
All the new tax raids Rachel Reeves is planning on YOUR cash to fill £50bn blackhole – how to protect yourself
TAX GRAB All the new tax raids Rachel Reeves is planning on YOUR cash to fill £50bn blackhole – how to protect yourself
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
RACHEL Reeves is under pressure to fill a £50billion blackhole with an all-new tax raid in the Autumn Budget.
Experts have suggested a raft of tax changes could be announced in the speech - but how could they affect you? And what can YOU do now to protect your finances. We explain.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
2
Rachel Reeves could announce a raft of tax changes in the Budget to plug a £50billion black hole in the public finances
Credit: Reuters
The Chancellor is under increasing pressure after slow economic growth, U-turns on spending and a weak jobs market have all pushed the government finances further into the red, the National Institute for Economic and Social Research has warned.
Among the ideas on the table are changes to stamp duty, capital gains tax and council tax.
Labour has already pledged not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT in its manifesto, which means it is considering other options.
Of course, the full details of the Budget will remain under wraps until the day it is unveiled.
Read more on the Chancellor
TAXING TIMES Rachel Reeves rules out raising rates of income tax, National Insurance or VAT
But here we explain what could be on the cards and what it might mean for you.
Inheritance tax
Reeves is said to be eyeing up inheritance tax changes as part of plans to fix the nation's finances.
Some of the options on the table are stopping parents from making unlimited tax-free gifts to kids by capping the value of gifts that someone can pass on to loved ones.
Currently, you can give away unlimited amounts of money and assets to friends or family members without paying inheritance tax, as long as you do so seven years before you die.
If you give money away and then die within seven years then the amount of tax you pay is charged at a tapered rate.
Capping the amount relatives can give to their loved ones could raise millions of pounds for the Treasury.
2
The tax raised a record £8.2billion last year alone.
Experts have warned that if the measure was brought in it could cause 'a fundamental change to the way families pass on wealth".
Rachael Griffin, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter warned the change 'could capture not just large transfers designed to reduce tax bills but also modest, routine support between family members."
Stamp duty
It has also been suggested this week that the Chancellor is considering plans to replace the current stamp duty thresholds with a new property tax.
Earlier this week The Guardian published a story about how the Chancellor Rachel Reeves is considering a new levy on houses over £500,000.
It said the Treasury has been considering suggestions from a report by thinktank Onward.
In it, Onward recommended that if a property is worth more than £500,000 it would incur an annual tax of 0.54%.
Meanwhile, any home worth more than £1million would pay 0.81% on the proportion of its value over the threshold.
This would replace the current stamp duty thresholds, which are tiered depending on the value of your home.
Currently there is no stamp duty to pay on a home worth less than £125,000.
On homes worth between £125,001 and £250,000 stamp duty is charged at a rate of 2%.
But this rises to 5% for homes worth between £250,001 and £925,000.
The Government has not yet confirmed how the proposals would work but did not rule them out.
It is understood that only homeowners who buy a property after the tax is brought in could be affected by the change, so the tax would not be applied to properties retrospectively.
This means homeowners who already paid stamp duty when they bought their home would not be charged again.
The extra stamp duty for homeowners with more than one property would remain in place and this group would not have to pay the new tax.
Experts have described the change as 'designed to radically overhaul stamp duty'.
David Hollingworth, of L&C Mortgages, said: 'Many have called for a rethink of stamp duty which can act as a barrier to buying, moving and downsizing.
'Buyers won't shed any tears for stamp duty but may have to rethink the likely annual cost of owning their own home.
'If that sees a big increase it will have a knock on impact for affordability.'
Meanwhile, property expert Kirstie Allsopp said the Chancellor's plans to reform stamp duty would have a 'destabilising' effect and added it's 'not the place to fly kites.'
Speaking on Times Radio she warned: "It's not Rachel's to go after because it's their homes.
"It's the roof over their head. And this Government seems to want to punish people for making the sacrifices they've made to buy their own homes."
Council tax
Officials are also said to be considering whether to replace council tax with a local property tax.
This would mean a total overhaul of the current council tax system, which came into effect in 1993.
Currently council tax is an annual fee that is paid to the local council to fund services such as road upkeep and state schools.
People pay more or less depending on where they live and the size of their home.
There have been fears that council tax will be reformed after several councils declared themselves bankrupt and others warned they have just months left before they run out of funds.
But a total reform of the council tax system could take years, so it is unlikely to happen in this parliament.
Capital gains tax
Homeowners with expensive properties could be hit with capital gains tax when they decide to move house, recent reports suggest.
Rachel Reeves is said to be considering ending private residence relief, which stops people from having to pay capital gains tax when they sell their main home.
The change would mean that properties worth over a certain amount would be subject to the tax.
