrase. 'The Fourteenth Amendment has never been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born within the United States,' Trump's executive order reads. 'The Fourteenth Amendment has always excluded from birthright citizenship persons who were born in the United States but not 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof.'' Legal precedent, including an 1898 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, has long upheld birthright citizenship. That case dealt with a man born in San Francisco to Chinese parents named Wong King Ark. The justices ruled he was a U.S. citizen. The two sides interpret this case differently. Much of Wednesday's arguments centered the Wong Kim Ark decision. McArthur noted the Supreme Court ruled 'every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States.' He focuses on the word 'domiciled,' arguing those here temporarily or without legal status don't fall under that umbrella. Matt Adams, legal director of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, countered by reading further from the Supreme Court decision. 'His allegiance to the United States is direct and immediate, and, although but local and temporary, continuing only so long as he remains within our territory,' the justices continued in their Wong Kim Ark ruling, arguing that he is 'as much a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen.' Washington's case against Trump's birthright citizenship order, filed alongside Oregon, Arizona and Illinois, led to the second Trump administration's first judicial rebuke. The Reagan-appointed judge, Coughenour, later agreed to indefinitely block Trump's order while the case played out in court. Trump's Department of Justice appealed, leading to Wednesday's hearing. Two pregnant noncitizen women joined the states' litigation, fearful their children could be born stateless. One has since given birth to a baby born a U.S. citizen because of court action, said Matt Adams, legal director of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project. In 2022, about 153,000 babies across the country were born to two parents without legal immigration status, including 4,000 in Washington, according to the plaintiffs. The states have said they stand to lose federal funding through programs like Medicaid that otherwise could help these children if they were citizens. Purcell told the judges that implementing the Trump administration's vision would be difficult, leaving hospitals to ask about immigration status and how long parents plan to remain in the United States. 'Doesn't that just show the injunction is premature?' asked Judge Patrick Bumatay, a Trump appointee. 'We don't know how unworkable it is because they were not given a chance to implement it.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
