AI application startups in India set to get more investments from VC firms Accel, Peak XV, Lightspeed
Indian venture capital firms are expected to increase the number of investments in startups building applications for artificial intelligence in 2025 following improvements in the tooling and infrastructure layers of the technology, according to industry veterans.
'We are seeing a lot more application-layer pitches from founders. Our investments will likely be weighed more heavily there," said Hemant Mohapatra, a partner at global VC firm Lightspeed Venture Partners. 'We're very active in the market."
It's a sentiment that's echoed by the largest VC firms in the Indian market including Lightspeed, Accel India and Peak XV Partners (formerly Sequoia Capital India and Southeast Asia).
Lightspeed said its cheque sizes for AI startups would vary, depending on a company's technology. Its investments have ranged from $3.5 million with a recent Pre-Series A round in Stimuler, a voice-first AI tutor for English-as-a-second language, to leading foundation model company Anthropic's $3.5 billion Series-E round earlier this year.
'We look for extraordinary founders who are going after large markets. We're just seeing more AI companies," said Rajan Anandan, managing director at Peak XV. The firm said it doesn't reveal the size of investments it makes in startups.
'It's not an increase as a strategy but more because for every one foundational company there are 10,000 application-layer companies," said Prayank Swaroop, a partner at Accel, a global VC firm. 'By the law of large numbers, application-layer investments will be a lot more not just for us, but for other Indian VCs, even for VCs all over the world."
A part of the reason for the shift towards the application layer is the significant improvement in middleware, the software that connects operating systems to applications, data and users.
It's the 'glue' that links various moving parts, allowing them to function seamlessly. As a result, AI startups aren't building horizontal platforms anymore. They're focusing on vertical solutions. Many AI startups from India are building vertical AI agents – targeting the US as well as Indian markets.
'Startups are building for banks, insurance, retail, healthcare, construction, even real estate. Vertical AI is a mega theme, followed by building for the tooling and infrastructure layers," said Anandan.
According to Accel, a global VC firm, three trends have emerged over the past few months in India: The shift to agentic applications, and the ease and convenience of building AI applications have contributed to boost in the ecosystem. Companies such as Cursor, Windsurf and other 'vibe-coding' platforms have made the barrier to build applications very low.
Due to these preceding trends, applications with better solutions are being built in India's AI ecosystem.
'Founders will be building software for testing of applications, data management and cybersecurity," said Swaroop. 'When people make so much software, they realise there are problems and start solving for them as well."
Startup founders have noticed the improvements in infrastructure as well, given that algorithms have advanced significantly over the past 18-24 months.
'The quality of applications, the complexity which we're able to build for enterprise applications is superior and at the same time, at much lower cost than what was available two years back," said Saurabh Mishra, co-founder and chief executive officer of OrbitShift.
Founded in 2022, OrbitShift was part of the most recent cohort of Surge, Peak XV's seed platform for startup founders, and raised $7 million in a Series-A round with participation from Peak XV and Stellaris Venture Partners in 2024.
CARPL.ai's founder Vidur Mahajan said the ease of building an AI application and the amount of accessible data have played a role.
'Given that reality, naturally there is a huge draw towards building application layer products," Mahajan said.
The startup is building an AI-based image analysis platform for hospitals and imaging centres. CARPL.ai raised $6 million in seed funding last year in a round led by Stellaris. Novo Holdings, LeapFrog Investments, Bain & Co, Boston Consulting Group and UnitedHealth Group were also part of the round.
Regardless of the ease of building applications, it's still a very competitive market. The cost of starting a company may fall, but customer value proposition will be key, with larger cheques being cut only when that happens.
'I think it'll be small raises up to $3 million in the beginning and once customer value is proven, a very large next round between $10 to $15 million," said Swaroop. 'For proven teams, the initial round can be larger, from $8 to $15 million."
Given the shift in technology, there's also been a change in founder behaviour, including many more pitches for the AI application layer and a clarity of vision that wasn't present last year.
'Founders are able to think more clearly about how they're trying to differentiate themselves in the market," said Swaroop of Accel.
What's more, traditional software-as-a-service business models are being
viewed as unsustainable. Founders realise they must build AI solutions to stay competitive as customers expect complex applications that can offer more.
'There's more clarity in Indian founders' minds about why they're different. They are a lot clearer on what their role is and what their company's role is in the global landscape," said Lightspeed's Mohapatra. 'Founders have more clarity in going after the application layer and they are able to articulate those advantages to us."
