
How TikTok's ‘#morningshed' went viral
The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.
Welcome to the tyranny of #morningshed, the viral TikTok trend in which creators apply multiple, increasingly absurd layers of skincare products, masks and accessories before bed, hoping to uncover a flawless complexion when they peel them away the following morning. We aren't talking about the (comparatively simple) serums and essences that made up the once-popular 12-step Korean-inspired routines. Now, it's chinstraps to 'lift' the jawline, hydrogel masks infused with 'ultra-low molecular collagen' to smooth, and adhesive tape applied to the skin to restrict wrinkling. I was going to liken it to Patrick Bateman's morning routine in American Psycho, but having rewatched that scene, his gel cleanser, exfoliating scrub and face mask ritual feels decidedly lower maintenance.
According to Dr Anjali Mahto, consultant dermatologist and founder of the Self London clinic, the morning shedding trend is based more on performative productivity than it is skincare science. 'There is growing pressure to curate every aspect of modern life – to present not just a polished appearance, but a polished process,' she says. 'Skincare has not been spared, and these increasingly complex night-time rituals often go beyond what the skin physiologically requires, and instead reflect a broader cultural compulsion toward perfection.'
There's something pretty dystopian about the image of these young women rising mummy-like from their beds – where presumably they have to sleep on their backs to ensure their masks, straps and gadgets stay in place – to begin the laborious process of 'shedding' each morning. And the more formidable the routine, the more views the video gets. As TikTok creator Ashley West declared to her 1 million followers: 'The uglier you go to bed, the hotter you wake up' – a depressingly popular 'affirmation' for the trend. And that's before we even get on to the popularity of mouth tape, which involves sealing your mouth shut to promote nose breathing instead – apparently resulting in better sleep and less snoring. Nose breathing can offer benefits, according to Harvard Health Publishing, but the organisation warns against using mouth tape to achieve it, citing 'hampered breathing' and 'significantly reduced' oxygen levels as potential risks. The symbolism is almost too on the nose. It feels as though, in many ways, we're still as beholden to the idea of having to suffer for beauty as we ever were.
Not only that, but is all of this effort actually achieving anything? Take face taping, a practice that uses kinesiology tape to restrict muscle movement and prevent lines forming in key areas such as between the eyebrows – referred to as 11 lines – the outer corners of the eyes, and between the nose and mouth. In theory, it sounds faintly plausible, but Mahto explains that the mechanisms of ageing are far more complex. 'Wrinkles are not just about movement, they involve collagen loss, changes in fat distribution … Taping cannot reverse or prevent those processes.' What it can do is irritate the skin, she says, especially with repeated application. 'At best, it offers a fleeting sense of control. At worst, it disrupts the barrier and causes unnecessary inflammation.'
Dermatologists are similarly dismissive of single-use collagen gel masks, which appear opaque white on application but are transparent by morning, when the ingredients are said to have absorbed into the skin.
'Not only is there an environmental impact, but there's also no solid evidence that applying collagen topically replenishes the body's own collagen stores,' says consultant dermatologist Dr Cristina Psomadakis, who is the medical director of prescription skincare brand Klira. And don't get her started on the cocktail of different serums influencers layer on underneath the masks – retinoids, acids and other powerful actives applied with an alarmingly liberal hand. 'I think most dermatologists will tell you the biggest problem they see is people overdoing it by following skin trends, or layering on products that should not be combined.'
In many ways, it's human nature to be drawn to products and rituals presented as offering an instant transformative effect. The skincare industry isn't booming for nothing. But as always, it's the slightly boring but ultimately reassuring less-is-more approach that actually works. 'The best thing you can do at night is wash off the remains of the day, including your face sunscreen, or makeup that can clog your pores,' says Psomadakis. 'Most dermatologists have a very simple skincare routine consisting of a cleanser, moisturiser, sunscreen, and usually a prescription treatment at night.'
The idea of having separate products for day and night is not all marketing spin, according to Mahto. 'At night, the skin becomes more permeable, meaning it absorbs active ingredients more efficiently. Blood flow increases, repair processes accelerate, and water loss peaks,' she says. 'So yes, there is some genuine science behind using particular products in the evening. Anything that increases skin sensitivity, like retinoids or exfoliating acids, is usually better applied at night, when the skin is not being exposed to UV or environmental pollutants.'
