Mohammed Siraj Becomes 1st Bowler In The World To...
Stokes came out to bat at No. 6 for England in the first innings of the ongoing 2nd India Test at Edgbaston but failed to open his account.
Ben Stokes came out to bat at No. 6 for England in the first innings of the ongoing second Test against India at Edgbaston but failed to score any runs. He, in fact, was sent back to the pavilion by Mohammed Siraj on the first ball he faced. The golden duck on Friday (July 4) was Stokes' first first-ball dismissal in Test cricket.
Since making his Test debut for the English team against Australia at Adelaide Oval on December 5, 2013, Stokes has failed to open his account 16 times in 202 innings of 113 Tests, but Friday was the first time he got out for a first-ball duck in Tests.
Siraj, who is leading India's bowling attack in the Birmingham Test in the absence of world No. 1 Test bowler Jasprit Bumrah, dismissed Joe Root for 22 runs on the third ball of the 22nd over of England's first innings and on the next ball removed Stokes. Both Root and Stokes were caught behind by Rishabh Pant.
England had high expectations from Root and Stokes on Friday, but both failed to make any significant contribution with the bat.
In the first two days of the ongoing second Test, India's Test captain Shubman Gill made headlines for his super show with the bat. Gill, after coming out to bat at No. 4 for Wednesday (July 2), scored 269 runs from 387 balls. He hammered 30 fours and 3 sixes during his stay at the crease and helped India post a total of 587 runs in the first innings.
The 269-run knock in the first innings helped Gill become the first Indian captain to score a double century in SENA countries, and he also broke Sachin Tendulkar's record of the highest score by an Indian batter in SENA countries. During the 2004 Sydney Test between India and Australia, Tendulkar remained unbeaten on 241 runs in the first innings.
During his 269-run knock, Gill also broke Virat Kohli's record of highest score (254 vs. South Africa in October 2019) by an Indian captain in Test cricket.
For India, apart from Gill, opener Yashasvi Jaiswal and all-rounder Ravindra Jadeja impressed with their batting in the first innings. While Jaiswal scored 87 runs from 107 balls, Jadeja smacked 89 runs from 137 balls and added 203 runs for the sixth wicket with Gill.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Why it's Testing times for coach Gautam Gambhir and Team India
It seemed like the arc of a big-budget Bollywood drama: the arrival of a fiery new lead, an early rush of optimism, some swaggering victories, and then—just as the music swells—an abrupt turn into trouble. Gautam Gambhir's tenure as India's head coach has so far been part thriller, part family saga and part box-office the former opener took over from Rahul Dravid in July 2024, ahead of a white-ball tour of Sri Lanka, it was billed as a new era: intense, fearless and unflinchingly direct. Few, however, anticipated how quickly the romance of appointment would give way to the grind of responsibility. India won the T-20 series 3-0 in Sri Lanka but lost the ODIs there has been silverware—the Champions Trophy crown in February 2025 and an almost unblemished T20 record that includes clean sweeps against Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, besides beating South Africa 3-1 in November 2024 and England 4-1 in January-February this year. But Test cricket—that old, unsparing critic—has been far less Gambhir took charge, India have played 11 Tests: won three, lost seven and drawn one. The win percentage—just 27.3 per cent—is unsettling by Indian standards. The contrast between formats couldn't be starker: in white-ball cricket, India have thrived. In the longest form, they've stumbled, often spectacularly. But as in any great script, the coach is not the only character in this unfolding drama. The supporting cast has fumbled its lines too—dropped catches, misfiring bowlers, fragile middle orders. Gambhir's role is under scrutiny, yes. But so is the very fabric of India's Test would be safe to surmise that Gambhir's apprenticeship as India's head coach is now firmly behind him. When the former opener succeeded Rahul Dravid in July 2024, ahead of a white-ball tour of Sri Lanka, few could have anticipated how quickly the romance of appointment would give way to the reality of pressure. But in cricket, as in life, the longer format remains the true crucible. And there, the figures are far less LITMUS TESTIndia's Test troubles began last year at home—ironically, their fortress. In a rain-curtailed match in Bengaluru against New Zealand, Rohit Sharma opted to bat first on a damp surface. India were skittled for 46, their lowest-ever home total. What could have been dismissed as a freak collapse turned into a pattern as India went on to lose 0-3 to the visiting Kiwis, the spinners feasting on frail techniques and poor whitewash inflicted by New Zealand stripped much of the sheen from India's 2-0 Test series victory over Bangladesh in September 2024—a series where the opposition offered little resistance. Then came the marquee tour of Australia, stretching from November to January. A famous 295-run triumph in Perth briefly rekindled hope, but it was swiftly extinguished by three sobering vulnerabilities were laid bare by their second-innings batting collapses: 175 in Adelaide (a 10-wicket loss), 8 without loss in Brisbane (match drawn), 155 in Melbourne (a 184-run defeat), and 157 in Sydney (defeated by six wickets). Such performances with the bat simply do not win you Test in the very Perth Test they won, India had been bowled out for just 150 in the first innings. Yet they rallied spectacularly in the second, declaring at 487 for 6—a commanding total that piled pressure on Australia and paved the way for a memorable came June 2025—and with it, England. In Leeds, India walked into Headingley in the throes of transition: no Rohit Sharma, no Virat Kohli, no R. Ashwin. This, for all intents and purposes, was Gambhir's India—a fledgling