As a result, the firm has seen an uptick in founders recognising new use-cases for AI and building to solve specific problem statements.
Peak XV clocked the trend earlier in its latest cohort of Surge, with eight of the 14 companies in AI – six developing AI applications and two building for AI infrastructure and tooling.
'We are seeing more companies building across the AI stack and you can expect to see that in our next cohort of Surge and the companies our venture team is partnering with," Anandan said, adding that there's also a boost in the infrastructure and tooling layers.
Companies such as Auquan and Wobot were part of the most recent Surge cohort and are building vertical AI agents in industries ranging from information technology-enabled services and banking to food services and retail.
While the US and China are widely considered to be ahead when it comes to building foundation models in AI, India's advantage lies in data – something that neither of the two nations has.
'Data is going to be critical – that's where India's moat is in terms of both specific data like healthcare information and general data like enterprise workflows," Mohapatra said.
The advantage that startups in India have is when they launch a product, the sheer number of potential users in the country gives them a lot of data to iterate their product on. Not just that, it gives them a chance to collect feedback and go to the market quicker.
Indian foundation model companies already have access to huge repositories of data or, in some cases, are building it themselves. Attentive.ai, which uses AI to map out construction sites and help with facilities maintenance, has been building its own AI models because there are no datasets for their product. Peak XV was part of the company's $12 million Series-A funding round led by Tenacity Ventures.
Netradyne, the first unicorn – a startup valued at $1 billion or more – of 2025, built all its datasets related to driver and road safety from scratch by putting its devices on vehicles in the US and in India when it launched.
'The best vertical AI companies will have access to proprietary data and one of the things that Indian startups can do – because of our cost of talent – is we can collect a lot more data and train domain specific models. It's a huge, huge moat," said Peak XV's Anandan.
What's more, given India's long history as a business process outsourcing destination, there is a lot of experience, knowledge networks and demand for application layer products, according to Mohapatra.
'Now is our moment. It is where the world is headed, it's where the capital is going and it's what we're already really good at. Frankly, it is our game to lose," he said.
But where does India stand when compared with AI giants
in the
US and China?
'We're ahead of China on the application layer. They don't have a global supply chain of applications," said Mohapatra, adding that nobody really uses a Chinese frontier model in an enterprise setting in India or the US. That is corroborated by the fact that soon after the release of DeepSeek earlier this year, several countries banned its use on government devices and for official work.
But given the pace of innovation, improvements and ease of building applications in AI, will older startups get pushed out by newer companies with better technology? It's not that simple.
'It requires lot more domain knowledge, spending time with the customers to understand their business, create something which meets their requirements, so they don't feel the friction," said OrbitShift's Mishra.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India's FY25 economic growth hits four-year low of 6.5%, Q4 GDP beats estimates
India's economic growth slowed to a four-year low of 6.5% in FY25, despite a stronger-than-expected Q4 performance of 7.4%. Key officials remain optimistic about India's growth potential, expecting it to remain the fastest-growing major economy. Factors like robust industrial activity, rural demand, and government spending helped navigate global trade disruptions, with the IMF projecting India's economy to surpass Japan's. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India's economic growth in FY25 hit a four-year low of 6.5 per cent, slowing down sharply from the 9.2 per cent growth recorded in FY24. However, Q4 GDP growth beat estimates after accelerating to 7.4 per cent but it couldn't save the economy from posting its slowest growth since New Delhi's key officials have backed India's growth potential and vouched that the country will retain its title as the fastest-growing major economy in the full-year growth remained within official projections, as private investment remained subdued amid global the quarter ending March 31, 2025, India's growth stood was fastest in the four quarters, on the back of robust industrial activity and sustained global trade tensions grew larger by third quarter had seen growth rise to 6.2 per cent, revised upward from an earlier estimate of 5.6 per cent, showing resilience amid global fourth quarter was marred by global trade disruptions led by Trump's tariffs and escalation of the Russia-Ukraine war. However, the Indian economy powered through the storm on the back of pick up rural demand and healthy government the latest growth figures continue to keep New Delhi in the race of fastest economies in the world. