Residents stockpile food, rush to bunkers as conflict rattles India and Pakistan, Asia News
India and Pakistan accused each other of launching new military attacks, using drones and artillery for the third day, in the worst fighting between the two countries in nearly three decades.
The conflict erupted after India struck multiple locations in Pakistan on Wednesday that it said were "terrorist camps", in retaliation for a deadly attack on Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir last month.
In the Indian state of Punjab, Amanpreet Dhillon, 26, said many families in his village — just 13 km from the border with Pakistan — have already sent women and children to safer areas.
"I am also contemplating it... I'm afraid my village could be next," he said.
In Indian-administered Kashmir's Uri district, residents said many fled overnight after several houses were struck by shelling, some taking shelter behind rocks or in bunkers.
"We have never seen such intense shelling in our life. The majority of the people fled the town and other villages as soon as shelling started last night with some taking shelter in underground bunkers," said Bashir Ahmad, 45, in the town of Baramulla in Uri. "It was a nightmare for us."
In the Pakistani city of Lahore, which lies near the border, residents were shaken on Thursday by drones that Pakistan said were launched by India and were shot down in the city, setting off sirens and leading the US consulate to tell its staff to shelter in place.
Schools were closed on Friday and residents and shopkeepers said Lahoris were stocking up on food, gas cylinders for cooking and medicine, prompting authorities to issue a notice warning businesses not to artificially increase prices.
"I have stocked grocery for a month: We got meat, flour, tea, oil lentils etc and also drew extra cash from bank," said Aroosha Rameez, 34, a Lahore resident.
Muhammad Asif, 35, said his pharmacy had seen an influx of customers.
"People in Lahore have started stocking medicines as well, which may lead to shortages of paracetamol, anti-allergies, antibiotics, blood pressure and diabetes medicines," he said.
Food delivery app FoodPanda, popular in Pakistan, said it had seen a surge in grocery orders nationwide.
[[nid:717859]]
Across the border, India's Consumer Affairs, Food, and Public Distribution minister warned against panic buying of food grains.
"We currently have stocks many times higher than the normal requirement-whether it is rice, wheat, or pulses...There is absolutely no shortage," he said.
Pankaj Seth, a resident of Amritsar in India's Punjab state, said people felt they had no choice: "We do not know if the markets will open tomorrow or not...I have children and grandchildren at home so I have to stock up."
Some residents of border regions were also requesting relatives to bring them supplies as prices rose.
"My aunt lives in Attari and has asked me to get some flour for her as supplies are getting expensive there," said Navneet Kaur, a nurse in Amritsar, 30 kilometres away, who was travelling to the town with a sack of flour. Fleeing at night
Residents of Kashmir near the line of control that divides the region faced a more stark and immediate threat.
Residents said they were starting to leave their villages and spend the nights, when shelling and firing roars through the valleys, in bunkers.
The prime minister's office in Pakistan-administered Kashmir said over 400 people had been evacuated by authorities in two areas near the line of control.
"Ever since the attack (Indian strike) in Muzaffarabad, we have been living in our bunker, which we carved into a nearby rocky mountain," said Manzoor Ahmed, 43, a resident of Jura Bandi village in the Neelum Valley, where local police confirmed most people were spending the night in bunkers.