side led by Shubman Gill, flanked by the youthful promise of Yashasvi Jaiswal, Sai Sudharsan and Rishabh Pant. The result? Another defeat. But this one was as humbling as it was a seaming Headingley pitch, India's batting order once again unravelled—not so much from lack of ability as from an alarming absence of application. Despite producing five centuries across the match, the side's brittle underbelly was ruthlessly exposed. In the first innings, only five batters reached double figures; of the remaining six, three were dismissed for second innings echoed the same dysfunction: three ducks, three others scoring 4, 4 and 8, with just five again crossing into double digits. The five centuries—so valuable in isolation—were effectively nullified by the anaemia of the rest. And yet, the blame cannot rest solely with the coach Gambhir, for all his vaunted cricketing intelligence and warrior's mindset, must shoulder a measure of responsibility. His combative persona may have set the press gallery alight, but his strategic imprint on this Test side remains elusive. The batting group, in particular, has displayed no coherent plan against lateral movement—a curious blind spot in a country where the ball is known to speak from the first session to the makes it more confounding is that Gambhir's own playing career was built on grit and adaptability, especially in challenging overseas conditions. His teams, thus far, have shown worryingly little of GAME, BIG PICTUREBut here's the inconvenient truth: a coach is only as good as his players. And cricket, most cruelly in Tests, offers no hiding place for errors that unfold over five that first Test against England, one top-order batter played across the line, gifting his wicket cheaply. A slip fielder shelled a regulation catch. A star bowler—expected to lead the attack—failed to take a single second-innings wicket. Gambhir could do little. In such a scenario, India were always destined to lose. It was not strategy that failed, but said, the coach is not blameless. Selection calls, rotation management, field settings and the overall tactical narrative remain squarely his remit. Why persist with some bowlers in conditions unsuited to them? Why the hesitation to groom a left-arm spinner when most of India's defeats have come without them? And why this inconsistency in trusting youth, one match too soon or one series too late?Gambhir's supporters argue he is still early into the job. His critics wonder aloud whether the learning curve, given the stakes, can afford to be so Gambhir was never expected to be Dravid. His appointment wasn't about calm stewardship—it was about changing gears. If Dravid was 'The Wall', Gambhir was brought in to rattle it, to infuse aggression, self-belief and a harder edge. That philosophy has, to some extent, delivered dividends in white-ball cricket. But Test cricket, with its long shadows and slower reckonings, demands more than passion. It demands patience, systems and the quiet, meticulous art of Gambhir must now decide is whether he is content to be a man of mood and momentum—or if he can become a craftsman of the format that still defines cricket's highest to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
'I wouldn't pick this gentleman': Ex-England captain slams Prasidh Krishna after another disappointing performance for India
On a day when Indian pacers, Mohammed Siraj and Akash Deep, went all over on England, Prasidh Krishna had a day to forget. Noting his performance, a former England captain has given a harsh verdict on Prasidh. read more Mohammed Siraj and Akash Deep emerged as the heroes for Team India on Day 3 of the Edgbaston Test against England. The duo picked up the entire English lineup- Siraj took 6 wickets and Akash Deep snared 4 dismissals. While Siraj and Akash prevailed in attaining purchase from the surface, it was a different scenario for the third bowler of the Indian pace battery. Prisidh Krishna went wicketless and was hammered by Jamie Smith and Harry Brook intermittently. He was given only 13 overs to bowl and in it, he conceded 73 runs, which can be adjudged quite expensive in the world of Test cricket. Krishna had a forgetful outing in the Oval Test as well, and after yet another flop show experts are losing patience on him. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Also Read | Harry Brook and Jamie Smith smash records as England mount thrilling comeback against India at Edgbaston Michael Atherton goes harsh on Prasidh Krishna Former England captain Michael Atherton showcased his angst with Shubman Gill and Gautam Gambhir over the selection of Prisidh Krishna. Atherton did not mince any words and went harsh by stating that if he were at the place of Shubman Gill then he would not have picked Krishna, but rather entrusted Kuldeep Yadav to do the job for him. 'I wouldn't pick this gentleman, Prasidh Krishna. I would have picked Kuldeep Yadav,' said Atherton in commentary when Krishna was being hammered all over the ground by Smith and Brook. While Prasidh Krishna has had a dry run till now in the series, there is still time left for him to overturn the tide. However, he would have to perform in the second innings and justify his selection in the team. India gain massive advantage over England on Day 3 Having posted a massive total of 587 on the board, Team India endured the batting heroics of Harry Brook and Jamie Smith, and still managed to bundle out England at the score of 407. A lead of 180 has been garnered, which took the shape of 244 at stumps, following a positive display of batting by Yashasvi Jaiswal and KL Rahul. Day 4 will be crucial and could reveal the winner. India will start the Day 4 proceedings at 64/1.
Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Grand Chess tour: Gukesh takes big 3-point lead in Rapid section of Super United
With the rapid section ensuring two points for each win, the Indian ace now enjoys a healthy lead over Duda who drew the first two games and was poised to draw the third one too in the day.