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) also expects India's economic size to surpass Japan's by the end of the year, reaching $4.18 trillion.A notable divergence between GDP and gross value added (GVA) was expected with the latter stripping out taxes and subsidies for a clearer picture of underlying economic activity. The GVA stood at 6.4 per Morgan, for instance, estimated March quarter GDP growth at 7.5%, but GVA growth at a more modest 6.7%.Some analysts said that the higher-than-expected GDP print might be a reflection of a fall in government subsidies, which could inflate the headline number without reflecting equivalent real economic the external challenges, the Indian economy remains relatively healthy due to its limited reliance on global goods trade, recent tax cuts, controlled inflation and a potentially softer interest rate environment.'While external uncertainties—such as supply chain disruptions and energy market volatility—pose challenges, India continues to benefit from strong service sector performance, a stable banking system, and improving manufacturing output under schemes like PLI,' said Dr. Manoranjan Sharma, Chief Economist at Infomerics Valuations and Ratings February 2025, the RBI had, for the first time in five years, cut the repo rate by 25 bps, a move expected to aid India's growth inflation dropped to a near six-year low of 3.16% in April, and a favourable monsoon forecast is expected to help stabilize food prices—factors that could allow the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to consider a rate cut in ahead, the RBI has projected 6.5% growth for the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2025.'On the inflation front, CPI is expected to moderate from 4.9% in FY25 to 4.3% in FY26, aided by easing food prices, prudent monetary policy, and a normal monsoon forecast. However, inflationary risks persist because of global commodity prices and any escalation in geopolitical tensions,' said Sharma.
India Today
21 minutes ago
- India Today
Not just water, money too flowed from India to Pakistan as part of Indus treaty
"I have stuck my neck out to secure funds from various friendly governments," an impatient and anxious World Bank president, Eugene Black, told Indian and Pakistani negotiators in April 1959. He needed to break the impasse over the agreement over the Indus waters. Time was running out, and an agreement could not be reached for the potential Indus Waters Treaty even after eight long years of impasse ended only after India and other donor countries agreed to pay $1 billion ($10 billion today, factoring in inflation). Of this, India paid $174 million ($1.6 billion today) to paved the way for the signing of the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960. Under the agreement, Pakistan was granted exclusive rights over the western rivers, the Indus, Chenab, and Jhelum, while India retained unrestricted use of the eastern rivers, the Ravi, Beas, and billions of gallons of water continued flowing into Pakistan, millions of dollars also flowed from India to Pakistan for the next 10 years, as compensation for India's exclusive access to the eastern almost six decades later, the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) is again in the spotlight. Following the deadly terror attack in Pahalgam, India announced the suspension of the IWT. Pakistani and Pakistan-trained terrorists killed 26 civilians, mostly Delhi said Pakistan's actions violated the treaty's foundational principles of goodwill and friendship. Prime Minister Narendra Modi echoed this stance, saying, "blood and water cannot flow together", as the treaty was kept in abeyance until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably ceased support for terrorism. This marked the first time since its signing in 1960 that India paused the urged India to reconsider the suspension of the pact, citing its critical role in supporting 80% of its agricultural water needs. Despite a ceasefire agreement on May 10 after a mini-war, India has kept the IWT in abeyance, with reports indicating that it will be fast-tracking projects on the western rivers to tap the suspension of the IWT came after India's patience was tested regularly by Pakistan and its gave Pakistan both water and money, but Pakistan returned the favour with this backdrop, it's worth revisiting the treaty's circumstances, how negotiations took shape, the rationale behind India's payment to Pakistan, how the payout of $174 million was arrived at through intense bargaining, and how Pakistan ultimately let India's then Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, down even after the IWT was signed. The Indus Waters Treaty was signed in 1960 by the Government of India, led by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru (L), and Pakistan's President Ayub Khan. (Image: World Bank) WHY WAS INDUS WATERS TREATY NEEDED?The Partition of India in 1947 split the Indus River System, which had long irrigated vast farmlands, between India (the upper riparian) and Pakistan (the lower riparian). By 1948, India's use of the river waters triggered a panic in the newly-formed Islamic Republic. An interim agreement was signed, but Pakistan said it remained 1956, as PM Nehru prepared to dedicate the Bhakra Dam on the Sutlej River to the