ALSO READ: Pakistan says it has launched military offensive against India
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump's sharp India criticism on tariffs, Russia oil corner Modi as rift deepens
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox - Any expectation of the camaraderie that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi enjoyed with US President Donald Trump during the latter's first term in office – united in part over the common threat of China – has all but evaporated. India underestimated just how transactional Mr Trump would be in his second term in power, as he has made little distinction between friends and adversaries. Ties have unpredictably and quickly gone south as Mr Trump has torn into India over its long-standing ties with Russia and the slow pace of negotiations for an India-US trade deal. The strain in US-India ties is a challenge for Mr Modi, who also faces domestic calls not to cave into Mr Trump's demands on trade and oil imports from Russia. India has benefitted from cheap Russian energy imports, which the US leader claims is helping to fund Russia's invasion of Ukraine . Mr Trump's vow to 'substantially raise' tariffs on Indian exports to the US from the already substantial 25 per cent because of New Delhi's Russian oil imports, is an indication of his administration's priorities in achieving broader geopolitical goals, say analysts. 'This (oil sanctions) is obviously a pressure tactic the US is using on Russia to get an outcome of its choice in the Ukraine war. We are collateral damage,' Mr Ashok Malik, a partner at the Asia Group business consultancy, told The Straits Times. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Business Women on corporate boards give firms a competitive advantage, says Australian Governor-General Singapore CEO of sports car distributor accused of offences including multiple counts of false trading 'I think things are very challenging at this juncture. It is the most challenging in a long, long time,' Mr Malik said. Mr Trump came into power promising he would end the war in Ukraine on his first day in office. But a long-term ceasefire has not materialised, and Russia has instead intensified its strikes on Ukraine, much to Mr Trump's frustration. India-Russia-US nexus 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits,' Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Aug 4. 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' Mr Trump has lumped Russia and India together, calling them 'dead economies' in another Truth Social post on July 31, despite the fact that India is the world's fourth-largest economy by nominal GDP after the US, China and Germany. India has a longstanding relationship with Russia dating ba ck to the Cold War, and is the among the largest importer of Russian oil along with China . It imported about 1.75 million barrels a day from January to June 2025, up 1 per cent from a year ago, according to Reuters. On Aug 4, the Ministry of External Affairs called the US President and European Union 's targeting of India for buying Russian oil 'unjustified and unreasonable.' 'India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability,' the MEA said in a statement. 'India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by the global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. ' The European Union had imposed sanctions on Russian-backed Indian refiner Nayara and banned the import of refined oil made from Russian crude. In particular, New Delhi called out the United States for its continual imports from Russia of 'uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers as well as chemicals.' Mr Trump is not the first US president to disapprove of India's ties with Iran and Russia. But previous US leaders like Mr Joe Biden and Mr Barack Obama chose to look the other way due to the strategic calculation of India's importance as a fast-growing economy a nd as a counter to China in America's Indo-Pacific strategy. In any case, India's ties with Russia are also not what they were once, as Russia has drawn closer to China and Pakistan, while India has grown closer to the West. The South Asian giant has also been diversifying its defence weapon purchases to include products from the US and Israel. But that doesn't mean India can walk away from the Russia relationship as desired by Mr Trump, according to Mr Nandan Unnikrishnan, a Distinguished Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank. 'We need warm relations. India is a growing economy; it is going to consume natural resources and Russia is a country that has every element in huge abundance. We will end up buying a lot of resources,' he said. US-India tariff negotiations Mr Trump is also frustrated that a trade deal with India to his liking has so far not materialised. He has used tariffs to force countries that have a trade surplus with the US into what he claims is a more reciprocal bilateral trade relationship. The US is India's largest export market, with exports reaching US$86.51 billion (S$111.37 billion) from April 2024 to March 2025. India's imports from the US were US$45.33 billion for the same period, according to Indian government figures . While both countries are still locked in negotiations, New Delhi has refused to grant the concessions that the Trump administration is seeking, including the opening up of heavily protected agriculture and dairy sectors to US imports. More than 60 per cent of the Indian population depends on these two sectors for their livelihoods in some form or another. Farmers have opposed opening up of the agriculture and dairy sectors , arguing they would not be able to withstand competition from US agriculture. Unlike US farms, India's farms are small, fragmented and hardly mechanised . In another post on Truth Social on July 30 , Mr Trump criticised India for imposing the most 'strenuous and obnoxious' tariffs in the world. India's refusal to give in to Trump for now may also be seen as a recognition that it is not just trade interests which are at stake. 'Trump has not only unleashed a trade war but is also deploying commercial instruments for geopolitical ends,' India's former foreign secretary Shyam Saran wrote in The Indian Express newspaper on Aug 4. 'These actions threaten India's core interests and its ability to follow a policy of strategic autonomy, which every government, irrespective of its political colour, has remained wedded to since Independence,' he said. 'We should not treat the current disruption in India-US relations as just a trade dispute. It is much more than that.' Mr Modi's response to Mr Trump's belligerent language, which has pushed the Indian prime minister into a corner domestically, took a nationalistic tone. 'The world economy is facing instability and uncertainty. In such times, countries are focusing solely on their own interests. India, too, is on the path to becoming the world's third-largest economy and must remain alert to its own economic priorities,' Mr Modi said in his constituency of Varanasi on Aug 2, even before Mr Trump's latest escalation. 'At a time when the world is going through uncertainty, let us take a pledge to sell only Swadeshi (made in India) goods from our shops and markets. Promoting made-in-India goods will be the truest service to the country.' Political watchers noted that it would be very difficult for the Indian Prime Minister to give any large concessions in the trade deal, given the growing anger within India towards Mr Trump. Even the right-wing Hindu nationalist ecosystem, which has been very supportive of the US president, is angry at what it perceives as a series of other slights to India. This includes Mr Trump's statements on how he engineered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, after the neighbours were embroiled in a military conflict over a terror attack in Kashmir, and Mr Trump's subsequent hosting of Pakistan's Army chief Asim Muneer in the White House. 'Mr Modi doesn't have much space to manoeuvre on the trade deal. The economic and political costs of accepting US demand are something this government will find difficult to swallow,' said Dr Biswajit Dhar, a trade expert and former professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University. 'We have to wait and watch. What the Trump administration has done is push India into a corner.'