Higher rate taxpayers would pay 24% of the value of any gains they make, while basic rate taxpayers would have to pay 18%, The Times has reported.
If the levy was brought in with a threshold of £1.5million then it would affect around 120,000.
These wealthy homeowners would be hit with a bill of £200,000 if they tried to move house.
It is not clear from when this change could be introduced or if it would be phased in.
Pensions
Another option that could come under the microscope is tax relief on pensions.
The Chancellor has previously shied away from this option but is said to be reconsidering it as an easy option to raise cash.
Currently you get tax relief on any money you pay into your pension.
This is done through rebates from the Government and the exact amount you get depends on your income tax rate.
For example, basic rate taxpayers get 20% tax relief on any money they pay into their retirement pot.
However, for higher rate taxpayers the relief rises to 40%, or 45% for additional rate taxpayers.
As a result, the system is currently tilted in favour of more wealthy people as they pay more tax.
But reports have suggested that the Chancellor could introduce a flat rate of tax relief.
This would cut the amount of cash higher and additional taxpayers get back from the Government.
However, it could also hit hardworking teachers, nurses and public sector workers who are on modest incomes.
This move could raise billions of pounds for the Chancellor each year.
Official figures show the total cost of providing pension tax relief was £52.5billion in 2023/24, up from £50.1billion the year before, official figures reveal.
Most of this money went to higher and additional rate taxpayers.
Former pensions minister Baroness Ros Altmann thinks the measure is likely to appear in the Budget.
She said: "With a desperate need for more money to be invested in this country, it is inevitable that the Chancellor will be looking at whether this money could be better used in Britain directly, and I do think she will find ways to reduce its generosity."
But overhauling the pension system would be a major reform, so it cannot be brought in overnight.
This means the Government is unlikely to be able to use it to raise the cash it needs in the short term.
What should YOU do now
None of the potential changes being tabled have been confirmed yet.
The Government has not yet ruled them out but any measures it introduces will not happen until after the autumn Budget at the earliest - and a date has not been set yet.
Don't make any rash decisions based on the current Budget speculation.
If and when the changes are announced you can decide to act to stop your finances from being hit.
For example, if the changes to stamp duty are brought in from a certain date then you cold move house before this deadline to avoid being hit.
Or if the Government decides to charge Capital Gains tax on high value properties then you could downsize to a smaller house before the change is implemented.
Most of the suggestions on the table will only affect the very wealthy, so you may not even be hit by the tax changes.
There are some things you can do if you're worried.
Get financial advice
If you are worried about your finances then you should speak to a financial adviser.
They will be able to offer you advice about your situation and explain if any of the measures will affect you.
You can find one using unbiased.co.uk - but remember, you will pay a fee.
Make a will
First, you should ensure your money gets to the right place by making a will, according to Ms Young.
'If you die without a will, your estate will fall under the rules of intestacy, which could mean a higher IHT bill.
'This is especially key for couples who aren't married, as unmarried partners will not automatically inherit from one another, even if they have lived together for many years.'
Check how to make one in our guide.
Give your finances a makeover
It's good practice to sit down and take stock of your finances every six months and work out a plan.
Work out all your bills and outgoings and what income you have and factor in any changes, such as bills going up or new income streams.
Think about what you need to do to make the most of your money. For example, do you need to prioritise paying off debts or saving for a house deposit.
Our guide to paying less tax legally could help you avoid giving away more cash to the tax man than necessary.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.
Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
17 minutes ago
- The Sun
Almost 80 per cent of pubs and restaurants have put up prices since last year's Budget
ALMOST 80 per cent of cash-starved pubs and restaurants have put up prices since last year's Budget tax-raid on businesses, figures have revealed. More than half of hospitality firms also axed jobs to help finances, with three-quarters operating at or below 85 per cent of required capacity. 1 Industry bosses warned Britain's pubs and restaurants are being squeezed by 'unsustainable' taxes, and urged Chancellor Rachel Reeves to relax taxation on the sector in the upcoming Budget. The survey of members of the British Institute of Innkeeping, the British Beer & Pub Association, UKHospitality and Hospitality Ulster found 79 per cent of operators have increased prices as a direct result of rises to costs in April. Meanwhile, 73 per cent have less than six months of cash reserves, with one in five having none at all. It comes after Ms Reeves raised employers' National Insurance contributions, as well as the national minimum wage, in the last Budget. Many pubs were also hit by changes to discounts on business rates. In a joint statement, the trade bodies said tax hikes were forcing businesses 'to make impossible decisions to cut jobs, put up prices, reduce opening hours and limit the support they want to give their communities'. PENSION 'GAP' gender pay gap, analysis has revealed. They are shortchanged by £7,600 a year, the TUC reports, while the Prospect union says they get 36.5 per cent less than men. The Government has revived the Pension Commission to look into the causes. How to protect your pension and Inheritance from the new Budget TUC boss Paul Nowak said: 'We must make sure these inequalities are addressed.' AIR PAY STRIKE WORKERS at aircraft maker Airbus will stage a series of strikes over pay. About 3,000 Unite members will walk out for ten days next month. The union warned the strikes would hit production of wings for Airbus's commercial and military aircraft. Its members are based in Broughton, North Wales, and Filton, near Bristol. General secretary Sharon Graham said: 'Workers deserve a fair deal.' IT'S A REALLY TOP SHOP TOPSHOP has picked a luxury department store for its High Street return. Liberty in London's West End will stock its AW25 collection from next Thursday. Shoppers have been unable to buy the brand in-person since 2020, when all Topshop stores were shuttered as its owner went bust. Topshop teased its return online with a short video featuring the building's mock-Tudor façade. Liberty merchandising director Lydia King called the partnership 'really exciting', highlighting the nostalgia around Topshop's heyday.


Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Traders bet on no more rate cuts this year: Blow for borrowers as inflation hits 18-month high of 3.8%
Millions of borrowers were dealt a bitter blow yesterday as soaring inflation shattered hopes of an interest rate cut. Markets are now betting that rates will remain unchanged for the rest of the year after higher air fares, fuel and food prices pushed consumer price inflation to 3.8 per cent, up from 3.6 per cent in June. That was the highest level in 18 months and above forecasts of 3.7 per cent. It means prices in Britain are rising more quickly than anywhere else in the G7 group of advanced economies. And it piles pressure on the Bank of England – and governor Andrew Bailey – which is tasked with keeping inflation at 2 per cent. It is also a blow to Rachel Reeves, whose faltering stewardship of the economy has seen growth slow in recent months and unemployment rise by more than 200,000 since Labour came to power. Experts said the Chancellor's £25billion employer National Insurance raid, as well as a sharp increase in the minimum wage bore much of the blame for the rise in inflation as firms pass on higher costs to consumers. The Bank has already been turning more hawkish as it voted to cut rates to 4 per cent last month by the narrowest of margins. And it has also warned inflation will continue to rise, hitting 4 per cent by the end of this year. Last night, market betting suggested there was a near zero chance of a rate cut next month and just a one-in-four likelihood that the BoE will reduce rates in November. Traders also saw a 56 per cent probability of rates being held in December, meaning borrowers are likely to have to wait until February 2026 for any relief. Fears of persistent inflation have sent UK borrowing costs higher in recent days with yields on 30-year bonds, known as gilts, rising to the highest level since 1998 earlier this week. The sell-off in bonds – whose yields rise as prices fall – has since abated. But UK borrowing costs continue to be higher than those of other advanced economies. Yesterday's inflation figures are likely to have particularly concerned the Bank of England's rate-setting Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) because of an unexpectedly big jump in services sector prices – a metric that the Bank watches closely. Services sector inflation rose from 4.7 per cent in June to 5 per cent in July. The Bank has been steadily cutting rates since last summer after a bout of spiralling price rises – that saw inflation hit more than 11 per cent – appeared to have been brought under control as it came down to around 2 per cent. But it has since drifted upwards causing doubts that the Bank can continue on the same path. Elliott Jordan-Doak, senior UK economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said: 'Inflation is set to stay miles above target for the foreseeable future. We expect headline inflation to remain above 3 per cent until April 2026, forcing the MPC to stay on hold for the rest of this year at least.' Expectations that rates will stay higher for longer are likely to have an impact on fixed rate mortgage deals. David Hollingworth, associate director at L&C Mortgages, said: 'Mortgage borrowers have been enjoying a market where rates have been dropping. 'Fixed rates have been pricing in the recent and future cuts, so have been edging down with a host of deals now below 4 per cent. 'Those reductions have tended to come in small increments, but we could see that slow further or even reverse in some cases if the market reacts badly to the threat of higher inflation than was previously expected.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reeves eyes raid on tax-free pension lump sum
Rachel Reeves is to consider cutting the tax-free pension lump sum in a move that would be expected to raise more than £2bn a year. The Telegraph understands the idea is to feature on an extensive list of money-raising proposals that civil servants will present to the Chancellor ahead of the Budget, as she battles a hole in the public finances of up to £50bn. Industry insiders said there was widespread speculation she will cut the maximum amount people can withdraw from their pension without paying tax. At present, pensioners are allowed to withdraw as much as 25 per cent of their pot tax-free upon retirement, up to a cap of £268,000. Reducing this cap would allow the Treasury to raise billions of pounds a year. The Treasury did not deny that a change would be considered, though one Whitehall official cautioned that the Chancellor was not prioritising pension reforms and said they thought it 'unlikely'. Experts claimed that Ms Reeves may have no choice but to act given the scale of the challenge facing the public finances. The Chancellor is also thought to be considering a raid on the sale of high-value homes, as well as a further crackdown on inheritance tax, in a scramble to balance the books. John Havard, a consultant at tax firm Blick Rothenberg, said: 'Rachel Reeves has taken all her easy choices for increasing tax revenue off the table by sticking with her manifesto promises. But one option that remains open to her is targeting pension tax reliefs.' Torsten Bell, the pensions