Sign up to Fashion Statement
Style, with substance: what's really trending this week, a roundup of the best fashion journalism and your wardrobe dilemmas solved
after newsletter promotion
At the end of the day though, all of this is optional. And, ironically, one of the best things you can do for your skin is to stop scrolling TikTok into the early hours and get plenty of sleep (ideally unencumbered by chinstraps and mouth tape). Since we live in an era in which young girls are waking at 4.30am to begin their extensive skincare routines, and poor self-esteem issues in tweens are being linked to the use of social media beauty filters, don't we owe it to ourselves to exercise a bit of restraint on the beauty front?
To read the complete version of this newsletter – complete with this week's trending topics in The Measure and your wardrobe dilemmas solved – subscribe to receive Fashion Statement in your inbox every Thursday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Not drinking enough water causes greater biological response to stress
People who do not drink enough water have a stronger biological response to stress, according to a study. Researchers found those who habitually drink less release greater levels of the stress hormone cortisol, despite not feeling any thirstier than people who drink more. Keeping a water bottle nearby during stressful periods could be beneficial for long-term health, researchers suggest. The study, led by experts at Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU), included 16 people who drank under 1.5 litres of water a day, along with 16 people who regularly met daily recommended guidelines for fluid intake. Researchers used the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidelines, which recommends men should drink 2.5 litres of water a day while women should drink two litres. In the UK, the Eatwell Guide suggests adults should drink between six and eight cups of fluid a day, which is roughly 1.5 to two litres. However, people may need to drink more when it is hot, if they are very active, if they are recovering from an illness, or if they are pregnant or breastfeeding. Researchers monitored hydration in both groups over seven days using urine and blood samples, after which they were invited into the lab for a stress test. The test involved an impromptu job interview, for which each individual was given 10 minutes to prepare for. After that time, they were invited into another room where a fake camera was set up and asked to do the interview to a panel of three people dressed in white coats. Following the fake interview, individuals were then asked to do a mental arithmetic challenge which involved subtracting numbers as fast as they can. Professor Neil Walsh, of the LJMU School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, described the test as 'really flustering'. He told the PA news agency: 'We know that people who have a low daily fluid intake, who don't meet the recommendations, are likely to be poorly hydrated. 'But what we didn't know was whether, when you then stress those people under controlled conditions, they would have a greater stress hormone response.' Researchers collected saliva samples from the group before and after the stress test to measure cortisol levels. Cortisol, known as the stress hormone, is produced by the adrenal glands in response to stress and also plays a role in immune response, metabolism and blood pressure. The team found cortisol levels were higher in those who drank less. Prof Shaw noted that stress responses such as increased heart rate, sweaty hands and dry mouth were similar between the two groups. 'Both groups felt equally anxious and experienced similar increases in heart rate during the stress test,' he said. 'But the people who were poorly hydrated, because they were not drinking enough water each day, had much greater cortisol responses.' The low-fluid intake group did also not report feeling more thirsty than those who drank more, according to Prof Walsh. He added: 'Cortisol is the body's primary stress hormone and exaggerated cortisol reactivity to stress is associated with an increased risk of heart disease, diabetes and depression. 'If you know you have a looming deadline or a speech to make, keeping a water bottle close could be a good habit with potential benefits for your long-term health.' Prof Walsh said further research is needed to better understand the findings, published in the Journal of Applied Physiology, and to see if increasing water intake in those who do not drink enough can reduce responses to daily 'micro stressors' like traffic jams or presentations at work. 'We'd like to think that meeting the water intake guidelines could be one of a number of things you could do to blunt that cortisol response day to day,' he added.