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
Trump to hike India tariffs within 24 hours, eyes pharma and chip duties next
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump said he would raise tariffs on Indian goods 'over the next 24 hours' in response to New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil. Trump announced a 25 per cent duty on India's exports to the US and has threatened repeatedly to increase that rate to punish the country for buying Russian energy, an effort to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine. 'We settled on 25 per cent but I think I'm going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours, because they're buying Russian oil,' Trump said on Tuesday (Aug 5) in a CNBC interview. 'They're fuelling the war machine. And if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy.' Trump has escalated his fight with India over trade, unilaterally imposing a tariff rate after months of negotiations failed to secure a deal. He accused New Delhi of refusing to ease access for American goods and criticising its membership in the Brics group of developing economies. The US president has also set an Aug 8 deadline for Russia to reach a truce with Ukraine, with the administration threatening so-called secondary sanctions on countries that purchase energy from Moscow. Ukraine's allies say those purchases prop up Putin's war effort. Trump in the interview said that if energy prices went down it would undercut Putin's ability to continue his invasion of Ukraine – now in its fourth year. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'If energy goes down low enough, Putin's going to stop killing people,' Trump said. 'If you get energy down another US$10 a barrel, he's going to have no choice, because his economy stinks.' The Indian government has indicated it intends to continue talks with the US in hopes of securing lower tariffs. It has also called Trump's threat over energy purchases unjustified. India is considering ramping up natural gas purchases from the US and increasing imports of communication equipment and gold. In the same interview, Trump also said US tariffs on semiconductor and pharmaceutical imports would be announced 'within the next week or so,' as the administration prepares to target key economic sectors in its effort to remake global trade. 'We'll be putting an initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year – one and a half years, maximum – it's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country,' Trump said. 'We're going to be announcing on semiconductors and chips, which is a separate category,' he added. The Commerce Department has been investigating the semiconductor market since April to set the stage for possible tariffs on an industry that's expected to generate nearly US$700 billion in global sales. Under Trump, the US has already imposed levies on imports of cars and auto parts as well as steel and aluminium. Levies on imported chips threaten to sharply increase costs for large data centre operators including Microsoft, OpenAI, Meta Platforms and that plan to spend billions of US dollars on purchases of advanced semiconductors needed to propel their artificial intelligence businesses. The president has also threatened debilitating tariffs on the drug industry in an effort to force manufacturing back to the US. Trump recently demanded major suppliers of medicines drastically cut costs or face additional, unspecified penalties. The world's largest drugmakers, including Merck and Eli Lilly, operate scores of manufacturing sites across the globe. Nearly 90 per cent of US biotech companies rely on imported components for at least half of their approved products, according to the Biotechnology Innovation Organisation. The sectoral tariffs on pharmaceuticals, metals and other industries stem from trade investigations that can last about nine months and are imposed on national security grounds under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. It's seen as stronger legal footing than the emergency powers Trump used for his country-specific levies, which face court challenges. Those so-called reciprocal tariffs are slated to go into effect on Thursday. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
8 hours ago
- Straits Times
Philippines, India shore up ties amid China tensions, US tariff risks
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. (left) with Indian PM Narendra Modi at Hyderabad House in New Delhi on Aug 5. MANILA – President Ferdinand Marcos Jr's state visit to India this week marked a deepening of Philippine efforts to diversify its strategic partnerships beyond traditional allies, as Manila grapples with escalating tensions in the South China Sea and economic headwinds from Washington's protectionist turn. 'Today, our relationship enters a new epoch,' Mr Marcos said in a joint media conference in New Delhi on Aug 5 as he and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi formally elevated bilateral ties to a strategic partnership. 