nation, tensions with Pakistan escalated sharply. The risk of a war loomed."Take up Arms" and "A Black Day" were the headlines in Lahore's Urdu newspapers, noted Niranjan Das Gulhati, the chief Indian negotiator and technical advisor during the formulation of the World Bank stepped in to mediate a long-term challenge was immense: to divide a single, integrated water system between two hostile neighbours. The solution took shape in the form of the IWT, in what would become one of the most complex international water-sharing agreements. The Indus River originates in Tibet near Lake Mansarovar, flows northwest into Ladakh, then enters Gilgit-Baltistan in Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, then traverses the length of Pakistan from north to south, and drains into the Arabian Sea near Karachi. (India Today File) advertisementFORMAL PROPOSAL AND THE FIRST DEADLOCK OF INDUS WATERS TREATYNegotiations formally began in May 1952, facilitated by the World Bank. The process moved in 1952 to 1954, a working party of engineers from both countries, along with World Bank officials, developed technical proposals. In 1954, the Bank presented its formal proposal, suggesting a division: India would get exclusive use of the Eastern rivers, and Pakistan the Western rivers (Indus, Jhelum and Chenab).Pakistan accepted the principle but insisted on a massive replacement plan to offset the loss of Eastern river said it would not fund this entire plan, leading to a deadlock, noted Niranjan Das Gulhati in his 1973 book, Indus Waters Treaty: An Exercise in International 1955 and 1958, negotiations stalled India and Pakistan remained wasn't until 1959 that a breakthrough seemed year, officials of the World Bank (then called the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development), including its President Eugene Black and Vice President WAB Iliff, undertook intensive shuttle diplomacy between New Delhi, Karachi (Pakistan's capital until 1959), Washington DC and London. The Indus Waters Treaty negotiations spanned eight arduous years, from 1952 to 1960, involving intense mediation by the World Bank. WAB Iliff (R), as Vice-President of the World Bank, played a crucial role in mediating the treaty, and ultimately signed the agreement on behalf of his organisation. (Images: World Bank) INDIA RESISTED SHARING PAKISTAN'S FINANCIAL BURDENPakistan's demand for aid was rooted in the fact that it had lost access to the canals and their networks fed by the Eastern rivers, some of whose headworks were then laid in India. To survive agriculturally, it needed to build new infrastructure to tap the Western rivers: link canals, dams, and barrages. The estimated cost exceeded $1 World Bank began seeking contributions from major powers. The United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Germany pledged funds. But the treaty couldn't move forward unless India, gaining exclusive rights over the Eastern rivers, also agreed to initially the World Bank argued that India was benefiting by securing exclusive rights and therefore should bear part of the replacement cost. The Bank also made it clear that without India's contribution, the treaty would collapse. Camels on a dry riverbed of the Indus River in central Sindh. Pakistan depends on the Indus Basin for nearly 80% of its agricultural water needs, making it the lifeline of the country's farming and food security. (Image: Reuters) WHY PAKISTAN WANTED MONEY AFTER INDUS WATERS TREATY?In May 1959, Iliff told Gulhati, India's chief negotiator, that Eugene Black had put his credibility on the line, saying, "A stage has been reached. If the negotiations are to break down, I should know immediately; otherwise my reputation with these governments would be at stake".The World Bank secured commitments from friendly nations based on India's assumed participation. If India refused to pay, the deal would fall apart."Before I left Washington in the third week of April, Iliff told me that, in New Delhi, Black would propose to the Prime Minister [Nehru] that India should pay $250 million as her contribution towards the cost of works to be built in Pakistan. I said that this was much too high a figure," Niranjan Das Gulhati wrote."However, the horse-trading in New Delhi was to be limited to the range of $158 million, which sum we considered fair, and $250 million, which Iliff regarded as a fair deal. Pakistan was hardly concerned as the Bank was undertaking to underwrite the entire cost of her works from assistance by friendly countries," he closed doors, Iliff and Indian officials, including then Finance Secretary, BK Nehru, debated the numbers. After much back and forth, they settled on $174.8 million (62.06 million pound).India would pay 10 equal annual instalments into the Indus Basin Development Fund, managed by the World Bank, until 1970. The fund financed Pakistan's massive infrastructure projects like the Mangla Dam and various link contribution was earmarked specifically for Pakistan's "replacement works" under the Indus Basin Development Contributions to Indus Basin Development Fund (1960)ContributorFinal Contribution (Approx.)United States$315 millionWorld Bank (IDA & Loan)$250 millionUnited Kingdom$90 millionCanada$70 millionAustralia$20 millionGermany (West Germany)$12 millionNew Zealand$6 millionIndia83 crore (approx $62 million)Pakistan (self-financed)$100 million (approx)Total Estimated CostOver $1 billionPAKISTAN REMAINS HOSTILITIE DESPITE INDUS WATERS TREATYWith the finances sorted, the treaty was finally signed on September 19, Nehru and Pakistan's President General Ayub Khan formalised the agreement in Karachi. World Bank Vice-President WAB Iliff signed it on behalf of his idealist in Nehru hoped that this IWT would usher in a new chapter in India-Pakistan relations. He believed that resolving this vital issue could pave the way for cooperation on other issues, including just months later, Gulhati, in his book, recalled Nehru telling him: "I had hoped that this agreement would open the way to settlement of other problems, but we are where we were".Four years after signing the IWT, in 1964, Pakistan's replacement works exceeded initial estimates. A supplementary agreement was signed to raise additional funds from donor countries. India did not pay again, as its financial obligation had already been fulfilled under the terms of the original treaty in the massive diplomatic and financial effort India put into the IWT, Pakistan continued to challenge and bleed India on several fronts. The Pahalgam attack was the latest of Pakistan's five years after the IWT was signed, Pakistan dragged India into a war after it infiltrated Kashmir and parts of spirit of goodwill that Nehru hoped the treaty would foster quickly retrospect, while the Indus Waters Treaty is still hailed globally as a successful case of water diplomacy, it came at a high cost for India, not just in terms of water allocation, but also in hard just with money, India paid with goodwill and trust too, only for Pakistan to repeatedly betray it. This very pattern of Pakistan's behaviour is what the Narendra Modi-led government, by suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, has now attempted to InMust Watch
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
India's FY25 economic growth hits four-year low of 6.5%, Q4 GDP beats estimates
India's economic growth in FY25 hit a four-year low of 6.5 per cent, slowing down sharply from the 9.2 per cent growth recorded in FY24. However, Q4 GDP growth beat estimates after accelerating to 7.4 per cent but it couldn't save the economy from posting its slowest growth since Covid-era. Nonetheless, New Delhi's key officials have backed India's growth potential and vouched that the country will retain its title as the fastest-growing major economy in the world. The full-year growth remained within official projections, as private investment remained subdued amid global uncertainties. In the quarter ending March 31, 2025, India's growth stood at 7.4 per cent, on the back of robust industrial activity and sustained global trade tensions grew larger by day. The third quarter had seen growth rise to 6.2 per cent, revised upward from an earlier estimate of 5.6 per cent, showing resilience amid global headwinds. Live Events The fourth quarter was marred by global trade disruptions led by Trump's tariffs and escalation of the Russia-Ukraine war. However, the Indian economy powered through the storm on the back of pick up rural demand and healthy government spending. Moreover, the latest growth figures continue to keep New Delhi in the race of fastest economies in the world. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) also expects India's economic size to surpass Japan's by the end of the year, reaching $4.18 trillion. A notable divergence between GDP and gross value added (GVA) was expected with the latter stripping out taxes and subsidies for a clearer picture of underlying economic activity. The GVA stood at 6.4 per cent. JP Morgan, for instance, estimated March quarter GDP growth at 7.5%, but GVA growth at a more modest 6.7%. Some analysts said that the higher-than-expected GDP print might be a reflection of a fall in government subsidies, which could inflate the headline number without reflecting equivalent real economic momentum. Despite the external challenges, the Indian economy remains relatively healthy due to its limited reliance on global goods trade, recent tax cuts, controlled inflation and a potentially softer interest rate environment. 'While external uncertainties—such as supply chain disruptions and energy market volatility—pose challenges, India continues to benefit from strong service sector performance, a stable banking system, and improving manufacturing output under schemes like PLI,' said Dr. Manoranjan Sharma, Chief Economist at Infomerics Valuations and Ratings Ltd. In February 2025, the RBI had, for the first time in five years, cut the repo rate by 25 bps, a move expected to aid India's growth blitz. Retail inflation dropped to a near six-year low of 3.16% in April, and a favourable monsoon forecast is expected to help stabilize food prices—factors that could allow the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to consider a rate cut in June. Looking ahead, the RBI has projected 6.5% growth for the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2025. 'On the inflation front, CPI is expected to moderate from 4.9% in FY25 to 4.3% in FY26, aided by easing food prices, prudent monetary policy, and a normal monsoon forecast. However, inflationary risks persist because of global commodity prices and any escalation in geopolitical tensions,' said Sharma.