minister, has previously advocated cutting the tax-free lump sum limit from its current level to just £40,000. Mr Bell stoked speculation of a raid in an interview last month, when he suggested that there were no plans for pension savings to be 'taxed twice' – a form of words that experts said left the door open for a raid on lump sums because they are not currently taxed at all. Pension industry figures fear Ms Reeves could launch a raid on wealthier retirees as she struggles to find enough cash to meet her fiscal rules. Ahead of last year's Budget, Treasury officials asked a top pension provider to assess the impact of reducing the limit by almost two-thirds to £100,000. Ms Reeves opted against the move, which would hit public servants with gold-plated pensions, and hiked other taxes like national insurance instead. But experts said the Chancellor may now be forced to revisit it as weak economic growth and high borrowing have left her with a huge fiscal shortfall. She has ruled out breaking Labour's manifesto promise not to raise income tax, VAT or employee national insurance, leaving a crackdown on pension reliefs as one of the few areas open to her which could yield significant cash. Ms Reeves, who is under pressure from backbenchers to introduce wealth taxes, is also reportedly considering a cap on the amount of money that can be gifted to family members to avoid inheritance tax. Any such move would follow an inheritance crackdown on farmers that has already triggered widespread protests. Another proposal on the table is the introduction of a so-called mansion tax, charging capital gains on the sale of family homes worth over £1.5m. However, experts cautioned that these plans, which would land higher-rate taxpayers with a bill equal to 24 per cent of any gain made on the rise in value of their property, would risk backfiring and could raise little or even no money. Andrew Wishart, an economist at Berenberg Bank, said: 'It is going to incentivise people to not sell, to try and hold to the next election, to see if it changes. Therefore, it might not generate any additional revenues at all.' If she were to go ahead with a raid on the pensions, the Chancellor could also make a Left-wing argument for slashing the tax-free allowance. The Chancellor would likely cite figures showing even a significant cut to the maximum lump sum would only impact the richest quarter of pensioners. Mr Havard said: 'The Government's argument will likely be that, as a disproportionate percentage of relief goes to fund the retirements of the 'better off', it is not fair for 'ordinary working people' to be subsidising the retirement of the 'wealthy'. 'With fiscal pressures mounting and political promises limiting traditional tax levers, pensions represent one of the few big-ticket items the Chancellor can realistically target. But the trade-offs are delicate.' Gary Smith, a retirement specialist at Evelyn Partners, said the wealth management firm had seen a 'rush of enquiries' from people worried the limit will be cut. He said: 'We can expect a re-run of last summer's uncertainty, unless the Treasury rules out such moves. 'That it hasn't, again – despite calls from stakeholders in the financial services sector to do so – can only leave people to suspect that pensions are on the table for the Budget.' Last year both the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and the Labour-leaning Fabian Society think tanks proposed cutting the limit to £100,000. The IFS said that doing so would save around £2bn a year in the long run as wealthy pensioners were forced to pay tax on more of their savings. Mr Bell, who is now the pensions minister, backed an even more radical cut to the lump sum when he was head of the Resolution Foundation think tank. In an article in 2019 he said that the current tax free allowance was 'very generous, very regressive, and a strange incentive not to stagger your retirement income'. 'Capping the tax-free lump sum at £40,000 would raise £2bn a year while leaving three quarters of future pensioners unaffected,' he said at the time. Helen Whately, the shadow pensions secretary, said: 'After a year of punishing pensioners, it should come as no surprise Labour have them in the crosshairs once again. 'People who have worked hard, done the right thing and saved all their lives should not have the rug pulled out from them by this incompetent Chancellor. 'We know tax rises are inevitable in the autumn. If they care at all about our nation's savings they should not go ahead with this one.' Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister who is now a partner at pension firm LLP, said he thought ministers were unlikely to end up cutting the allowance. He said that the need for transitional measures for pensioners and people close to retirement meant that the move would not raise much money before the next election. A Treasury spokesman said: 'We are committed to helping our pensioners live their lives with dignity and respect, which is why in April the basic and new state pension increased by 4.1 per cent. 'Pensioners will receive a boost of up to £470 to their income in 2025-26. Our commitment to the triple lock means millions will see their pension rise by up to £1,900 this parliament.'