'India becomes only the fifth strategic partner of the Philippines.' The announcement came as Indian and Philippine Navy ships held on Aug 3 to 4 their first-ever joint maritime drills, notably within the Philippines' 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone in the South China Sea, an area that Beijing also claims. The timing and location of the exercises underscore the defence dimension of the new partnership at a time when China's assertiveness in the disputed waters is intensifying. Delivering rare public remarks in English, Mr Modi framed the moment in sweeping terms. He said: 'India and the Philippines are friends by choice and partners by destiny. From the Indian Ocean to the Pacific, we are united by shared values. Ours is not just a friendship of the past; it is a promise to the future.' Aligned Indo-Pacific strategies Defence analysts say the expanding security ties reflect a broader recalibration of Manila's foreign policy under Mr Marcos, who has sought to deepen ties with middle powers that share concerns over regional security but avoid great power rivalry. 'The naval drills and state visit happening at the same time was no coincidence. It's meant to project the mutuality of the interest of the two countries in the South China Sea,' said Dr Aries Arugay, a visiting senior fellow at Singapore's ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. 'India is also asserting itself as a major power not just in Asia, but globally.' The new partnership formalises coordination that has been quietly building. In 2022, the Philippines became the first foreign buyer of India's BrahMos supersonic cruise missile in a US$375 million (S$483 million) deal – India's first major arms export. The first batch was delivered in 2024. India has also publicly supported the Philippines' legal position in the South China Sea. In 2023, in a rare move by an Asian government, it called on China to comply with the 2016 arbitral ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague. 'India has become more sensitive to the security interests of its partners in South-east Asia, particularly the Philippines,' said geopolitical analyst Don McLain Gill of De La Salle University in Manila. 'So this shows you also Manila's willingness to incorporate India deeper into its security calculations.' From New Delhi's perspective, Manila is no longer just a marginal partner in Asean, said Mr C. Uday Bhaskar, a retired military official and director of the Society for Policy Studies in New Delhi. 'The Philippines is important for India... because the Philippines has a distinctive maritime relevance in the region and it has taken on a definitive stand vis- a -vis China,' he said. Manila's purchase of the BrahMos system 'gave credibility' to India's ambitions as an arms supplier. Going beyond arms sales The partnership is expected to expand beyond procurement. Philippine officials have expressed interest in India's Akash surface-to-air missile system, and talks are under way for India to import Philippine nickel, a critical mineral used in steel and defence production. 'India is also pursuing its own self-reliance efforts, and it seeks to present itself not just as a partner that sells arms, but as a partner that builds capacities,' said Mr Gill. Indian Ministry of External Affairs Secretary (East) P. Kumaran said both countries are exploring cooperation on submarine infrastructure, ship design and naval modernisation. This aligns with both countries' push for self-reliant defence postures. India, traditionally non-aligned, has always been wary of China, particularly since the deadly 2020 border clash in Ladakh, which froze bilateral ties. Ties are on the mend but distrust still remains high. 'If you notice, India and the Philippines represent different points in the Indo-Pacific region. From the perspective of geopolitics, it's a big deal for the two nations to have a strategic security relationship,' said Dr Arugay. While defence was the centrepiece of Mr Marcos' visit, economic diversification was also high on the agenda. Both countries have been impacted by US President Donald Trump's protectionist trade policies: T he Philippines faces a 19 per cent tariff, while Mr Trump has threatened higher duties on Indian goods over its oil trade with Russia. Delhi and Manila are working toward s a bilateral preferential trade agreement. Philippine trade with India exceeded US$3.3 billion (S$4.25 billion) in 2024 but remains modest. Mr Kumaran cited potential cooperation in seaweed farming, rice research, biofuels and renewable energy. He also said India has offered oil and gas consultancy support, noting the Philippines' high oil import bill. Unlocking soft power cooperation Beyond defence and trade, the two leaders signed agreements covering science and technology, mutual legal assistance, digital tech, outer space, and cultural and tourism exchanges. Both sides agreed to reciprocal visa-free entry for tourists, with direct flights between Manila and New Delhi set to resume later this year. 'These soft-power agreements are ways to lock in the cooperation, so it will not just be at the level of pledges,' Dr Arugay said. 'These people-to-people, socio-cultural exchanges always have the value of complementing the defence and economic deals.' The two countries also committed to regular maritime security dialogues, alternating between New Delhi and Manila – similar to both countries' arrangements with Australia and Japan. Mr Marcos' visit caps a broader strategy of hedging. With uncertainty over future US tariffs and China's pressure in the South China Sea, the Philippines is positioning itself for a world where great power competition is fluid and unreliable. 'In the end, the Marcos administration has learn t from the past that it cannot overly rely on the US for all its security and defence needs,' said Dr Arugay. 'And it's hard to get a hook on India. So this is a big achievement.'