The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
New software could reduce NHS waiting lists for prosthetic legs, study finds
New software which personalises prosthetic leg fittings based on data from previous patients could help reduce NHS waiting lists, a study has found. The data-driven fittings for below the knee prosthetics were, on average, as comfortable for patients as those created by highly skilled prosthetists, the NHS trial suggested. Technology developed by Radii Devices and the University of Southampton is hoping to halve the number of clinical visits for the fitting from an average of four to two using the software. The new technology is built to provide a personalised 'socket' using data from other fittings and a 3D scan of the residual limb to immediately generate a basic design. The CEO and founder of Radii Devices, Dr Joshua Steer, said analysing hundreds of previous sockets allowed them to 'identify trends' between different patient characteristics. 'We can then scan a new patient's residual limb and generate a personalised design recommendation based on features that have been successful for similar patients in the past,' he explained. The results of an NHS trial published on Friday in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology suggest the new designs are on average as comfortable as those created by a prosthetist. Nineteen sockets were made for 17 participants, as two participants were double amputees, and all bar one of the sockets were above the 'NHS comfort score target', the Radii Devices CEO said. Of those 19 sockets, six of the new designs were reportedly more comfortable than normal prosthetics, while five were less and eight were very similar. Prosthetic sockets are personalised to ensure they are comfortable and functional, as they need to bear a person's body weight without damaging limb tissue or creating discomfort. Traditionally, a prosthetist makes a plaster cast of the leg and reshapes it to produce a socket which achieves the right balance, producing trial versions before settling on a definitive one. Radii Devices says the NHS currently tries to deliver a prosthetic in four clinical visits roughly a month from their first appointment, while the new system can aim for a 'gold standard' of two appointments. Alex Dickinson, Professor of Prosthetics Engineering at the University of Southampton – who helped to develop the new method, acknowledges that it has limits. He said: 'Only a highly skilled prosthetist can identify things like bone spurs and neuromas, and know how to tweak designs to avoid causing pain or damage at these sensitive areas. 'We developed the data-driven socket design approach to save prosthetists' time by giving them a solid base to work from so they can use their expertise where it is most valuable, in making precise adaptations tailored to their patients' specific needs. 'The method effectively helps prosthetists to learn from each other.' Another co-author, Professor Maggie Donovan-Hall, said it was 'surprising and encouraging' that the data-driven sockets performed so well in a test designed as a 'worst case' scenario where they received no additional input from prosthetists. Nearly 100 people have now had a prosthetic leg designed this way, across multiple centres in the UK and the USA. The study has now moved into its final stage where the new software is developed alongside clinicians to see how it can be best incorporated into their practices.


The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
9 in 10 shoppers call for healthy food to be more affordable despite sales of junk food falling
Legislation to restrict supermarket sales of junk food has led to a 'significant' reduction in purchases, according to the first ever independent analysis. The research, which was carried out in England by the University of Leeds, estimates that two million fewer products high in fat, sugar or salt (HFSS) were sold per day after the new law took effect. The team analysed 11.6 billion items sold in Tesco, Morrisons, Sainsbury's and Asda. Before the legislation was implemented, 20 out of every 100 items sold were HFSS products that fell within the scope of the legislation. This number dropped to 19 after the legislation, which restricts the location of HFSS products within supermarkets in England as part of the UK Government's Childhood Obesity Strategy, was introduced in October 2022, the study found. Nearly 2,000 shoppers were also surveyed to find out how the legislation was perceived and how it affected their shopping behaviour. Although 73 per cent of shoppers did not think it would impact their own shopping behaviour, 71 per cent believed it would have more impact on others who did not plan their shopping. Nearly all shoppers (90 per cent) thought making healthier foods affordable was just as, if not more, important than the legislation against less healthy food. The study noted that the legislation was intended to go unnoticed and this was largely achieved, as 56 per cent of shoppers did not notice any changes in store. Professor Michelle Morris, who led the research team, said: 'Our research shows that the HFSS legislation was a force for good, leading to significant reduction in sales of in-scope HFSS products. 'But more now needs to be done to make healthy and sustainable diets the easy choice for our population, so that we can shift more people's eating habits towards the national recommendations of the Eatwell Guide.' Dr Alison Fildes, of the University of Leeds School of Psychology, said: 'Our findings suggested shoppers were in favour of the HFSS legislation. 'However, they also expressed their support for greater promotion and affordability of healthy foods. 'Tightening the current legislating to ensure HFSS products are replaced in prominent locations with healthier foods, would go further towards helping shoppers make healthier purchases.'